Reddit

Reddit
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:COVID-19大流行影响了人们如何获得医疗服务,以及他们如何管理2型糖尿病(T2D)等慢性病。社交媒体论坛提供了定性数据的来源,以了解如何从患者的角度进行适应。
    目的:我们的目的是通过进行范围界定的文献综述,了解在大流行早期,T2D患者的求医行为和态度是如何受到影响的。第二个目标是将范围审查的结果与流行的社交媒体平台Reddit上显示的结果进行比较。
    方法:2021年进行了范围审查。纳入标准为T2D人群,研究以病人为中心,研究目标以健康行为为中心,疾病管理,或COVID-19大流行期间的心理健康结果。排除标准是患有其他非传染性疾病的人群,检查COVID-19与T2D的共病,T2D患者中COVID-19的临床治疗,患有T2D的人群中COVID-19的遗传表达,灰色文学,或者不是用英语发表的研究。通过与其他作者一起审查不确定性,可以减轻偏差。从研究中提取的数据被分为主题类别。根据我们的目标,这些类别反映了本研究的结果。下载了2020年3月至2021年3月初与T2D相关的Reddit论坛的数据,如果在大流行的背景下发布了帖子,则使用支持向量机进行分类。进行了潜在狄利克雷分配主题建模,以收集COVID-19大流行特有的讨论主题。
    结果:2020年2月至9月共进行了26项研究,由13,673名参与者组成。包括在这篇范围界定文献综述中。这些研究是定性的,主要依赖于来自调查或问卷的定性数据。从文献综述中发现的主题是“血糖控制较差,\"\"增加不健康食品的消费,“\”体力活动减少,\"\"无法访问医疗预约,\"和\"增加压力和焦虑。“Reddit论坛潜在的Dirichlet分配主题建模的结果是”应对不良的心理健康,\"\"接触医生和药物并控制血糖,\“\”在大流行期间改变饮食习惯,压力对血糖水平的影响,\"\"改变就业和保险状况,“和”COVID并发症的风险。\"
    结论:Reddit论坛评估的讨论主题提供了大流行对T2D患者影响的整体观点,这些发现与文献综述的结果相当。这项研究的局限性在于只有一名文献综述者,但是当存在不确定性时,咨询作者可以减轻偏见。Reddit表格的定性分析可以补充传统的T2D患者行为的定性研究。
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted how people accessed health services and likely how they managed chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes (T2D). Social media forums present a source of qualitative data to understand how adaptation might have occurred from the perspective of the patient.
    OBJECTIVE: Our objective is to understand how the care-seeking behaviors and attitudes of people living with T2D were impacted during the early part of the pandemic by conducting a scoping literature review. A secondary objective is to compare the findings of the scoping review to those presented on a popular social media platform Reddit.
    METHODS: A scoping review was conducted in 2021. Inclusion criteria were population with T2D, studies are patient-centered, and study objectives are centered around health behaviors, disease management, or mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusion criteria were populations with other noncommunicable diseases, examining COVID-19 as a comorbidity to T2D, clinical treatments for COVID-19 among people living with T2D, genetic expressions of COVID-19 among people living with T2D, gray literature, or studies not published in English. Bias was mitigated by reviewing uncertainties with other authors. Data extracted from the studies were classified into thematic categories. These categories reflect the findings of this study as per our objective. Data from the Reddit forums related to T2D from March 2020 to early March 2021 were downloaded, and support vector machines were used to classify if a post was published in the context of the pandemic. Latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling was performed to gather topics of discussion specific to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    RESULTS: A total of 26 studies conducted between February and September 2020, consisting of 13,673 participants, were included in this scoping literature review. The studies were qualitative and relied mostly on qualitative data from surveys or questionnaires. Themes found from the literature review were \"poorer glycemic control,\" \"increased consumption of unhealthy foods,\" \"decreased physical activity,\" \"inability to access medical appointments,\" and \"increased stress and anxiety.\" Findings from latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling of Reddit forums were \"Coping With Poor Mental Health,\" \"Accessing Doctor & Medications and Controlling Blood Glucose,\" \"Changing Food Habits During Pandemic,\" \"Impact of Stress on Blood Glucose Levels,\" \"Changing Status of Employment & Insurance,\" and \"Risk of COVID Complications.\"
    CONCLUSIONS: Topics of discussion gauged from the Reddit forums provide a holistic perspective of the impact of the pandemic on people living with T2D, which were found to be comparable to the findings of the literature review. The study was limited by only having 1 reviewer for the literature review, but biases were mitigated by consulting authors when there were uncertainties. Qualitative analysis of Reddit forms can supplement traditional qualitative studies of the behaviors of people living with T2D.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在美国,阿尔茨海默病和阿尔茨海默病相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)患者的护理人员每年提供超过160亿小时的无偿护理.这些护理人员经历与提供护理相关的挑战相关的高水平的压力和负担。社交媒体是个人寻求各种形式支持的新兴空间。
    目的:我们旨在探索社交媒体网站Reddit上与AD/ADRD相关的主要话题。然后,我们旨在深入探讨这些主题,专门检查用户讨论的社会支持和行为症状学元素。
    方法:我们首先从2个痴呆症特定的subreddit论坛(r/Alzheimers和r/destime)的6563个帖子中生成了一个无监督主题模型。然后,我们对这些数据的随机子集进行了手动定性内容分析,以进一步探索语料库中的显著主题.
    结果:总体一致性得分最高(0.38)的主题模型包括10个主题,包括照顾者的负担,焦虑,寻求支持,和AD/ADRD行为症状学。定性分析提供了额外的上下文,其中用户为护理体验的许多方面寻求情感和信息支持,包括协助做出关键的护理相关决策。用户在Reddit上表达了具有挑战性和复杂的情绪,这可能是当面表达的禁忌。
    结论:Reddit用户寻求许多不同形式的支持,包括情感和特定的信息支持,从其他人在互联网上。用户表达了各种各样的担忧,挑战,和行为症状作为护理体验的一部分进行管理。独特的(即,匿名和温和)论坛的性质允许一个安全的空间来表达情绪,而没有记录在案的看护者的耻辱。需要额外的支持结构来帮助AD/ADRD患者的护理人员。
    BACKGROUND: In the United States, caregivers of people living with Alzheimer disease and Alzheimer disease-related dementias (AD/ADRD) provide >16 billion hours of unpaid care annually. These caregivers experience high levels of stress and burden related to the challenges associated with providing care. Social media is an emerging space for individuals to seek various forms of support.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to explore the primary topics of conversation on the social media site Reddit related to AD/ADRD. We then aimed to explore these topics in depth, specifically examining elements of social support and behavioral symptomology discussed by users.
    METHODS: We first generated an unsupervised topic model from 6563 posts made to 2 dementia-specific subreddit forums (r/Alzheimers and r/dementia). Then, we conducted a manual qualitative content analysis of a random subset of these data to further explore salient themes in the corpus.
    RESULTS: The topic model with the highest overall coherence score (0.38) included 10 topics, including caregiver burden, anxiety, support-seeking, and AD/ADRD behavioral symptomology. Qualitative analyses provided added context, wherein users sought emotional and informational support for many aspects of the care experience, including assistance in making key care-related decisions. Users expressed challenging and complex emotions on Reddit, which may be taboo to express in person.
    CONCLUSIONS: Reddit users seek many different forms of support, including emotional and specific informational support, from others on the internet. Users expressed a variety of concerns, challenges, and behavioral symptoms to manage as part of the care experience. The unique (ie, anonymous and moderated) nature of the forum allowed for a safe space to express emotions free from documented caregiver stigma. Additional support structures are needed to assist caregivers of people living with AD/ADRD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    口吃对社会构成挑战,职业,和生活的教育方面。传统的行为疗法可能会有所帮助,但效果往往有限。已经探索了药物治疗,但没有FDA批准的口吃治疗方法。人们对经典迷幻药的潜在用途越来越感兴趣,包括psilocybin和LSD,已显示出治疗具有类似症状的疾病的有效性(例如,焦虑,抑郁症,PTSD)。尚未探索迷幻药对口吃的潜在影响。我们对自我识别的口吃者进行了初步调查,他们在在线消息论坛上报告了他们服用经典迷幻药的经历,Reddit.我们定性分析了114个公开发布的帖子,提取有意义的单元并归纳地分配描述符代码。然后,我们将反应演绎地组织成一个既定的迷幻药框架,包括行为,情感,认知,基于信仰,和社会影响。这些影响随后被归类为组织主题(积极,负,中性)。描述性统计数据显示,大多数用户(74.0%)报告了积极的总体短期影响,特别是与行为和情绪变化有关(例如,减少口吃和焦虑),但为负(9.6%),混合(正负;4.8%),并报告了中立的总体经验(11.6%)。结果支持迷幻药可能影响口吃的可能性,但鉴于其他地方报道的完全不受控制的研究环境和迷幻药的潜在不良健康影响,在他们的解释中必须谨慎。虽然这些结果并不鼓励口吃者使用迷幻药,他们建议,未来的工作可以在有监督和临床控制的环境下检查迷幻药对口吃的影响。
    Stuttering poses challenges to social, occupational, and educational aspects of life. Traditional behavioral therapies can be helpful but effects are often limited. Pharmaceutical treatments have been explored but there are no FDA-approved treatments for stuttering. Interest has grown in the potential use of classic psychedelics, including psilocybin and LSD, which have shown effectiveness in treating disorders with similar symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression, PTSD). The potential effects of psychedelics on stuttering have not been explored. We conducted a preliminary investigation of self-identified stutterers who report their experiences taking classic psychedelics on the online messaging forum, Reddit. We qualitatively analyzed 114 publicly available posts, extracting meaningful units and assigning descriptor codes inductively. We then deductively organized responses into an established framework of psychedelics which includes behavioral, emotional, cognitive, belief-based, and social effects. These effects were subsequently grouped under organizing themes (positive, negative, neutral). Descriptive statistics revealed that the majority of users (74.0%) reported positive overall short-term effects particularly related to behavioral and emotional change (e.g., reduced stuttering and anxiety), but negative (9.6%), mixed (positive and negative; 4.8%), and neutral overall experiences (11.6%) were also reported. The results support the possibility that psychedelics may impact stuttering, but caution must be applied in their interpretation given the entirely uncontrolled research setting and potential adverse health effects of psychedelics as reported elsewhere. While these results do not encourage the use of psychedelics by stutterers, they suggest that future work could examine the impact of psychedelics on stuttering under supervised and in clinically controlled settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会支持对于促进乳腺癌女性的最佳健康结果至关重要。然而,据估计,12%的乳腺癌女性同时经历亲密伴侣暴力(IPV;身体,心理,或亲密伴侣的性虐待)。在乳腺癌期间经历IPV的女性可能缺乏传统的社会支持,从而寻找替代的支持来源。在线社区论坛,比如Reddit,可以在乳腺癌特定社区内提供可访问的社交联系。然而,乳腺癌女性如何使用Reddit来描述和寻求对IPV体验的支持,这在很大程度上是未知的。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨乳腺癌患者如何在Reddit上描述与伴侣和直系亲属的毒性关系。
    方法:这是探索性的,横截面,2023年2月,主题建模研究分析了r/braycancersubreddit中96位用户的文本数据。意义提取方法,包括主成分分析,用于识别底层组件。对组件进行情感分析和总结性内容分析,并进行紧急分类发展以阐明主题。
    结果:出现了与毒性关系有关的七个主题:(1)将讲故事与淋巴结联系起来,(2)毒性行为和宣泄情绪,(3)诊断后的遗弃和虐待,(4)有毒的关系和社会相关的恐惧,(5)内在的力量和导航乳腺癌随着时间的推移,(6)评估社会关系和互动,(7)社区建议和支持。毒性关系通常以隔离为特征,放弃,和情感虐待,这对患者产生了深远的情感后果。Reddit促进了有关有毒关系的匿名发泄,帮助患者应对强烈的感受和压力。在乳腺癌期间交换有关导航毒性关系的建议和支持是乳腺癌社区的核心功能。
    结论:研究结果强调了Reddit作为乳腺癌患者的社会支持来源的价值。了解许多乳腺癌患者经历毒性关系和相当大的心理后遗症的临床医生可以更好地支持他们的患者的整体福祉。进一步调查Reddit作为可能的建议资源,信息,和支持有可能帮助指导临床实践,随后,患者健康结果。
    BACKGROUND: Social support is essential to promoting optimal health outcomes for women with breast cancer. However, an estimated 12% of women with breast cancer simultaneously experience intimate partner violence (IPV; physical, psychological, or sexual abuse by an intimate partner). Women who experience IPV during breast cancer may lack traditional social support, and thus seek out alternative sources of support. Online community forums, such as Reddit, can provide accessible social connections within breast cancer-specific communities. However, it is largely unknown how women with breast cancer use Reddit to describe and seek support for experiences of IPV.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore how patients with breast cancer describe toxic relationships with their partners and immediate family members on Reddit.
    METHODS: This exploratory, cross-sectional, topic-modeling study analyzed textual data from 96 users in the r/breastcancer subreddit in February 2023. The meaning extraction method, inclusive of principal component analysis, was used to identify underlying components. Components were subjected to sentiment analysis and summative content analysis with emergent categorical development to articulate themes.
    RESULTS: Seven themes emerged related to toxic relationships: (1) contextualizing storytelling with lymph nodes, (2) toxic behavior and venting emotions, (3) abandonment and abuse following diagnosis, (4) toxic relationships and social-related fears, (5) inner strength and navigating breast cancer over time, (6) assessing social relationships and interactions, and (7) community advice and support. Toxic relationships were commonly characterized by isolation, abandonment, and emotional abuse, which had profound emotional consequences for patients. Reddit facilitated anonymous venting about toxic relationships that helped patients cope with intense feelings and stress. Exchanging advice and support about navigating toxic relationships during breast cancer were core functions of the r/breastcancer community.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings emphasized the value of Reddit as a source of social support for patients with breast cancer experiencing toxic relationships. Clinicians who understand that many patients with breast cancer experience toxic relationships and considerable psychological sequelae are better prepared to support their patients\' holistic well-being. Further investigation of Reddit as a possible resource for advice, information, and support has the potential to help inform clinical practice and subsequently, patient health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对堕胎的态度历来是通过二分法标签来表征的,然而,研究表明,这些标签并没有恰当地概括堕胎的信念。相反,上下文,环境,和生活经验经常把对堕胎的看法塑造成更微妙和复杂的观点。定性数据也被证明是关于堕胎的信念系统的基础。社交媒体,作为一种定性数据,可以揭示如何在基于Web的空间中公开传达对堕胎的态度。此外,在某些情况下,社交媒体也可以用来寻求健康信息。
    目的:本研究应用自然语言处理和社交媒体挖掘来分析Reddit(Reddit,Inc)专门针对堕胎的论坛,包括r/Abortion(关于堕胎的最大的subreddit)和r/AbortionDebate(旨在讨论和辩论关于堕胎的世界观的subreddit)。我们的分析管道旨在确定数据中的潜在主题以及每个帖子的影响。
    方法:我们应用了基于神经网络的主题建模管道(BERTopic)来揭示r/Abortion(n=2151)和r/AbortionDebate(n=2815)子项目中的主题。在使用迭代一致性分数计算得出每个subreddit的最佳主题数量之后,我们使用价值感知词典和情绪推理器进行了情绪分析,以评估积极的,中性,和负面影响,并使用Text2Emotion词典进行情绪分析,以识别每个帖子的潜在情绪。比较了subreddit在情感和情感方面的差异。
    结果:迭代相干性得分计算显示了r/Abortion(相干性=0.42)和r/AbortionDebate(相干性=0.35)的10个主题。r/Abortionsubreddit中的主题主要集中在信息共享或提供社会支持的来源;相比之下,r/AbortionDebatesubreddit中的主题集中在将各种伦理领域关于堕胎的观点转变或演变的背景化,道德,法律领域。r/abortion和r/abortionaldindits的平均复合价值意识词典和情绪推理评分分别为0.01(SD0.44)和-0.06(SD0.41),分别。在r/Abortion和r/AbortionationDebatesubreddits中,情绪得分是一致的;但是,r/堕胎的平均恐惧得分略高,为0.36(SD0.39)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在Reddit上的堕胎论坛上发帖的人愿意分享他们的信念,以不同的方式表现出来,比如分享堕胎故事,包括他们的世界观是如何改变的,批评二分法堕胎身份标签的价值,和信息寻求。值得注意的是,subreddit的话语风格差异很大。r/堕胎主要被用作信息和外展来源;r/堕胎辩论主要集中在各种法律、伦理,道德堕胎领域。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,堕胎对于人们来说仍然是一个不透明但带有政治色彩的问题,并且可以利用社交媒体来了解围绕堕胎的观点和情况.
    BACKGROUND: Attitudes toward abortion have historically been characterized via dichotomized labels, yet research suggests that these labels do not appropriately encapsulate beliefs on abortion. Rather, contexts, circumstances, and lived experiences often shape views on abortion into more nuanced and complex perspectives. Qualitative data have also been shown to underpin belief systems regarding abortion. Social media, as a form of qualitative data, could reveal how attitudes toward abortion are communicated publicly in web-based spaces. Furthermore, in some cases, social media can also be leveraged to seek health information.
    OBJECTIVE: This study applies natural language processing and social media mining to analyze Reddit (Reddit, Inc) forums specific to abortion, including r/Abortion (the largest subreddit about abortion) and r/AbortionDebate (a subreddit designed to discuss and debate worldviews on abortion). Our analytical pipeline intends to identify potential themes within the data and the affect from each post.
    METHODS: We applied a neural network-based topic modeling pipeline (BERTopic) to uncover themes in the r/Abortion (n=2151) and r/AbortionDebate (n=2815) subreddits. After deriving the optimal number of topics per subreddit using an iterative coherence score calculation, we performed a sentiment analysis using the Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner to assess positive, neutral, and negative affect and an emotion analysis using the Text2Emotion lexicon to identify potential emotionality per post. Differences in affect and emotion by subreddit were compared.
    RESULTS: The iterative coherence score calculation revealed 10 topics for both r/Abortion (coherence=0.42) and r/AbortionDebate (coherence=0.35). Topics in the r/Abortion subreddit primarily centered on information sharing or offering a source of social support; in contrast, topics in the r/AbortionDebate subreddit centered on contextualizing shifting or evolving views on abortion across various ethical, moral, and legal domains. The average compound Valence Aware Dictionary and Sentiment Reasoner scores for the r/Abortion and r/AbortionDebate subreddits were 0.01 (SD 0.44) and -0.06 (SD 0.41), respectively. Emotionality scores were consistent across the r/Abortion and r/AbortionDebate subreddits; however, r/Abortion had a marginally higher average fear score of 0.36 (SD 0.39).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that people posting on abortion forums on Reddit are willing to share their beliefs, which manifested in diverse ways, such as sharing abortion stories including how their worldview changed, which critiques the value of dichotomized abortion identity labels, and information seeking. Notably, the style of discourse varied significantly by subreddit. r/Abortion was principally leveraged as an information and outreach source; r/AbortionDebate largely centered on debating across various legal, ethical, and moral abortion domains. Collectively, our findings suggest that abortion remains an opaque yet politically charged issue for people and that social media can be leveraged to understand views and circumstances surrounding abortion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自下而上的优先级设置方法越来越支持健康技术创新,旨在更好地反映其预期受益人的关切。基于网络的论坛为父母提供了一个分享担忧的渠道,建议,以及与育儿以及子女的健康和福祉有关的信息。它们提供了有关育儿问题和优先事项的丰富数据来源,可以为未来的儿童健康研究和创新提供信息。
    目的:本研究的目的是确定在两个主要的网络论坛上表达的共同问题,并将这些问题集中起来,以确定潜在的家庭健康问题,作为未来研究和创新的指示性优先领域。
    方法:我们对r/Parentingsubreddit(69,846个帖子)和Mumsnet的育儿部分(99,848个帖子)进行了文本挖掘,以创建大量的帖子语料库。使用生成统计模型(潜在的Dirichlet分配)来识别语料库中讨论最多的主题,和内容分析被用来识别在一个子集中发现的育儿问题。
    结果:具有25个主题的模型产生了最高的连贯性和广泛的有意义的育儿主题。最常表达的育儿问题与孩子的睡眠有关,自我照顾,吃(和食物),行为,儿童保育背景,以及包括父母冲突在内的父母背景。与婴儿直接相关的主题,例如便盆训练和奶瓶喂养,在Mumsnet上更常见,而父母环境和屏幕时间在r/育儿上更常见。
    结论:潜在狄利克雷分配主题建模可用于获得快速,然而,在大量不同的社交媒体帖子上表达的家长担忧的有意义的概述,用于补充传统的洞察力收集方法。父母把他们的担忧放在孩子的日常健康问题上,生成的主题与既定的家庭健康关注主题显着重叠。我们提供了在这些来源发现的一系列家庭健康问题的证据,并希望这可以用来生成与传统的洞察力收集方法一起使用的材料。
    Health technology innovation is increasingly supported by a bottom-up approach to priority setting, aiming to better reflect the concerns of its intended beneficiaries. Web-based forums provide parents with an outlet to share concerns, advice, and information related to parenting and the health and well-being of their children. They provide a rich source of data on parenting concerns and priorities that could inform future child health research and innovation.
    The aim of the study is to identify common concerns expressed on 2 major web-based forums and cluster these to identify potential family health concern topics as indicative priority areas for future research and innovation.
    We text-mined the r/Parenting subreddit (69,846 posts) and the parenting section of Mumsnet (99,848 posts) to create a large corpus of posts. A generative statistical model (latent Dirichlet allocation) was used to identify the most discussed topics in the corpus, and content analysis was applied to identify the parenting concerns found in a subset of posts.
    A model with 25 topics produced the highest coherence and a wide range of meaningful parenting concern topics. The most frequently expressed parenting concerns are related to their child\'s sleep, self-care, eating (and food), behavior, childcare context, and the parental context including parental conflict. Topics directly associated with infants, such as potty training and bottle feeding, were more common on Mumsnet, while parental context and screen time were more common on r/Parenting.
    Latent Dirichlet allocation topic modeling can be applied to gain a rapid, yet meaningful overview of parent concerns expressed on a large and diverse set of social media posts and used to complement traditional insight gathering methods. Parents framed their concerns in terms of children\'s everyday health concerns, generating topics that overlap significantly with established family health concern topics. We provide evidence of the range of family health concerns found at these sources and hope this can be used to generate material for use alongside traditional insight gathering methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这种反思集中在焦点小组和访谈研究的招募阶段遇到的方法和道德挑战,旨在调查男性(共同)如何在避孕和计划生育的背景下构建(他们的)男性气质。我们批判性地参与我们的社交媒体招聘公告的评论部分,并在以下方面吸取教训:(i)在尝试以包容性的方式招聘男性时,“正确”和社会可接受的术语,以及(ii)我们方法的可行性。我们问我们可以从中学到什么,我们具体的研究项目,当我们将招聘阶段出现的伦理挑战视为反身研究伦理的一个组成部分时,更普遍地进行研究。
    This reflection focuses on the methodological and ethical challenges encountered during the recruitment stage in a focus group and interview study that sought to investigate how men (co-)construct (their) masculinity in the context of contraception and family planning. We critically engage with the comments sections of our social media recruitment announcements and draw lessons in regard to (i) the \'correct\' and socially acceptable terminology when trying to recruit men in an inclusive manner and (ii) the feasibility of our method more generally. We asked what we may learn about ourselves, our specific research project, and the conduct of research more generally when we view the ethical challenges arising during the recruitment stage as an integral part of reflexive research ethics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究旨在通过第一手账户了解Reddit用户对直升机育儿的体验。文本挖掘和自然语言处理技术被用来从subredditr/helicoterparents中提取数据。共有713个原始帖子从非结构化文本处理为整洁的格式。潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA),一种流行的主题建模方法,用于发现语料库中隐藏的主题。数据揭示了直升机育儿的常见环境背景(即,学校,大学,工作,和家庭)及其对大学决策的影响,隐私,和社会关系。这些共同提出了支持自主育儿和正念干预作为直升机育儿带来的问题的可行解决方案的重要性。此外,研究结果为过去的研究提供了支持,该研究确定了更多的母亲而不是父亲的直升机育儿模型。有必要进一步研究COVID-19大流行对直升机育儿的影响。
    The study aimed to understand Reddit users\' experience with helicopter parenting through first-hand accounts. Text mining and natural language processing techniques were employed to extract data from the subreddit r/helicopterparents. A total of 713 original posts were processed from unstructured texts to tidy formats. Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), a popular topic modeling method, was used to discover hidden themes within the corpus. The data revealed common environmental contexts of helicopter parenting (i.e., school, college, work, and home) and its implication on college decisions, privacy, and social relationships. These collectively suggested the importance of autonomy-supportive parenting and mindfulness interventions as viable solutions to the problems posed by helicopter parenting. In addition, findings lent support to past research that has identified more maternal than paternal models of helicopter parenting. Further research on the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on helicopter parenting is warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:子宫内膜异位症是一种使人衰弱且难以诊断的妇科疾病。由于信息和认识有限,女性通常依赖社交媒体平台作为支持系统,参与有关其疾病相关问题的讨论。
    目的:本研究旨在将计算技术应用于社交媒体帖子,以确定有关子宫内膜异位症的讨论主题,并确定需要医疗保健专业人员和研究人员更多关注的主题。我们还旨在探讨,在这种疾病的挑战性中,子宫内膜异位症社区中有一些主题聚集了积极情绪的帖子。
    方法:我们回顾性地从2011年1月至2022年4月的r/Endo和r/子宫内膜异位症子reddits中提取了帖子。我们使用机器学习中的情感分析和基于主题建模的方法分析了45,693个Reddit帖子。
    结果:自2011年以来,帖子和评论的数量稳步增长。这些职位分为11类,职位数量最多的是询问信息(问题);分享经验(Rant/Vent);或诊断和治疗子宫内膜异位症,尤其是手术(手术相关)。情绪分析显示,92.09%(42,077/45,693)的帖子与负面情绪有关,只有2.3%(1053/45,693)表达了积极的感受,而且没有比负面帖子更积极的类别。主题建模揭示了27个主要主题,最受欢迎的话题是手术,问题/建议,诊断,和痛苦。调查/研究主题,汇集了大多数与研究相关的帖子,在帖子方面是最后一个。
    结论:我们的研究表明,社交媒体平台上的帖子可以为患有子宫内膜异位症的女性提供见解。对帖子的分析证实,患有子宫内膜异位症的女性每天都必须面对负面情绪和疼痛。与提问有关的大量帖子表明,妇女没有从医生那里获得足够的信息,需要社区支持来应对这种疾病。医护人员应更多关注子宫内膜异位症的症状和诊断,与患者讨论这些话题,以减少他们对医生的不满,并为子宫内膜异位症女性的整体健康做出更多贡献。研究人员还应该更多地参与社交媒体,分享关于子宫内膜异位症的新的科学知识。
    Endometriosis is a debilitating and difficult-to-diagnose gynecological disease. Owing to limited information and awareness, women often rely on social media platforms as a support system to engage in discussions regarding their disease-related concerns.
    This study aimed to apply computational techniques to social media posts to identify discussion topics about endometriosis and to identify themes that require more attention from health care professionals and researchers. We also aimed to explore whether, amid the challenging nature of the disease, there are themes within the endometriosis community that gather posts with positive sentiments.
    We retrospectively extracted posts from the subreddits r/Endo and r/endometriosis from January 2011 to April 2022. We analyzed 45,693 Reddit posts using sentiment analysis and topic modeling-based methods in machine learning.
    Since 2011, the number of posts and comments has increased steadily. The posts were categorized into 11 categories, and the highest number of posts were related to either asking for information (Question); sharing the experiences (Rant/Vent); or diagnosing and treating endometriosis, especially surgery (Surgery related). Sentiment analysis revealed that 92.09% (42,077/45,693) of posts were associated with negative sentiments, only 2.3% (1053/45,693) expressed positive feelings, and there were no categories with more positive than negative posts. Topic modeling revealed 27 major topics, and the most popular topics were Surgery, Questions/Advice, Diagnosis, and Pain. The Survey/Research topic, which brought together most research-related posts, was the last in terms of posts.
    Our study shows that posts on social media platforms can provide insights into the concerns of women with endometriosis symptoms. The analysis of the posts confirmed that women with endometriosis have to face negative emotions and pain daily. The large number of posts related to asking questions shows that women do not receive sufficient information from physicians and need community support to cope with the disease. Health care professionals should pay more attention to the symptoms and diagnosis of endometriosis, discuss these topics with patients to reduce their dissatisfaction with doctors, and contribute more to the overall well-being of women with endometriosis. Researchers should also become more involved in social media and share new science-based knowledge regarding endometriosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究的目的是使用来自癌症特异性subredits的基于文本的社交媒体内容分析来评估抑郁和焦虑加载的内容。自然语言处理,自动,和基于词典的方法被用来执行情感分析和识别抑郁和焦虑加载的内容。
    数据来自187名被诊断为癌症的Reddit用户,目前正在接受治疗,或已完成治疗。参与者根据生存状况分为短期,过渡,和长期癌症幸存者。在三个癌症幸存者组中总共分析了72524个帖子。
    结果显示,短期癌症幸存者比长期幸存者有更多的抑郁负荷的帖子和更多的焦虑负荷的话,相对于过渡期没有显著差异。主题分析表明,长期幸存者,比其他阶段的生存,有资源分享他们在自杀意念和心理健康问题上的经验,同时为他们的幸存者社区提供支持。
    结果表明,Reddit文本似乎是压力源何时活跃并触发心理健康问题的指标。这为Reddit成为筛选和第一手干预交付的平台奠定了基础。应特别注意短期幸存者。
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to use text-based social media content analysis from cancer-specific subreddits to evaluate depression and anxiety-loaded content. Natural language processing, automatic, and lexicon-based methods were employed to perform sentiment analysis and identify depression and anxiety-loaded content.
    UNASSIGNED: Data was collected from 187 Reddit users who had received a cancer diagnosis, were currently undergoing treatment, or had completed treatment. Participants were split according to survivorship status into short-term, transition, and long-term cancer survivors. A total of 72524 posts were analyzed across the three cancer survivor groups.
    UNASSIGNED: The results showed that short-term cancer survivors had significantly more depression-loaded posts and more anxiety-loaded words than long-term survivors, with no significant differences relative to the transition period. The topic analysis showed that long-term survivors, more than other stages of survivorship, have resources to share their experiences with suicidal ideation and mental health issues while providing support to their survivor community.
    UNASSIGNED: The results indicate that Reddit texts seem to be an indicator of when the stressor is active and mental health issues are triggered. This sets the stage for Reddit to become a platform for screening and first-hand intervention delivery. Special attention should be dedicated to short-term survivors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号