OBJECTIVE: Pediatric burn injuries are a global clinical issue causing significant morbidity. Early adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy improves re-epithelialization rates in children with burns, yet adoption in acute burn care is inconsistent. This investigation aimed to determine barriers to the implementation of adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy for the acute management of pediatric burns and co-design targeted implementation strategies.
METHODS: A sequential mixed methods design was used explore barriers to adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy implementation in acute pediatric burn care. An online questionnaire was disseminated to healthcare professionals within four major Australian pediatric hospitals, each with a dedicated burns service. Barriers were coded according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Semi-structured interviews with senior clinicians tailored implementation strategies to local contexts. A stakeholder consensus meeting consolidated implementation strategies and local processes.
RESULTS: Sixty-three healthcare professionals participated in the questionnaire, and semi-structured interviews involved nine senior burn clinicians. We identified eight implementation barriers across all five CFIR domains then co-designed targeted strategies to address identified barriers. Barriers included lack of available resources, limited access to knowledge and information, individual stage of change, patient needs and resources, limited knowledge and beliefs about the intervention, lack of external policies, intervention complexity, and poor implementation planning.
CONCLUSIONS: Multiple contextual factors affect negative pressure wound therapy uptake in acute pediatric burn settings. Results will inform a multi-state stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. Additional resources, education, training, updated policies, and guidelines are required for successful implementation. It is anticipated that adjunctive negative pressure wound therapy, in conjunction with tailored implementation strategies, will enhance adoption and sustainability.
BACKGROUND: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12622000166774. Registered 1 February 2022.

BACKGROUND: Nutritional support is essential in burn care. There are few studies investigating the effect of nutrition on burn healing. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between perioperative serum prealbumin levels and the probability of autologous skin graft take in burned patients.
METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out with burned adults recruited consecutively from April 2019 until September 2021. Serum prealbumin was determined perioperatively. The percentage of graft take was evaluated over the first 5 postoperative dressing changes. Time until full epithelialization (absence of wounds) was also registered.
RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were recruited, mostly middle-aged people with moderate flame burns. Serum prealbumin levels and graft take had a weak-moderate, nonlinear, statistically significant correlation. They were also an independent predictor of full epithelialization on the fifth dressing change, together with burn depth. Higher perioperative serum prealbumin levels were significantly associated with a reduction in time until full epithelialization.
CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative serum prealbumin levels are significantly correlated with the probability of split-thickness skin autograft take in burned patients and with a reduced time to achieve complete epithelialization. They were an independent predictor of full graft take.

Autologous split thickness skin grafting is the standard-of-care for most deep dermal and full thickness skin defects. Historically, mesh grafting is used to expand skin grafts for smaller defects and other techniques such as Meek micrografting is used to enable expansion for larger skin defects. Yet, Meek micrografting is increasingly used for smaller skin defects as well. Both techniques are frequently used, especially in burn centers, but evidence on which one is preferable for relative smaller skin defects is lacking. Therefore, an intra-patient randomized controlled trial was designed to adequately compare multiple outcomes of the Meek micrografting and mesh grafting techniques.
A multicenter intra-patient controlled randomized trial is being performed in two burn centers (the Netherlands and Belgium) to compare multiple outcomes of Meek micrografting and mesh grafting burns or skin defects. Study registration number (NL74274.029.20). Adult patients with a (burn) wound and an indication for surgical excision and skin grafting were screened for inclusion. In total 70 patients will be included and the primary outcome is scar quality twelve months post-surgery assessed by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Moreover, graft take, re-epithelialization, infection rate, donor site size and patients\' preference are also measured within hospital admission, on 3 months and 12 months post-surgery.
This is the first randomized trial that is intra-patient controlled, which enables a proper comparison between both skin expansion techniques. The results of this study will contribute to the clarification of the indications of both techniques and ample attention is paid for the patients\' opinion on the surgical treatment options.

BACKGROUND: Burns are a global public health problem and cause approximately 180,000 deaths annually, mainly in low- and middle-income countries. Topical antibiotics and occlusive dressing are standard treatments for burns not requiring a skin graft. However, physiotherapy has low-cost phototherapeutic and electrophysical resources (e.g., light-emitting diode [LED]) that may accelerate burn healing. This study aims to compare the re-epithelialization rate of second-degree burns, pain, pruritus, skin temperature, quality of wound healing, and scar quality and mobility among individuals undergoing treatment with red LED, infrared LED, and simulated photobiomodulation.
METHODS: This is a double-blinded, three-arm parallel-group, randomized controlled superiority trial. Individuals of both sexes, aged over 18 years, and with second-degree burns will be included. The sample will be divided into three groups of 13 individuals: two will receive LED therapy (red or infrared) and one placebo. Pain, pruritus, skin temperature, and wound size will be assessed daily. Interventions will take place until complete healing, when scar mobility and quality will be evaluated. Data will be presented as mean and 95% confidence interval and analyzed using mixed linear models.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized controlled trial has minimal risk of bias and intends to identify the ideal type, procedures, and doses of photobiomodulation to heal burns, which are not standardized in clinical practice. Positive results will allow the implementation of the technique in burn and wound guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Brazilian Clinical Trials Registry (ReBEC) RBR-8bfznx6 . Registered on October 13, 2021.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the wound-healing effect and antimicrobial properties of a novel stabilized hypochlorous acid solution on acute wounds, using a suction blister wound model. One suction blister was raised and de-roofed on each forearm in 20 healthy volunteers. Stabilized hypochlorous acid/control (sterile 0.9% NaCl) solutions were assigned to either wound by randomization. Wounds were irrigated and treated on days 0, 2 and 4. Re-epithelialization was assessed blindly by digital planimetry, and bacterial growth was assessed as the number of colony-forming units cultured from surface swabs. Hypochlorous acid solution increased the degree of re-epithelialization on day 4 by 14% compared with the control solution (95% confidence interval (CI) 6.8-20%, p = 0.00051) and was not inferior (p < 0.0001) to the control solution on day 10 (0.3%, 95% CI -1.3-1.9%). Median bacterial counts were lower with stabilized hypochlorous acid compared with control and were further reduced after irrigation and treatment of both groups on day 4, but remained lower in the stabilized hypochlorous acid group compared with the control group. This study demonstrates immediate and durable antimicrobial action and a beneficial effect on acute wound healing after irrigation and treatment with a stabilized hypochlorous acid formulation.

The formation of scar tissue in the wound healing process is associated with fibroblasts that are produced during the proliferation phase (3-14 days after surgery/injury). One of the strategies to suppress the formation of excessive scar tissue is to use wound care material. The use of herbal extracts is currently being investigated by researchers, as it allows avoiding the side effects of synthetic drugs. The Hydnophytum formicarum extract has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential.
The aim of the study was to analyze the effects of the Hydnophytum formicarum plant extract on collagen density, angiogenesis, wound length, and re-epithelialization in wound healing.
Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 2 groups: the control group; and the treatment group. Skin wounds were made on the dorsum of the rats, using the biopsy punch technique. Four rats from each group were sacrificed on days 4, 7 and 14 after injury. Collagen density, angiogenesis, wound length, and re-epithelialization were analyzed using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and Masson\'s trichrome staining.
There were significant differences in the results of the angiogenesis analysis, wound length and re-epithelialization between the treatment and control groups. When considering angiogenesis, there were fewer vessels in the treatment group, but they were more mature as compared to the control group. There was also a meaningful interaction between the application of the Hydnophytum formicarum extract and the necropsy day with regard to collagen density and the re-epithelialization rate. No secondary infection was found in either group.
The topical use of the Hydnophytum formicarum extract affected the formation of scar tissue, as indicated by the positive area of collagen, the extent of angiogenesis, wound length, and the re-epithelialization rate in the early, middle and final granulation phases. The inhibition of angiogenesis through the application of Hydnophytum formicarum was probably related to the formation of scar tissue in the wound.

Acanthamoeba keratitis is challenging to treat and thought to result in poor outcomes, but very few comparative studies exist to assess whether ulcers caused by Acanthamoeba are worse than those caused by bacteria or fungus.
In a retrospective cohort study, all cases of smear- or culture-proven Acanthamoeba keratitis diagnosed from January 2006 to June 2011 at an eye hospital in South India were identified from the microbiology database. Random samples of the same number of cases of bacterial and fungal keratitis, matched by year, were identified from the same database in order to compare outcomes between the three types of organism. The main outcomes were the time until the following events: re-epithelialization, discontinuation of antimicrobials, perforation/keratoplasty, elevated intraocular pressure, and new cataract.
The median time until re-epithelialization was 113 days for Acanthamoeba keratitis, 30 days for fungal keratitis, and 25 days for bacterial keratitis, and the median time until discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy was 100 days for Acanthamoeba keratitis, 49 days for fungal keratitis, and 40 days for bacterial keratitis. Compared to the other two organisms, Acanthamoeba ulcers took significantly longer to re-epithelialize (adjusted HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.6 relative to bacterial ulcers and HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.5 relative to fungal ulcers; overall p<0.001) and had significantly longer courses of antimicrobials (adjusted HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2 to 0.6 relative to bacterial ulcers and HR 0.5, 95%CI 0.3 to 0.8 relative to fungal ulcers; overall p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was observed between the three organisms for the other time-to-event outcomes.
Acanthamoeba keratitis was more difficult to treat and had worse clinical outcomes than bacterial or fungal ulcers, highlighting the lack of adequate treatment regimens for this infection.

Medical treatment, including glyceryl trinitrate ointment, represents the first step for the management of chronic anal fissure. However, glyceryl trinitrate ointment is associated with headache and, consequently, a high withdrawal rate of the treatment.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the topical application of tocopherol acetate ointment on pain relief and chronic anal fissure epithelialization, comparing it with the effect of a standard treatment with glyceryl trinitrate ointment.
This is a 2-parallel-group, single-center, randomized controlled, intent-to-treat clinical trial.
This study was conducted at the Garcilaso Clinic affiliated with Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, Spain).
Patients with chronic anal fissure were selected.
Patients were randomly assigned into 2 groups: patients receiving tocopherol acetate ointment and patients receiving glyceryl trinitrate ointment.
The primary end point was quantification of anal pain 8 weeks after beginning the treatment as measured by a Visual Analogue Scale ranging from 0 to 100 mm. The secondary end points were the healing rate (during the treatment period of 8 weeks) and the recurrence rate.
One hundred sixty consecutive patients were treated, 80 in each group. By 8 weeks after treatment, mean anal pain score declined by 56.2 mm in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group compared with a mean anal pain score decline of 67.1 mm in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (mean difference, 10.9 mm (95% CI, 4.3-18.6); p = 0.018). Sixteen weeks after finishing the therapy, the recurrence rate was 13.2% in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group vs 2.9 in the tocopherol acetate ointment group (p = 0.031).
Limitations of the study include the absence of manometric measurements of the internal anal sphincter before and after the treatments and the use of glyceryl trinitrate ointment as an active comparator, whereas calcium channel blockers are actually the standard treatment.
Anal pain was significantly lower in the tocopherol acetate ointment group than in the glyceryl trinitrate ointment group at 8 weeks after treatment. Tocopherol acetate ointment achieved a greater healing rate and a lower recurrence rate 16 weeks after finishing the treatment. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751.
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT03787030.APLICACIÓN PERIANAL DE POMADA DE TRINITRATO DE GLICERILO FRENTE A LA POMADA DE ACETATO DE TOCOFEROL EN EL TRATAMIENTO DE LA FISURA ANAL CRÓNICA: UN ENSAYO CLÍNICO ALEATORIZADOANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento médico, incluida la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo, representa el primer paso para el tratamiento de la fisura anal crónica. Sin embargo, la pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo se asocia con cefalea y, en consecuencia, una alta tasa de cancelación del tratamiento.OBJETIVO:El objetivo del presente estudio fue evaluar el efecto de la aplicación tópica de pomada de acetato de tocoferol en el alivio del dolor y la epitelización de la fisura anal crónica, comparándolo con el efecto de un tratamiento estándar con pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.DISEÑO:Ensayo clínico con intención de tratar controlado, aleatorizado, de un solo centro, con dos grupos paralelos.ESCENARIO:Clínica Garcilaso adscrita a la Universidad Alfonso X (Madrid, España).PACIENTES:Pacientes con fisura anal crónica.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados en 2 grupos: pacientes que recibieron pomada de acetato de tocoferol y pacientes que recibieron pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la cuantificación del dolor anal 8 semanas después de comenzar el tratamiento, medido por la escala analógica visual que varía de 0 a 100 mm. Los criterios de valoración secundarios fueron la tasa de curación (durante el período de tratamiento de 8 semanas) y la tasa de recurrencia.RESULTADOS:Se trataron ciento sesenta pacientes consecutivos, 80 en cada grupo. A las ocho semanas después del tratamiento, la puntuación media de dolor anal se redujo en 56.2 mm en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo en comparación con una disminución de la puntuación de dolor anal medio de 67.1 mm en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (diferencia media: 10.9 mm (intervalo de confianza del 95%; 4.3 a 18.6; p = 0.018) Dieciséis semanas después de finalizar la terapia, la tasa de recurrencia fue del 13.2% en el grupo de pomada de trinitrato de glicerilo frente a 2.9 en el grupo de pomada de acetato de tocoferol (p = 0.031).LIMITACIONES:Ausencia de medidas manométricas del esfínter anal interno antes y después de los tratamientos. Ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo como comparador activo, mientras que los bloqueadores de los canales de calcio son en realidad el tratamiento estándar de oro.CONCLUSIONES:El dolor anal fue significativamente menor en el grupo de ungüento de acetato de tocoferol que en el grupo de ungüento de trinitrato de glicerilo a las 8 semanas después del tratamiento. La pomada de acetato de tocoferol logró una mayor tasa de curación y una menor tasa de recurrencia 16 semanas después de finalizar el tratamiento. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B751. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Deep burns are a common form of trauma worldwide, and they are hard to be cured in a short time and enhance psychological pressure of the patients. How to effectively promote the healing of wounds after burns is a continuing challenge currently faced by burn physicians. Various strategies of promoting wound healing of deep burns have been developed, including gene therapy and growth factor therapy. In this study, we developed a combined therapy using PLGA nanoparticles as carriers to deliver bFGF and VEGFA genes to promote healing of burn wounds. We first inserted the bFGF and VEGFA genes into pEGFP-N1 vectors and loaded the mixed generated plasmids into PLGA nanoparticles. Next, we injected the nanoparticle/plasmid complexes into the rats intracutaneously and found that the complexes were successfully transfected in vivo one week later. Finally, we injected the nanoparticle/plasmid complexes containing bFGF and VEGFA around burn wounds. We found that the percentage of wound healing of rats treated with nanoparticles/bFGF+ VEGFA plasmid complexes was higher than that of rats in the scald control group, and the early percentage of wound complete epithelialization was also higher. Therefore, combining gene therapy with nanoparticles may be an effective biological strategy for wound repair.

Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes for children with burns by accelerating wound re-epithelialisation. Its effects on healthcare costs, however, remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NPWT from a healthcare provider perspective using evidence from the SONATA in C randomised controlled trial, in which 101 children with small-area burns were allocated to either standard care (silver-impregnated dressings) or standard care in combination with adjunctive NPWT. The primary outcome, time to re-epithelialisation, was assessed through a blinded photographic review. Resource usage and costs were prospectively recorded for each participant for up to 6 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and dominance probabilities were estimated and uncertainty quantified using bootstrap resampling. Mean costs per participant-including dressings, labour, medication, scar management, and theatre operations-were lower in the NPWT group (AUD $903.69) relative to the control group (AUD $1669.01). There was an 89% probability that NPWT was dominant, yielding both faster re-epithelialisation and lower overall costs. Findings remained robust to sensitivity analyses employing alternative theatre costs and time-to-re-epithelialisation estimates for grafted patients. In conclusion, adjunctive NPWT is likely to be a cost-effective and dominant treatment for small-area paediatric burns (ANZCTR.org.au:ACTRN12618000256279).