BACKGROUND: Among patients treated with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), combination therapy with clopidogrel (ie, known as dual antithrombotic therapy [DAT]) is the treatment of choice. However, there are concerns for individuals with impaired response to clopidogrel.
OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of clopidogrel vs low-dose ticagrelor in patients with impaired clopidogrel response assessed by the ABCD-GENE score.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized PD study of NOAC-treated patients undergoing PCI. Patients with an ABCD-GENE score ≥10 (n = 39), defined as having impaired clopidogrel response, were randomized to low-dose ticagrelor (n = 20; 60 mg twice a day) or clopidogrel (n = 19; 75 mg once a day). Patients with an ABCD-GENE score <10 (n = 42) were treated with clopidogrel (75 mg once a day; control cohort). PD assessments at baseline and 30 days post-randomization (trough and peak) were performed to assess P2Y12 signaling (VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units [PRU], light transmittance aggregometry, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein); makers of thrombosis not specific to P2Y12 signaling were also assessed. The primary endpoint was PRU (trough levels) at 30 days.
RESULTS: At 30 days, PRU levels were reduced with ticagrelor-based DAT compared with clopidogrel-based DAT at trough (23.0 [Q1-Q3: 3.0-46.0] vs 154.5 [Q1-Q3: 77.5-183.0]; P < 0.001) and peak (6.0 [Q1-Q3: 4.0-14.0] vs 129.0 [Q1-Q3: 66.0-171.0]; P < 0.001). Trough PRU levels in the control arm (104.0 [Q1-Q3: 35.0-167.0]) were higher than ticagrelor-based DAT (P = 0.005) and numerically lower than clopidogrel-based DAT (P = 0.234). Results were consistent by light transmittance aggregometry and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein. Markers measuring other pathways leading to thrombus formation were largely unaffected.
CONCLUSIONS: In NOAC-treated patients undergoing PCI with an ABCD-GENE score ≥10, ticagrelor-based DAT using a 60-mg, twice-a-day regimen reduced platelet P2Y12 reactivity compared with clopidogrel-based DAT. (Tailoring P2Y12 Inhibiting Therapy in Patients Requiring Oral Anticoagulation After PCI [SWAP-AC-2]; NCT04483583).

Platelets represent a potential therapeutic target for improved clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.
To evaluate the benefits and risks of adding a P2Y12 inhibitor to anticoagulant therapy among non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19.
An open-label, bayesian, adaptive randomized clinical trial including 562 non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was conducted between February 2021 and June 2021 at 60 hospitals in Brazil, Italy, Spain, and the US. The date of final 90-day follow-up was September 15, 2021.
Patients were randomized to a therapeutic dose of heparin plus a P2Y12 inhibitor (n = 293) or a therapeutic dose of heparin only (usual care) (n = 269) in a 1:1 ratio for 14 days or until hospital discharge, whichever was sooner. Ticagrelor was the preferred P2Y12 inhibitor.
The composite primary outcome was organ support-free days evaluated on an ordinal scale that combined in-hospital death (assigned a value of -1) and, for those who survived to hospital discharge, the number of days free of respiratory or cardiovascular organ support up to day 21 of the index hospitalization (range, -1 to 21 days; higher scores indicate less organ support and better outcomes). The primary safety outcome was major bleeding by 28 days as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis.
Enrollment of non-critically ill patients was discontinued when the prespecified criterion for futility was met. All 562 patients who were randomized (mean age, 52.7 [SD, 13.5] years; 41.5% women) completed the trial and 87% received a therapeutic dose of heparin by the end of study day 1. In the P2Y12 inhibitor group, ticagrelor was used in 63% of patients and clopidogrel in 37%. The median number of organ support-free days was 21 days (IQR, 20-21 days) among patients in the P2Y12 inhibitor group and was 21 days (IQR, 21-21 days) in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.83 [95% credible interval, 0.55-1.25]; posterior probability of futility [defined as an odds ratio <1.2], 96%). Major bleeding occurred in 6 patients (2.0%) in the P2Y12 inhibitor group and in 2 patients (0.7%) in the usual care group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.31 [95% CI, 0.64-17.2]; P = .15).
Among non-critically ill patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the use of a P2Y12 inhibitor in addition to a therapeutic dose of heparin, compared with a therapeutic dose of heparin only, did not result in an increased odds of improvement in organ support-free days within 21 days during hospitalization.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04505774.

Itching is a common clinical symptom in diabetic patients. This research is to carry out experiments on the pathological changes in the P2Y12 receptor in type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic itching. Changes in body weight, fasting blood glucose (FBG), thermal hyperalgesia, cold hyperalgesia, spontaneous itching, and sciatic nerve conduction velocity were detected. The content of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the dorsal root ganglion was detected by chemical fluorescence. The expression of the P2Y12 receptor, NLRP3, ASC, interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and IL-18 was detected by Western blotting, real-time quantitative PCR, immunofluorescence double labelling, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Itching and pain behaviours of the mice in the type 2 diabetes mellitus + itch group were significantly increased, and the expression of P2Y12 and NLRP3 as well as the content of ROS increased, and these changes were significantly reversed by treatment with P2Y12 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor. Upregulated P2Y12 receptor expression after the activation of satellite glial cells contributes to the increase in ROS content in vivo, followed by NLRP3 inflammasome activation, increased inflammatory cytokine release, and damage to peripheral nerves, which leads to chronic itching. Treatment with P2Y12 shRNA or ticagrelor can inhibit these pathological changes, thus improving itching behaviour. Development mechanism of diabetes mellitus complicated with chronic itching. Notes: The upregulation of P2Y12 receptor expression and the activation of SGCs lead to the increase of ROS content in vivo, followed by the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome, the increase of inflammatory cytokine release, the abnormal excitation of DRG neurons, and the damage of peripheral nerves, resulting in chronic itching. P2Y12 receptor-related inflammatory injury involves chronic itching in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment with P2Y12 receptor shRNA or P2Y12 antagonist ticagrelor can inhibit these pathological changes and improve itching behaviour.

Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and clopidogrel is the standard of care for neurointerventional stenting and flow diversion. Platelet function testing has been increasingly performed to identify patients with a hypo- or hyper-response to clopidogrel. Ticagrelor has been a popular alternative antiplatelet agent for such patients. We assessed the role of platelet function testing in patients receiving ticagrelor and undergoing stenting or flow diversion.
The data from patients who had undergone stent-assisted coiling or Pipeline flow diversion of a cerebral aneurysm with ticagrelor therapy at any point during their treatment course from May 2017 to August 2019 at a single academic institution in the United States were retrospectively reviewed. Platelet function testing was used to determine the P2Y12 reactive units (PRUs), and the results were correlated with the procedural complications.
A total of 28 patients with 29 aneurysms were treated while receiving ticagrelor. Of the 29 aneurysms, 16 (55.2%) were treated with flow diversion and 13 (44.8%) with stent-assisted coiling. Four thromboembolic complications (13.8%) and no hemorrhagic complications developed. Of the 8 patients with ≥1 PRU value >100, 4 (50%) had experienced a thromboembolic complication. The patients without a PRU value >100 did not experience any complications.
A risk of thromboembolic complications exists for patients receiving ticagrelor, which correlated with the PRUs in the present preliminary study. The findings from the present study suggest that the safe PRU range for patients receiving ticagrelor should be shifted to 0-100, which is lower than that of clopidogrel, thought to be 60-210. Further validation of the optimal PRU range for patients receiving ticagrelor is necessary.

Clopidogrel (CLP) is a second generation thienopyridine drug commonly used in secondary prevention of ischemic stroke (IS). Its antiplatelet response maybe variable due to genetic and non-genetic factors. Adipokines may affect platelet aggregation through ADP mediated platelet signalling. However, the combined effect of CYP genetic variants and adipokines on antiplatelet response of clopidogrel is unclear. Patients of IS/Transient ischemic attack (TIAs) within 3 months were prospectively screened following clopidogrel treatment. Major exclusions were cardioembolic and non atherosclerotic strokes. Antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel along with adipokine (Leptin and adiponectin) levels and genotyping of CYP, P2Y12 gene were investigated. Rare genetic variants were confirmed by DNA sequencing. 204 patients with ischemic stroke/TIAs were screened and 163 were recruited. 85 (52.1%) patients were poor responders to clopidogrel. Antiplatelet response to clopidogrel was weaker in females [Median 8.0 (IQR: 3.0-14.0)] compared to males [Median 5.0 (IQR: 2.0-10.0)]. In female subgroup analysis, association was found among high leptin levels and PPI (+) usage in poor responders. None of the genetic variants (CYP2C19*2,*3,*4*, CYP2C9*3, CYP2B6 and P2Y12) were found to influence the antiplatelet effects (p > 0.05). On multivariable logistic regression, a poor clopidogrel response was associated with female gender (Adjusted OR 2.55, 95% CI: 1.05-6.18) and PPI usage (Adjusted OR 2.42, 95% CI: 1.09-5.34). Despite a high prevalence of clopidogrel resistance in the North Indian stroke patients, female gender rather than genetic polymorphisms of CYP and P2Y12 genes may influence its antiplatelet effect. Further research may ascertain the role of gender on clopidogrel response.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was suggested to be better correlated with recurrent ischemic events as compared with gene polymorphism, whereas most of the results were from white populations with acute coronary disease. The evidence is relatively limited regarding HTPR and its genetic determinants in predicting clinical outcomes of stroke among Chinese-Han patients.A prospective study including 131 Chinese-Han stroke patients treated with clopidogrel was analyzed. Platelet function was assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA)- adenosine diphosphate (ADP) method. HTPR was defined as 5 μM ADP induced platelet aggregation > 46%. CYP2C19 and P2Y12 genotype were detected using the PCR-RFLP method. The difference in the occurrence of the primary endpoint was analyzed according to platelet function and genetic status.Sixty-three (48.1%) subjects displayed HTPR after administering clopidogrel for 1 week. The prevalence of HTPR was significantly higher in CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) alleles (2, 3) carriers vs wild-type homozygotes (71.7% vs 32.1%, P < .01), and logistic regression analysis showed that carriers of CYP2C19 LOF alleles were an independent risk factor of HTPR. Survival analysis indicated that patients with HTPR had an increased risk of primary endpoints (20.6% vs 7.3%, P = .04), whereas the presence of CYP2C19 LOF alleles or P2Y12 H2 haplotype did not increase the incidence of ischemic events. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that HTPR was an independent predictor of the primary composite endpoint (HR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.07-8.99; P = .04).We identified a high prevalence of clopidogrel-HTPR in a cohort of Chinese-Han patients with acute ischemic stroke, and patients with HTPR may have an increased risk of recurrent ischemic stroke events. CYP2C19 LOF alleles are associated with HTPR but not with stroke prognosis. Further clinical trials with large samples are needed to confirm these findings.

Background Ticagrelor and prasugrel are potent P2Y12 inhibitors with superior efficacy compared with clopidogrel among patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), though use in recent practice is not well described. In this retrospective study, we assessed trends, predictors, and variation in use of P2Y12 inhibitors in patients with STEMI in the United States. Methods and Results We identified 169 505 STEMI patients in the Chest Pain-Myocardial Infarction Registry from October 2013 through March 2017. We determined national utilization rates of P2Y12 inhibitors at discharge, patient predictors for each medication, and variation in use between hospitals. In a subset of 9655 Medicare patients ≥65 years old, we compared 1-year adjusted risks of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and bleeding based on hospital quartile of potent P2Y12 inhibitor use. Rates of ticagrelor use increased from 18.0% to 44.0%, while rates of prasugrel and clopidogrel use decreased from 24.6% to 13.5% and 57.4% to 42.6%, respectively. Prior percutaneous coronary intervention was the strongest clinical predictor for use of ticagrelor (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.09-1.18]) and prasugrel (adjusted odds ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 1.21-1.34]) compared with clopidogrel. Predictors of clopidogrel use included no insurance, insurance with Medicare or Medicaid, and features associated with higher bleeding risk. The median hospital usage rate for newer P2Y12 inhibitors was 51.3% (interquartile range, 35.0%-65.9%), with substantial variation between hospitals (adjusted median odds ratio, 2.92 [95% CI, 2.77-3.10]). Among patients ≥65 years old, there were no differences in adjusted 1-year risks of adverse outcomes across hospital quartiles of potent P2Y12 inhibitor use. Conclusions Almost one-half of STEMI patients by 2017 were discharged on ticagrelor while far fewer received prasugrel. Patient characteristics are associated with P2Y12 inhibitor selection, though substantial hospital variation exists. Identifying barriers to use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors may improve patient-centered decision-making for STEMI patients.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can put cardiac surgery patients at a high risk of lethal complications. If anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (anti-PF4/Hep Abs) are present, 2 strategies exist to prevent intraoperative aggregation during bypass surgery: first, using an alternative anticoagulant, and second, using heparin combined with an antiaggregant. The new P2Y12 inhibitor, cangrelor, could be an attractive candidate for the latter strategy; several authors have reported its successful use. The present in vitro study evaluated cangrelor\'s ability to inhibit heparin-induced platelet aggregation in the presence of anti-PF4/Hep Abs.
Platelet-poor plasma (PPP) from 30 patients with functional anti-PF4/Hep Abs was mixed with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) from 5 healthy donors.Light transmission aggregometry was used to measure platelet aggregation after adding 0.5 IU·mL of heparin (HIT) to the plasma, and this was compared with samples spiked with normal saline (control) and samples spiked with cangrelor 500 ng·mL and heparin 0.5 IU·mL (treatment). Friedman test with post hoc Dunn-Bonferroni test was used for between-group comparisons.
Heparin 0.5 IU·mL triggered aggregation in 22 of 44 PPP-PRP mixtures, with a median aggregation of 86% (interquartile range [IQR], 69-91). The median aggregation of these 22 positive samples\' respective control tests was 22% (IQR, 16-30) (P < .001). Median aggregation in the cangrelor-treated samples was 29% (IQR, 19-54) and significantly lower than the HIT samples (P < .001). Cangrelor inhibited heparin-induced aggregation by a median of 91% (IQR, 52-100). Cangrelor only reduced heparin-induced aggregation by >95% in 10 of the 22 positive samples (45%). Cangrelor inhibited heparin-induced aggregation by <50% in 5 of the 22 positive samples (22%) and by <10% in 3 samples (14%).
This in vitro study found that cangrelor was an unreliable inhibitor of heparin-induced aggregation in the presence of anti-PF4/Hep Abs. We conclude that cangrelor should not be used as a standard antiaggregant for cardiac patients affected by HIT during surgery. Unless cangrelor\'s efficacy in a particular patient has been confirmed in a presurgery aggregation test, other strategies should be chosen.

Drugs inhibiting the platelet P2Y12 receptor, such as clopidogrel and prasugrel, are potent antithrombotic agents and are widely used in cardiovascular disease. However, the adverse effects of these drugs have limited their clinical use. For example, clopidogrel resistance occurs in approximately one third of patients, while prasugrel increases the risk of major bleeding. Therefore, new generations of such drugs are of clinical interest.
In this study, the pharmacodynamics of a new P2Y12 antagonist, CN-218, was compared with that of clopidogrel and prasugrel in rats and mice. The differences between CN-218 and clopidogrel include deuteration of the 7-position methyl carboxylate and the introduction of cinnamate in the 2-position of thiophene.
CN-218 had an antiaggregatory efficacy that was at least five times more potent than that of clopidogrel but not as potent as that of prasugrel. It had a significant impact on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), whereby the APTT of CN-218-treated rats was approximately 9 s longer than that of the vehicle- or clopidogrel-treated group, while it had no impact on prothrombin time (PT) in rats. CN-218 had a similar potent antithrombotic effect to that of prasugrel and clopidogrel and also reduced the risk of bleeding compared to prasugrel.
CN-218 may be a promising antithrombotic agent, with potent antiplatelet and significant anticoagulant activity, as well as a lower risk of bleeding compared to clopidogrel and prasugrel.

In the ARCTIC trial (Assessment by a Double Randomization of a Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy Versus a Monitoring-Guided Strategy for Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and of Treatment Interruption Versus Continuation One Year After Stenting), treatment adjustment following platelet function testing failed to improve clinical outcomes. However, high-on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) is considered as a predictor of poor ischemic outcome. This prespecified substudy evaluated clinical outcomes according to the residual platelet reactivity status after antiplatelet therapy adjustment.
We analyzed the 1213 patients assigned to the monitoring arm of the ARCTIC trial in whom platelet reactivity was evaluated by the VerifyNow P2Y12 test before percutaneous coronary intervention and during the maintenance phase (at 14 days). HPR was defined as platelet reaction unit≥235U. The primary ischemic end point, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or urgent revascularization and the safety end point of major bleeding were assessed according to the platelet reactivity status.
Before percutaneous coronary intervention, 35.7% of patients displayed HPR (n=419). During the acute phase, between percutaneous coronary intervention and the 14-day platelet function testing, ischemic (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.74-1.18]; P=0.58) and safety outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.22-7.59]; P=0.78) were similar in HPR and non-HPR patients. During the maintenance phase, the proportion of HPR patients (n=186, 17.4%) decreased by 56%. At 1-year, there was no difference for the ischemic end point (5.9% versus 6.0%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.40-1.58]; P=0.51) and a nonsignificant higher rate of major bleedings (2.7% versus 1.0%, hazard ratio, 2.83 [95% CI, 0.96-8.41]; P=0.06) in HPR versus non-HPR patients.
The proportion of HPR was halved after platelet function testing and treatment adjustment but without significant ischemic benefit at 1 year. HPR seems more as a modifiable risk marker than a risk factor of ischemic outcome.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00827411.