Critically ill patients with cirrhosis admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are usually on broad-spectrum antibiotics because of suspected infection or as a hospital protocol. It is unclear if additional rifaximin has any synergistic effect with broad-spectrum antibiotics in ICU patients with acute overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE).
In this double-blind trial, patients with overt HE admitted to ICU were randomized to receive antibiotics (ab) alone or antibiotics with rifaximin (ab + r). Resolution (or 2 grade reduction) of HE, time to resolution of HE, in-hospital mortality, nosocomial infection, and changes in endotoxin levels were compared between the 2 groups. A subgroup analysis of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and acute-on-chronic liver failure was performed.
Baseline characteristics and severity scores were similar among both groups (92 in each group). Carbapenems and cephalosporin with beta-lactamase inhibitors were the most commonly used ab. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 44.6% (41/92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32-70.5) in ab-only arm and 46.7% (43/92; 95% CI, 33.8-63) in ab + r arm achieved the primary objective ( P = 0.84).Time to achieve the primary objective (3.65 ± 1.82 days and 4.11 ± 2.01 days; P = 0.27) and in-hospital mortality were similar among both groups (62% vs 50%; P = 0.13). Seven percent and 13% in the ab and ab + r groups developed nosocomial infections ( P = 0.21). Endotoxin levels were unaffected by rifaximin. Rifaximin led to lower in-hospital mortality (hazard ratio: 0.39 [95% CI, 0.2-0.76]) in patients with decompensated cirrhosis but not in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (hazard ratio: 0.99 [95% CI, 0.6-1.63]) because of reduced nosocomial infections.
Reversal of overt HE in those on ab was comparable with those on ab + r.

Rationale: Pretomanid is a new nitroimidazole with proven treatment-shortening efficacy in drug-resistant tuberculosis. Pretomanid-rifamycin-pyrazinamide combinations are potent in mice but have not been tested clinically. Rifampicin, but not rifabutin, reduces pretomanid exposures. Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of regimens containing pretomanid-rifamycin-pyrazinamide among participants with drug-sensitive pulmonary tuberculosis. Methods: A phase 2, 12-week, open-label randomized trial was conducted of isoniazid and pyrazinamide plus 1) pretomanid and rifampicin (arm 1), 2) pretomanid and rifabutin (arm 2), or 3) rifampicin and ethambutol (standard of care; arm 3). Laboratory values of safety and sputum cultures were collected at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. Time to culture conversion on liquid medium was the primary outcome. Measurements and Main Results: Among 157 participants, 125 (80%) had cavitary disease. Median time to liquid culture negativity in the modified intention-to-treat population (n = 150) was 42 (arm 1), 28 (arm 2), and 56 (arm 3) days (P = 0.01) (adjusted hazard ratio for arm 1 vs. arm 3, 1.41 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93-2.12; P = 0.10]; adjusted hazard ratio for arm 2 vs. arm 3, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.24-2.87; P = 0.003]). Eight-week liquid culture conversion was 79%, 89%, and 69%, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 3 of 56 (5%), 5 of 53 (9%), and 2 of 56 (4%) participants. Six participants were withdrawn because of elevated transaminase concentrations (five in arm 2, one in arm 1). There were three serious adverse events (arm 2) and no deaths. Conclusions: Pretomanid enhanced the microbiologic activity of regimens containing a rifamycin and pyrazinamide. Efficacy and hepatic adverse events appeared highest with the pretomanid and rifabutin-containing regimen. Whether this is due to higher pretomanid concentrations merits exploration. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02256696).

Tuberculosis preventive therapy (TPT) is recommended for people with HIV infection, including during pregnancy. The effect of TPT exposure at conception and during pregnancy is poorly documented.
We report pregnancy outcomes among South African women with HIV enrolled in a randomized trial of 4 TPT regimens (two 3-month regimens, rifapentine/isoniazid [3HP] or rifampin/isoniazid [3HR], isoniazid for 6 months, or isoniazid continuously). Descriptive statistics and risk ratios were assessed to examine relationships between study regimens and outcomes.
216/896 women (24%) conceived during the study. Women who conceived were younger (27.9 vs 31.3 years) and had higher mean CD4 counts (589.1 vs 536.7). The odds of pregnancy were higher in women in the rifamycin-isoniazid arms than those in the isoniazid arms (3HP: relative risk [RR] 1.73, P = 0.001; 3HR:RR 1.55, P = 0.017) despite increased contraceptive use compared with the standard 6H therapy. Thirty-four women became pregnant while taking preventive treatment (8 rifamycin and 26 isoniazid monotherapy). Pregnancy outcomes in these women were as follows: 17 (50%) mother/baby healthy, 3 (9%) spontaneous abortions, 6 (18%) elective abortions, 1 (3%) premature delivery, 2 (6%) neonatal deaths [1 rifamycin-isoniazid and 1 isoniazid], and 5 (15%) unknown.
Pregnancy was common in women who had received TPT and more frequent in women who had received rifamycin-isoniazid-based regimens.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the performance of Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert-Ultra) in testing pleural tissue and fluid collected by medical thoracoscopy among patients with unexplained exudative pleural effusion.
METHODS: Patients with an undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion were prospectively and consecutively recruited. Pleural tissue and fluid were collected by medical thoracoscopy and subjected to culture, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Xpert-Ultra assays. Histopathological examination was also performed with the tissue and used as the major reference.
RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were enrolled, including: 27 tuberculosis (TB) pleurisy, 15 malignancy and 19 other chronic infection cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of Xpert-Ultra for TB diagnosis were 85.19% (23/27), 97.06% (33/34), 95.83% (23/24), and 89.19% (33/37), respectively. Xpert-Ultra testing with the biopsy tissue alone had an equivalent diagnostic capacity to that of pathological examination for the diagnosis of confirmed TB cases. By combining the pathological examination with Xpert-Ultra for biopsy, the percentage of confirmed TB cases greatly increased (i.e. 92.59% (25/27)). The \"trace\" positive outcome of Xpert-Ultra was highly supportive of TB diagnosis for both biopsy tissue and pleural fluid examinations.
CONCLUSIONS: With the specimens collected by medical thoracoscopy, the Xpert-Ultra assay presented high value in identifying TB among pleurisy patients who had difficulties in etiological diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a neuropsychiatric complication of liver cirrhosis. HE is associated with poor survival and detrimental effects on quality of life (QOL). The drawbacks of the long-term use of rifaximin in HE necessitates searching for alternative therapies. In this context, our study aimed at evaluating the safety and efficacy of nitazoxanide (NTZ) as compared to rifaximin (RFX) in preventing the recurrence of HE and assessing its impact on QOL.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study included 60 patients who were randomly assigned to receive either rifaximin 550 mg twice daily (group 1; n = 30) or nitazoxanide 500 mg twice daily (group 2; n = 30) for 24 weeks. During the study period, the patients\' neurological symptoms, mental status, and performance were monitored. The serum levels of HE triggers (ammonia, TNF-α, and octopamine) were assessed. The patients\' health-related quality of life was also evaluated.
RESULTS: Six months after treatment, patients on NTZ therapy showed a statistically significant improvement in CHESS score and mental status. NTZ provided 136 days of remission vs 67 days of remission for patients on RFX (P1  = .0001) and significant reduction in Child score (P1  = .018). Additionally, NTZ showed a statistically significant decrease in serum ammonia, TNF-α, and octopamine levels as compared to rifaximin. Regarding QOL, NTZ group showed an improvement in total Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) score. Both groups experienced minor controllable side effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Nitazoxanide may represent a suitable and safe alternative therapy to rifaximin in preventing the recurrence of hepatic encephalopathy.

BACKGROUND: Rifaximin is an oral antimicrobial with a daily dose ranging from 600 to 800 mg. It is classified as Class IV in the Biopharmaceutic Classification System. Thus, rifaximin-based samples were developed by complexation to β-cyclodextrin using a phase solubility diagram, and malaxation and decreasing particle size using wet milling.
OBJECTIVE: Concomitant to the pharmaceutical technology, a stability studywas undertaken with the objective of verifying the integrity of the drug.
METHODS: The stability of the new samples were studied for 6 months, without interruption, under controlled conditions of temperature and humidity in a climatic chamber. They were analyzed simultaneously by HPLC and microbiological turbidimetry at zero, 3, and 6 months.
RESULTS: Two of the samples follow second reaction order and one follows zero reaction order. Microbiological analysis proved to be important in assessing the potency of rifaximin in one of the samples, and its results were more consistent than the results by HPLC.
CONCLUSIONS: The rifaximin-based samples were stable under controlled temperature and humidity conditions and the physical-chemical and microbiological methods were able to evaluate their behavior during the 6-month study.
CONCLUSIONS: It is worth considering the development of these products, since the design process of formulation and pharmaceutical technology is financially more attractive than the development of new drugs that require high levels of investment in research and development, innovation of public policies, and regulatory actions.

Shorter, more potent regimens are needed for tuberculosis. The nitroimidazole pretomanid was recently approved for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in combination with bedaquiline and linezolid. Pretomanid may also have benefit as a treatment-shortening agent for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. It is unclear how and whether it can be used together with rifamycins, which are key sterilizing first-line drugs. In this analysis, data were pooled from two studies: the Assessing Pretomanid for Tuberculosis (APT) trial, in which patients with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB received pretomanid, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide plus either rifampin or rifabutin versus standard of care under fed conditions, and the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5306 (A5306) trial, a phase I study in healthy volunteers receiving pretomanid alone or in combination with rifampin under fasting conditions. In our population pharmacokinetic (PK) model, participants taking rifampin had 44.4 and 59.3% reductions in pretomanid AUC (area under the concentration-time curve) compared to those taking rifabutin or pretomanid alone (due to 80 or 146% faster clearance) in the APT and A5306 trials, respectively. Median maximum concentrations (Cmax) in the rifampin and rifabutin arms were 2.14 and 3.35 mg/liter, while median AUC0-24 values were 30.1 and 59.5 mg·h/liter, respectively. Though pretomanid exposure in APT was significantly reduced with rifampin, AUC0-24 values were similar to those associated with effective treatment in registrational trials, likely because APT participants were fed with dosing, enhancing pretomanid relative bioavailability and exposures. Pretomanid concentrations with rifabutin were high but in range with prior observations. While pretomanid exposures with rifampin are unlikely to impair efficacy, our data suggest that pretomanid should be taken with food if prescribed with rifampin. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02256696.).

Mycobacterium xenopi is associated with the highest mortality among pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) infections, but whether this is due to the infection or other factors is unclear. There is little information regarding outcomes among patients infected with M. xenopi versus other NTM species. We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study comparing M. xenopi pulmonary disease (Mx-PD) to M. avium complex (MAC)-PD. Patients were matched by sex, age, radiologic subtype, and presence of cavitation. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were compared using matched analyses. We identified 70 Mx-PD cases: 29 fibrocavitary-type, 28 nodular-bronchiectatic-type, and 13 unclassifiable-type CT patterns, mean (SD) age 63 (13) years, and 54.3% (n = 38) female. Median follow-up duration was longer in the Mx-PD cohort (1552 days versus 1035 days, p = 0.01). Symptoms, radiologic phenotype, and pulmonary function were similar between groups although the Charlson Comorbidity Index was numerically higher in Mx-PD patients (3.6 versus 3.2, p = 0.08). Rifamycins were used less frequently in Mx-PD (59.5% versus 85.7%, p = 0.02). Although combined clinical and radiologic improvement was similar between the groups, successful treatment was more common with Mx-PD (40.5% versus 16.7%, p = 0.02) owing to superior culture conversion (70.8% versus 33.3%, p = 0.0001). Mortality 24 months after initiation of treatment was numerically but not statistically greater in the Mx-PD cohort (20.4% versus 10.3%, p = 0.32). Among matched Mx-PD and MAC-PD patients, standard anti-mycobacterial treatment was significantly more likely to achieve culture conversion and successful treatment for Mx-PD patients. Mortality among Mx-PD patients was numerically, but not statistically higher, possibly explained by increased comorbidity burden.

BACKGROUND: Capsular contracture remains a problem following breast implant surgery. Although impact of biofilm and implant surface on capsule formation has been demonstrated, interaction of microorganisms with different surface types has not been clarified yet. We aimed to compare the ability of biofilm formation of implants with different surfaces, under standard conditions and to demonstrate its impact on capsular contracture.
METHODS: Twenty-four rats were divided into four groups. Mini-implants with three different surfaces (fine-textured, rough-textured and polyurethane) were placed on the dorsum of each rat. In Group-1, sterile implants were placed in submuscular pockets. In Group-2, implants were incubated in Staphylococcus epidermidis medium before implantation. In Group-3, before implantation, implants were immersed in Rifamycin solution following bacterial contamination. In Group-4, sterile implants were immersed in Rifamycin solution before implantation, and served as the control group. Rats were sacrificed at three months. Clinical, microbiological, histological and immunohistochemical evaluations were performed.
RESULTS: Capsule contracture developed only on infected rough-textured implants. Rough-textured and polyurethane implants showed more biofilm formation than fine-textured implants. Capsule thickness and inflammatory cell density were higher on rough-textured implants compared to fine-textured implants (p = 0.004). Actin sequence was parallel and concentric on fine-textured and rough-textured implants; but was in irregular array on polyurethane implants.
CONCLUSIONS: In presence of bacterial contamination, rough-textured implants have the most propensity of developing capsular contracture comparing to fine-textured and polyurethane implants at three months after implantation. Despite high bacterial load and biofilm formation, polyurethane implants are resistant to capsule contracture due to surface characteristics.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a significant public health problem that causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Current first-line anti-TB chemotherapy, although very effective, has limitations including long-treatment duration with a possibility of non-adherence, drug interactions, and toxicities. Dose escalation of rifampicin, an important drug within the regimen, has been proposed as a potential route to higher treatment efficacy with shorter duration and some studies have suggested that dose escalation is safe; however, these have almost entirely been conducted among human immunodeficiency (HIV)-negative TB patients. TB-HIV co-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy (ART) are at increased risk of drug-drug interactions and drug-related toxicities. This study aims to determine the safety of higher doses of rifampicin and its effect on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz (EFV) and dolutegravir (DTG) in TB-HIV co-infected patients.
METHODS: This study is a randomized, open-label, phase IIb clinical trial among TB-HIV infected adult outpatients attending an HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda. Patients newly diagnosed with TB will be randomized to either standard-dose or high-dose rifampicin (35 mg/kg) alongside standard TB treatment. ART-naïve patients will be randomly assigned to first-line ART regimens (DTG or EFV). Those who are already on ART (DTG or EFV) at enrollment will be continued on the same ART regimen but with dose adjustment of DTG to twice daily dosing. Participants will be followed every 2 weeks with assessment for toxicities at each visit and measurement of drug concentrations at week 6. At the end of intensive-phase therapy (8 weeks), all participants will be initiated on continuation-phase treatment using standard-dose rifampicin and isoniazid.
CONCLUSIONS: This study should avail us with evidence about the effect of higher doses of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of EFV and DTG among TB-HIV co-infected patients. The trial should also help us to understand safety concerns of high-dose rifampicin among this vulnerable cohort.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03982277. Registered retrospectively on 11 June 2019.