Rifampin

利福平
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    链球菌感染可能有助于牛皮癣的发展,抗链球菌治疗被认为是潜在的治疗方法,但由于系统证据有限,其有效性仍不确定.我们的目的是分析抗链球菌治疗改善银屑病的有效性。我们遵循PRISMA指南进行了系统审查,从PubMed,Scopus,和Embase数据库,直到2022年8月14日。符合条件的研究包括接受抗链球菌治疗的银屑病患者,无论人口统计学或牛皮癣类型。分析了50项研究(1778例患者),青霉素/氨基青霉素是研究最多的抗生素(21项研究),显示混合的结果,一些报告指出,点滴状牛皮癣有显著改善,而其他人则没有显着差异。利福平在十项研究中的大多数研究中都显示出积极的结果,和大环内酯类药物在两项研究中表现出不同的有效性。14项研究(409例患者)的扁桃体切除术主要集中在点滴和慢性斑块状银屑病显示出积极的结果,表明改善症状和生活质量。局限性包括异质性研究,采样偏差,和证据的质量。本系统综述揭示了银屑病治疗中全身性抗生素治疗疗效的有限和多样的证据。虽然扁桃体切除术是一种潜在的有益的抗链球菌选择,敦促进一步精心设计,具有更大样本量和标准化方案的对照研究,以进行更好的比较。
    Streptococcal infections may contribute to psoriasis development, and antistreptococcal treatments are considered potential therapies, but their effectiveness remains uncertain due to limited systematic evidence. Our objective was to analyze antistreptococcal therapies\' effectiveness in improving psoriasis. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, evaluating antistreptococcal treatment efficacy in psoriasis patients from PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases until August 14, 2022. Eligible studies included psoriasis patients undergoing antistreptococcal therapy, regardless of demographics or psoriasis type. 50 studies (1778 patients) were analyzed, with penicillins/aminopenicillins as the most studied antibiotics (21 studies), showing mixed outcomes, some reporting significant improvement in guttate psoriasis, while others showed no significant difference. Rifampin demonstrated positive results in most of ten studies, and macrolides showed varying effectiveness in two studies. Tonsillectomy in 14 studies (409 patients) mainly focusing on guttate and chronic plaque psoriasis showed positive outcomes, indicating improved symptoms and quality of life. Limitations include heterogeneous studies, sampling bias, and quality of evidence. This systematic review reveals limited and varied evidence for systemic antibiotic therapy efficacy in psoriasis treatment, while tonsillectomy emerges as a potentially beneficial antistreptococcal option, urging further well-designed, controlled studies with larger sample sizes and standardized protocols for better comparisons.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    毛细胞白血病(HCL)与非结核性分枝杆菌感染(NTM)之间的关系得到了很好的描述,最著名的是Kansasii分枝杆菌.确切的病理生理学尚不清楚。我们报告了一例31岁的男性,伴随诊断为HCL和播散性M.kansasii感染,表现为皮疹,全血细胞减少症,和巨大的腋窝淋巴结病。最初通过使用无细胞DNA检测来诊断Mkansasii,并通过骨髓和淋巴结培养来确认。毛细胞白血病用外周流式细胞术诊断并通过相同的骨髓样品确认。他的HCL通过克拉屈滨和利妥昔单抗化疗单疗程缓解;然而,尽管进行了积极的抗菌和手术治疗,但他的Mkansasii感染仍持续了6个月。最终使用高剂量利福平与阿奇霉素和乙胺丁醇的组合进行控制。此案例突出了HCL和Mkansasii之间的已知联系。此外,它暗示了化疗诱导的免疫损害之外的潜在原因。值得注意的可能性包括HCL细胞充当Mkansasii逃避免疫系统的避难所,和亚临床M.kansasii感染导致NLRP3炎性体过度激活,从而引发致癌转化为HCL。对HCL和Mkansasii感染之间的病理生理联系的更多研究将允许更有效的预防,诊断,以及这些严重的非典型感染的治疗,这些感染是盐酸克拉屈滨治疗时代发病的主要原因。
    The association between Hairy Cell Leukemia (HCL) and non-tuberculous mycobacterial infections (NTMs) is well described, most notably Mycobacterium kansasii. The exact pathophysiology is not known. We report a case of a 31-year-old male with concomitantly diagnosed HCL and disseminated M kansasii infection who presented with rash, pancytopenia, and bulky axillary lymphadenopathy. The M kansasii was initially diagnosed through use of cell-free DNA detection and confirmed by bone marrow and lymph node cultures. Hairy Cell Leukemia was diagnosed with peripheral flow cytometry and confirmed via the same bone marrow sample. His HCL was put into remission with a single course of cladribine and rituximab chemotherapy; however, his M kansasii infection persisted for 6 months despite aggressive antimicrobial and surgical therapy. It was finally controlled using high-dose rifampin in combination with azithromycin and ethambutol. This case highlights the known link between HCL and M kansasii. Furthermore, it hints at potential causes beyond chemotherapy-induced immunocompromise. Notable possibilities include HCL cells acting as sanctuary sites for M kansasii to evade the immune system, and subclinical M kansasii infections causing NLRP3 inflammasome overactivation to trigger the oncogenic transformation to HCL. More research into the pathophysiologic link between HCL and M kansasii infections would allow for more effective prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these severe atypical infections which are the major cause of morbidity in the cladribine era of HCL treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:预防意外接触布鲁氏菌后的布鲁氏菌病是公共卫生领域的重要课题。本研究旨在系统评价意外接触布鲁氏菌后预防抗生素预防人类布鲁氏菌病的功效。
    方法:研究方案在PROSPERO(CRD42023456812)中注册。结果包括布鲁氏菌病的发病率,不良事件发生率,和抗生素预防依从性。全面的文献检索,一直持续到11月20日,2023年,涉及Medline,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和LILACS数据库。使用R软件进行描述性分析和荟萃分析,使用JBI关键评估工具评估偏差风险,使用GRADE工具评估证据的确定性。
    结果:在最初确定的3102条记录中,八项研究涉及97个人意外暴露,所有这些都集中在实验室环境中意外接触布鲁氏菌的高风险,包括在审查中。所有研究都报道了包含多西环素的预防性治疗,剂量为100毫克,每天两次,结合600毫克的利福平,两者均超过21天。86%的病例报告了预防依从性,治疗后布鲁氏菌病的发病率为0.01。不良事件,主要是胃肠,发生在26%的病例中。严格的评估揭示了报告人口统计学和临床信息的局限性。证据的确定性被评为非常低,由于研究设计的限制和缺乏比较组,强调在解释观察到的结果时需要谨慎。
    结论:PEP是文献中报道的替代实践,用于高风险接触布鲁氏菌的事故。目前可用的抗生素预防功效的证据不足以支持支持或反对广泛使用抗生素预防的建议。因此,由于证据的确定性非常低,在解释结果时需要谨慎,主要源于病例系列和缺乏比较组。
    BACKGROUND: Antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent brucellosis after accidental exposure to Brucella is an important topic in public health. This study aimed to systematically review the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis following accidental exposure to Brucella in preventing human brucellosis disease.
    METHODS: The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023456812). The outcomes included the incidence of brucellosis disease, adverse events rate, and antibiotic prophylaxis adherence. A comprehensive literature search, conducted until 20 November, 2023, involved Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and LILACS databases. Descriptive analysis and meta-analysis using R software were performed, risk of bias was assessed using JBI Critical appraisal tools, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.
    RESULTS: Among 3102 initially identified records, eight studies involving 97 individuals accidentally exposed, all focused on high-risk accidental exposure to Brucella in laboratory settings, were included in the review. All studies reported the prophylactic treatment comprising doxycycline at a dosage of 100 mg twice daily, combined with rifampicin at 600 mg, both administered over 21 days. Prophylaxis adherence was reported in 86% of cases, and incidence of brucellosis post-treatment was 0.01. Adverse events, mainly gastrointestinal, occurred in 26% of cases. Critical appraisal revealed limitations in reporting demographics and clinical information. The certainty of evidence was rated as \'very low,\' emphasising the need for caution in interpreting the observed outcomes due to study design constraints and the absence of comparative groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: PEP is an alternative practice reported in the literature, used in accidents with high-risk exposure to Brucella. The currently available evidence of the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis is insufficient to support a recommendation for or against the widespread use of antibiotic prophylaxis, so caution is needed in interpreting results due to the very low certainty of evidence, primarily stemming from case series and lack of comparative groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:潜伏性结核感染的治疗策略是减少结核病例的数量,从而减少病原菌的传播。本研究旨在确定安全性,有效性,和使用异烟肼治疗潜伏性结核感染的依从性。
    方法:为了确定异烟肼用于潜伏性结核感染的研究,搜索了五个电子数据库。方法和结果根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的优选报告项目呈现。
    结果:大多数研究(53)使用异烟肼9个月。使用和坚持治疗的患病率差异很大(18%至100%),并通过参与者完成对潜伏性结核感染的异烟肼治疗进行评估。最常报告的不良事件是肝毒性,胃不耐受,和神经病变;发生率从<1%到48%不等。在评估异烟肼对潜伏性结核感染的有效性的研究中,随访期后无活动性肺结核患者的发病率为0~19.7%.
    结论:由于发生不良事件的风险,应强调对使用异烟肼的患者保持随访的重要性。尽管治疗面临挑战,在随访期间使用异烟肼和发展为活动性结核病的患者的比率较低.我们认为,异烟肼继续有助于全球范围内的结核病控制,需要更好的护理策略。
    BACKGROUND: The treatment strategy for latent tuberculosis infection is to reduce the number of tuberculosis cases and consequently reduce the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to determine the safety, effectiveness, and adherence of isoniazid use for latent tuberculosis infection treatment.
    METHODS: To identify studies on isoniazid use for latent tuberculosis infection, five electronic databases were searched. The methods and results are presented in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    RESULTS: Most studies (53) used isoniazid for 9 months. The prevalence of use and adherence to treatment varied considerably (18% to 100%), and were evaluated by participant completion of isoniazid treatment for latent tuberculosis infection. The adverse events most frequently reported were hepatotoxicity, gastric intolerance, and neuropathy; the rates of occurrence ranged from < 1% to 48%. In the studies that evaluated the effectiveness of isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection, the rate varied from 0 to 19.7% for patients who did not have active tuberculosis after the follow-up period.
    CONCLUSIONS: The importance of maintaining follow up for patients using isoniazid should be emphasized due to the risk of developing adverse events. Despite the treatment challenges, the rates of patients who used isoniazid and developed active tuberculosis during the follow-up period were low. We believe that isoniazid continues to contribute to tuberculosis control worldwide, and better care strategies are required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鉴于抗生素的不良副作用和难以达到足够的中枢神经系统(CNS)抗生素浓度,管理幼儿的医疗保健获得性和设备相关颅内感染可能具有挑战性。头孢洛林是一种头孢菌素,对耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌和几种革兰氏阴性生物体具有良好的安全性和活性。关于使用头孢洛林治疗儿童和成人中枢神经系统感染的公开数据有限。
    方法:我们描述了一个2个月大的婴儿,患有脑室下分流相关的甲氧西林耐药表皮葡萄球菌脑室炎,用头孢洛林成功治疗,除了万古霉素和利福平。我们对从PubMed检索到的英语文献进行了范围审查,EMBASE和WebofScience评估头孢洛林用于中枢神经系统感染。
    结果:我们确定了22篇文章纳入我们的综述,描述了92个独特的病人,其中2人<21岁。头孢洛林通常与其他抗生素一起用于治疗金黄色葡萄球菌引起的感染,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和肺炎链球菌。大多数病例报告描述了头孢洛林的临床成功,尽管小型病例系列和队列研究得出了混合的疗效评估。头孢洛林的不良反应很少见,包括可逆性骨髓抑制,嗜酸性粒细胞增多,肝毒性和肾毒性。药代动力学/药效学研究表明,与其他β内酰胺抗生素一样,中枢神经系统通过发炎的脑膜渗透相似。
    结论:我们发现越来越多的公开证据支持使用头孢洛林与其他药物联合治疗中枢神经系统感染。在没有临床试验的情况下,需要更多的真实世界数据来确定头孢洛林对患有中枢神经系统感染的儿童和成人的疗效和安全性.
    BACKGROUND: Managing health care acquired and device-associated intracranial infections in young children can be challenging given adverse antibiotic side effects and difficulties in achieving adequate central nervous system (CNS) antibiotic concentrations. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with a favorable safety profile and activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and several Gram-negative organisms. Published data on the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections in children and adults are limited.
    METHODS: We describe a 2-month-old infant with ventriculo-subgaleal shunt-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ventriculitis, which was successfully treated with ceftaroline, in addition to vancomycin and rifampin. We conducted a scoping review of English-language literature retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science that assessed the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections.
    RESULTS: We identified 22 articles for inclusion in our review, which described 92 unique patients, of whom 2 were <21 years old. Ceftaroline was commonly used in conjunction with other antibiotics to treat infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus , coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Most case reports described clinical success with ceftaroline, though small case series and cohort studies yielded mixed efficacy assessments. Adverse effects attributed to ceftaroline were rare and included reversible myelosuppression, eosinophilia, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies suggested similar CNS penetration through inflamed meninges as other beta lactam antibiotics.
    CONCLUSIONS: We identified a growing body of published evidence supporting the use of ceftaroline in combination with other agents for the treatment of CNS infections. In absence of clinical trials, additional real-world data are needed to define the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline for children and adults with CNS infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    化脓性链球菌(S.化脓性)是革兰氏阳性细菌,可引起一系列疾病,从无症状感染到危及生命的败血症。研究报告,在症状发作后30天内,密切接触的指标病例中,侵袭性化脓性链球菌疾病的风险高达2000倍。尽管如此,在无症状携带化脓性链球菌和有继发性侵袭性化脓性链球菌感染风险的患者的管理方面存在差异。
    目的:我们的系统评价评估了不同抗生素方案用于根除无症状个体咽部化脓性链球菌的疗效。
    方法:我们搜索了Pubmed,EMBASE(1974-),OVIDMedline(1948-)和CochraneCENTRAL注册表。我们纳入了随机对照试验(RCT),其中无症状的参与者>50%,基线时咽部培养为化脓性链球菌阳性。仅使用微生物学方法进行研究,包括培养(+/-聚合酶链反应,PCR)包括在内。我们包括以英语发表的研究。每个纳入的研究都由两名独立的审阅者评估数据提取和偏倚风险。
    结果:在确定的1166条唯一记录中,3项RCT纳入本综述.三个纳入RCT中的两个发现口服克林霉素10天是最有效的方案,与肌肉注射苄星青霉素G,然后口服利福平4天相比,或使用苄星青霉素的单一疗法,苯氧甲基青霉素或红霉素。两项随机对照试验被评估为存在高偏倚风险,第三项研究表明,偏倚风险较低/有一定程度。
    结论:目前关于根除咽部化脓性链球菌携带的最佳抗生素的现有证据有限。未来的RCT应该包括青霉素,第一代头孢菌素,利福平,大环内酯类(如阿奇霉素)和克林霉素。
    Streptococcus pyogenes (S. pyogenes) is a Gram-positive bacteria which causes a spectrum of diseases ranging from asymptomatic infection to life-threatening sepsis. Studies report up to 2000 times greater risk of invasive S. pyogenes disease in close contacts of index cases within 30-days of symptom onset. Despite this, there is variability in the management of asymptomatic carriage of S. pyogenes and those at risk of secondary cases of invasive S. pyogenes infection.
    OBJECTIVE: Our systematic review assessed the efficacy of different antibiotic regimens used for eradication of S. pyogenes from the pharynx in asymptomatic individuals.
    METHODS: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE (1974-), OVID Medline (1948-) and the Cochrane CENTRAL registry. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with asymptomatic participants with >50% with pharyngeal cultures positive with S. pyogenes at baseline. Only studies with microbiological methods including culture (+/- polymerase chain reaction, PCR) were included. We included studies published in English. Each included study was assessed by two independent reviewers for data extraction and risk of bias.
    RESULTS: Of 1166 unique records identified, three RCTs were included in the review. Two of the three included RCTs found oral clindamycin for 10-days was the most efficacious regimen, compared to intramuscular benzathine penicillin G followed by 4 days of oral rifampicin, or monotherapy using benzathine penicillin, phenoxymethylpenicillin or erythromycin. Two RCTs were assessed as being at high risk of bias, with the third study demonstrating low/some risk of bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current available evidence for the optimal antibiotic in eradicating pharyngeal S. pyogenes carriage is limited. Future RCTs should include penicillin, first-generation cephalosporins, rifampicin, macrolides (such as azithromycin) and clindamycin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:粪肠球菌是与感染性心内膜炎相关的最常见的肠球菌,也是继发性/持续性牙髓感染(SPEI)病例中最常见的细菌之一。抗菌素耐药性是全球公共卫生关注的问题。
    目的:这篇综述旨在回答以下研究问题:“这些年来,粪肠球菌临床菌株的抗生素耐药性发生了变化吗?”P(人口)-SPEI患者,I(干预)-牙髓再治疗,C(比较)-不包括在内,O(结果)-肠球菌耐药性和对使用的全身抗生素(SA)的敏感性。
    方法:两位作者独立进行研究选择,数据提取和偏差风险评估。文献检索使用以下电子数据库进行:PubMed,Scopus,EMBASE,WebofScience和Medline包括分离粪肠球菌菌株以评估其抗微生物耐药性的临床研究。
    结果:包括11项临床试验。总的来说,从患有SPEI的牙齿中分离出的粪肠球菌对16种抗生素具有中等耐药性。近年来,粪肠球菌对阿莫西林(不含克拉维酸)和苄青霉素表现出很小的抗性。红霉素和利福平在第一个和最后一个研究之间的中间耐药状态增加。屎肠球菌呈现中等抗性结果。
    结论:最有效的药物仍然是阿莫西林和克拉维酸的组合,其次是阿莫西林和苄青霉素。对青霉素衍生物过敏的患者,莫西沙星和阿奇霉素可谨慎使用。对粪肠球菌耐药性最高的抗生素是克林霉素,庆大霉素,甲硝唑,和利福平,因此在SPEI病例中是禁忌的。在牙髓失败的牙齿中使用微生物学方法进行的临床研究很少,以提高预防方案的疗效。然而,随着细菌定期对所用的主要药物产生耐药性,应定期研究这些药物在感染控制中的作用。
    背景:PROSPERO数据库(CRD42022368150)。
    BACKGROUND: Enterococcus faecalis is the most common enterococcal species associated with infective endocarditis and 1 of the most commonly detected bacteria in cases of secondary/persistent endodontic infection (SPEI). Antimicrobial resistance is a global public health concern. This review aimed to answer the following research question: \"Is there a change in the antibiotic resistance profile in clinical strains of E. faecalis over the years?\". P (population) - patients with SPEI, I (intervention) -endodontic retreatment, C (comparison) -not included, O (outcome) - profile of Enterococci resistance and susceptibility to systemic antibiotics used.
    METHODS: Two authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The literature search was conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Medline. Clinical studies in which Enterococci strains were isolated to assess their antimicrobial resistance were included.
    RESULTS: Eleven clinical trials were included. Overall, E. faecalis isolated from teeth with SPEI presented an intermediate resistance to 16 antibiotics. In recent years, E. faecalis showed a little resistance to amoxicillin (without clavulanate) and benzylpenicillin. Erythromycin and rifampicin presented an increase in the intermediate-resistance status between the first and the last studies. E. faecium presented intermediate-resistance results.
    CONCLUSIONS: The most effective drugs remain the combination of amoxicillin and clavulanate, followed by amoxicillin and benzylpenicillin. In patients allergic to penicillin derivatives, moxifloxacin and azithromycin may be indicated with caution. The antibiotics with the highest pattern of resistance against E. faecalis are clindamycin, gentamicin, metronidazole, and rifampicin and are therefore, contraindicated in cases of SPEI. Very few clinical studies using a microbiological approach in teeth with endodontic failure have been carried out to improve the efficacy of prophylactic regimens. However, as bacteria periodically develop resistance to the main drugs used, regular studies should be carried out on the action of these drugs in infection control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE)是医院获得性感染的主要原因,治疗选择有限。至少两种抗微生物剂的组合是获得快速和持续的杀菌作用并克服耐药性出现的可能策略。我们从体外研究中修订了有关利奈唑胺协同特性的文献,以评估其与其他抗生素类分子联合抗肠球菌的活性。
    方法:我们对来自三个同行评审数据库的文献进行了系统综述,包括评估利奈唑胺在体外对抗肠球菌的协同特性的论文。solates.
    结果:我们包括206种肠球菌。分离株(92粪肠球菌,90E.屎肠杆菌,2E.gallinarum,3E.卡塞利黄,19肠球菌属。)来自24项研究。用不同的组合对分离株进行测试时,每个组合都独立考虑用于进一步分析.最常见的相互作用是无差别效应(247/343,占总相互作用的72%)。当利奈唑胺与利福平(10/49,20.4%的相互作用)和磷霉素(16/84,19.0%,互动)。拮抗作用占总相互作用的7/343(2.0%)。
    结论:我们的研究报告了利奈唑胺与其他抗生素在体外对肠球菌属进行测试时的整体有限的协同作用。临床上选择利奈唑胺与其他抗生素联合用药,应以合理的经验性治疗为指导,以怀疑微生物感染或对微生物结果进行靶向治疗。而不是基于利奈唑胺的组合的预期协同作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with limited therapeutic options. Combination of at least two antimicrobials is a possible strategy to obtain rapid and sustained bactericidal effects and overcome the emergence of resistance. We revised the literature on linezolid synergistic properties from in vitro studies to assess its activity in combination with molecules belonging to other antibiotic classes against Enterococcus spp.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature from three peer-reviewed databases including papers evaluating linezolid synergistic properties in vitro against Enterococcus spp. isolates.
    RESULTS: We included 206 Enterococcus spp. isolates (92 E. faecalis, 90 E. faecium, 2 E. gallinarum, 3 E. casseliflavus, 19 Enterococcus spp.) from 24 studies. When an isolate was tested with different combinations, each combination was considered independently for further analysis. The most frequent interaction was indifferent effect (247/343, 72% of total interactions). The highest synergism rates were observed when linezolid was tested in combination with rifampin (10/49, 20.4% of interactions) and fosfomycin (16/84, 19.0%, of interactions). Antagonistic effect accounted for 7/343 (2.0%) of total interactions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study reported overall limited synergistic in vitro properties of linezolid with other antibiotics when tested against Enterococcus spp. The clinical choice of linezolid in combination with other antibiotics should be guided by reasoned empiric therapy in the suspicion of a polymicrobial infection or targeted therapy on microbiological results, rather than on an intended synergistic effect of the linezolid-based combination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号