UNASSIGNED: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in men. High-risk PCa is associated with an increased risk of PCa-related death. The combined use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is essential to improve oncological outcomes in patients with high-risk PCa, and relatively long-term ADT administration is preferred when radiotherapy is performed. Meanwhile, whether neoadjuvant therapy for radical prostatectomy (RP) improves oncological outcomes remains controversial. This study aimed to review the oncological outcomes of RP in high-risk PCa and emphasize the significance of neoadjuvant therapy including neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) and neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy (NCHT) followed by RP for managing high-risk PCa.
UNASSIGNED: We searched for articles published in the PubMed and Scopus databases from January 1, 2005 to March 30, 2023 using the medical subject headings (MeSH) terms: prostate cancer, prostatectomy, radiation therapy, neoadjuvant therapy, and treatment outcome.
UNASSIGNED: The study on NHT before RP for high-risk PCa found that NHT was associated with reduced adverse pathological features, such as pT3, positive surgical margins (PSM), and lymph node involvement. However, despite shorter operative times and improved surgical outcomes, NHT did not significantly enhance biochemical recurrence (BCR) or other oncological outcomes. The combination therapy using ADT and androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) showed varying results. Another investigation explored NCHT with taxane-based agents, indicating acceptable treatment benefits and improved BCR-free survival rates in high-risk PCa patients, demonstrating potential feasibility for this approach. Ongoing trials, like the PROTEUS trial, aim to further evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk PCa.
UNASSIGNED: NHT for high-risk PCa does not contribute to improved oncological outcome and should not be administered easily for downstaging or PSM reduction. NHT in combination with ARSI has the potential advantage of improving the oncological outcome of high-risk PCa compared to RP alone, but the results are currently unsatisfactory, and the development of individualized treatment strategies using several different therapeutic approaches is needed.

OBJECTIVE: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) and systemic immuno- or targeted therapy both play significant roles in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Concurrent application of these therapies is increasing, however, no guidelines exist regarding the combination of systemic therapy with RT. This narrative review summarises the existing literature reporting toxicity observed after concurrent treatment with RT and immuno- or targeted therapeutic agents commonly used in HCC.
METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies published between 2011 and 2023 reporting toxicity data on patients treated concurrently with RT and targeted agents used in HCC. Due to the paucity of relevant literature in HCC, the inclusion criteria were expanded to include non-HCC cohorts treated with targeted therapies commonly used in advanced HCC.
UNASSIGNED: Sixty-seven articles were included in this review. Twenty-two articles reported combined RT with sorafenib, one with regorafenib, 22 with bevacizumab, three with lenvatinib and 19 with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Significant findings include a high rate severe hepatotoxicity with combination RT and sorafenib, ranging from 0-19% with liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and 3-18% with conventionally fractionated liver RT. Severe gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities including perforation and ulceration were seen with combination bevacizumab and RT, ranging from 0-27% in the acute setting and 0-23% in the late setting. The safety profile of combination immune checkpoint blockade agents and RT was similar to that seen in monotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Existing data suggests that combination RT and targeted therapy given the risk of severe adverse events including hepatotoxicity and GI toxicity. There is an urgent need for future studies specifically examining the impact of combination therapy in HCC patients to guide clinical decision-making in the evolving landscape of immune- and targeted therapies.

Germ cell tumors are malignant tumors that mostly develop in the gonads. Extragonadal localization is rare and may affect the mediastinal and sacrococcygeal regions. Mediastinal seminoma is a malignant germ cell tumor of the mediastinum. The tumor typically occurs in the anterosuperior mediastinum in males and often has a very slow growth pattern and limited potential for metastasis. And symptoms are not very characteristic, with many patients being asymptomatic and the tumor being discovered incidentally. In this paper, we report the case of a 26-year-old patient admitted for the management of a large anterosuperior mediastinal tumor encasing the vital structures of the mediastinum.

OBJECTIVE: In radiotherapy (RT) for locally advanced cervical cancer, high soft tissue contrast on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can ensure accurate delineation of target volumes (TVs) and optimal dose distribution to the RT target and organs at risk (OAR). MRI-guided adaptive RT (MRIgART) is a novel technology that revises RT plans according to anatomical changes occurring throughout the treatment to improve target coverage and minimise OAR toxicity. This review aims to assess the evidence and gaps of MRI use in RT planning and MRIgART in the treatment of cervical cancer, as well as challenges in its clinical implementation.
METHODS: Ovid Medline and PubMed were searched using keywords for MRI in RT for cervical cancer. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the initial search was deduced to 32 studies. A total of 37 final studies were reviewed, including eight additional articles from references.
UNASSIGNED: In the primary studies, TVs and organ motion were assessed before, during, and after treatment. MRI was used to investigate dose distribution and therapeutic response to the treatment in association with its outcome. Lastly, rationales for MRIgART were evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that MRI enables accurate target delineation, assessment of organ motion and interfraction changes, and monitoring of treatment response through dynamic parameters. Enhanced target coverage and reduced OAR irradiation through MRIgART can improve local control and the overall outcome, although its rationales against the logistical challenges need to be evaluated on further research.

The direct engagement of hafnium (Hf) in biological processes or its critical function in living things is not well understood as of now. Unlike key elements like oxygen, carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen, which are necessary for life, Hf is not known to have any biological activities or functions. It is essential to acknowledge that scientific research is ongoing and that new findings may have been made. This systematic review aimed to aggregate and analyze the studies that discuss biomedical applications of Hf metal. This systematic review was conducted following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement. The following search strategy was used: two independent researchers conducted electronic searches in databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. The search was conducted up to August 2023 using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms \"transition elements,\" \"hafnium,\" and \"biomedical research.\" Boolean operators \"AND\" and \"OR\" were used to refine the search. Electronic databases, along with hand searches, identified a total of 38 studies. The various database searches resulted in a total of 38 studies, of which 12 were excluded as duplicates, and five were unavailable for full-text data. The remaining 21 full-text articles were then assessed for their eligibility based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and finally, a total of 12 studies were included in the present systematic review. Among the 12 chosen studies, six were on cancer-related targeted radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, five were on bone or apatite-forming capabilities, and one was on the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The common outcome measures included cell proliferation, osteoblast formation, radiotherapy intensification, and immunotherapy. This review outlines an overall picture of the biomedical uses of Hf metal, a transition element, as a potent biomaterial. In conclusion, this transition element, Hf, has some promising scope in the fields of biomedicine, with a special focus in terms of cancer radiotherapy and osteogenic capabilities.

OBJECTIVE: The use of radiotherapy (RT) in the palliative and emergent settings for pediatric cancers is an under-utilized resource. Our objective was to provide an evidence-based review of the data to increase awareness of the benefit for this population along with providing guidance on pediatric specific treatment considerations for palliative care physicians, pediatric oncologists, and radiation oncologists.
METHODS: A narrative review was performed querying PubMed, MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov databases, and supplemented with review articles, survey studies, current and recent clinical trials. When limited data existed, well-designed retrospective and prospective studies in the adult setting were evaluated and expert opinion was provided from pediatric oncologists.
UNASSIGNED: Pediatric specific treatment considerations include the use of anesthesia, impact of treatment on the developing child, and logistical challenges of RT. Treatment modality and dose selection are driven by histology and symptomatic site of pain, where we discuss detailed recommendations for hematologic, central nervous system, and solid tumors. For palliative RT, an underlying principle of searching for the lowest effective dose to balance response rate with minimal acute and late treatment related morbidity and logistical hardships is of paramount importance when caring for a pediatric patient. Lastly, we outline how to effectively communicate this option to patients and their caregivers.
CONCLUSIONS: Palliative RT can be of valuable benefit in most settings for patients with pediatric cancer. There is an unmet need for prospective data to inform on dose-fractionation along with patient and caregiver reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with primary genitourinary (GU), gynecologic (GYN) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers can develop life-threatening or critical function-threatening symptoms that necessitate emergent intervention with palliative radiotherapy (RT). Unfortunately, research describing the use of RT in this critical setting is lacking. We aimed to review literature describing emergent palliative RT for primary pelvic malignancies and provide a narrative synthesis of relevant studies.
METHODS: A medical librarian searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase Classic, and Embase databases for relevant English language references from 1946-2022. No restrictions were placed on study type, publication type or date. References for GU, GYN and GI cancers were grouped and synthesized separately.
UNASSIGNED: The treatment of bleeding from primary pelvic tumors was the only indication for emergent RT identified, however, no references reported dedicated cohorts of patients treated for bleeding in the emergent setting. Most references were retrospective single institution studies describing various dose fractionation schemes for non-emergent palliative RT. Outcome measures and response assessment times varied. The latency to hemostasis after RT commencement was not well described; most studies reported outcomes captured weeks or months following treatment. In general, high rates of hemostasis for GU, GYN and GI tumors have been reported following RT schedules ranging from a single fraction to many weeks of fractionated treatments. Bleeding seems to respond more favorably than other symptoms including pain and obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Managing bleeding was the only indication for emergent RT identified in our search. Scant data exist that describe the latency to a hemostatic response following RT. This is an important knowledge gap in the literature given how commonly patients are affected by this complication of primary pelvic malignancies.

Background Small cell oesophageal carcinoma (SCEC), a rare neuroendocrine malignancy, presents various challenges in diagnosis and treatment. The condition is characterised by rapid dissemination, a marked responsiveness to chemotherapy, and a guarded prognosis. While the European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society has recommended platinum-based chemotherapy, ongoing debates on optimal strategies and the lack of clear guidelines underscore the need for further comprehensive research efforts. Methods This study retrospectively analysed 12 cases of localised pure SCEC treated at a UK tertiary care centre between 2006 and 2020. We systematically analysed and categorised the cases based on stage, performance status, and patient age. This comprehensive approach enabled a nuanced examination of overall survival (OS), thereby providing valuable insights into the differences between outcomes. Results The study revealed a median OS of 12.01 months for treated non-metastatic cases, highlighting the challenges of SCEC management. Conversely, treated metastatic cases exhibited a mean survival of 9.15 months, which contrasts starkly with the 2.55 months demonstrated by those receiving best supportive care (BSC). These figures underscore the urgency for refined strategies in handling advanced localised disease and the need to continue research endeavours to devise methods to enhance the precision and optimise outcomes beyond the presented data. Conclusion Based on our findings, the combination of chemoradiotherapy and surgery to manage SCEC holds promise; however, further research is needed to optimise the management approach. The lack of clear guidelines underscores the imperative for personalised treatment approaches.

OBJECTIVE: Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) practice patterns among radiation oncologists are heterogeneous. Appropriate selection of PRT regimen must balance symptom/disease control with patient quality of life. The aim of this review is to summarize prognostic scoring systems for PRT in order to help guide clinical decision making and selection of appropriate PRT regimens.
METHODS: A PubMed search was conducted for articles published between 01/2000 and 07/2023. Standardized search terms including \"palliative\", \"radiotherapy\" and \"survival\" were used. Only English-language, peer-reviewed articles that presented a prognostic scoring system of PRT were included in this review.
UNASSIGNED: In this study, we review the published literature on prognostic scoring systems for patients treated with PRT. Multiple models have been developed and each pertains to a specific patient population or primary tumor type. While they are specific to a particular patient population, all models incorporate patients\' clinical characteristics such as primary site, performance status, location of metastatic disease, and indication for PRT to estimate overall survival (OS) after PRT. For each model, the salient points of the scoring system are described. Based on survival estimates from each prognostic system, different PRT regimens are recommended.
CONCLUSIONS: PRT scoring systems can be used to help clinicians assess patient prognosis. With the information provided by the included studies, radiation oncologists will be better prepared to formulate an optimal, individualized treatment plan for patients to be treated with PRT.

BACKGROUND: A number of therapeutic treatment strategies exist for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein thrombosis (PVT). The aim of this review is to provide a current understanding of treatment options and determine the relative effectiveness of treatment options in preventing mortality over 24 months.
METHODS: A search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2007 to 2022. Articles were screened to identify those that reported on all-cause mortality among treated, non-palliative patients with HCC and PVT. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool (ROBINS-1). Mortality rates at prespecified timepoints between 6 and 24 months were extracted and summarized using a random-effects DerSimonian-Laird model. This review was registered a priori on PROSPERO (CRD42022290708).
RESULTS: When comparing radiotherapy (RT) to sorafenib and combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), there was a trend that RT yields better survival at 6 months [odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-1.76]. When comparing sorafenib to Y90 and RT, sorafenib was associated with higher odds for mortality at 6 months (OR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.11-4.39). No significant differences were noticed from 12 to 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Future strategies for HCC with PVT should look at the combination of radiation and systemic treatments either concurrently or sequentially.