The community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) has become increasingly prevalent in both community and hospital settings. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, molecular characteristics and antibiotic resistance profiles of CA-MRSA from community- and hospital-associated infections in a tertiary care hospital in Mangalore, India. Of 520 S. aureus isolates, 362 were from inpatients (IP) and 158 were from outpatients (OP). One-hundred and thirty-two MRSA isolates obtained from 94 inpatients and 38 outpatients with complete clinical details were further analyzed. Of these, 81 (61.4%) were CA-MRSA (IP-47.9%, OP-94.7%) and 51 (38.6%) were HA-MRSA (IP-52.1%, OP-5.3%). All (100%) MRSA isolates were mecA gene positive. SCCmec typing identified SCCmec type IV (50.6%) and SCCmec type V (66.7%) in CA-MRSA, while SCCmec type I (41.2%), SCCmec type III (19.6%), SCCmec type IV (31.4%) and SCCmec type V (25.5%) were detected in HA-MRSA isolates. The Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) gene was found in 70.4% of CA-MRSA, 43.1% of HA-MRSA with SCCmec type IV and SCCmec type V, and in 7.8% of true HA-MRSA. The antibiotic resistance profiles were determined by the disc diffusion method. Resistance to cefoxitin was used to identify MRSA. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA with respect to resistance against cephalexin, cefotaxime, levofloxacin, linezolid and teicoplanin. CA-MRSA was predominantly resistant to ciprofloxacin (86.4%), erythromycin (66.7%), ofloxacin (49.4%), cefotaxime (44.4%), gentamicin (40.7%) and clindamycin (40.7%), while HA-MRSA showed resistance against ciprofloxacin (80.4%), erythromycin (80.1%), cefotaxime (70.6%),ofloxacin (58.8%), clindamycin (47.1%) and levofloxacin (41.2%).This study reports the prevalence of CA-MRSA in community and hospital settings and the possibility of multidrug-resistant CA-MRSA replacing HA-MRSA in hospitals. The observations from our study emphasize the need for urgent measures to manage this emerging crisis in healthcare settings.

Epidemiological and molecular data on community acquired methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) are still scarce in both Egypt and Saudi Arabia. There is almost no data regarding methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence in both countries. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among outpatients attending primary health care centers in two big cities in both countries. A total of 206 nasal swabs were obtained, 103 swabs from each country. S. aureus isolates were characterized by antibiotic susceptibility, presence of mecA and PVL genes, SCCmec-typing and spa typing, the corresponding Multi locus sequence typing clonal complex was assigned for each spa type based on Ridom StaphType database. MRSA was detected in 32% of the Egyptian outpatients while it was found in 25% of the Saudi Arabian outpatients. All MRSA isolates belonged to SCCmec type V and IVa, where some isolates in Saudi Arabia remained nontypeable. Surprisingly PVL(+) isolates were low in frequency: 15% of MRSA Egyptian isolates and 12% of MRSA isolates in Saudi Arabia. Two novel spa types were detected t11839 in Egypt, and t11841 in Saudi Arabia. We found 8 spa types among 20 isolates from Egypt, and 12 spa types out of 15 isolates from Saudi Arabia. Only two spa types t008 and t223 coexisted in both countries. Four clonal complexes (CC5, CC8, CC22, and CC80) were identified in both Egypt and Saudi Arabia. However, the data collected lacked a representation of isolates from different parts of each country as only one health center from each country was included, it still partially illustrates the CA-MRSA situation in both countries. In conclusion a set of control measures is required to prevent further increase in MRSA prevalence.