Root planing

根面平整
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    缩放和根部平整(SRP)是非手术牙周治疗中不可避免的主要步骤。使用手动仪器和超声波进行的清创术导致牙齿结构的去除。当前的研究围绕激光作为SRP的有效辅助手段。这项研究评估并比较了超声和Er之间根面结石去除的有效性,Cr:YSGG激光器。
    选择因牙周病而拔除的28颗单根牙齿进行研究。将标本随机分为两组(n=14)。第一组接受了使用压电超声洁牙器的超声检查,第二组使用Er进行激光仪器检查,Cr:YSGG激光(Waterlase)。标本经过处理,固定,在场发射扫描电子显微镜下观察,并使用剩余牙结石指数(RCI)和牙齿物质损失指数(LTSI)进行评估。
    与Er相比,超声处理的标本显示出更多的残留结石(1.57±0.65)和牙齿物质丢失(1.71±0.61),Cr:YSGG激光处理试样,RCI(0.71±0.61)和LTSI(1.00±0.56)明显降低。两组根面结石清除疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    与超声波相比,呃,Cr:YSGG激光通过精确去除牙根表面结石而不会显着影响牙齿结构并有助于新的附着,从而显示出优异的效果。
    UNASSIGNED: Scaling and root planing (SRP) is an inevitable primary step in non-surgical periodontal therapy. Debridement carried out with manual instruments and ultrasonics results in the removal of tooth structure. Current research revolves around laser as an efficient adjunct to SRP. This study evaluated and compared the effectiveness of root surface calculus removal between ultrasonics and Er,Cr:YSGG laser.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-eight single-rooted teeth extracted due to periodontal disease were selected for the study. The specimens were randomly assigned to two groups (n=14). Group I underwent ultrasonic instrumentation using a piezo ultrasonic scaler, and group II was subjected to laser instrumentation using Er,Cr:YSGG laser (Waterlase). The specimens were processed, fixed, viewed under a field emission scanning electron microscope and evaluated using the remaining calculus index (RCI) and loss of tooth substance index (LTSI).
    UNASSIGNED: Ultrasonics-treated specimens revealed more remaining calculus (1.57±0.65) and lost tooth substance (1.71±0.61) compared to the Er,Cr:YSGG laser-treated specimens, with significantly lower RCI (0.71±0.61) and LTSI (1.00±0.56). There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.05) in the efficacy of root surface calculus removal between the two groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Compared to ultrasonics, Er,Cr:YSGG laser demonstrated superior results by causing precise removal of root surface calculus without significantly affecting tooth structure and aiding in new attachment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:该研究旨在评估玫瑰红(RB)介导的抗菌光动力疗法(a-PDT)作为慢性牙周炎患者治疗中牙垢和牙根平整的辅助手段的临床参数,如牙龈指数(GI),探测袋深度(PPD),临床依恋水平(CAL),和微生物参数,如微生物总数,总红色复杂生物计数,牙龈卟啉单胞菌计数,树突螺旋体计数,还有连翘坦纳菌.材料和方法:在这项随机对照临床试验中,共招募了30例符合纳入标准的患者.将参与者随机分为A组,仅进行缩放和根规划(SRP),B组使用SRPa-PDT。在基线和3个月随访时测量临床和微生物学参数。组间和组内比较采用独立t检验和配对t检验,分别。p<0.05的值被认为是统计学上显著的。结果:随访3个月,用SRP+a-PDT治疗的B组的GI(0.58±0.20)和PPD(1.81±0.32mm)有统计学意义的降低,以CAL为单位的增益(0.73±0.04mm),微生物总数减少[2.80±0.08×104菌落形成单位(CFU)],总红色复合物计数(0.29±0.14×102CFU),牙龈卟啉单胞菌计数(0.43±0.13×102CFU),T.denticola计数(0.61±0.04×102CFU),与A组比较,连翘衣原体计数(0.59±0.04×102CFU)(p<0.05)。结论:RB介导的a-PDT作为SRP的辅助手段在改善胃肠道方面明显更有效,PPD,与单独使用SRP治疗慢性牙周炎相比,减少了CAL和微生物计数。
    Aim: The study aims to assess the efficacy of rose bengal (RB)-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (a-PDT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing in the management of chronic periodontitis patients in terms of clinical parameters like gingival index (GI), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and microbiological parameters like total microbial count, total red complex organism count, Porphyromonas gingivalis count, Treponema denticola count, and Tannerella forsythia count. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, a total of 30 patients were recruited who met the inclusion criteria. The participants were randomly allocated into group A with scaling and root planning (SRP) alone and group B with SRP + a-PDT. The clinical and microbiological parameters were measured at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Intergroup and intragroup comparisons were performed using independent t test and paired t test, respectively. Value of p < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: At 3-month follow-up, group B treated with SRP + a-PDT showed statistically significant reduction in GI (0.58 ± 0.20) and PPD (1.81 ± 0.32 mm), gain in CAL (0.73 ± 0.04 mm), and reduction in total microbial count [2.80 ± 0.08 × 104 colony forming unit (CFU)], total red complex count (0.29 ± 0.14 × 102 CFU), P. gingivalis count (0.43 ± 0.13 × 102 CFU), T. denticola count (0.61 ± 0.04 × 102 CFU), and T. forsythia count (0.59 ± 0.04 × 102 CFU) as compared with group A (p < 0.05). Conclusion: RB-mediated a-PDT as an adjunct to SRP was significantly more effective in improving GI, PPD, and CAL and in reducing microbial count as compared with SRP alone in the management of chronic periodontitis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)作为牙垢和牙根平整(ScRp)辅助治疗浅层牙周袋的疗效。
    方法:12例牙周炎患者入组,随机临床试验。通过单独的ScRp(对照)或PRF(测试)治疗总共24个浅牙周袋(4-6mm)。临床依恋丧失(CAL),探测袋深度(PPD),探查出血(BOP),和菌斑指数(PLI),以及通过酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)在龈沟液(GCF)中的血小板衍生生长因子-BB(PDGF-BB)在基线和1个月和3个月随访时进行了测定.
    结果:在1个月和3个月的随访中,更大的CAL增益(2.6±0.25mm和3.26±0.31mm,分别)和PPD减小(2.58±0.38和3.31±0.39mm,分别)与对照组相比,在测试组中观察到(CAL增益为1.01±0.49mm和1.43±0.48mm;PPD降低为1.1±0.55和1.37±0.49mm,分别)。此外,在1个月和3个月随访时,试验组GCF中PDGF-BB的增加(724.5±186.09pg/μl和1957.5±472.9pg/μl)明显大于对照组(109.3±24.07和614.64±209.3pg/μl),分别。
    结论:无创性使用PRF作为ScRp的辅助手段成功地改善了临床牙周参数,并可能有助于GCF中PDGF-BB的增加。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (ScRp) for healing shallow periodontal pockets.
    METHODS: Twelve patients with periodontitis were enrolled in this split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. A total of 24 shallow periodontal pockets (4-6 mm) were treated by either ScRp alone (control) or PRF (test). Clinical attachment loss (CAL), probing pocket depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PLI), as well as platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) were measured at baseline and at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits.
    RESULTS: At 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, greater CAL gains (2.6 ± 0.25 mm and 3.26 ± 0.31 mm, respectively) and PPD reductions (2.58 ± 0.38 and 3.31 ± 0.39 mm, respectively) were observed in the test group compared to those in controls (CAL gain of 1.01 ± 0.49 mm and 1.43 ± 0.48 mm; PPD reduction of 1.1 ± 0.55 and 1.37 ± 0.49 mm, respectively). In addition, the increase in PDGF-BB in GCF in the test group (724.5 ± 186.09 pg/μl and 1957.5 ± 472.9 pg/μl) was significantly greater than that in controls (109.3 ± 24.07 and 614.64 ± 209.3 pg/μl) at 1- and 3-month follow-up visits, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: The noninvasive use of PRF as an adjunct to ScRp successfully improved clinical periodontal parameters and might contribute to increased PDGF-BB in GCF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:没有足够的临床和微生物学证据支持使用二极管激光和赤藓糖醇的空气抛光作为鳞片和根部规划(SRP)的补充。本研究的目的是评估赤藓糖醇牙龈下空气抛光和二极管激光治疗牙周炎的临床和微生物疗效。
    方法:该研究包括24名寻求牙周治疗并诊断为I期和II期牙周炎的个体。八名患者仅接受了SRP。另有8名患者接受了SRP,然后进行了赤藓糖醇龈下空气抛光,8例患者接受了SRP,然后应用了二极管激光。在基线和六周,测量牙周临床参数,包括斑块指数(PI),牙龈指数(GI),牙周探伤深度(PPD),和临床依恋水平(CAL)。放线菌的细菌计数(A.A),牙龈卟啉单胞菌(P.G)在不同的时间点进行评价。
    结果:微生物学评估显示,治疗后立即激光组和赤藓糖醇组之间的A.A.计数存在显着差异,表明对微生物水平的潜在影响。然而,微生物水平在随后的几周内出现波动,没有统计学上的显著差异。各组治疗后斑块指数显著下降,组间无显著差异。牙龈指数下降,激光组显示低于赤藓糖醇和对照组。PPD和CAL在所有组显著下降,激光组表现出最低值。
    结论:补充使用二极管激光和赤藓糖醇空气抛光,与SRP一起,代表加速牙周治疗方式。这种方法导致细菌的减少和牙周健康的改善。
    背景:该临床试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(注册ID:NCT06209554)上注册,并于2024年01月08日发布。
    BACKGROUND: There is insufficient clinical and microbiological evidence to support the use of diode laser and air-polishing with erythritol as supplements to scaling and root planning(SRP). The aim of the current study is to evaluate the clinical and microbiologic efficacy of erythritol subgingival air polishing and diode laser in treatment of periodontitis.
    METHODS: The study encompassed twenty-four individuals seeking periodontal therapy and diagnosed with stage I and stage II periodontitis. Eight patients simply underwent SRP. Eight more patients had SRP followed by erythritol subgingival air polishing, and eight patients had SRP followed by diode laser application. At baseline and six weeks, clinical periodontal parameters were measured, including Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), periodontal Probing Depth (PPD), and Clinical Attachment Level (CAL). The bacterial count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans(A.A), Porphyromonas gingivalis (P.G) was evaluated at different points of time.
    RESULTS: The microbiological assessment revealed significant differences in the count of A.A. between the laser and erythritol groups immediately after treatment, indicating a potential impact on microbial levels. However, the microbial levels showed fluctuations over the subsequent weeks, without statistically significant differences. Plaque indices significantly decreased post-treatment in all groups, with no significant inter-group differences. Gingival indices decreased, and the laser group showed lower values than erythritol and control groups. PPD and CAL decreased significantly across all groups, with the laser group exhibiting the lowest values.
    CONCLUSIONS: The supplementary use of diode laser and erythritol air polishing, alongside SRP, represents an expedited periodontal treatment modality. This approach leads to a reduction in bacteria and improvement in periodontal health.
    BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was registered on Clinical Trials.gov (Registration ID: NCT06209554) and released on 08/01/2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在证明铒的疗效,铬掺杂:钇,钪,镓,和石榴石(呃,Cr:YSGG)在8周愈合期间对牙周炎患者进行激光辅助的非手术牙周治疗。
    方法:张口,单盲,对12例诊断为III/IV期牙周炎的患者进行了随机对照临床试验,这些患者在至少两个象限中至少有2颗探诊袋深度(PPD)>5mm的牙齿.随机化后,每个象限被指定为常规刮伤和根部平整(SRP)手术或使用径向发射尖端的激光辅助治疗(SRP+激光)(RFPT5,Biolase).进行临床测量和龈沟液收集以进行统计分析。
    结果:在对整个受试者牙齿的初步统计分析中,改良牙龈指数(MGI)的降低在测试组中大于1(P=0.0153),4(P=0.0318),与同期对照相比8周(P=0.0047)。试验组4周时PPD降低为-1.67±0.59,与对照组相比有显著性差异(-1.37±0.63,P=0.0253)。当平均PPD≥5mm的牙齿被分类时,在第1周(P=0.003)和第8周(P=0.0102)随访时,测试组的MGI下降幅度明显更大。在4周期间,测试组的PPD降低也显着更大(-1.98±0.55vs-1.58±0.56,测试与对照,P=0.0224)。
    结论:呃,Cr:YSGG辅助牙周治疗有利于早期愈合期MGI和PPD的减少。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of erbium, chromium-doped:yttrium, scandium, gallium, and garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser-assisted nonsurgical periodontal therapy in periodontitis patients during 8 weeks of healing.
    METHODS: A split-mouth, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 12 patients diagnosed with stage III/IV periodontitis and had a minimum of two teeth with probing pocket depth (PPD) > 5 mm in at least two quadrants. Upon randomization, each quadrant was assigned for conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) procedure or laser-assisted therapy (SRP + laser) using radial firing tip (RFPT 5, Biolase). Clinical measurements and gingival crevicular fluid collection were performed for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: In the initial statistical analysis on the whole subject teeth, modified gingival index (MGI) reduction was greater in test group at 1(P = 0.0153), 4 (P = 0.0318), and 8 weeks (P = 0.0047) compared to the control in the same period. PPD reduction at 4 weeks in test group was -1.67 ± 0.59 showing significant difference compared to the control (-1.37 ± 0.63, P = 0.0253). When teeth with mean PPD ≥5 mm were sorted, MGI decrease was significantly greater in test group at 1 (P=0.003) and 8 week (P=0.0102) follow-ups. PPD reduction was also significantly greater in test group at 4 week period (-1.98 ± 0.55 vs -1.58 ± 0.56, test vs control, P=0.0224).
    CONCLUSIONS: Er,Cr:YSGG-assisted periodontal therapy is beneficial in MGI and PPD reductions during early healing period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景和目的:本文旨在通过一种创新方法评估激光治疗在牙周炎中的作用,该方法涉及通过网络分析(高斯图形模型-GGMs)和结构方程(SEM)进行的计算预测和高级建模。材料与方法:40例患者,显示最小深度为5毫米的牙周袋,随机分为两组:对照组和激光组。测量了每颗牙齿的四个具体指标,即牙周袋深度(PPD),临床依恋水平(CAL),探查出血(BOP),和菌斑指数(PI),并在五个时间标记处记录六个测量值的平均值(基线,6个月,1年,2年,和4年)。评估算法包括注册,测量,和牙周非手术治疗,根据集团分配。缩放,根部平整,对照组为1%的氯己定,和缩放,根刨和铒,铬:钇-钪-镓-石榴石(Er,CR:YSGG)激光组进行激光治疗。结果:主要结果突出表明,在鳞屑和根面平整中增加激光治疗可导致临床显着改善,降低PPD值,降低BOP得分,增加CAL。结论:GGMs和SEM都强调了所考虑的具体指标之间的显著关系,从而证实了它们是否适合作为牙周治疗成功的代理。
    Background and Objectives: This paper aims to assess the role of laser therapy in periodontitis through an innovative approach involving computational prediction and advanced modeling performed through network analysis (Gaussian graphical models-GGMs) and structural equations (SEM). Materials and Methods: Forty patients, exhibiting periodontal pockets with a minimum depth of 5 mm, were randomly divided into two groups: a control group and a laser group. Four specific indicators were measured for each tooth, namely periodontal pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), bleeding on probing (BOP), and plaque index (PI), and the mean of six measured values was recorded at five time markers (baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years). The assessment algorithm included enrollment, measurements, and differential non-surgical periodontal treatment, according to the group allocation. Scaling, root planing, and chlorhexidine 1% were conducted for the control group, and scaling, root planing and erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,CR:YSGG) laser therapy were conducted for the laser group. Results: The main results highlight that the addition of laser treatment to scaling and root planing led to notable clinical improvements, decreasing the PPD values, reducing the BOP scores, and increasing the CAL. Conclusions: Notable relationships between the specific indicators considered were highlighted by both the GGMs and by SEM, thus confirming their suitability as proxies for the success of periodontal treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是评估三种不同药物对牙周受损牙齿的去污效果。
    方法:本研究包括75颗因牙周病而拔除的磨牙。之后,使用简单随机技术将25个样本随机分配到三个不同的代理组,A组:缩放和根部平整(SRP)以及SofScale试剂的应用,B组:SRP和QMix剂的应用,C组:SRP和MTAD剂的应用。用金刚石圆锯,将处理的部分分成水平和垂直两半。在扫描电子显微镜下观察所有样品。每颗牙齿都集中在冠状第三颗,中间三分之一,和顶端第三部分,放大倍数为1000倍。记录数据并进行统计学分析。
    结果:在根面,QMix剂(3.06±0.04)组,其次是MTAD剂(3.28±0.09)和SoftScale剂(4.14±0.10)组。在组内比较中,在所有三个水平的所有组内药物中,发现有统计学上的显着差异。关于群体间评价,在第三日冕,不同药物之间没有发现显著差异。在中部和冠状三分之一的不同药剂之间发现了显着差异。
    结论:结论,目前的调查发现,与用MTAD和SofScale试剂处理的牙齿表面相比,用QMix处理的牙根表面显示出更强的去除涂抹层的能力。
    结论:SRP等常规疗法可有效消除结石,牌匾,和坏死的牙骨质;尽管如此,它们会留下一层可能妨碍正常愈合的涂抹层。为了克服这一点,将根调理剂应用于根表面以去除涂抹层。传统的根系调理剂如柠檬酸有必定的缺点,虽然,例如可能损害根表面的酸性pH值。因此,研究人员一直在寻找更有效的生物相容性根部调理治疗方法。如何引用这篇文章:SinghDK,BSRajH,SoansCR,etal.三种不同药物对牙周损伤牙齿的涂抹层去除功效的评估:体外研究。JContempDentPract2024;25(2):156-159。
    OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the smear layer removal efficacy of three various agents on periodontally compromised tooth.
    METHODS: The current study included 75 molar teeth that were extracted due to periodontal disease. After that, 25 samples were randomly assigned using a simple random technique to the three different agent groups, group A: Scaling and root planing (SRP) and application of SofScale agent, group B: SRP and application of QMix agent, group C: SRP and application of MTAD agent. Using a diamond circular saw, the treated portions were divided into horizontal and vertical halves. All samples were viewed under Scanning Electron Microscope. Every tooth was focused at the coronal third, middle third, and apical third portion with a magnification of 1000×. Data were recorded and statistically analyzed.
    RESULTS: The smear layer removal efficacy was more in the QMix agent (3.06 ± 0.04) group followed by MTAD agent (3.28 ± 0.09) and SofScale agent (4.14 ± 0.10) group on the root surface. On intra group comparison, there was a statistically significant difference found in all the intra group agents with all the three levels. On inter group evaluation, at coronal third, there was no significant difference found between the different agents. There was a significant difference found between the different agents at middle and coronal third.
    CONCLUSIONS: On conclusion, the current investigation found that, the root surfaces treated with QMix shown a greater ability to remove smear layers compared to tooth surfaces treated with MTAD and SofScale agent.
    CONCLUSIONS: Conventional therapies such as SRP effectively eliminate calculus, plaque, and necrosed cementum; nevertheless, they leave behind a smear layer that could impede normal healing. In an effort to overcome this, root conditioning agents were applied on the root surface to remove the smear layer. The traditional root conditioning agents such as citric acid have certain disadvantages, though, such as an acidic pH that could harm the root surface. As a result, researchers have been looking for biocompatible root conditioning treatments that are more effective. How to cite this article: Singh DK, BS Raj H, Soans CR, et al. Assessment of the Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Three Different Agents on Periodontally Compromised Tooth: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(2):156-159.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是评估光动力疗法(PDT)作为牙垢和牙根平整(SRP)的辅助手段对牙周炎患者龈下菌斑的临床参数和微生物组成的影响。
    方法:17名患者被纳入这项分口随机临床试验。将不同象限探查袋深度(PPD)≥5mm并伴有探查出血的部位随机分为对照组,在SRP之后使用单个PDT申请的组,和SRP后1周重复应用3次PDT的组。收集龈下菌斑进行基线16SrRNA基因测序,第2周和第8周。
    结果:共有60个地点的17名患者完成了为期8周的随访,通过测序成功分析了157个龈下菌斑。在两个主要结果中观察到显著改善:第8周时的PPD和龈下微生物组成。与对照组相比,重复PDT组PPD明显改善,微生物谱的实质性改变,包括减少α-多样性和厌氧细菌,以及第2周时需氧细菌的增加。次要结果,如临床附着水平和沟出血指数,在第8周也显示出改善。此外,与基线相比,单次和重复PDT组均显示牙周病原菌减少,有益菌增加.
    结论:PDT促进牙周炎患者龈下菌斑的微生物组成向有利于牙周健康的方向变化,重复PDT是牙周治疗的一种有前途的辅助治疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical parameters and microbial composition in subgingival plaque of periodontitis patients.
    METHODS: Seventeen patients were included in this split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Sites with probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥5 mm in combination with bleeding on probing in different quadrants were randomized into the control group, the group with a single PDT application right after SRP, and the group with three repeated PDT applications 1 week after SRP. The subgingival plaque was collected for 16S rRNA gene sequencing at baseline, Week 2, and Week 8.
    RESULTS: Seventeen patients with 60 sites completed this 8-week follow-up, and 157 subgingival plaques were successfully analyzed by sequencing. Significant improvements were observed in two primary outcomes: PPD at Week 8 and subgingival microbial composition. Compared to the control group, the repeated-PDT group showed a notable improvement in PPD, substantial alterations in the microbial profile, including a reduction in α-diversity and anaerobic bacteria, and an increase in aerobic bacteria at Week 2. Secondary outcomes, such as clinical attachment level and sulcus bleeding index, also showed improvement at Week 8. Furthermore, both the single- and repeated-PDT groups exhibited a decrease in periodontopathogens and an increase in beneficial bacteria compared with baseline.
    CONCLUSIONS: PDT promotes changes in the microbial composition of periodontitis patients\' subgingival plaque in a direction favorable to periodontal health, and repeated PDT is a promising adjunctive therapy for periodontal treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估虚拟现实分散(VRD)对牙周炎患者牙周刮削和牙根平整(SRP)过程中牙科焦虑的影响。
    方法:这项随机对照分口研究包括60名患者,这些患者的牙科焦虑量表(DAS)评分为9分或以上,并且需要在至少两个象限中进行SRP,至少有五颗牙齿和两个探测深度≥4mm的部位。使用虚拟现实眼镜处理随机选择的象限,其他象限在同一次访问中没有戴眼镜。在VRD期间,一个自然场景的视频被投影到病人眼前的屏幕上。在手术结束时应用DAS和关于患者感受的视觉模拟量表。
    结果:使用VRD,疼痛和不适水平(VASP)的量表值明显降低(p=0.01,d=0.57)。开始不戴眼镜的治疗显着降低了对照和测试侧的VASP(分别为p=0.00,d=0.85;p=0.00,d=0.80),并增加了沉浸感和真实感(p=0.03,d=0.45;p=0.02,d=0.46)。开始无VRD治疗的患者的术中和术后DAS值显着降低(分别为p=0.04,d=0.34;p=0.02,d=0.44)。在患者中,63.3%的患者在后续治疗中首选VRD。虽然患者偏好与性别无关,与年龄相关(r=-0.48,p=0.01)。
    结论:VRD和使用VRD启动SRP程序影响了焦虑性牙周炎患者的疼痛和不适水平。此外,戴着眼镜开始手术也会影响焦虑水平。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of virtual reality distraction (VRD) on dental anxiety during scaling and root planing (SRP) in periodontitis patients.
    METHODS: This randomized controlled split-mouth study included 60 patients who scored 9 or above on the dental anxiety scale (DAS) and required SRP in at least two quadrants with at least five teeth and two sites with a probing depth of ≥4 mm. Randomly chosen quadrants were treated using virtual reality glasses, and other quadrants were treated without glasses at the same visit. During VRD, a video of nature scenes was projected onto the screen in front of the patient\'s eyes. DAS and a visual analogue scale about patient feelings were applied at the end of the procedure.
    RESULTS: With VRD, the scale value of pain and discomfort level (VASP) was significantly reduced (p = 0.01, d = 0.57). Starting treatment without glasses significantly decreased VASP in both control and test sides (p = 0.00, d = 0.85; p = 0.00, d = 0.80, respectively) and increased the sensation of immersion and realism (p = 0.03, d = 0.45; p = 0.02, d = 0.46, respectively). Intraoperative and postoperative DAS values were significantly lower in patients who started treatment without VRD (p = 0.04, d = 0.34; p = 0.02, d = 0.44, respectively). Of the patients, 63.3% preferred VRD in the subsequent treatment. While patient preference did not correlate with sex, it correlated with age (r = -0.48, p = 0.01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The VRD and initiating SRP procedure with VRD affected the pain and discomfort level in anxious periodontitis patients. In addition, the anxiety level was also affected by starting the procedure with glasses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:牙周炎是一种微生物引起的疾病,会破坏将牙齿固定在颌骨上的结构。尽管甲硝唑联合螺旋霉素是III期C级牙周炎的有效常规治疗方法,它有几个系统性副作用。激光疗法如今被广泛用作鳞屑和根部平整(SRP)的辅助手段,以调节炎症宿主反应并根除微生物,由于杀菌和解毒作用。由于微生物学分析是确定牙周风险的诊断方法之一;我们的研究旨在研究袋内应用二极管激光(980nm)与抗生素疗法在增强III期C级牙周炎临床和微生物学参数方面的功效。
    方法:对50例Ⅲ期C级牙周炎患者进行随机对照临床试验,平均分为两组。我们通过SRP在口袋内应用二极管激光(980nm)来管理测试组,并通过SRP在全身抗生素(螺旋霉素和甲硝唑)中管理对照组。然后,我们测量了两组的牙周袋深度(PPD)和临床附着丧失(CAL),治疗前(基线),四周和十二周后。此外,我们在基线时收集两组的龈沟液,治疗后4周和12周,并通过实时聚合酶链反应分析,以检测Aggregatibacter放线菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的相对计数。
    结果:与基线相比,所有评估的临床和微生物学参数分别证明了在研究期结束时每个组的改善,而两个研究组之间没有显著差异.虽然,在十二周,全身使用抗生素检测到细菌水平的升高。
    结论:激光治疗可被视为III期C级牙周炎的有效治疗方式,避免全身抗生素副作用,并通过长期使用解决由于细菌耐药性引起的复发问题。
    背景:NCT05222737回顾性于2022年2月3日,Clinicaltrial.gov。
    BACKGROUND: Periodontitis is a microbially induced disease destroying structures anchoring teeth to jaw bones. Although metronidazole in combination with spiramycin is the effective conventional treatment of stage III grade C periodontitis, it has several systemic side effects. Laser therapy is widely used nowadays as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) to modulate inflammatory host response and eradicate microbes, due to bactericidal and detoxifying effects. Since microbiological analysis is one of the diagnostic methods identifying periodontal risk; our research aimed to investigate the efficacy of intra-pocket application of diode laser (980 nm) versus antibiotic therapy in enhancing clinical and microbiological parameters in stage III grade C periodontitis.
    METHODS: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on fifty patients with stage III grade C periodontitis, divided equally into two groups. We managed test group by SRP with intra-pocket application of diode laser (980 nm) and the control group by SRP with systemic antibiotic administration (spiramycin and metronidazole). Then, we measured periodontal pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment loss (CAL) for both groups, before treatment (baseline), four and twelve weeks after. Moreover, we collected gingival crevicular fluid from both groups at baseline, four and twelve weeks after treatment and analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction to detect the relative count of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Porhyromonas gingivalis.
    RESULTS: Compared to baseline, all assessed clinical and microbiological parameters attested improvement at the end of the study period in each group individually with no significant difference between the two studied groups. Although, at twelve weeks, flare up of bacterial levels was detected with systemic antibiotic administration.
    CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapy can be considered as an effective treatment modality in stage III grade C periodontitis, avoiding the systemic antibiotic side effects and solving the recurrence problems due to bacterial resistance by long term usage.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05222737 retrospectively on 03/02/2022, Clinicaltrial.gov.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号