Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. In atherothrombotic MI (ST-elevation MI and type 1 non-ST-elevation MI), coronary artery occlusion leads to ischemia. Subsequent cardiomyocyte necrosis evolves over time as a wavefront within the territory at risk. The spectrum of ischemia and reperfusion injury is wide: it can be minimal in aborted MI or myocardial necrosis can be large and complicated by microvascular obstruction and reperfusion hemorrhage. Established risk scores and infarct classifications help with patient management but do not consider tissue injury characteristics. This document outlines the Canadian Cardiovascular Society classification of acute MI. It is an expert consensus formed on the basis of decades of data on atherothrombotic MI with reperfusion therapy. Four stages of progressively worsening myocardial tissue injury are identified: (1) aborted MI (no/minimal myocardial necrosis); (2) MI with significant cardiomyocyte necrosis, but without microvascular injury; (3) cardiomyocyte necrosis and microvascular dysfunction leading to microvascular obstruction (ie, \"no-reflow\"); and (4) cardiomyocyte and microvascular necrosis leading to reperfusion hemorrhage. Each stage reflects progression of tissue pathology of myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury from the previous stage. Clinical studies have shown worse remodeling and increase in adverse clinical outcomes with progressive injury. Notably, microvascular injury is of particular importance, with the most severe form (hemorrhagic MI) leading to infarct expansion and risk of mechanical complications. This classification has the potential to stratify risk in MI patients and lay the groundwork for development of new, injury stage-specific and tissue pathology-based therapies for MI.

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the heart failure (HF) which may follow are among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. As such, new therapeutic interventions are still needed to protect the heart against acute ischemia/reperfusion injury to reduce myocardial infarct size and prevent the onset of HF in patients presenting with AMI. However, the clinical translation of cardioprotective interventions that have proven to be beneficial in preclinical animal studies, has been challenging. One likely major reason for this failure to translate cardioprotection into patient benefit is the lack of rigorous and systematic in vivo preclinical assessment of the efficacy of promising cardioprotective interventions prior to their clinical evaluation. To address this, we propose an in vivo set of step-by-step criteria for IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (\'IMPACT\'), for investigators to consider adopting before embarking on clinical studies, the aim of which is to improve the likelihood of translating novel cardioprotective interventions into the clinical setting for patient benefit.

Experimental small bowel transplantation (SBT) in rats has been proven to be a useful tool for the study of ischemia-reperfusion and immunological aspects related to solid organ transplantation. However, the model is not completely refined, specialized literature is scarce and complex technical details are typically omitted or confusing. Most studies related to acute rejection (AR) use the orthotopic standard, with small sample sizes due to its high mortality, whereas those studying chronic rejection (CR) use the heterotopic standard, which allows longer term survival but does not exactly reflect the human clinical scenario. Various animal strains have been used, and the type of rejection and the timing of its analysis differ among authors. The double purpose of this study was to develop an improved unusual AR model of SBT using the heterotopic technique, and to elaborate a guide useful to implement experimental models for studying AR. We analyzed the model\'s technical details and expected difficulties in overcoming the learning curve for such a complex microsurgical model, identifying the potential problem areas and providing a step-by-step protocol and reference guide for future surgeons interested in the topic. We also discuss the historic and more recent options in the literature.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

The 22 supersetnd Hohenheim Consensus Workshop took place in at the University of Stuttgart-Hohenheim. The subject of this conference was vitamin C and its role in the treatment of endothelial dysfunction. Scientists, who had published and reviewed scientific and regulatory papers on that topic were invited, among them basic researchers, toxicologists, clinicians and nutritionists. The participants were presented with eleven questions, which were discussed and answered at the workshop, with the aim of summarising the current state of knowledge. The explicatory text accompanying the short answers was produced and agreed on after the conference and was backed up by corresponding references. The therapeutic relevance of administration of the physiological antioxidant vitamin C in high parenteral doses in Endothelial Dependent Pathophysiological Conditions (EDPC) was discussed. Endothelial dysfunction is defined as including disturbed endothelial dependant relaxation of resistance vessels, breakdown of the microvascular endothelial barrier and/or loss of anti-adhesive function. It occurs in severe burn injury, intoxications, acute hyperglycemia, sepsis, trauma, and ischemic-reperfusion tissue injury and is induced by oxidative stress. Reduced plasma ascorbate levels are a hallmark of oxidative stress and occur in severe burns, sepsis, severe trauma, intoxication, chemotherapy/radiotherapy and organ transplantation. Vitamin C directly enhances the activity of nitric oxide synthase, the acyl CoA oxidase system and inhibits the actions of proinflammatory lipids. There is experimental evidence that parenteral high-dose vitamin C restores endothelial function in sepsis. In vitro, supraphysiological concentrations (> 1mM) of ascorbate restore nitric oxide bioavailability and endothelial function. Only parenterally, can enough vitamin C be administered to combat oxidative stress. There is no evidence that parenteral vitamin C exerts prooxidant effects in humans. Theoretical concerns in relation to competitive interactions between vitamin C and glucose cellular uptake are probably only relevant for oxidised vitamin C (dehydroascorbate).

暂无摘要。