Sarcopenia is a pathology resulting from a progressive and severe loss of muscle mass, strength, and function in the course of aging, which has deleterious consequences on quality of life. Among the most widespread studies on the issue are those focused on the effect of different types of physical exercise on patients with sarcopenia. This randomized controlled study aimed to compare the effects of a whole-body vibration exercise (WBV) session on the inflammatory parameters of non-sarcopenic (NSG, n=22) and sarcopenic elderly (SG, n=22). NSG and SG participants were randomly divided into two protocols: intervention (squat with WBV) and control (squat without WBV). After a one-week washout period, participants switched protocols, so that everyone performed both protocols. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy radiological absorptiometry (DXA) and function through the six-minute walk test (6MWD) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Plasma soluble tumor necrosis factor receptors (sTNFR) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and measured before and immediately after each protocol. After exercise with WBV, there was an increase in sTNFR2 levels in the NSG (P<0.01; d=-0.69 (-1.30; -0.08) and SG (P<0.01, d=-0.95 (-1.57; -0.32) groups. In conclusion, an acute session of WBV influenced sTNFr2 levels, with sarcopenic individuals showing a greater effect. This suggested that WBV had a more pronounced impact on sTNFr2 in those with loss of muscle strength and/or physical performance. Additionally, WBV is gaining recognition as an efficient strategy for those with persistent health issues.

BACKGROUND: Most genetic studies of asthma and allergy have focused on common variation in individuals primarily of European ancestry. Studying the role of rare variation in quantitative phenotypes and in asthma phenotypes in populations of diverse ancestries can provide additional, important insights into the development of these traits.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the contribution of rare variants to different asthma- or allergy-associated quantitative traits in children with diverse ancestries and explore their role in asthma phenotypes.
METHODS: We examined whole-genome sequencing data from children participants in longitudinal studies of asthma (n = 1035; parent-identified as 67% Black and 25% Hispanic) to identify rare variants (minor allele frequency < 0.01). We assigned variants to genes and tested for associations using an omnibus variant-set test between each of 24,902 genes and 8 asthma-associated quantitative traits. On combining our results with external data on predicted gene expression in humans and mouse knockout studies, we identified 3 candidate genes. A burden of rare variants in each gene and in a combined 3-gene score was tested for its associations with clinical phenotypes of asthma. Finally, published single-cell gene expression data in lower airway mucosal cells after allergen challenge were used to assess transcriptional responses to allergen.
RESULTS: Rare variants in USF1 were significantly associated with blood neutrophil count (P = 2.18 × 10-7); rare variants in TNFRSF21 with total IgE (P = 6.47 × 10-6) and PIK3R6 with eosinophil count (P = 4.10 × 10-5) reached suggestive significance. These 3 findings were supported by independent data from human and mouse studies. A burden of rare variants in TNFRSF21 and in a 3-gene score was associated with allergy-related phenotypes in cohorts of children with mild and severe asthma. Furthermore, TNFRSF21 was significantly upregulated in bronchial basal epithelial cells from adults with allergic asthma but not in adults with allergies (but not asthma) after allergen challenge.
CONCLUSIONS: We report novel associations between rare variants in genes and allergic and inflammatory phenotypes in children with diverse ancestries, highlighting TNFRSF21 as contributing to the development of allergic asthma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether there is a difference in the efficacy of intra-articular injection of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor and triamcinolone acetonide (HA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with recurrent synovitis after the first intra-articular injection of HA.
METHODS: RA patients who relapsed 12 weeks after the first HA treatment were enrolled in this study. After joint cavity extraction, recombinant human TNF receptor-antibody fusion protein (TNFR:FC) (25 mg or 12.5 mg) or HA (1 ml or 0.5 ml) was injected then. The changes in the visual analog scale (VAS), joint swelling index, and joint tenderness index before and 12 weeks after reinjection were compared and analyzed. The changes in synovial thickness, synovial blood flow, and fluid dark zone depth before and after reinjection were observed by ultrasound.
RESULTS: Forty-two RA patients were enrolled, including 11 males and 31 females, with an average age of 46.79 ± 12.61 years and an average disease duration of 7.76 ± 5.44 years. After 12 weeks of intra-articular injection of HA or TNFR:FC, the VAS scores were significantly lower than those before treatment (P < 0.01). After 12 weeks of injection, the scores of the joint swelling index and tenderness index in both groups were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment. There was no significant difference in synovial thickness under ultrasound in the HA group before and after injection, while the synovial thickness in the TNFR:FC group was significantly improved after 12 weeks (P < 0.01). After 12 weeks of injection, the grade of synovial blood flow signal in both groups decreased significantly compared with that before treatment, especially in the TNFR:FC group. After 12 weeks of injection, the depth of the liquid dark area under ultrasound decreased significantly in the HA group and TNFR:FC group compared with that before treatment (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular injection of a TNF inhibitor is an effective method for the treatment of recurrent synovitis after conventional hormone therapy. Compared with HA treatment, it can reduce synovial thickness. Key Points • Intra-articular injection of a TNF inhibitor is an effective method for the treatment of recurrent synovitis after conventional hormone therapy. • Compared with HA treatment, intra-articular injection of biological agents combined with glucocorticoids can not only relieve joint pain but also significantly inhibit joint swelling. • Compared with HA treatment, intra-articular injection of biological agents combined with glucocorticoids cannot only improve synovial inflammation but also inhibit synovial proliferation. • For the treatment of refractory RA synovitis, biological agents combined with glucocorticoid injection are an effective and safe option.

To assess the efficacy and safety of ABBV-3373, a novel antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) composed of the anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody adalimumab linked to a glucocorticoid receptor modulator (GRM), compared to adalimumab, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, proof-of-concept trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03823391), adults with moderate-to-severe RA receiving background methotrexate were administered intravenously (IV) ABBV-3373 100 mg every other week for 12 weeks, followed by placebo for 12 weeks, or subcutaneous adalimumab 80 mg every other week for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 12, with 2 prespecified primary comparisons of ABBV-3373 versus historical adalimumab (80 mg every other week or equivalent dose) and versus combined in-trial/historical adalimumab. Secondary end points included change from baseline in the Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index, and DAS28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate, as well as the proportion of patients achieving a DAS28-CRP of ≤3.2 and the American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria.
Forty-eight patients were randomized to receive either ABBV-3373 (n = 31) or adalimumab (n = 17). At week 12, ABBV-3373 demonstrated a reduction in DAS28-CRP compared to historical adalimumab (-2.65 versus -2.13; P = 0.022) and compared to combined in-trial/historical adalimumab (-2.65 versus -2.29; probability 89.9%), with numerically greater improvement than in-trial adalimumab (-2.51). For secondary end points, greater efficacy was observed with ABBV-3373 compared to historical adalimumab; ABBV-3373 was predicted with 79.3-99.5% probability to be more effective than adalimumab based on combined in-trial/historical adalimumab data. Of the ABBV-3373-treated patients who achieved DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 at week 12, 70.6% maintained this response at week 24 despite switching to placebo. Four serious adverse events (SAEs) were reported with ABBV-3373 (noncardiac chest pain, pneumonia, upper respiratory tract infection, and anaphylactic shock) and 2 SAEs with adalimumab (breast abscess and bronchitis). After increasing the duration of IV ABBV-3373 administration from 3 minutes to 15-30 minutes, no similar events of anaphylactic shock were reported.
Data from this proof-of-concept trial support the continued development of a TNF-GRM ADC for the treatment of RA, with the potential to achieve superior outcomes compared to currently available therapies.

BACKGROUND: Biologicals, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Impaired renal function is a known predictor of CVD and elevated in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of anti-TNF on renal function in patients with AS and whether anti-TNF use is safe in AS patients with pre-existing risk factors for renal decline.
METHODS: Biological-naïve consecutive AS patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab were prospectively followed from 2005 to 2014. Renal function was determined by calculation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), estimated with the abbreviated modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula. The effect of anti-TNF on eGFR was analyzed using mixed model analysis.
RESULTS: 211 AS patients were followed for a median of 156 (36-286) weeks. Overall mixed model analyses showed a significant decrease of eGFR over time (β =  - 0.040, p = 0.000), although this association did not remain significant after adjustment for responding to anti-TNF, alcohol use, disease duration, body mass index (BMI), C-reactive protein (CRP), and disease activity (β =  - 0.018, p = 0.094). However, patients with pre-existing risk factors for renal decline did have a significant change in eGFR over time (β =  - 0.029, p = 0.006).
CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant change in eGFR over time, although this small decrease was not clinically relevant. This study further demonstrates that anti-TNF does not affect renal function in AS patients with and without existing risk factors for renal decline, which means that use of anti-TNF is safe concerning renal function in patients with AS. Key Points • Previous studies showed that biologicals, such as anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF), reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS). • Impaired renal function is a known predictor of CVD, and also a known concern for many AS patients. • Use of anti-TNF is safe with regard to renal function in patients with AS. • The effect of anti-TNF on CVD in AS patients does not seem to be mediated by changes in renal function.

We investigated whether the drug denosumab modulates the inflammatory response after total hip arthroplasty in a randomized controlled trial. Significantly increased expression of RANKL was found in patients treated with denosumab. This could provide an explanation for the rebound effect with rapid loss of BMD seen after discontinuation of denosumab treatment.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL), modulates the inflammatory response after cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip.
METHODS: Sixty-four patients operated with cementless THA were randomized to two doses of 60-mg denosumab or placebo 1-3 days and 6 months postoperatively. Serum samples were analyzed by a multiplex extension assay detecting 92 inflammation-related proteins. Bone turnover markers were assessed. Proteins were analyzed using linear mixed effect models. Validation of conspicuous findings was performed with ELISA.
RESULTS: Two proteins were significantly affected by denosumab treatment: RANKL and tumor necrosis factor receptor super family member 9 (TNFRSF9). Serum levels of RANKL were more than twice as high in the denosumab than in the placebo group 3 months after surgery (ratio 2.10, p<0.001). Six and 12 months after surgery, the expression of RANKL was still elevated in the denosumab-treated group (ratios 1.50, p < 0.001; 1.47, p =0.002). The expression of TNFRSF9 was lower in the denosumab group at 3 months (ratio 0.68, p<0.001). In the denosumab group, concentrations of bone turnover markers were substantially reduced after 3 months, remained suppressed after 6 and 12 months, but increased above baseline at 24 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Two subcutaneous denosumab injections 6 months apart increase RANKL and depress TNFRSF9 after THA. This provides a possible explanation for the rebound effect on bone turnover markers as well as bone mineral density (BMD) upon withdrawal of denosumab. None of the other measured markers of inflammation was influenced by denosumab treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety profile of adalimumab and etanercept in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and total spinal ankylosis (TSA).
UNASSIGNED: Case-series follow-up study.
METHODS: Twenty-eight patients (26 men and 2 women) with active AS (BASDAI > 4) and TSA were treated as follows: 19 patients receiving adalimumab and 9 patients receiving etanercept. Twelve-month data related to the efficacy and safety of these two TNF-alpha inhibitors were evaluated. The primary endpoint was ASAS 20 (the ASsessment in AS International Working Group criteria for 20% improvement) at weeks 12 and 52. Other measures that were evaluated were function (BASFI), disease activity (BASDAI), patient\'s and physician\'s global disease assessment on visual analogue scale (VAS) and C-reactive protein.
RESULTS: In both adalimumab and etanercept groups, there was a significant improvement in all observed variables (baseline compared to weeks 12 and 52). This improvement was sustained for the whole follow-up period. In the adalimumab group, at week 12, ASAS 20 was achieved in 18/19 patients and at week 52 in 17/19 patients. In the etanercept group, at week 12 ASAS 20 was achieved in all patients and at week 52 in 6/9 patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active AS and TSA, adalimumab and etanercept treatment showed significant improvement in function and disease activity. No serious side effects or adverse effects were observed in our cohort. Key Points • TNF-alpha inhibitors can be effective treatment options for patients with AS and having total spinal ankylosis. • Patients with advanced AS should not be disregarded as good candidates for treatment with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the prefilled syringe (PFS) with lyophilized (LYO) recombinant human tumor necrosis factor-α receptor II:lgG Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR:Fc) in healthy Chinese male subjects. A single-center, randomized, open-label, 2-period, crossover study was performed in healthy Chinese male subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned into 2 sequences and received a subcutaneous injection of 25 mg rhTNFR:Fc PFS or rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo), with a 35-day washout between the 2 periods. Blood samples were collected at specified time intervals, and then serum concentrations of rhTNFR:Fc were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The maximum serum concentration, area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all calculated and evaluated. Meanwhile, safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. A total of 82 subjects completed the study, and six subjects withdrew for various reasons. The 90%CIs for geometric mean ratios of maximum serum concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all within the equivalence range of 80% to 125%. Safety was comparable between the 2 formulations with low immunogenicity. rhTNFR:Fc PFS exhibited similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo) in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Genetic polymorphisms may affect the molecular mechanisms underlying determination of skin type. So far, several genetic studies have been reported; however, very few studies have been conducted to examine the relationship between genotype and skin phenotypes. In this study, the genome sequences of individuals tested for five cosmetic characteristics (wrinkles, moisture content, pigmentation, oil content, and ensitivity) were determined, and we also conducted five genome-wide association studies (GWASs) to identify predictive markers. Some single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within those genes were more frequent in individuals exhibiting stronger traits. GWASs revealed that two genome-wide significant SNPs within FCRL5 and OCA2 genes were associated with wrinkles and pigmentation, respectively (p < 5 × 10-8), and that genomewide SNPs in 21 genes (wrinkles: FCRL5, REEP3, ADSS, and SPTLC1; moisture: TBX4, TRPM3, CEMIP2, CTSH, and TTC39C; pigmentation: OCA2, NCLN, TNS1, CDC42BPA, HS3ST4, and UNCX; oil: SYN2, CNDP1, GAS6, INSR, and TNFRSF19; and sensitivity: CREB5) might be associated with five skin phenotypes. Among these, a genome-wide significant SNP (rs117381658) and the SNP located downstream of FCRL5, which encodes a member of the immunoglobulin receptor family, were associated with an increased risk of wrinkles (p = 1.52 × 10-8). The other genome-wide significant SNP (rs74653330) was associated with a decreased risk of pigmentation (p = 1.04 × 10-8), which is located in the coding region of OCA2 that encodes for a transporter of melanin. Our study reports genetic factors associated with skin cosmetology parameters in the Korean population. We hope our findings will provide a foundation for further genetic and molecular studies related to custom cosmetics. Based on these findings, the industry will be able to provide consumers with ingredients capable of palliating the lack of function associated in genes with SNPs.

The majority of patients with a rheumatic disease treated with etanercept may be overexposed. Data regarding etanercept tapering are scarce, particularly in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). We compared extending the dose interval to continuation of the standard dose and studied the success rate of etanercept discontinuation. Etanercept concentrations were measured throughout the study.
160 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), PsA, or AS with sustained minimal disease activity (MDA) were enrolled in this 18-month, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The intervention group doubled the dosing interval at baseline and discontinued etanercept 6 months later. The control group continued the standard dose for 6 months and doubled the dosing-interval thereafter. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients maintaining MDA at 6 month follow-up.
At 6 months, MDA status was maintained in 47 patients (63%) in the intervention group and 56 (74%) in the control group (p = 0.15), with comparable results in all rheumatic diseases. And median etanercept concentrations decreased from 1.50 µg/mL (interquartile range 1.06- 2.65) to 0.46 µg/mL (0.28-0.92). In total, 40% discontinued etanercept successfully with maintained MDA for at least 6 months.
Etanercept tapering can be done without losing efficacy in RA, PsA, and AS patients in sustained MDA. A substantial proportion of patients could stop etanercept for at least 6 months. In many patients, low drug concentrations proved sufficient to control disease activity. However, the risk of minor and major flares is substantial, even in patients continuing standard dosing.