Reminder Systems

提醒系统
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Contemporary perioperative fasting guidelines aim to alleviate patient discomfort before surgery and enhance postoperative recovery whilst seeking to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia. The impact of a short message service (SMS) reminder on fasting guideline compliance is unknown. Therefore, we performed a retrospective observational study and quality improvement project aiming to quantify the extent of excessive and prolonged fasting, and then assessed the impact of a SMS reminder in reducing fasting times.
    METHODS: After ethics committee approval we performed a retrospective observational study investigating preoperative fasting times of adult patients undergoing elective surgery. First, we assessed whether the fasting guideline times were adhered to (Standard Care group). All patients received internationally recommended fasting guidelines in the form of a written hospital policy document. We then implemented an additional prompt via a mobile phone SMS 1 day prior to surgery containing a reminder of fasting guideline times (SMS group). The primary aims were to compare fasting times between the Standard Care group and the SMS group.
    RESULTS: The fasting times of 160 patients in the Standard Care group and 110 patients in the SMS group were evaluated. Adherence to the fasting guidelines for solids occurred in 14 patients (8.8%) in the Standard Care group vs. Twenty-two patients (13.6%) in the SMS group (p=0.01). Adherence to the fasting guidelines for fluids occurred in 4 patients (2.5%) in the Standard Care group vs. Ten patients (6.3%) in the SMS group (p=0.023). Patients in the Standard Care group had a longer median (inter-quartile range (IQR)) fasting time for fluids compared the SMS group [6.5 h (IQR 4.5:11) vs 3.5 h (IQR 3:8.5), p< 0.0001]. Median fasting times for solids were 11 h (IQR 7:14) in the Standard Care group and 11.5 h (IQR 7:13.5) in the SMS group (p=0.756).
    CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to internationally recommended fasting guidelines for patients undergoing elective surgery is poor. The introduction of a fasting guideline reminder via a mobile phone SMS in addition to a written hospital policy improved adherence to fasting advice and reduced the fasting times for fluids but not for solids. The use of an SMS reminder of fasting guidelines is a simple, feasible, low-cost, and effective tool in minimising excessive fasting for fluids among elective surgical patients.
    BACKGROUND: ACTRN12619001232123 (Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry). Registered 6th September 2019 (retrospectively registered).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    推动干预是那些试图改变社会和物理环境,以增强与个人内在价值观相一致的潜意识行为能力的干预措施。没有积极限制选择。本研究旨在描述微推策略对临床医生实施健康相关指南的应用和影响。相关Cochrane系统评价中包含的研究中的政策和实践。
    由于描述轻推的术语多种多样,本研究审查了相关系统综述中的研究.进行了两个阶段的筛选过程,首先,我们对2016年至2018年在Cochrane图书馆发表的所有系统综述进行了筛选,以确定纳入量化研究的综述,以改善医疗保健提供者指南的实施.其次,如果相关系统综述中的个别研究是(i)随机对照试验(RCT),(Ii)在至少一个干预部门中包括推动策略,和(iii)明确旨在改善临床医生的执行行为。我们将推动策略归类为启动策略,显著性和影响,默认值,激励机制,承诺和自我,以及基于Mindspace框架的规范和信使。
    计算使用每种微动策略的试验次数和百分比。由于巨大的异质性,我们没有进行荟萃分析.相反,我们计算了研究内点估计和95%置信区间,并使用计票方法来探索效果。
    纳入7项综述,包括42项试验报告57项结果。最常见的推动策略是启动(69%),然后规范和信使(40%)。在57项成果中,86%的人在假设的方向上对临床医生的行为有影响,其中53%具有统计学意义。对于连续的结果,中位效应大小为0.39(0.22,0.45),而二分法结局的中位赔率为1.62(1.13,2.76).
    这项对Cochrane系统评价中包含的42项随机对照试验的综述发现,轻推策略对临床医生行为的影响至少与其他旨在实施循证指南的干预措施相当。虽然不确定性仍然存在,该审查为正在进行的关于评估和应用微推干预措施以支持提供者行为改变的调查提供了理由.
    此评论未进行前瞻性注册。
    Nudge interventions are those that seek to modify the social and physical environment to enhance capacity for subconscious behaviours that align with the intrinsic values of an individual, without actively restricting options. This study sought to describe the application and effects of nudge strategies on clinician implementation of health-related guidelines, policies and practices within studies included in relevant Cochrane systematic reviews.
    As there is varied terminology used to describe nudge, this study examined studies within relevant systematic reviews. A two-stage screening process was undertaken where, firstly, all systematic reviews published in the Cochrane Library between 2016 and 2018 were screened to identify reviews that included quantitative studies to improve implementation of guidelines among healthcare providers. Secondly, individual studies within relevant systematic reviews were included if they were (i) randomised controlled trials (RCTs), (ii) included a nudge strategy in at least one intervention arm, and (iii) explicitly aimed to improve clinician implementation behaviour. We categorised nudge strategies into priming, salience and affect, default, incentives, commitment and ego, and norms and messenger based on the Mindspace framework.
    The number and percentage of trials using each nudge strategy was calculated. Due to substantial heterogeneity, we did not undertake a meta-analysis. Instead, we calculated within-study point estimates and 95% confidence intervals, and used a vote-counting approach to explore effects.
    Seven reviews including 42 trials reporting on 57 outcomes were included. The most common nudge strategy was priming (69%), then norms and messenger (40%). Of the 57 outcomes, 86% had an effect on clinician behaviour in the hypothesised direction, and 53% of those were statistically significant. For continuous outcomes, the median effect size was 0.39 (0.22, 0.45), while for dichotomous outcomes the median Odds Ratio was 1.62 (1.13, 2.76).
    This review of 42 RCTs included in Cochrane systematic reviews found that the impact of nudge strategies on clinician behaviour was at least comparable to other interventions targeting implementation of evidence-based guidelines. While uncertainty remains, the review provides justification for ongoing investigation of the evaluation and application of nudge interventions to support provider behaviour change.
    This review was not prospectively registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Health care professionals (HCPs) use clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to make evidence-informed decisions regarding patient care. Although a large number of cancer-related CPGs exist, it is unknown which CPG dissemination and implementation strategies are effective for improving HCP behaviour and patient outcomes in a cancer care context. This review aimed to determine the effectiveness of CPG dissemination and/or implementation strategies among HCPs in a cancer care context.
    A comprehensive search of five electronic databases was conducted. Studies were limited to the dissemination and/or implementation of a CPG targeting both medical and/or allied HCPs in cancer care. Two reviewers independently coded strategies using the Mazza taxonomy, extracted study findings, and assessed study quality.
    The search strategy identified 33 studies targeting medical and/or allied HCPs. Across the 33 studies, 23 of a possible 49 strategies in the Mazza taxonomy were used, with a mean number of 3.25 (SD = 1.45) strategies per intervention. The number of strategies used per intervention was not associated with positive outcomes. Educational strategies (n = 24), feedback on guideline compliance (n = 11), and providing reminders (n = 10) were the most utilized strategies. When used independently, providing reminders and feedback on CPG compliance corresponded with positive significant changes in outcomes. Further, when used as part of multi-strategy interventions, group education and organizational strategies (e.g. creation of an implementation team) corresponded with positive significant changes in outcomes.
    Future CPG dissemination and implementation interventions for cancer care HCPs may benefit from utilizing the identified strategies. Research in this area should aim for better alignment between study objectives, intervention design, and evaluation measures, and should seek to incorporate theory in intervention design, so that behavioural antecedents are considered and measured; doing so would enhance the field\'s understanding of the causal mechanisms by which interventions lead, or do not lead, to changes in outcomes at all levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于不良心血管事件的风险增加,指南建议对所有外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者进行他汀类药物治疗。在美国东南部的一家血管诊所发现缺乏对这些指南的遵守。这个以执业护士为主导的质量改进项目的目的是增加在该诊所开具他汀类药物的下肢PAD患者的百分比。基线数据是通过图表审查获得的。使用计划-做-研究-行动(PDSA)模型,我们在临床中实施了一个描述循证算法的纸质工具,持续6周,以提高对指南的认识(PDSA第1周期).接下来,在接下来的6周(PDSA第2周期),在电子健康记录中实施了电子弹出提醒.在整个过程中收集数据并进行分析,以确定任一干预措施是否增加了服用他汀类药物的PAD患者的数量。基线数据显示,只有54.16%的患者服用他汀类药物。PDSA第1周期后,平均70.8%的患者服用他汀类药物。PDSA第2周期显示平均73.3%的患者服用他汀类药物。进行方差分析并显示组间的统计学意义(P=.003)。算法的基线和实现以及弹出窗口的基线和实现之间存在统计意义,但不是在两次干预之间。这些发现与研究表明算法和电子提醒可以提高医务人员对指南的认识是一致的。这些干预措施的标准化增强了提供者对指南的依从性,并最终改善了患者的预后。
    Guidelines recommend statin therapy for all patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) due to the increased risk of adverse cardiovascular events. A lack of adherence to these guidelines was identified at a vascular clinic located in the southeastern United States. The aim of this nurse practitioner-led quality improvement project was to increase the percentage of patients with lower extremity PAD who were prescribed a statin medication at this clinic. Baseline data were obtained via a chart review. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model, a paper tool depicting an evidence-based algorithm was implemented in the clinic for 6 weeks to increase awareness of guidelines (PDSA cycle 1). Next, an electronic pop-up reminder was implemented in the electronic health record for the following 6 weeks (PDSA cycle 2). Data were collected throughout the process and analyzed to determine if either intervention increased the number of patients with PAD who were prescribed a statin medication. Baseline data revealed only 54.16% of patients were on a statin medication. After PDSA cycle 1, an average of 70.8% of patients were on a statin medication. PDSA cycle 2 revealed an average of 73.3% of patients were taking a statin medication. ANOVA was conducted and showed statistical significance between the groups (P = .003). There was statistical significance between baseline and implementation of the algorithm and baseline and implementation of the pop-up, but not between the 2 interventions. These findings are consistent with research suggesting algorithms and electronic reminders may increase medical staff awareness of guidelines. Standardization of these interventions enhanced provider adherence to guidelines and ultimately improved patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管肺炎球菌疾病的负担很高,肺炎球菌疫苗覆盖率继续低于2020年健康人的目标。与仅健康维护通知相比,使用准实验设计来调查有和没有工作流程重新设计的肺炎球菌特异性最佳实践警报(BPA)的影响。关于高危和高危成年人的肺炎球菌疫苗接种率,以及65岁以上有免疫能力的成年人的系列完成。
    方法:这项回顾性研究使用电子健康记录和管理数据,使用2013年至2017年在犹他大学健康相关诊所就诊的19岁以上成年人的横断面和历史队列,确定肺炎球菌疫苗接种。差异(DD)分析用于评估干预措施在三个观察期的影响(基线,临时,并跟进)。通过纵向分析来衡量老年人对2剂疫苗接种时间表的依从性。
    结果:在DD分析中,实施工作流程重新设计和双酚A将疫苗接种率提高了8个百分点(pp)(P<0.001),实施双酚A仅将疫苗接种率提高了7pp.(P<0.001)在19-64岁的高危成年人中,相对于实施健康维护通知(即,常规护理)仅在比较诊所。在19-64岁的高危成年人中,相对于健康维护通知,有或没有重新设计工作流程的双酚A对从基线到随访的疫苗接种率均无显著影响.根据DD分析,在65岁以上的免疫功能正常和免疫功能低下的成年人中,BPA的作用是混合的.然而,在实施BPA加健康维护通知和工作流程重新设计的诊所就诊的有免疫能力的老年人接受第二次肺炎球菌剂量的几率(赔率(OR)1.94;P=0.0003,95%CI1.24,3.01)比在常规诊所就诊的患者高1.94倍(即无干预)。
    结论:在重新设计和不重新设计工作流程的情况下,反映当前指南的肺炎球菌BPA工具提高了19-64岁高危成年人的疫苗接种率,并增加了65岁以上成年人完成推荐的2剂系列的可能性。然而,在其他成年患者群体中,BPA与肺炎球菌疫苗接种率的改善并不一致.
    BACKGROUND: Despite the high burden of pneumococcal disease, pneumococcal vaccine coverage continues to fall short of Healthy People 2020 goals. A quasi-experimental design was used to investigate the impact of pneumococcal-specific best-practice alerts (BPAs) with and without workflow redesign compared to health maintenance notifications only, on pneumococcal vaccination rates in at-risk and high-risk adults, and on series completion in immunocompetent adults aged 65+ years.
    METHODS: This retrospective study used electronic health record and administrative data to identify pneumococcal vaccinations using cross sectional and historical cohorts of adults age 19+ years from 2013 to 2017 who attended clinics associated with the University of Utah Health. Difference-in-differences (DD) analyses was used to assess the impact of interventions across three observation periods (Baseline, Interim, and Follow Up). Adherence to the 2-dose vaccination schedule in older adults was measured through a longitudinal analysis.
    RESULTS: In DD analyses, implementing both workflow redesign and the BPA raised the vaccination rate by 8 percentage points (pp) (P < 0.001) and implementing the BPA only raised the rate by 7 pp. (P < 0.001) among at-risk adults age 19-64 years, relative to implementing health maintenance notifications (i.e., usual care) only in comparison clinics. In high-risk adults age 19-64 years, the BPA with or without workflow redesign did not significantly affect vaccination rates from baseline to follow up relative to health maintenance notifications. Per DD analyses, the effect of the BPA was mixed in immunocompetent and immunocompromised adults age 65+ years. However, immunocompetent older adults attending a clinic that implemented the BPA plus health maintenance notifications and workflow redesign (all 3 interventions) had 1.94 times higher odds (Odds ratio (OR) 1.94; P = 0.0003, 95% CI 1.24, 3.01) to receive the second pneumococcal dose than patients attending a usual practice clinic (i.e., no intervention).
    CONCLUSIONS: A pneumococcal BPA tool that reflects current guidelines implemented with and without workflow redesign improved vaccination rates for at-risk adults age 19-64 years and increased the likelihood of adults aged 65+ to complete the recommended 2-dose series. However, in other adult patient groups, the BPA was not consistently associated with improvements in pneumococcal vaccination rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To check if mobile health (m-Health) short message service (SMS) can improve the knowledge and practice of the American Diabetic Association preventive care guidelines (ADA guidelines) recommendations among physicians.
    Quasi-experimental pre-post study design with a control group.
    The participants of the study were 62 medical officers/medical postgraduate trainees from two hospitals in Lahore, Pakistan. Pretested questionnaire was used to collect baseline information about physicians\' knowledge and adherence according to the ADA guidelines. All the respondents attended 1-day workshop about the guidelines. The intervention group received regular reminders by SMS about the ADA guidelines for the next 5 months. Postintervention knowledge and practice scores of 13 variables were checked again using the same questionnaire. Statistical analysis included χ2 and McNemar\'s tests for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. Pearson\'s correlation analysis was done to check correlation between knowledge and practice scores in the intervention group. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
    The total number of participating physicians was 62. Fifty-three (85.5%) respondents completed the study. Composite scores within the intervention group showed statistically significant improvement in knowledge (p<0.001) and practice (p<0.001) postintervention. The overall composite scores preintervention and postintervention also showed statistically significant difference of improvement in knowledge (p=0.002) and practice (p=0.001) between non-intervention and intervention groups. Adherence to individual 13 ADA preventive care guidelines level was noted to be suboptimal at baseline. Statistically significant improvement in the intervention group was seen in the following individual variables: review of symptoms of hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia, eye examination, neurological examination, lipid examination, referral to ophthalmologist, and counselling about non-smoking.
    m-Health technology can be a useful educational tool to help with improving knowledge and practice of diabetic guidelines. Future multicentre trials will help to scale this intervention for wider use in resource-limited countries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To increase the adherence of health professionals and cancer survivors to evidence-based physical exercise, effective implementation strategies (ISTs) are required.
    To examine to what extent these ISTs provide value for money and which IST has the highest expected value.
    The net benefit framework of health economic evaluations is used to conduct a value-of-implementation analysis of nine ISTs. Seven are directed to health professionals and two to cancer survivors. The analysis consists of four steps: 1) analyzing the expected value of perfect implementation (EVPIM); 2) assessing the estimated costs of the various ISTs; 3) comparing the ISTs\' costs with the EVPIM; and 4) assessing the total net benefit (TNB) of the ISTs. These steps are followed to identify which strategy has the greatest value.
    The EVPIM for physical exercise in the Netherlands is €293 million. The total costs for the ISTs range from €34,000 for printed educational materials for professionals to €120 million for financial incentives for patients, and thus all are cost-effective. The TNB of the ISTs that are directed to professionals ranges from €5.7 million for printed educational materials to €30.9 million for reminder systems. Of the strategies that are directed to patients, only the motivational program had a positive net benefit of €100.4 million.
    All the ISTs for cancer survivors, except for financial incentives, had a positive TNB. The largest improvements in adherence were created by a motivational program for patients, followed by a reminder system for professionals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要进行多年的筛查以优化降低结直肠癌(CRC)死亡率。然而,之前没有试验对获得长期依从性的策略进行比较.
    方法:增加结直肠癌筛查和随访的支持系统在华盛顿州的一个综合医疗保健组织中实施。在2008年至2009年之间,4675名年龄在50至74岁之间的人被随机分配接受常规护理(UC)。其中包括基于临床的策略来增加CRC筛查(第1组),或者,在第1年和第2年,用电话邮寄结肠镜检查和邮寄粪便检查(第2臂),邮件加简短的电话协助(第3组),或邮件和援助加上护士导航(手臂4)。仍有资格进行CRC筛查的积极干预受试者(第2、3和4组合并)被随机分配到第3年和第5年停止或继续邮寄。比较了分配给任何干预措施的人和分配给UC的人的5年以上符合CRC筛查的时间。筛查测试在国家筛查间隔指南的基础上贡献了时间(每年的粪便测试,乙状结肠镜检查每5年,每10年进行一次结肠镜检查)。
    结果:所有参与者都贡献了数据,但是他们在退伍时受到审查,死亡,76岁,或CRC的诊断。与UC参与者相比,干预参与者在5年内的调整后覆盖时间增加了31%(发病率比,1.31;95%置信区间,1.25-1.37;覆盖时间,47.5%对62.1%)。粪便测试几乎占了所有额外的覆盖时间。
    结论:在一个以诊所为基础的活动,以增加CRC筛查的卫生保健组织中,一个集中的计划导致5年以上CRC筛查依从性增加.需要有关筛查依从性及其对CRC结局影响的长期数据。癌症2017;123:4472-80。©2017美国癌症协会。
    BACKGROUND: Screening over many years is required to optimize reductions in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. However, no prior trials have compared strategies for obtaining long-term adherence.
    METHODS: Systems of Support to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening and Follow-Up was implemented in an integrated health care organization in Washington State. Between 2008 and 2009, 4675 individuals aged 50 to 74 years were randomized to receive the usual care (UC), which included clinic-based strategies to increase CRC screening (arm 1), or, in years 1 and 2, mailings with a call-in number for colonoscopy and mailed fecal tests (arm 2), mailings plus brief telephone assistance (arm 3), or mailings and assistance plus nurse navigation (arm 4). Active-intervention subjects (those in arms 2, 3, and 4 combined) who were still eligible for CRC screening were randomized to mailings being stopped or continued in years 3 and 5. The time in compliance with CRC screening over 5 years was compared for persons assigned to any intervention and persons assigned to UC. Screening tests contributed time on the basis of national guidelines for screening intervals (fecal tests annually, sigmoidoscopy every 5 years, and colonoscopy every 10 years).
    RESULTS: All participants contributed data, but they were censored at disenrollment, death, the age of 76 years, or a diagnosis of CRC. Compared with UC participants, intervention participants had 31% more adjusted covered time over 5 years (incidence rate ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.37; covered time, 47.5% vs 62.1%). Fecal testing accounted for almost all additional covered time.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a health care organization with clinic-based activities to increase CRC screening, a centralized program led to increased CRC screening adherence over 5 years. Longer term data on screening adherence and its impact on CRC outcomes are needed. Cancer 2017;123:4472-80. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Automated reminders are employed frequently to improve guideline adherence, but limitations of automated reminders are becoming more apparent. We studied the reasons for non-adherence in the setting of automated reminders to test the hypothesis that a separate request for a reason in itself may further improve guideline adherence.
    In a previously implemented automated reminder system on prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), we included additional automated reminders requesting a reason for non-adherence. We recorded these reasons in the pre-operative screening clinic, the OR and the PACU. We compared adherence to our PONV guideline in two study groups with a historical control group.
    Guideline adherence on prescribing and administering PONV prophylaxis (dexamethasone and granisetron) all improved compared to the historical control group (89 vs. 82% (p< 0.0001), 96 vs 95% (not significant) and 90 vs 82% (p<0.0001)) while decreasing unwarranted prescription for PONV prophylaxis (10 vs. 13 %). In the pre-operative screening clinic, the main reason for not prescribing PONV prophylaxis was disagreement with the risk estimate by the decision support system. In the OR/PACU, the main reasons for not administering PONV prophylaxis were: \'unintended non-adherence\' and \'failure to document\'.
    In this study requesting a reason for non-adherence is associated with improved guideline adherence. The effect seems to depend on the underlying reason for non-adherence. It also illustrates the importance of human factors principles in the design of decision support. Some reasons for non-adherence may not be influenced by automated reminders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床建议的自动解释是一项艰巨的任务,当它涉及复杂的时间约束的处理时,更是如此。为了解决这个问题,本文提出了一种基于web的系统。其基础模型提供了临床实践指南中时间约束的全面表示。通过一个案例研究显示了该模型的表现力和范围,该案例研究以结肠癌的诊断和管理临床实践指南为特征。所提出的模型足以表示指南中的时间约束,特别是那些定义周期性事件并对患者状态评估施加时间限制的事件。该基于网络的工具充当医疗保健专业人员的医疗保健助手,结合集中注意力和提供针对患者的建议的作用。
    The automatic interpretation of clinical recommendations is a difficult task, even more so when it involves the processing of complex temporal constraints. In order to address this issue, a web-based system is presented herein. Its underlying model provides a comprehensive representation of temporal constraints in Clinical Practice Guidelines. The expressiveness and range of the model are shown through a case study featuring a Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis and management of colon cancer. The proposed model was sufficient to represent the temporal constraints in the guideline, especially those that defined periodic events and placed temporal constraints on the assessment of patient states. The web-based tool acts as a health care assistant to health care professionals, combining the roles of focusing attention and providing patient-specific advice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号