One of the resistant mechanisms of EGFR-TKIs is BRAF V600E mutation. Herein, we present the case of a 54-year-old Japanese female who underwent a right middle lobectomy for pathological stage IIB lung adenocarcinoma. One year and nine months after the surgery, she developed multiple intrapulmonary metastases. Osimertinib was administered due to EGFR exon 19 deletion. Although all intrapulmonary metastases had shrunk, the nodule at the superior segment of left lung enlarged after postoperative 4 years. The tumour was resected and BRAF V600E mutation and exon 19 deletion were detected. Three months after treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib instead of osimertinib, the remaining intrapulmonary metastases increased again. The continued growth of the metastatic foci even after EGFR-TKI may indicate an acquired resistance. Thus, a repeat biopsy will aid in confirming the new gene expression. It should have been necessary to administer an additional dose of dabrafenib and trametinib without discontinuing osimertinib.

UNASSIGNED: Despite significant benefits from targeted therapy in patients with driver mutations, inevitable drug resistance usually occurred in non-small cell lung cancer, highlighting the necessity for sequential treatments to prolong overall survival. Unfortunately, durable drug response has not been reported in posterior-line therapy of cases with acquired EML4-ALK fusion after resistance to osimertinib, urging the need of referable decision-making in clinical management.
UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a 71-year-old Chinese female, never smoker, diagnosed with invasive adenocarcinoma in the left inferior lobe of her lung, with metastases in regional lymph nodes. She received erlotinib treatment after the detection of coexistent EGFR L858R/G719S and BRAF V600E via next-generation sequencing of resected tumor tissue. Routine imaging revealed disease progression approximately 14 months after starting erlotinib treatment, followed by the detection of EGFR L858R through non-invasive liquid biopsy. Subsequently, osimertinib was administered, showing clinical activities for nearly 19 months until the emergence of an EML4-ALK fusion. Given the EML4-ALK fusion, a relatively rare resistance mechanism to osimertinib, she received third-line ensartinib treatment. One month later, alleviated tumor lesions plus normal serum marker levels demonstrated the effectiveness of ensartinib in overcoming resistance to osimertinib. Of note, the clinical response to ensartinib persisted for more than 14 months, superior to the previously reported efficacy of aletinib and crizotinib in osimertinib-failure cases. As of the last follow-up in July 2022, the patient showed no signs of recurrence and maintained a good life quality.
UNASSIGNED: We reported a third-line ensartinib therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma who developed an acquired EML4-ALK fusion after sequential treatment with erlotinib and osimertinib. Given the rarity of the EML4-ALK fusion as a resistance mechanism to osimertinib, ensartinib emerges as a promising treatment option for this specific clinical challenge, offering superior efficacy and good safety.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are the recommended treatment of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer but are prone to eventual drug resistance. Herein we report a 45-year-old Asian woman diagnosed with EML4-ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. Small cell lung cancer-like phenotypic transformation occurred when resistance to crizotinib treatment. Next-generation sequencing was performed and detected an ALK rearrangement co-existent with a TP53 gene mutation in the small cell specimens. The patient had a good response to alectinib with a progression-free survival >7 months. After disease progression, newly emerged ALK p.G1269A and p.L1196 M gene mutations co-existent with ALK rearrangement were detected. The patient had a good initial response to ceritinib treatment, which last for >12 months. After ceritinib failure, however, more complicated mutations within the ALK kinase domain (p.G1269A, p.L1196 M, newly emerged p.D1203 N, and p.L1122V) were detected. Ultimately, due to terminal rapid progression and resistance to lorlatinib, the overall survival was nearly 3 years. Our case showed that next-generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be an appropriate choice after transformation to small cell lung cancer and failure to one ALK-TKI. Sequential biopsies and gene mutation monitoring are important to arrange the sequence of different generation ALK-TKIs. Appropriate sequential therapies may yield a prolonged response with a satisfactory quality of life in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

HIP1-ALK is a relatively rare fusion pattern in ALK-rearranged NSCLC. Existing studies on the efficacy of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance mechanisms and treatment strategies in HIP1-ALK-rearranged lung cancer are limited. Here, we report the case of an 18-year-old man with HIP1-ALK-rearranged adenocarcinoma who developed BRAF V600E and V1180L mutations after ALK TKI therapy, in whom the administration of BRAF and MEK inhibitors was ineffective. Brigatinib was effective after chemotherapy with cytotoxic drugs. Development of effective treatments is desirable for rare variants of ALK-rearranged lung cancer after acquiring resistance to ALK TKIs.

Lung cancer stands as a leading cause of mortality in China, with EGFR mutations frequently identified as pivotal driver genes. Osimertinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting EGFR mutations, is typically employed as a first-line treatment for EGFR-sensitive mutations; nevertheless, resistance can emerge. In this case report, we present the case of a 53-year-old non-smoking male diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma bearing an EGFR exon 19 deletion. This patient eventually developed resistance to both Erlotinib and Osimertinib after 28 months of treatment. Subsequent genetic testing uncovered the emergence of new MET exon 14 skipping and MET fusion, coexisting with the initial EGFR exon 19 deletion. In light of this complex molecular profile, the patient was administered a combination therapy consisting of Osimertinib and Capmatinib. This novel approach yielded a partial response, and notably, the patient experienced a progression-free survival exceeding 7 months. Vigilant monitoring of the patient\'s progress revealed the disappearance of the MET exon 14 skipping and a notable improvement in the patient\'s symptoms. This case report underscores the potential efficacy of Osimertinib and Capmatinib combination therapy as a viable treatment strategy for patients harboring EGFR-mutated lung cancer who develop resistance to first-line EGFR inhibitors due to MET activation.

The single echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion is the most common variant of ALK rearrangements in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we firstly report that coexistence of a novel histone methyltransferase (SETD2)-ALK, EML4-ALK double-fusion is sensitive to alectinib as first-line therapy, and response to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy after resistant. The patient responded to alectinib as a first-line therapy and achieved progression-free survival (PFS) for 26 months. After resistance, liquid biopsy showed that the reason of drug resistance was the disappearance of SETD2-ALK and EML4-ALK fusion variants. In addition, chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy subsequently achieved a survival benefit of more than 25 months. Therefore, alectinib may be a viable therapeutic option for NSCLC patients with double ALK fusion and immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy may be a viable therapeutic option when double ALK fusion loss may be the mechanism of alectinib resistance.

UNASSIGNED: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease. To date, more than ninety ALK fusions in lung cancer have been found. Here, we report for the first time a rare LOC388942-ALK fusion in NSCLC was sensitive to crizotinib but resistant to the sequential ceritinib and alectinib and acquired classical ALK G1202R resistance mutation after long-term treatment with anlotinib. This case highlights dynamic monitoring of gene alteration using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is necessary during the anti-tumor process.
UNASSIGNED: A 55-year-old male, with no history of smoking history and no family history of cancer, was found malignant pleural effusion and multiple metastasis nodules in the left lung. He was histopathologically diagnosed with ALK-positive cT4N0M1a adenocarcinoma in June 2016. NGS of the tumor identified a rare LOC388942-ALK fusion (L intergenic: A 20, 1.41%). Then, the patient was treated with chemotherapy, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, and anlotinib sequentially. The patient achieved partial response (PR) to chemotherapy and crizotinib. No evidence of a secondary resistant molecular event was found after resistance to crizotinib, ceritinib, or Alectinib. After 8 months of alectinib treatment, the tumor gradually enlarged again. Anlotinib was followed for 13 months. Thirteen months later, new lesions in the lower lobe of the right lung appeared and increased gradually, indicating definite progression of the tumor. Classical ALK G1202R resistance mutations was detected using cfDNA NGS. The patient refused to receive lorlatinib targeting G1202R resistance mutations and continued with anlotinib. He dead in August 2022, achieving 5-year overall survival (OS).
UNASSIGNED: Distinct ALK fusions in NSCLC have different cancer biology, leading to different response to ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), even developed different resistance mechanism. Reporting the clinical details of rare ALK fusions in NSCLC is necessary to guide the treatment for clinicians and researchers.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cancer in the world. In recent years, the incidence of synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (SMPLC) has gradually increased. Surgery is the preferred method to treat these patients. The management of SMPLC patients who cannot tolerate surgical treatment is controversial. We report a rare case in which a 70-year-old Chinese woman with no history of smoking had three primary lung adenocarcinoma lesions. Two lesions had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletion mutations, and one lesion had the L858R mutation. After first-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, the three lesions all showed a good response until disease progression. After the corresponding drug treatments were given based on the different drug resistance mechanisms, good responsiveness was shown in each lessions. This case suggests that in the treatment of SMPLC, it is necessary to learn the molecular-biological information of each lesion due to the differences thereof, and a targeted treatment regimen should be developed on this basis.

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare hematological malignancy, which exhibits morphological and immunophenotypic features of histiocytes. A standard therapy for HS has not yet been established due to its rareness; therefore, disease control is not always possible. A multimodal treatment strategy has been suggested for HS. The present study reported on a case of a 43-year-old female patient who complained of left femoral pain, which was caused by left femoral bone mass. A biopsy of their left femoral bone tumor revealed that the patient had HS. Their sarcoma was localized in the femoral bone and was not considered to be curable, due to local infiltration of the bone tumor beyond the periosteum. The patient then underwent two types of HS-specific chemotherapy; however, both regimens were ineffective. As a result, they underwent radiation therapy at the sites of progressive disease. Because the HS cells of the patient expressed PD-L1, they were treated with nivolumab (240 mg/body, biweekly) for residual diseases in the right occipital bone, multiple lung nodules, intrapelvic right lymph node and primary site. Nivolumab treatment resulted in a complete response at all sites, with the exception of the primary site, which was confirmed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. The patient received additional nivolumab treatment as consolidation therapy for 1 year. In addition, residual disease of the femoral head was completely resected. The surgically resected refractory tumor revealed the tumor cells no longer pathologically expressed PD-L1 . In conclusion, for refractory and recurrent HS in which surgical resection is not appropriate, treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab, may be considered an optional but promising immunotherapy if the tumor histologically expresses PD-L1. The present study detected one of the refractory mechanisms of ICI treatment.

BACKGROUND: The poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib has displayed superior clinical effect in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with the homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes mutations. However, when a patient\'s tumor tissue volume is insufficient for genomic profiling of HRR gene mutations, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be useful in helping to determine and monitor the efficacy of olaparib, as well as in abiraterone-combination treatment, and for understanding any resistance mechanism related to such mutations.
METHODS: A 61-year-old man who was diagnosed with metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma was initially hormone sensitivity, showing high Gleason score (5 + 5 = 10) and absolute positive rate (14/14 biopsied specimens). Following failure of several standard therapies, the patient progressed to mCRPC. Surprisingly, the patient showed good response to olaparib-abiraterone-prednisone combination treatment (an androgen-deprivation therapy, provided as the \'final choice\' in China). Serum total prostate-specific antigen (TPSA) level reduced and symptoms remitted for 4 months. However, thereafter, serum TPSA levels began slowly increasing, indicating development of olaparib resistance. Subsequent comprehensive genomic profiling of ctDNA, screening 508 cancer-related genes by next-generation sequencing, identified 10 somatic variants as well as 3 copy number alterations. Two identified reverse missense mutations in partner and localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) may have recovered the reading frame, restoring function of the primary germline PALB2 mutation and causing resistance to the PARP inhibitor olaparib.
CONCLUSIONS: Reverse mutations in PALB2, discovered via genomic profiling of ctDNA, may represent a potential resistance mechanism against olaparib in mCRPC.