Inclusive research combines the expertise of academically trained researchers with the lived experience of individuals with disabilities to render results that are more accessible, accountable, and meaningful to the disability community. In this case study, adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) contributed as co-researchers to a series of studies on mental health of adults with intellectual disability. The research model, specific engagement strategies, and lessons learned are shared. Feedback from members of the research team suggests that including adults with IDD as co-researchers benefited investigators, co-researchers with IDD, and project outcomes. Our case study emphasizes the valuable contributions of research partners with IDD and provides a model that may be adapted and utilized by researchers to enhance their practice.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: The National Research Mentoring Network (NRMN) is a National Institutes of Health-funded program for diversifying the science, technology, engineering, math, and medicine research workforce through the provision of mentoring, networking, and professional development resources. The NRMN provides mentoring resources to members through its online platform-MyNRMN.
UNASSIGNED: MyNRMN helps members build a network of mentors. Our goal was to expand enrollment and mentoring connections, especially among those who have been historically underrepresented in biomedical training and the biomedical workforce.
UNASSIGNED: To improve the ease of enrollment, we implemented the split testing of iterations of our user interface for platform registration. To increase mentoring connections, we developed multiple features that facilitate connecting via different pathways.
UNASSIGNED: Our improved user interface yielded significantly higher rates of completed registrations (P<.001). Our analysis showed improvement in completed enrollments that used the version 1 form when compared to those that used the legacy form (odds ratio 1.52, 95% CI 1.30-1.78). The version 2 form, with its simplified, 1-step process and fewer required fields, outperformed the legacy form (odds ratio 2.18, 95% CI 1.90-2.50). By improving the enrollment form, the rate of MyNRMN enrollment completion increased from 57.3% (784/1368) with the legacy form to 74.5% (2016/2706) with the version 2 form. Our newly developed features delivered an increase in connections between members.
UNASSIGNED: Our technical efforts expanded MyNRMN\'s membership base and increased connections between members. Other platform development teams can learn from these efforts to increase enrollment among underrepresented groups and foster continuing, successful engagement.

UNASSIGNED: To determine gender gaps in Emeritus researchers in Colombia.
UNASSIGNED: Oaxaca-Blinder-Kitakagwa decomposition model, correcting the sample selection bias with the inclusion of Mills\' inverse ratio (Heckman\'s Lambda) through an ordered probit model. Data: Information available in the ScienTI Platform - Colombia during the period 2015-2021.
UNASSIGNED: The results show that the gender gap between female and male researchers is 5.8%. To achieve Emeritus status, one must be over 65 years old, and the possibility of achieving Emeritus status is 5.1% higher for female researchers than for their male counterparts. These differences can be explained by the time constraints that female researchers face in being productive, as they spend more time than male researchers on caregiving responsibilities, either due to motherhood or the care of other dependent family members.
UNASSIGNED: The results obtained allow us to affirm that there is a gender gap in scientific research in Colombia in the Emeritus research category in the calls for proposals for the period 2015-2021. Moreover, the existing gap cannot be explained by factors associated with attributes of education and academic productivity that are part of the regulatory requirements, insofar as not being explained by them, it evidences the existence of discrimination against women researchers to access the highest research category.

暂无摘要。

Routine outcome monitoring (ROM) is a major development in the field since it offers likely outcome trajectories and is particularly helpful for failing cases. However, ROM has not led to improved skill development more generally, and it is debatable as to whether expertise is even possible to acquire in psychotherapy. What is missing but crucial to expertise is feedback on the outcome of one\'s actions in real time, which would enable responsive adjustments and improve outcomes. It is argued in this article that by identifying empirically validated moment-to-moment markers capable of differentiating later clinical outcomes, process researchers have uncovered the possibility of extracting prognostic information in real time, but one must develop the requisite observational skills. Multiple lines of research are reviewed to support the contention that real-time outcome information is available to guide responsivity and improve outcomes. And the typically hidden nature of these important signals further underscores the need for systematic training in process acuity. Given the pressing need to improve training methods, process coding training should not be restricted to research laboratories but should be exported to the clinical setting and tailored to the needs of clinicians for use in real time during therapy sessions. These are testable hypotheses that, if successful, hold the possibility of improving training and reversing the worrying trend of experience in psychotherapy being unrelated to outcome. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

暂无摘要。

Medical research prioritization is an important aspect of decision-making by researchers and relevant stakeholders. The ever-increasing availability of technology and data has opened doors to new discoveries and new questions. This makes it difficult for researchers and relevant stakeholders to make well-informed decisions about the research areas they want to support and the nations they should look for collaborations. It is, therefore, useful to look at the spatio-temporal trends of medical research prioritization to gain insight into popular and neglected areas of research as well as the allocation of prioritization of each nation. In this study, we develop a system that collects, classifies, and summarizes case report abstracts according to the location, time, and disease category of the report. The additional classifications allow us to visualize and monitor the trends in medical research prioritization by location, time, and disease category.

In April 2023, the National Cancer Institute offered a roadmap for cancer research to achieve Cancer Moonshot goals. To reach these goals requires making progress for all cancers, not just those that are most common. Achieving progress against rare cancers, as well as common cancers, requires involvement of large clinical research networks. In 2020, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) launched an initiative on Conducting Rare Disease Research using PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network. The purpose of this commentary is to introduce the broader community of cancer researchers to the PCORnet NET-PRO study (comparing the effects of different treatment approaches for neuroendocrine tumors on patient-reported outcomes) thereby demonstrating how researchers can use the PCORnet infrastructure to conduct large-scale patient-centered studies of rare cancers.

暂无摘要。