Robot

机器人
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:机器人辅助访问,作为远程医疗的一部分,可以为医生提供照顾病人的机会。由于COVID-19大流行,远程医疗有所增加。使用远程会诊,例如,已经进入了德国的医疗保健系统。然而,机器人辅助术后访视的实用性和益处尚未在全球范围内进行过系统研究.方法:患者参加了一项前瞻性随机研究,比较了2019年12月至2022年4月期间通过Double机器人进行的标准术后访视和数字访视。所有患者和医生都在访视后完成了调查。主要结果是患者满意度。次要结果包括患者疼痛,住院时间,和病人对机器人有用性的看法。算术平均值的李克特量表,标准偏差,采用Mann-WhitneyU检验和Fisher精确检验的亚组分析比较结局。结果:共纳入106例患者,其中54例(50.9%)接受机器人访视,52例(49.1%)接受常规访视。组间基线人口统计学和临床特征相似。我们的主要结果在两个武器中是相同的。对于次要终点获得了类似的结果。结论:机器人远程访问与标准访问相当,包括满意度,有用性,和住院时间。医学数字化是一个不可逆的过程,特别是在COVID-19大流行之后。我们希望我们的研究将提供具体的帮助,以鼓励在德国的医疗系统远程医疗的资金分配。
    Introduction: Robot-assisted visits, as part of telemedicine, can offer doctors the opportunity to take care of patients. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in telemedicine. The use of teleconsultations, for example, has found its way into the German health care system. However, the practicability and the benefit of robot-assisted postoperative visits have not been systematically investigated in any study worldwide. Methods: Patients were enrolled in a prospective randomized study comparing the standard postoperative visit with the doctor on call and the digital visit through the Double robot between December 2019 and April 2022. All patients and doctors completed a survey after the visit. The primary outcome was patient satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included patients\' pain, hospitalization time, and patients\' opinions about the usefulness of the robot. Likert scales of arithmetic mean, standard deviation, and subgroup analyses with the Mann-Whitney U test and the Fisher\'s exact test were used to compare outcomes. Results: We enrolled a total of 106 patients: 54 (50.9%) of them underwent the robot visit and 52 (49.1%) underwent the conventional visit. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Our primary outcome was the same in both arms. Similar results were obtained for the secondary endpoints. Conclusion: Robot-televisits were comparable with standard visits including satisfaction, usefulness, and time of hospitalization. Digitalization in medicine is an irreversible process, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. We hope that our study will provide concrete help to encourage the allocation of funds for telemedicine in Germany\'s health care system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    机器人手术中的“双双极方法”(DBM)已广泛应用于日本普外科和妇科;然而,它不常用于泌尿外科领域。一名55岁女性被诊断患有IA期子宫内膜癌。在磁共振成像上偶然观察到膀胱圆顶处2厘米的囊性病变。计划使用达芬奇Xi系统同时进行机器人辅助的全子宫切除术和膀胱部分切除术。妇科手术首先是用DBM进行的,并且DBM也用于膀胱部分切除术,而无需额外的器械以降低手术成本。马里兰双极镊子被用来切除腹膜,脂肪,膀胱壁没有出血,使用镊子\'提示进行精细和精确的切除。使用DBM进行机器人辅助的膀胱部分切除术是可行的。与其他部门联合手术时,如果DBM已经被使用,尝试降低手术成本是值得的。
    The \"double bipolar method\" (DBM) in robotic surgery has been widely used in Japanese general surgery and gynecology; however, it is not commonly used in the field of urology. A 55-year-old female was diagnosed with stage IA endometrial cancer. A 2-cm cystic lesion was incidentally observed at the dome of the bladder on magnetic resonance imaging. A simultaneous robot-assisted total hysterectomy and partial cystectomy using the da Vinci Xi system was planned. The gynecological procedure was first performed with the DBM, and the DBM was also used in the partial cystectomy without additional instruments to reduce surgical costs. Maryland bipolar forceps was used to excise the peritoneum, fat, and bladder wall without bleeding, enabling delicate and precise resection using the forceps\' tips. Robot-assisted partial cystectomy using the DBM was feasible. When performing combined surgeries with other departments, if the DBM is already being utilized, it is worthwhile to attempt to decrease surgical cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    路径规划是机器人学的一个重要研究领域。与其他路径规划算法相比,快速探索随机树(RRT)算法同时具有搜索和随机抽样特性,因此具有更多的潜力来生成可以平衡全局最优和局部最优的高质量路径。本文回顾了2021-2023年基于RRT的改进算法的研究,包括理论改进和应用实现。在理论层面,分支战略改进,抽样策略的改进,后处理改进,突出显示了模型驱动的RRT,在应用层面,RRT在焊接机器人下的应用场景,装配机器人,搜索和救援机器人,手术机器人,自由漂浮的太空机器人,和检测机器人是详细的,最后,总结了RRT在理论和应用层面面临的诸多挑战。这篇综述表明,尽管基于RRT的改进算法在大规模场景中具有优势,实时性能,和不确定的环境,一些难以定量描述的策略可以基于模型驱动的RRT来设计,基于RRT的改进算法仍然存在难以设计超参数和泛化能力弱的问题,在实际应用层面,控制器等硬件的可靠性和准确性,执行器,传感器,通信,电源和数据采集效率都对大规模非结构化场景下RRT的长期稳定性提出了挑战。作为自主机器人的一部分,RRT路径规划性能的上限还取决于机器人的定位和场景建模性能,在多机器人协作中仍然存在架构和战略选择,除了必须面对的伦理和道德。为了解决上述问题,我相信多类型机器人协作,人机协作,实时路径规划,超参数的自整定,面向任务或应用场景的算法和硬件设计,高度动态环境中的路径规划是未来的发展趋势。
    Path planning is an crucial research area in robotics. Compared to other path planning algorithms, the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) algorithm possesses both search and random sampling properties, and thus has more potential to generate high-quality paths that can balance the global optimum and local optimum. This paper reviews the research on RRT-based improved algorithms from 2021 to 2023, including theoretical improvements and application implementations. At the theoretical level, branching strategy improvement, sampling strategy improvement, post-processing improvement, and model-driven RRT are highlighted, at the application level, application scenarios of RRT under welding robots, assembly robots, search and rescue robots, surgical robots, free-floating space robots, and inspection robots are detailed, and finally, many challenges faced by RRT at both the theoretical and application levels are summarized. This review suggests that although RRT-based improved algorithms has advantages in large-scale scenarios, real-time performance, and uncertain environments, and some strategies that are difficult to be quantitatively described can be designed based on model-driven RRT, RRT-based improved algorithms still suffer from the problems of difficult to design the hyper-parameters and weak generalization, and in the practical application level, the reliability and accuracy of the hardware such as controllers, actuators, sensors, communication, power supply and data acquisition efficiency all pose challenges to the long-term stability of RRT in large-scale unstructured scenarios. As a part of autonomous robots, the upper limit of RRT path planning performance also depends on the robot localization and scene modeling performance, and there are still architectural and strategic choices in multi-robot collaboration, in addition to the ethics and morality that has to be faced. To address the above issues, I believe that multi-type robot collaboration, human-robot collaboration, real-time path planning, self-tuning of hyper-parameters, task- or application-scene oriented algorithms and hardware design, and path planning in highly dynamic environments are future trends.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较接受机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术(RALP)伴神经血管结构邻近冰冻切片检查(NeuroSAFE)的男性和接受RALP不伴NeuroSAFE(标准护理[SOC])的男性的1年功能和5年肿瘤预后。
    方法:2009年1月1日至2018年6月30日在我们中心接受RALP的男性从前瞻性维护的数据库中纳入。如果患者接受了术前治疗或术后辅助治疗或参加了临床试验,则将其排除在外。根据使用NeuroSAFE对患者进行分组。随访在5年进行审查。主要结果是多变量分析的生化复发时间差异(BCR),定义为前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)>0.2ng/L连续两次测量。次要结果是1年勃起功能障碍和尿失禁的差异。
    结果:在注册期间,连续1199名男子接受RALP,其中1140人符合资格,包括317与神经安全和823与SOC。两组的PSA随访中位数均为60个月。在Kaplan-Meier存活曲线分析中,5年BCR的比率相似(11%vs11%;P=0.9),多变量Cox比例风险模型的BCR时间(风险比1.2;P=0.6).与1年SOC组相比,NeuroSAFE组未调整失禁发生率相似(5.1%vs7.7%),未调整阳痿发生率较低(57%vs80%).在多变量分析中,NeuroSAFE患者尿失禁的风险相当(比值比[OR]0.59,95%CI0.17-1.6;P=0.4),但勃起功能障碍的风险显着降低(OR0.37,95%CI0.22-0.60;P<0.001)。
    结论:对于接受RALP的男性,与SOC相比,NeuroSAFE患者有相同的BCR时间和1年失禁的风险,并显著降低1年勃起功能障碍的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare 1-year functional and 5-year oncological outcomes of men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) with those in men undergoing RALP without NeuroSAFE (standard of care [SOC]).
    METHODS: Men undergoing RALP in our centre between 1 January 2009 and 30 June 2018 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were excluded if they had undergone preoperative therapy or postoperative adjuvant therapy or were enrolled in clinical trials. Patients were grouped based on use of NeuroSAFE. Follow-up was censored at 5 years. The primary outcome was difference in time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) on multivariable analysis, defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >0.2 ng/L on two consecutive measurements. Secondary outcomes were difference in 1-year erectile dysfunction and incontinence.
    RESULTS: In the enrolment period, 1199 consecutive men underwent RALP, of whom 1140 were eligible, including 317 with NeuroSAFE and 823 with SOC. The median PSA follow-up was 60 months in both groups. Rates of 5-year BCR were similar on Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis (11% vs 11%; P = 0.9), as was time to BCR on multivariable Cox proportional hazards modelling (hazard ratio 1.2; P = 0.6). Compared with the SOC group at 1 year, the NeuroSAFE group had similar unadjusted rates of incontinence (5.1% vs 7.7%) and lower unadjusted impotence (57% vs 80%). On multivariable analysis, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent risk of incontinence (odds ratio [OR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.17-1.6; P = 0.4) but significantly reduced risk of erectile dysfunction (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22-0.60; P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: For men undergoing RALP, compared with SOC, NeuroSAFE patients had equivalent time to BCR and risk of 1-year incontinence, and significantly lower risk of 1-year erectile dysfunction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:探讨机器人辅助植入骶髂穿钉在骨盆后环骨折骨科手术中的准确性及临床效果。
    方法:回顾性分析2022年8月至2023年8月采用机器人辅助骶髂穿螺钉治疗的24例骨盆后环骨折患者的临床资料。其中男性10例,女性14例;年龄21~73岁,平均(49.29±14.48)岁;根据Tile骨盆骨折,13例患者为B型,11例患者为C型。根据术后CT扫描结果,根据Gras标准评估螺钉放置的效果。在最后的后续行动中,根据Matta评分评估骨折愈合情况,功能恢复通过Majeed评分进行评价。
    结果:所有患者均获随访3~13个月,平均(6.00±3.28)个月。共36颗骶髂穿透螺钉,18个S1贯穿螺钉,插入18个S2穿透螺钉,根据Gras标准,共有29个优秀,7个良好。螺钉调整次数为0.00(0.00,0.75)次。在最后的后续行动中,18例患者的Matta评分优异,5个好,1个中等,最大位移距离为2.55(0.00,5.65)mm。Majeed得分为84.37±8.38,15例患者优,7个良好,2个中等。
    结论:机器人可以准确、安全地辅助放置骶髂关节螺钉治疗骨盆后环骨折,促进患者术后功能恢复。
    OBJECTIVE: To explore accuracy and clinical effect of robot-assisted implantation of sacroiliac penetrating screw in orthopedic surgery for posterior pelvic ring fracture.
    METHODS: The clinical data of 24 patients with posterior pelvic ring fracture treated with robot-assisted sacroiliac penetration screws from August 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 10 males and 14 females; aged from 21 to 73 years old with an average of (49.29±14.48) years old;according to Tile pelvic fractures, 13 patients were type B and 11 were type C. The effect of screw placement was evaluated according to Gras criteria based on postoperative CT scan results. At the final follow-up, fracture healing was evaluated according to Matta score, and functional recovery was evaluated by Majeed score.
    RESULTS: All patients were followed up for 3 to 13 months with an average of (6.00±3.28) months. Totally 36 sacroiliac penetrating screws, 18 S1 penetrating screws, 18 S2 penetrating screws were inserted, a total of 29 were excellent and 7 good according to Gras standard. Screw adjustment times was 0.00 (0.00, 0.75) times. At the final follow-up, Matta score was excellent in 18 patients, 5 good and 1 moderate, and the maximum displacement distance was 2.55 (0.00, 5.65) mm. Majeed score was 84.37±8.38, 15 patients were excellent, 7 good and 2 moderate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robot could accurately and safely assist in the placement of sacroiliac joint screws for the treatment of posterior pelvic ring fractures, and promote postoperative functional recovery of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:机器人提供了增强医疗保健服务的机会。而不是针对完全自动化和护士更换,协作机器人,或“协作机器人”,可能旨在让护士专注于高价值的护理。虽然许多机构现在正在投资这些平台,关于如何开发协作机器人的公开数据很少,已实施,并进行评估以确定它们是否以及如何支持现实世界中的护理实践。方法:本系统综述调查了旨在帮助医院护士的机器人技术的现状,它们的预期应用,以及对护士和病人护理的影响。全面的数据库搜索确定了自2018年以来发表的28篇相关同行评审文章,涉及在模拟或实际临床环境中使用机器人平台进行的真实研究。结果:很少有合作机器人被明确设计为通过行政或后勤援助来减少护理工作量。大多数纳入研究的设计是以患者为中心,而不是以护士为中心。但包括对药物输送等任务的援助,生命监测,和社交互动。大多数应用程序来自印度,尽管商业上有护士辅助机器人,但来自美国的证据有限。机器人的范围从概念验证到商业部署的系统。讨论:这篇综述强调了需要进一步发表关于机器人发育和评估的研究。需要更多的证据来认识到当前的局限性和务实的机会,以帮助护士和患者使用最先进的机器人技术。以人为中心的设计可以帮助发现合适的机器人辅助机会。需要致力于研究实践的伙伴关系和以人为本的设计,以指导以护士为中心的机器人解决方案的技术开发。
    Introduction: Robots present an opportunity to enhance healthcare delivery. Rather than targeting complete automation and nurse replacement, collaborative robots, or \"cobots\", might be designed to allow nurses to focus on high-value caregiving. While many institutions are now investing in these platforms, there is little publicly available data on how cobots are being developed, implemented, and evaluated to determine if and how they support nursing practice in the real world. Methods: This systematic review investigates the current state of cobotic technologies designed to assist nurses in hospital settings, their intended applications, and impacts on nurses and patient care. A comprehensive database search identified 28 relevant peer-reviewed articles published since 2018 which involve real studies with robotic platforms in simulated or actual clinical contexts. Results: Few cobots were explicitly designed to reduce nursing workload through administrative or logistical assistance. Most included studies were designed as patient-centered rather than nurse-centered, but included assistance for tasks like medication delivery, vital monitoring, and social interaction. Most applications emerged from India, with limited evidence from the United States despite commercial availability of nurse-assistive cobots. Robots ranged from proof-of-concept to commercially deployed systems. Discussion: This review highlights the need for further published studies on cobotic development and evaluation. A larger body of evidence is needed to recognize current limitations and pragmatic opportunities to assist nurses and patients using state-of-the-art robotics. Human-centered design can assist in discovering the right opportunities for cobotic assistance. Committed research-practice partnerships and human-centered design are needed to guide the technical development of nurse-centered cobotic solutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的脊柱骨折主要表现为不稳定,涉及脊柱的所有三列,手术干预通常被认为是必要的。然而,在AS患者中,骨结构和解剖结构的显著改变导致缺乏可识别的地标,增加了椎弓根螺钉植入的难度。因此,我们介绍了机器人辅助经皮内固定治疗AS患者胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效.
    方法:对12例确诊为AS的患者进行了回顾性分析。所有患者在2018年10月至2022年10月期间均患有胸腰椎骨折,并接受了后路机器人辅助经皮内固定手术。感兴趣的结果包括手术时间,术中失血,并发症,住院时间和骨折愈合。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结果。为了调查已实现的手术矫正,通过测量Cobb角分析术前和术后侧面的X光片。
    结果:12例患者的平均年龄为62.8±13.0岁,平均随访时间为32.7±18.9个月。平均住院时间为15±8.0天。平均手术时间119.6±32.2min,中位失血量为50(50,250)ml。VAS值从术前的6.8±0.9提高到末次随访时的1.3±1.0(P<0.05)。ODI值从术前的83.6±6.1%提高到最新随访的11.8±6.6%(P<0.05)。平均Cobb角由术前的15.2±11.0变为末次随访的8.3±7.1(P<0.05)。骨愈合始终如一,平均愈合时间为6(5.3,7.0)个月。在植入的108颗螺钉中,2(1.9%)定位不当。一名患者术后出现迟发性神经损伤,但出院后神经功能恢复正常.
    结论:后路机器人辅助经皮内固定可作为治疗AS患者胸腰椎骨折的理想手术方法。然而,而机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉的放置可以提高椎弓根螺钉插入的准确性,不应该仅仅依靠它。
    BACKGROUND: Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) mainly present as instability, involving all three columns of the spine, and surgical intervention is often considered necessary. However, in AS patients, the significant alterations in bony structure and anatomy result in a lack of identifiable landmarks, which increases the difficulty of pedicle screw implantation. Therefore, we present the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar fractures in patients with AS.
    METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a series of 12 patients diagnosed with AS. All patients sustained thoracolumbar fractures between October 2018 and October 2022 and underwent posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation procedures. Outcomes of interest included operative time, intra-operative blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay and fracture union. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To investigate the achieved operative correction, pre- and postoperative radiographs in the lateral plane were analyzed by measuring the Cobb angle.
    RESULTS: The 12 patients had a mean age of 62.8 ± 13.0 years and a mean follow-up duration of 32.7 ± 18.9 months. Mean hospital stay duration was 15 ± 8.0 days. The mean operative time was 119.6 ± 32.2 min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50, 250) ml. The VAS value improved from 6.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.0 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The ODI value improved from 83.6 ± 6.1% preoperatively to 11.8 ± 6.6% at the latest follow-up (P < 0.05). The average Cobb angle changed from 15.2 ± 11.0 pre-operatively to 8.3 ± 7.1 at final follow-up (P < 0.05). Bone healing was consistently achieved, with an average healing time of 6 (5.3, 7.0) months. Of the 108 screws implanted, 2 (1.9%) were improperly positioned. One patient experienced delayed nerve injury after the operation, but the nerve function returned to normal upon discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous internal fixation can be used as an ideal surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fractures in AS patients. However, while robot-assisted pedicle screw placement can enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, it should not be relied upon solely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:尽管腹侧疝修补术在全球范围内普遍存在,方法,解剖平面,缺陷闭合,网格的选择和放置层正在进行辩论。我们报道了手术技术的细节,机器人辅助经腹横肌筋膜和腹膜前修补术(R-TATFPP)治疗小腹侧疝的安全性和可行性。
    方法:本研究包括2018年至2023年通过机器人辅助腹侧疝修补术进行的22例病例中的5例R-TATFPP修补术,并获得圣卢克国际大学机构审查委员会和圣卢克国际医院临床伦理委员会的批准(19-R147,22-012)。
    结果:有4名男性和1名女性,平均年龄64.4±10.0岁,包括两个脐带疝和三个切口疝。平均身高,体重,体重指数(BMI),疝缺损长度,宽度,操作时间,控制台时间,住院时间为171.2±11.8厘米,82.4±13.4kg,28.0±2.1kg/m2,2.8±1.4cm,3.0±1.3cm,180分钟,133.8分钟,2.4天,分别。除一例急性尿潴留外,未观察到任何转换或并发症。
    结论:机器人辅助的横肌筋膜和腹膜前修补术对于小腹侧疝是安全可行的,对腹壁结构和结构的破坏最小。
    OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread of ventral hernia repairs globally, the approach method, dissection planes, defect closure, and the choice and placement layer of mesh are an ongoing debate. We reported the details of surgical techniques, safety and feasibility for robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair (R-TATFPP) for small ventral hernia.
    METHODS: This study included 5 cases of R-TATFPP repair among 22 cases performed by robot-assisted ventral hernia repair from 2018 to 2023 with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at St. Luke\'s International University and clinical ethical committee at St. Luke\'s International Hospital (19-R147, 22-012).
    RESULTS: There were four males and one female, with mean age of 64.4 ± 10.0 years, inclusive of two umbilical and three incisional hernias. Mean height, weight, body mass index (BMI), hernia defect length, width, operation time, console time, and hospital stay were 171.2 ± 11.8 cm, 82.4 ± 13.4 kg, 28.0 ± 2.1 kg/m2, 2.8 ± 1.4 cm, 3.0 ± 1.3 cm, 180 min, 133.8 min, and 2.4 days, respectively. No conversion nor complication was observed except for one acute urinary retention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Robot-assisted transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair was safe and feasible for small ventral hernia with the minimal disruption to the abdominal wall architecture and structures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在中风后进行上肢康复的机器人辅助手臂伸展运动期间,躯干代偿运动经常表现出来。可能会阻碍功能恢复。这些异常运动在中风幸存者中普遍存在,并可能阻碍他们的康复进展。使解决这个问题变得至关重要。这项研究评估了视觉反馈的功效,由RGB-D相机促进,减少干线补偿。总的来说,17名身体健全的人和18名中风幸存者在不受限制的躯干条件和视觉反馈条件下执行了伸手任务。在视觉反馈模式中,目标位置与躯干运动同步,目标运动速度相同,双,和三倍的躯干的运动速度,向参与者提供实时反馈。值得注意的是,当目标以相同的速度移动并且是躯干运动速度的两倍时,躯干代偿运动显着减少。此外,这些情况显示卒中幸存者的任务完成时间和感知劳累增加.这一结果表明,视觉反馈有效地提高了任务难度,从而阻止不必要的躯干运动。研究结果强调了定制视觉反馈在纠正中风幸存者异常上肢运动中的关键作用。可能有助于机器人辅助康复策略的发展。这些见解倡导将视觉反馈整合到康复练习中,强调其通过减少不必要的代偿运动为中风后个体提供更有效的康复途径的潜力。
    Trunk compensatory movements frequently manifest during robotic-assisted arm reaching exercises for upper limb rehabilitation following a stroke, potentially impeding functional recovery. These aberrant movements are prevalent among stroke survivors and can hinder their progress in rehabilitation, making it crucial to address this issue. This study evaluated the efficacy of visual feedback, facilitated by an RGB-D camera, in reducing trunk compensation. In total, 17 able-bodied individuals and 18 stroke survivors performed reaching tasks under unrestricted trunk conditions and visual feedback conditions. In the visual feedback modalities, the target position was synchronized with trunk movement at ratios where the target moved at the same speed, double, and triple the trunk\'s motion speed, providing real-time feedback to the participants. Notably, trunk compensatory movements were significantly diminished when the target moved at the same speed and double the trunk\'s motion speed. Furthermore, these conditions exhibited an increase in the task completion time and perceived exertion among stroke survivors. This outcome suggests that visual feedback effectively heightened the task difficulty, thereby discouraging unnecessary trunk motion. The findings underscore the pivotal role of customized visual feedback in correcting aberrant upper limb movements among stroke survivors, potentially contributing to the advancement of robotic-assisted rehabilitation strategies. These insights advocate for the integration of visual feedback into rehabilitation exercises, highlighting its potential to foster more effective recovery pathways for post-stroke individuals by minimizing undesired compensatory motions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项荟萃分析旨在评估机器人辅助的深部脑刺激(DBS)手术治疗帕金森病(PD)的有效性和安全性。
    四个数据库(Medline,Embase,WebofScienceandCENTRAL)从建立数据库到2024年3月23日进行了搜索,以研究机器人辅助的DBS在诊断为PD的患者中的文章。向量误差的荟萃分析,并发症发生率,左旋多巴等效日剂量(LEDD),统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS),UPDRSII,UPDRSIII,并进行了UPDRSIV。
    本荟萃分析共纳入15项研究,包括732名接受机器人辅助DBS的PD患者。汇总结果显示,接受机器人辅助DBS的帕金森病患者的矢量误差为1.09mm(95%CI:0.87至1.30)。并发症发生率为0.12(95%CI,0.03至0.24)。LEDD的减少为422.31mg(95%CI:68.69至775.94)。UPDRS的改进,UPDRSIII,UPDRSIV为27.36(95%CI:8.57至46.15),14.09(95%CI:4.67至23.52),和3.54(95%CI:-2.35至9.43),分别。
    机器人辅助DBS是治疗PD的可靠且安全的方法。与传统的基于框架的立体定位技术相比,机器人辅助的DBS提供了增强的准确性。然而,进一步的研究是必要的,以验证机器人辅助DBS在提高运动功能和减少抗帕金森病药物的需要方面的优势,与传统的基于框架的立体定位技术相比。临床试验注册:PROSPERO(CRD42024529976)。
    UNASSIGNED: This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery for Parkinson\'s disease(PD).
    UNASSIGNED: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science and CENTRAL) were searched from establishment of database to 23 March 2024, for articles studying robot-assisted DBS in patients diagnosed with PD. Meta-analyses of vector error, complication rate, levodopa-equivalent daily dose (LEDD), Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), UPDRS II, UPDRS III, and UPDRS IV were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 732 patients with PD who received robot-assisted DBS. The pooled results revealed that the vector error was measured at 1.09 mm (95% CI: 0.87 to 1.30) in patients with Parkinson\'s disease who received robot-assisted DBS. The complication rate was 0.12 (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.24). The reduction in LEDD was 422.31 mg (95% CI: 68.69 to 775.94). The improvement in UPDRS, UPDRS III, and UPDRS IV was 27.36 (95% CI: 8.57 to 46.15), 14.09 (95% CI: 4.67 to 23.52), and 3.54 (95% CI: -2.35 to 9.43), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Robot-assisted DBS is a reliable and safe approach for treating PD. Robot-assisted DBS provides enhanced accuracy in contrast to conventional frame-based stereotactic techniques. Nevertheless, further investigation is necessary to validate the advantages of robot-assisted DBS in terms of enhancing motor function and decreasing the need for antiparkinsonian medications, in comparison to traditional frame-based stereotactic techniques.Clinical trial registration: PROSPERO(CRD42024529976).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号