BACKGROUND: Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.
BACKGROUND: NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to assess inter- and intrafraction errors for two patient immobilisation devices in the context of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy: a vacuum cushion and a simple arm support.
METHODS: Twenty patients who were treated with lung stereotactic body radiation therapy in supine position with arms above their head were included in the study. Ten patients were setup in a vacuum cushion (Bluebag™, Elekta) and ten other patients with a simple arm support (Posirest™, Civco). A pretreatment four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography and a post-treatment three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography were acquired to compare positioning and immobilisation accuracy. Based on a rigid registration with the planning computed tomography on the spine at the target level, translational and rotational errors were reported.
RESULTS: The median number of fractions per treatment was 5 (range: 3-10). Mean interfraction errors based on 112 four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographies were similar for both setups with deviations less than or equal to 1.3mm in lateral and vertical direction and 1.2° in roll and yaw. For longitudinal translational errors, mean interfraction errors were 0.7mm with vacuum cushion and -3.9mm with arm support. Based on 111 three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographies, mean lateral, longitudinal and vertical intrafraction errors were -0.1mm, -0.2mm and 0.0mm respectively (SD: 1.0, 1.2 and 1.0mm respectively) for the patients setup with vacuum cushion, and mean vertical, longitudinal and lateral intrafraction errors were -0.3mm, -0.7mm and 0.1mm respectively (SD: 2.3, 1.8 and 1.4mm respectively) for the patients setup with arm support. Intrafraction errors means were not statistically different between both positions but standard deviations were statistically larger with arm support.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study showed similar inter and intrafraction mean deviations between both positioning but a large variability in intrafraction observed with arm support suggested a more accurate immobilization with vacuum cushion.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is on the rise among individuals aged 70 and older. While the gold standard for treatment remains surgical resection, some elderly and frail patients with comorbidities are not eligible for this procedure. In selected cases, percutaneous thermal ablation, such as cryotherapy, microwave and radiofrequency, offers less invasive options. General anesthesia is sometimes necessary for such treatments, but most of the procedures can be conducted using mild or deep conscious sedation. This approach is preferably recommended for small cT1a tumors situated at a distance from the renal hilum and/or ureter. Active surveillance remains an alternative in the case of small low grade RCC although it may induce anxiety in certain patients. Recent research has highlighted the potentials of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as a noninvasive, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for small renal tumors. This narrative review aims to explore recent advances in SABR for localized RCC, including appropriate patient selection, treatment modalities and administration, as well as efficacy and tolerance assessment.
METHODS: We conducted a literature review using the terms [kidney cancer], [renal cell carcinoma], [stereotactic radiotherapy], [SBRT], and [SABR] in the Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases, focusing on prospective and relevant retrospective studies published in English.
RESULTS: Studies report local control rates ranging from 70% to 100% with SABR, highlighting its efficacy in treating RCC. The decline in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is approximately -5 to -17mL/min over the years following SABR. Common toxicities are rare, primarily CTCAE grade 1, include fatigue, nausea, chest or back pain, diarrhea, or gastritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) may be considered as a viable option for patients with localized RCC who are not suitable candidates for surgery with a high local control rate and a favorable safety profile. This approach should be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting and results from ongoing clinical trials are awaited.
METHODS:

The management of peripheral lung nodules is challenging, requiring specialized skills and sophisticated technologies. The diagnosis now appears accessible to advanced endoscopy (see Part 1), which can also guide treatment of these nodules; this second part provides an overview of endoscopy techniques that can enhance surgical treatment through preoperative marking, and stereotactic radiotherapy treatment through fiduciary marker placement. Finally, we will discuss how, in the near future, these advanced endoscopic techniques will help to implement ablation strategy.

Surgery is the standard treatment for operable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (T1-T2aN0M0). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the treatment of choice for non-operable patients, and its positioning for operable patients remains to be clarified. The pattern of recurrence after management of stage I NSCLC is dominated by the risk of distant recurrence, this constituting the rationale for the adjunction of systemic treatment, and especially check point inhibitor (CPI), in combination with surgery or SBRT for patients with high risk features. While the benefit of postoperative CPI on the micro-metastatic disease is logically considered within the framework of a simply additive effect of both therapeutic modalities, it is reasonable to consider a synergistic effect of both CPI and SBRT. Given the role of tumor draining nodes in the development of an anti-tumor immune response, a \"tumor-draining node sparing\" strategy enabled by SBRT could therefore be of major interest in combination with CPI. Pending confirmation of the role of CPI in combination with RTS for the management of stage I NSCLC, we thus discuss in this review the theoretical advantages that this therapeutic strategy could have compared to a surgical strategy.

Standard treatment stage of non-small cell lung cancer is currently surgery. For inoperable patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy is the reference treatment. This non-invasive technique has developed considerably and its excellent results in terms of carcinological control and tolerance raise the question of its indication for operable patients, especially for old patients and/or with comorbidities. This article reviews the available data in the literature of the place of stereotactic body radiotherapy for medically operable patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

The incidence of primary renal cancer is increasing, particularly in elderly patients who may have comorbidities and/or a surgical contraindications. Stereotactic body radiotherapy has primarily been evaluated retrospectively to date. The most commonly used dose schedules are 40Gy in five fractions, 42Gy in three fractions, and 26Gy in one fraction. The results in terms of local control and toxicity are very encouraging. The advantages of stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to thermal ablative treatments are its non-invasive nature, absence of general anesthesia, ability to treat larger lesions, and those close to the renal hilum. Prospective evaluations are still necessary.

OBJECTIVE: Search for predictive factors on survival and local control for less than 3 centimeters (cm) (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) inoperable lung tumors treated by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in a retrospective monocentric study from Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM) PATIENTS AND METHOD: Every patients treated at ICM for a stage I or II inoperable lung tumors from 2009 to 2019 were analyzed.
RESULTS: One hundred and seventy nine lesions were treated in 176 patients, with a major part (82,7%) in operated due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Median overall survival for all patients was 71,7 months with a 35 months follow-up and the 2 years loco-regional free survival was 94,0 months. Better associated outcomes were stage I (median overall survival 71,7 versus 29,0 months P=0,004 ; HR=2,37 P=0,005), BED≥150Gy (median time-to-progression not reached versus 76,7 months P=0,025), small size of Planning Target Volume (PTV) (HR=0,42 P=0,032 when PTV<15,6 cc). 7,3% of all patients developed radiation pneumonitis.
CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is associated with an excellent overall survival and a high rate of local control for less than 3cm (stage I) and 5cm (stage II) lung tumors but a low rate of toxicities. For these patients with many comorbidities, BED over 150Gy seems to be associated with a better loco-regional free survival, while cause of death is often other than lung cancer.

Ultracentral (UC) lung lesions are generally defined by the presence of the tumour or the Planning Target Volume (PTV) abutting proximal bronchial tree (PBT) or the esophagus. Initial reports rose awareness regarding the potential toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) when delivered to UC lesions. Major concerns include necrosis, stenosis, and bleeding of the PBT. Technological improvements now enable the delivery of more accurate treatments, possibly redefining the historical \"no-fly zone\". In this review, studies focusing on the treatment of UC lesions with SBRT are presented. The narrow therapeutic window requires a multidisciplinary approach.

暂无摘要。