Respiratory Physiological Phenomena

呼吸生理现象
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:阻塞性气道疾病,包括哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD),是两种最常见的慢性呼吸道健康问题。这两种情况都需要健康专业知识来进行诊断。因此,这一过程对于医疗保健提供者来说是耗时的,诊断质量受操作人员内部和操作人员之间的差异影响。在这项研究中,我们探讨了自动检测阻塞性气道疾病以降低成本并提高诊断质量的作用。
    方法:我们调查了现有的证据,并将首选报告项目应用于系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,以搜索IEEE中的记录,谷歌学者,和PubMed数据库。我们确定了2013年至2022年发表的65篇论文,这些论文涵盖了67项不同的研究。审查过程是根据用于疾病检测的医学数据构建的。我们确定了六个主要类别,即空气流动,遗传,成像,信号,和杂项。对于每个类别,我们报告了两种疾病检测方法及其性能。
    结果:我们发现,在14项综述的研究中,医学成像被用作自动阻塞性气道疾病检测的数据。在13项研究中使用了遗传和生理信号。在9项和7项研究中使用了医疗记录和气流,分别。大多数论文都是在2020年发表的,我们发现机器学习(ML)方面的工作是深度学习(DL)的三倍。统计分析表明,与ML相比,DL技术具有更高的准确性(ACC)。卷积神经网络(CNN)是最常见的DL分类器,支持向量机(SVM)是最广泛使用的ML分类器。在我们的审查中,我们仅发现了两个公开的哮喘和COPD数据集.大多数研究使用私人临床数据集,所以数据大小和数据组成是不一致的。
    结论:我们的综述结果表明,人工智能(AI)可以提高健康专业人员在COPD和哮喘诊断过程中的决策质量和效率。然而,我们在这篇综述中发现了几个局限性,例如缺乏数据集的一致性,有限的数据集和远程监测没有得到充分探索.我们呼吁社会接受和信任计算机辅助的气流阻塞疾病诊断,并鼓励卫生专业人员与人工智能科学家密切合作,在临床实践和医院环境中促进自动检测。
    OBJECTIVE: Obstructive airway diseases, including asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), are two of the most common chronic respiratory health problems. Both of these conditions require health professional expertise in making a diagnosis. Hence, this process is time intensive for healthcare providers and the diagnostic quality is subject to intra- and inter- operator variability. In this study we investigate the role of automated detection of obstructive airway diseases to reduce cost and improve diagnostic quality.
    METHODS: We investigated the existing body of evidence and applied Preferred Reporting Items for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to search records in IEEE, Google scholar, and PubMed databases. We identified 65 papers that were published from 2013 to 2022 and these papers cover 67 different studies. The review process was structured according to the medical data that was used for disease detection. We identified six main categories, namely air flow, genetic, imaging, signals, and miscellaneous. For each of these categories, we report both disease detection methods and their performance.
    RESULTS: We found that medical imaging was used in 14 of the reviewed studies as data for automated obstructive airway disease detection. Genetics and physiological signals were used in 13 studies. Medical records and air flow were used in 9 and 7 studies, respectively. Most papers were published in 2020 and we found three times more work on Machine Learning (ML) when compared to Deep Learning (DL). Statistical analysis shows that DL techniques achieve higher Accuracy (ACC) when compared to ML. Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is the most common DL classifier and Support Vector Machine (SVM) is the most widely used ML classifier. During our review, we discovered only two publicly available asthma and COPD datasets. Most studies used private clinical datasets, so data size and data composition are inconsistent.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our review results indicate that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can improve both decision quality and efficiency of health professionals during COPD and asthma diagnosis. However, we found several limitations in this review, such as a lack of dataset consistency, a limited dataset and remote monitoring was not sufficiently explored. We appeal to society to accept and trust computer aided airflow obstructive diseases diagnosis and we encourage health professionals to work closely with AI scientists to promote automated detection in clinical practice and hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:加热指南,通风,和空调系统已经开发了不同的设置。然而,缺乏为供暖提供具体建议的最新证据,通风,和隔离室的空调系统,这对于适当指导感染控制政策至关重要。这项范围审查旨在强调供暖指南,通风,和隔离室的空调系统,以告知相关利益相关者和政策制定者。
    方法:基于JoannaBriggs方法,使用五个数据库(CINAHL,EMBASE,乔安娜·布里格斯研究所,Medline,和WebofScience)和网站。本评论包括政府部门发表的八篇文章。
    结果:大多数研究建议无再循环的受控气流,每小时换气12次,高效微粒空气滤液排出空气隔离室内的污染空气,湿度≤60%,温度范围为18-30℃。
    结论:这篇综述强调了加热,通风,和空调系统指南各国的一致性。这提供了进一步的证据,表明需要跨学科合作研究来量化加热的最佳范围,通风,和空调系统参数,考虑到门的类型,前厅,和床位管理,有效减少隔离室感染的传播。
    Guidelines for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems have been developed for different settings. However, there is a lack of up-to-date evidence providing concrete recommendations for the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems of an isolation room, which is essential to appropriately guide infection control policies. To highlight the guidelines for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems in isolation rooms to inform relevant stakeholders and policymakers. A systematic search was performed based on Joanna Briggs Methodology using five databases (CINAHL, Embase, Joanna Briggs Institute, Medline, and Web of Science) and websites. Eight articles published by government departments were included in this review. Most studies recommended controlled airflow without recirculation, 12 air changes per hour, high-efficiency particulate air filtrate to exhaust contaminated air from the airborne isolation room, humidity ≤60%, and temperature in the range of 18-30 °C. This review provides further evidence that there is a need for interdisciplinary collaborative research to quantify the optimum range for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system parameters, considering door types, anterooms, and bed management, to effectively reduce the transmission of infection in isolation rooms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:机械通气(MV)的个性化优化在现代重症监护医学中仍然很麻烦。电脑化,基于模型的支持系统可以帮助调整MV设置以适应MV和个体患者病理生理学之间的复杂相互作用。因此,我们批判性地评估了目前关于ICU中个性化MV的计算生理模型(CPM)的文献,重点是质量,可用性,和临床准备。
    方法:于2023年2月13日在MEDLINEALL进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,Scopus和WebofScience确定描述ICU中个性化MV的CPM的原始研究文章。模拟的生理现象,临床应用,并提取了准备水平。根据美国机械工程师协会(ASME)标准评估模型设计报告和验证的质量。
    结果:在6,333份独特出版物中,共有149份出版物。自1970年代以来,随着准备水平的提高,CPM出现了。共有131篇文章(88%)模拟肺力学,主要用于肺保护性通气。气体交换(n=38,26%)和气体稳态(n=36,24%)模型主要用于控制氧合和通气。最近出现了膈肌保护性通气的呼吸肌功能模型(n=3,2%)。启动了三项随机对照试验,应用Beacon和CURESoft模型进行气体交换和PEEP优化。总的来说,在93%和21%的文章中,模型设计和质量报告不令人满意,分别。
    结论:CPM正朝着临床应用的方向发展,作为优化个性化MV的可解释工具。促进临床应用,质量评估和模型报告的专用标准至关重要。试用注册号PROSPERO-CRD42022301715。2月5日注册,2022年。
    Individualised optimisation of mechanical ventilation (MV) remains cumbersome in modern intensive care medicine. Computerised, model-based support systems could help in tailoring MV settings to the complex interactions between MV and the individual patient\'s pathophysiology. Therefore, we critically appraised the current literature on computational physiological models (CPMs) for individualised MV in the ICU with a focus on quality, availability, and clinical readiness.
    A systematic literature search was conducted on 13 February 2023 in MEDLINE ALL, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science to identify original research articles describing CPMs for individualised MV in the ICU. The modelled physiological phenomena, clinical applications, and level of readiness were extracted. The quality of model design reporting and validation was assessed based on American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) standards.
    Out of 6,333 unique publications, 149 publications were included. CPMs emerged since the 1970s with increasing levels of readiness. A total of 131 articles (88%) modelled lung mechanics, mainly for lung-protective ventilation. Gas exchange (n = 38, 26%) and gas homeostasis (n = 36, 24%) models had mainly applications in controlling oxygenation and ventilation. Respiratory muscle function models for diaphragm-protective ventilation emerged recently (n = 3, 2%). Three randomised controlled trials were initiated, applying the Beacon and CURE Soft models for gas exchange and PEEP optimisation. Overall, model design and quality were reported unsatisfactory in 93% and 21% of the articles, respectively.
    CPMs are advancing towards clinical application as an explainable tool to optimise individualised MV. To promote clinical application, dedicated standards for quality assessment and model reporting are essential. Trial registration number PROSPERO- CRD42022301715 . Registered 05 February, 2022.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:为了确定哪种呼气末正压(PEEP)滴定法更有用,并为基于电阻抗断层扫描(EIT)的个体PEEP设置的临床影响建立证据基础,这似乎是优化急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者PEEP的有希望的方法。
    方法:系统综述和荟萃分析。
    方法:4个数据库(PUBMED,EMBASE,网络科学,和Cochrane图书馆)从1980年到2020年12月进行。
    方法:ARDS患者的随机临床试验。
    方法:PaO2/FiO2比值和呼吸系统顺应性。
    UNASSIGNED:使用Cochrane风险和偏倚工具评估研究质量。
    结果:8项试验,包括222名参与者,有资格进行分析。荟萃分析表明,与其他PEEP滴定策略相比,接受较高PaO2/FiO2比值的患者具有显著的基于EIT的个体PEEP设置[5项试验,202名患者,SMD0.636,(95%CI0.364-0.908)]。与其他窥视滴定策略相比,EIT驱动的PEEP滴定策略并未显着提高呼吸系统的依从性。[7试验,202名患者,SMD-0.085,(95%CI-0.342至0.172)]。
    结论:在安慰剂对照试验中,PEEP滴定与EIT对ARDS临床结局的益处可能源于EIT的可见区域通气。这些发现为临床医生和利益相关者提供了基于EIT的个人PEEP设置的安全性和有效性的全面评估和高质量证据,作为接受ARDS患者的首选选择。
    To determine which method of Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration is more useful, and to establish an evidence base for the clinical impact of Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) based individual PEEP setting which appears to be a promising method to optimize PEEP in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) patients.
    A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    4 databases (PUBMED, EMBASE, Web Of Science, and the Cochrane Library) from 1980 to December 2020 were performed.
    Randomized clinical trials patients with ARDS.
    PaO2/FiO2-ratio and respiratory system compliance.
    The quality of the studies was assessed with the Cochrane risk and bias tool.
    8 trials, including a total of 222 participants, were eligible for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrates a significantly EIT-based individual PEEP setting for patients receiving higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio as compared to other PEEP titration strategies [5 trials, 202 patients, SMD 0.636, (95% CI 0.364-0.908)]. EIT-drived PEEP titration strategy did not significantly increase respiratory system compliance when compared to other peep titration strategies, [7 trials, 202 patients, SMD -0.085, (95% CI -0.342 to 0.172)].
    The benefits of PEEP titration with EIT on clinical outcomes of ARDS in placebo-controlled trials probably result from the visible regional ventilation of EIT. These findings offer clinicians and stakeholders a comprehensive assessment and high-quality evidence for the safety and efficacy of the EIT-based individual PEEP setting as a superior option for patients who undergo ARDS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    打哈欠是一种刻板的复杂肌肉运动,通常由大多数脊椎动物执行。在几秒钟内,整个气道完全扩张,周围的肌肉有力地伸展,最突出的是咽部。迄今为止,打哈欠很少被研究,到目前为止,还没有就其主要功能达成共识。
    为了研究打哈欠的机械气道功能,进行了文献检索,以联系打哈欠的频率和气道阻塞情况。
    结果表明,阻塞性气道状况的变化和打哈欠频率的改变在时间上是相关的。
    这些关系,然而,不能解释为因果关系,也不能推断它们来解释打哈欠的功能。然而,气道管理和打哈欠共有许多生理特征。因此,我们提出了一个新的假设:打哈欠通过肌肉重新定位和加宽气道管腔在气道生理学中起着重要作用,从而确保长期氧合。
    Yawning is a stereotypical complex muscular movement and is commonly executed by most vertebrates. In seconds, the entire airway is fully dilated and surrounding muscles are powerfully stretched, most prominently around the pharynx. To date, yawning has been rarely studied, and as of yet there is no consensus on its main function.
    To investigate a mechanical airway function for yawning, a literature search was conducted to relate the frequency of yawning and obstructive airway conditions.
    The results show that changes in obstructive airway conditions and alteration of the frequency of yawning are temporally related.
    These relationships, however, cannot be interpreted as causal, nor can they be extrapolated to explain the function of yawning. Yet airway management and yawning share many physiological characteristics. We therefore propose a novel hypotheses: yawning plays a significant role in airway physiology by muscle repositioning and widening the airway lumen, thereby securing long-term oxygenation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    当代关于“体现情感”的研究强调了身体在情感感觉中的作用。证据基于相互感觉,可以说是体现情感研究中最突出的部分,强调心脏,呼吸系统和胃肠道系统。反过来,人际感觉与改善的情绪调节具有基于证据的联系。尽管专注于独立的身体系统,尚不清楚特定的交互感受位置是否在情绪感觉和情绪调节中发挥更大的作用。Further,根据Gross\'\“流程模型\”,情绪调节越早发生,越好;因此,此外,识别要激活的第一个身体区域也很重要。这些问题将在两阶段综合审查中进行调查。第一阶段是初步的,概述了证据基础,以突出测量的身体区域的分布。这表明86%的出版物(n=88)测量了心脏活动,26%的人测量了呼吸系统,百分之六的胃肠系统。鉴于在交互感觉理论和情感研究中对所有三个系统的重视,这表明缺乏与感觉位置有关的全面发现。第二阶段调查了在身体中感受到情感感受的核心问题以及与时间相关的调节含义。这是基于十个文本,这表明头部,喉咙和胸部是在众多情感环境中最一致检测到的位置。需要注意,然而,由于在讨论的其他原因中,测量在这些出版物中没有时间限制,只有少数病例发现了直接的生理测量。
    Contemporary research on \"embodied emotion\" emphasizes the role of the body in emotional feeling. The evidence base on interoception, arguably the most prominent strand of embodied emotion research, places emphasis on the cardiac, respiratory and gastrointestinal systems. In turn, interoception has evidence-based links with improved emotion regulation. Despite the focus on separate bodily systems, it is unclear whether particular interoceptive locations play a greater role in emotional feeling and emotion regulation. Further, according to Gross\' \"process model\", the sooner that regulation of an emotion occurs, the better; hence, it is additionally important to identify the first body areas to activate. These issues are investigated in a two-stage integrative review. The first stage was preliminary, giving an overview of the evidence base to highlight the distribution of measured body areas. This indicated that 86% of publications (n = 88) measured cardiac activity, 26% measured the respiratory system, and six percent the gastrointestinal system. Given the emphasis placed on all three systems in interoception theory and research on emotion, this suggests a dearth of comprehensive findings pertaining to feeling locations. The second stage investigated the core issues of where emotional feelings are felt in the body and time-related implications for regulation. This was based on ten texts, which together suggested that the head, throat and chest are the most consistently detected locations across and within numerous emotional contexts. Caution is required, however, since-among other reasons discussed-measurement was not time-restricted in these latter publications, and direct physiological measurement was found in only a minority of cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由医疗程序产生的气溶胶传播SARS-CoV-2的风险令人担忧。
    目的:评估与气道抽吸或诱发咳嗽/打喷嚏相关的气雾剂产生和呼吸道感染传播的证据。
    方法:本综述由PRISMA指南提供。在PubMed中对1月1日之间发表的研究进行了搜索,2003年10月6日,2020年。纳入的研究检查了是否插入鼻胃管,肺功能检查,鼻内窥镜检查,吞咽困难评估,或吸入气道清除导致SARS-CoV-2,SARS-CoV,MERS,或流感。偏差风险评估侧重于测量的稳健性,控制混杂,和临床实践的适用性。
    结果:共纳入18项主要研究和2项系统综述。三项流行病学研究发现,鼻胃管插入与呼吸道感染之间没有关联。一项模拟研究发现,与肺肺功能测试相关的气溶胶产量低/非常低。对内窥镜鼻窦手术的七项模拟研究表明,气溶胶显着增加,但结果不一致;两项临床研究发现,空气中的颗粒与微清创器/钻头的使用有关。一些模拟研究没有使用强大的措施来检测颗粒,并且很难等同于临床条件。
    结论:没有证据表明审查中包括的手术与呼吸道感染传播风险增加相关。为了更好地制定预防措施以降低风险,需要更多的研究来确定增加SARS-CoV-2传播风险的医疗程序和患者的特征。
    BACKGROUND: The risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from aerosols generated by medical procedures is a cause for concern.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence for aerosol production and transmission of respiratory infection associated with procedures that involve airway suctioning or induce coughing/sneezing.
    METHODS: The review was informed by PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed for studies published between January 1st, 2003 and October 6th, 2020. Included studies examined whether nasogastric tube insertion, lung function tests, nasendoscopy, dysphagia assessment, or suctioning for airway clearance result in aerosol generation or transmission of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS, or influenza. Risk of bias assessment focused on robustness of measurement, control for confounding, and applicability to clinical practice.
    RESULTS: Eighteen primary studies and two systematic reviews were included. Three epidemiological studies found no association between nasogastric tube insertion and acquisition of respiratory infections. One simulation study found low/very low production of aerosols associated with pulmonary lung function tests. Seven simulation studies of endoscopic sinus surgery suggested significant increases in aerosols but findings were inconsistent; two clinical studies found airborne particles associated with the use of microdebriders/drills. Some simulation studies did not use robust measures to detect particles and are difficult to equate to clinical conditions.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was an absence of evidence to suggest that the procedures included in the review were associated with an increased risk of transmission of respiratory infection. In order to better target precautions to mitigate risk, more research is required to determine the characteristics of medical procedures and patients that increase the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    屏息潜水是人类自古以来从事的一项活动,以寻找资源,提供支持和支持军事行动。在现代,屏气潜水作为一项竞技和休闲运动,继续受到欢迎和认可。世界纪录的不断进步有些了不起,特别是考虑到极端的低氧血症和高碳酸血症,这些运动员承受的静水压力。然而,有大量的文献表明,到目前为止,人们还没有完全理解的窒息能力存在巨大的个体间差异。在这次审查中,我们探讨了呼吸暂停生理学的发展,并描述了可能支持这种变异的特征和机制。此外,我们试图强调与持续屏气训练相关的生理(正常)适应。屏气潜水员(BHD)比非潜水员表现出更明显的潜水反应。而精英BHD(EBHDs)在血液和骨骼肌中也显示出有益的适应性。重要的是,这些生理特征被证明主要受训练诱导刺激的影响.BHD暴露于独特的生理和环境压力源,并因此具有抵抗急性脑血管和神经元菌株的能力。这些特征是否也是训练诱导的适应或遗传易感性的结果尚不确定。尽管定期屏气潜水活动的长期影响尚未从整体上确定,初步证据提出了认知方面的考虑,神经学,BHDs中的肾脏和骨骼健康。应在纵向研究中进一步探索这些领域,以更有信心地确定极端屏气活动的长期健康影响。
    Breath-hold diving is an activity that humans have engaged in since antiquity to forage for resources, provide sustenance and to support military campaigns. In modern times, breath-hold diving continues to gain popularity and recognition as both a competitive and recreational sport. The continued progression of world records is somewhat remarkable, particularly given the extreme hypoxaemic and hypercapnic conditions, and hydrostatic pressures these athletes endure. However, there is abundant literature to suggest a large inter-individual variation in the apnoeic capabilities that is thus far not fully understood. In this review, we explore developments in apnoea physiology and delineate the traits and mechanisms that potentially underpin this variation. In addition, we sought to highlight the physiological (mal)adaptations associated with consistent breath-hold training. Breath-hold divers (BHDs) are evidenced to exhibit a more pronounced diving-response than non-divers, while elite BHDs (EBHDs) also display beneficial adaptations in both blood and skeletal muscle. Importantly, these physiological characteristics are documented to be primarily influenced by training-induced stimuli. BHDs are exposed to unique physiological and environmental stressors, and as such possess an ability to withstand acute cerebrovascular and neuronal strains. Whether these characteristics are also a result of training-induced adaptations or genetic predisposition is less certain. Although the long-term effects of regular breath-hold diving activity are yet to be holistically established, preliminary evidence has posed considerations for cognitive, neurological, renal and bone health in BHDs. These areas should be explored further in longitudinal studies to more confidently ascertain the long-term health implications of extreme breath-holding activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Deaths occurring among agitated or violent individuals subjected to physical restraint have been attributed to positional asphyxia. Restraint in the prone position has been shown to alter respiratory and cardiac physiology, although this is thought not to be to the degree that would cause asphyxia in a healthy, adult individual. This comprehensive review identifies and summarizes the current scientific literature on prone position and restraint, including experiments that assess physiology on individuals restrained in a prone position. Some of these experimental approaches have attempted to replicate situations in which prone restraint would be used. Overall, most findings revealed that individuals subjected to physical prone restraint experienced a decrease in ventilation and/or cardiac output (CO) in prone restraint. Metabolic acidosis is noted with increased physical activity, in restraint-associated cardiac arrest and simulated encounters. A decrease in ventilation and CO can significantly worsen acidosis and hemodynamics. Given these findings, deaths associated with prone physical restraint are not the direct result of asphyxia but are due to cardiac arrest secondary to metabolic acidosis compounded by inadequate ventilation and reduced CO. As such, the cause of death in these circumstances would be more aptly referred to as \"prone restraint cardiac arrest\" as opposed to \"restraint asphyxia\" or \"positional asphyxia.\"
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Airway afferents monitor the local chemical and physical micro-environments in the airway wall and lungs and send this information centrally to regulate neural circuits involved in setting autonomic tone, evoking reflex and volitional respiratory motor outflows, encoding perceivable sensations and contributing to higher order cognitive processing. In this mini-review we present a current overview of the central wiring of airway afferent circuits in the brainstem and brain, highlighting recent discoveries that augment our understanding of airway sensory processing. We additionally explore how advances in describing the molecular diversity of airway afferents may influence future research efforts aimed at defining central mesoscale connectivity of airway afferent pathways. A refined understanding of how functionally distinct airway afferent pathways are organized in the brain will provide deeper insight into the physiology of airway afferent-evoked responses and may foster opportunities for targeted modulation of specific pathways involved in disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号