QUALITATIVE

定性
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探索医疗保健提供者对中风患者提供支持的看法。
    进行了定性的描述性研究。Snowball抽样用于招募澳大利亚医护人员,为中风患者提供护理。对半结构化的一对一访谈进行了录音和转录。两位作者对所有转录本进行了归纳主题分析。
    采访了澳大利亚三个州在护理连续体中工作的14名参与者。回应符合三个总体主题:(1)对支持的态度;(2)支持的可用性和可及性;(3)对支持的认识。这些主题包括对中风患者可用的支持选择的看法以及影响医疗保健提供者之间支持提供决策的因素。
    本研究中的医疗保健提供者认为中风患者将受益于更广泛的可用支持。支持应考虑到中风患者的不同经历以及急性和长期需求,以及所有文化的人都可以接触到,语言学,和社会经济背景。医疗保健提供者和经历过中风的人可能会受益于中风后支持的路线图,该路线图清楚地概述了支持提供的责任所在。
    整个护理连续体的医疗保健提供者认为,当前的中风后支持和服务不能充分满足中风幸存者的经历和需求的多样性。不参加康复的中风幸存者,包括那些“轻度”中风或不适合以肢体为重点的康复服务的人,可能会错过关键的中风后信息和支持。制定中风后支持路线图,确定最低限度的支持规定以及提供的责任可能会使医疗保健提供者受益,中风幸存者和他们的照顾者。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to explore healthcare providers\' perceptions of support provision for people who have experienced stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Snowball sampling was used to recruit Australian healthcare workers providing care to people with stroke. Semi-structured one-on-one interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. An inductive thematic analysis of all transcripts was undertaken by two authors.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen participants who worked across the care continuum in three Australian states were interviewed. Responses fit into three overarching themes: (1) attitudes to supports; (2) availability and accessibility of supports; and (3) awareness of supports. These themes encompassed perceptions of the support options available for people with stroke and the factors affecting support provision decision making among healthcare providers.
    UNASSIGNED: The healthcare providers in this study thought people with stroke would benefit from a greater range of available supports. Supports should take into account the diverse experiences and acute and long-term needs of people with stroke, as well as be accessible to people from all cultural, linguistic, and socioeconomic backgrounds. Healthcare providers and people who have experienced stroke may benefit from a roadmap for post-stroke support that clearly outlines where responsibility lies for support provision.
    Healthcare providers across the care continuum feel that current post-stroke supports and services do not adequately serve the diversity of experiences and needs of stroke survivors.Stroke survivors who do not attend rehabilitation, including those with “mild” stroke or who do not fit within limb-focused rehabilitation services, may be missing out on key post-stroke information and support.The development of a roadmap for post stroke support that identifies minimum support provisions and where responsibility lies for provision could benefit healthcare providers, stroke survivors and their carers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自闭症患者在接受自闭症诊断方面面临许多障碍。通常,他们可能会被误诊为边缘性人格障碍。对于我们的研究,我们采访了10名以前被诊断为边缘性人格障碍的自闭症成年人。这有助于我们更好地了解他们的经历。他们解释了边缘性人格障碍是如何被污名化的,并可能暗示人们应该为他们的行为差异负责。他们发现他们不得不尝试治疗边缘性人格障碍的治疗方法是有害的。例如,这些治疗促进了“掩蔽”。先前的研究表明,掩蔽对自闭症患者可能有害,把它和自杀的风险联系起来.这种诊断也导致医疗保健专业人员忽视他们并贬低他们的信念。一旦他们被诊断出患有边缘性人格障碍,很难获得自闭症评估。当他们接受自闭症诊断时,这更加积极。这个诊断是有效的。这也改善了他们的心理健康,因为他们不再被期望掩盖-他们的分歧现在被接受了。他们仍然认为自闭症在社会上受到污名化。然而,这与边缘性人格障碍的污名非常不同。他们觉得自闭症的污名更多是关于他们作为人的能力,而边缘人格障碍的耻辱是关于他们是如何被打破的,可能对他人有害。这项研究很重要,因为它可以让研究人员和医疗保健专业人员听到他们的故事。增加他们的声音有助于他们的人性化,促进精神卫生服务的积极变化。现在需要更多的研究。
    UNASSIGNED: Autistic people face many barriers to receiving an autism diagnosis. Often, they may be misdiagnosed with borderline personality disorder instead. For our study, we interviewed 10 autistic adults who had previously been diagnosed with borderline personality disorder. This helped us to better understand their experiences. They explained how borderline personality disorder is quite stigmatised and may suggest that people are to blame for their differences in behaviour. They found the treatments they had to try for borderline personality disorder to be harmful. For example, these treatments promoted \'masking\'. Previous research showed that masking can be harmful for autistic people, linking it to risk of suicide. This diagnosis also led to healthcare professionals neglecting them and discounting their beliefs. Once they were diagnosed with borderline personality disorder, it was hard to access an autism assessment. When they did receive their autism diagnoses, this was much more positive. This diagnosis was validating. It also improved their mental health, as they were no longer expected to mask - their differences were now accepted. They still felt that autism was stigmatised in society. However, this was very different to the stigma around borderline personality disorder. They felt autism stigma was more about their competence as people, whereas borderline personality disorder stigma was about how they were broken and might be harmful to others. This study is important because it allows their stories to be heard by researchers and healthcare professionals alike. Adding their voices helps to humanise them, promoting positive change in mental health services. More research is now needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 负担能力,缺乏公共精神保健设施,保险范围不足,在印度,污名和歧视是利用精神保健的障碍。关于这些障碍和影响心理健康服务使用的因素的研究有限。
    探索在改良的自信社区治疗计划中为患有严重精神疾病的个人及其照顾者寻求精神保健的障碍。
    在使用描述性主题分析的定性研究中,我们对19名成年人进行了深度访谈,包括7名患有严重精神疾病的人和12名护理人员。所有参与者都参加了经过修改的自信社区治疗计划至少两年。使用主题分析,我们确定了代码并将其分组为子主题,然后将其分组为主题。
    出现了寻求心理健康服务的三个主要主题:与服务相关的因素,社会相关因素,和疾病相关因素。与服务相关的因素包括负担能力,可访问性和地理差异,以及保险计划下的不承保。社会相关因素包括社会污名和歧视,缺乏精神卫生服务知识和寻求其他形式的治疗,可怜的社会支持。与疾病相关的因素包括对疾病的洞察力差以及尽管药物治疗但症状没有缓解。
    寻求心理健康的障碍可以归类为与服务相关的,与社会相关的,和疾病相关。确定这些因素将改善心理健康服务的提供。
    UNASSIGNED: Affordability, lack of public mental healthcare facilities, inadequate insurance coverage, and stigma and discrimination are barriers to mental healthcare utilization in India. There is limited research on these barriers and the factors influencing the use of mental health services.
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the barriers to seeking mental healthcare for individuals with severe mental illness and their caregivers in a modified assertive community treatment program.
    UNASSIGNED: In a qualitative study using a descriptive thematic analysis, we conducted in-depth interviews with 19 adults, including seven individuals with severe mental illness and twelve caregivers. All the participants had been in the modified assertive community treatment program for at least two years. Using thematic analysis, we identified and grouped codes into subthemes and then clustered into themes.
    UNASSIGNED: Three major themes on barriers to seeking mental health services emerged: service-related factors, societal-related factors, and illness-related factors. Service-related factors included affordability, accessibility and geographical disparity, and noncoverage under insurance schemes. Societal-related factors included social stigma and discrimination, lack of mental health service knowledge and seeking other forms of treatment, and poor social support. Illness-related factors included poor insight into the illness and no relief from the symptoms despite medication.
    UNASSIGNED: Barriers to seeking mental healthcare can be categorized as service-related, societal-related, and illness-related. Identifying these factors will improve mental health service delivery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于自杀念头的现象学知识仍然缺乏,研究的重点是自杀的原因,而不是他们的心理表达。虽然临床访谈仍然是标准的现象学方法,对于这个敏感话题,这种对生活经验的探索可能具有挑战性。作为一个补充的选择,使用自然发生的在线数据是捕捉禁忌现象的细节的机会。
    在这项现象学研究中,我们对Reddit在线板(r/Depression)的非身份用户自发报告的自杀想法的生活经历进行了主题分析,使用搜索词“自杀意念”收集668个帖子,\"\"自杀的想法,“和”自杀。“代码被分为描述性类别,总结思想的属性,他们的影响,以及他们与自杀的关系.然后,解释性综合产生了全球性主题,这些主题将自杀念头的经历联系在一起。
    具有长期性和重复性,自杀的想法以生动的意象和白日梦的形式出现,最初给不利的情绪带来缓解,但最终变得条条框框,无所不包。而不是一个奇迹,他们被人们认为是侵入性的思想,努力使他们的发生变得有意义。当调解不想要的想法的存在时,用户表达复杂的关系,希望或不死,以及对行为的控制或对自杀行为的恐惧的不同看法。
    通过将大定性数据创新应用于现象学分析,这项研究有助于对自杀念头的初步表征,发现没有考虑到当前自杀概念化的发现。分析受到职位和未知人口统计的限制,临床访谈的进一步研究对于深入探索自杀念头是必要的.
    UNASSIGNED: There remains a dearth of knowledge concerning the phenomenology of suicidal thoughts, with research focusing on reasons for feeling suicidal rather than their mental expression. While clinical interviews remain the standard phenomenological approach, such exploration of lived experiences may prove challenging for this sensitive topic. As a complementary alternative, the use of naturally-occurring online data is opportune for capturing elaborations on tabooed phenomena.
    UNASSIGNED: In this phenomenological study, we present a thematic analysis on lived experiences of suicidal thoughts as spontaneously reported by non-identified users of a Reddit online board (r/Depression), collecting 668 posts using the search terms \"suicidal ideation,\" \"suicidal thoughts,\" and \"suicide.\" Codes were grouped into descriptive categories summarizing the properties of thoughts, their effects, and their relation to suicide. Then, an interpretative synthesis yielded global themes connecting salient meanings on the experience of suicidal thoughts.
    UNASSIGNED: With a long-term and recurring nature, thoughts of suicide appear in the form of vivid imagery and daydreaming\'s, initially bringing relief to adverse feelings but eventually becoming conditioned and all-consuming. Rather than a wonderment, they are experienced as intrusive thoughts by people struggling to make meaning of their occurrence. When conciliating the presence of unwanted thoughts, users express intricate relations to wishing or not to die, as well as varying perceptions of control over actions or fear of suicidal behavior.
    UNASSIGNED: With an innovative application of big qualitative data into phenomenological analysis, this study contributes to an initial characterization of suicidal thoughts, uncovering findings that are not contemplated into current conceptualizations of suicidality. The analysis is limited by a restricted context of posts and unknown demographics, and further research with clinical interviews is warranted for in-depth exploration of suicidal thoughts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解什么对帕金森氏症患者及其家人重要,对于得出相关的临床结果指标和指导临床护理至关重要。这项研究的目的是探讨什么是重要的帕金森病患者与家庭随着时间的推移。对英国帕金森大学收集的在线调查数据进行了定性内容分析,以确定帕金森病对患者的重要症状和影响的类型和频率。患有帕金森氏症的家庭。独立T检验用于确定患者与患者之间组间差异的显著性。家庭<2,2-5,6-10,11-20,>20年的持续时间。ANOVA用于评估疾病持续时间的组内差异。我们发现,随着疾病持续时间的延长,症状优先级随时间发生显着变化。震颤后来报道较少,而流动性,运动障碍,步态和言语/沟通症状获得优先考虑。总的来说,患者识别出与运动相关的症状(例如,走路,运动迟缓)是在所有持续时间内最麻烦的,而家庭更强烈地优先考虑疾病的身体和心理社会影响(例如,移动性,安全,人际交往,独立性,和家庭影响)。我们得出的结论是,家庭和患者对重要事物的看法之间存在重要差异,并且随着疾病持续时间的延长而随着时间的推移而变化。
    Understanding what matters to people with Parkinson\'s and their family is essential to derive relevant clinical outcome measures and guide clinical care. The purpose of this study was to explore what is important to people with Parkinson\'s disease vs. family over time. A qualitative content-analysis of online survey data collected by Parkinson\'s UK was conducted to identify types and frequencies of important symptoms and impacts of Parkinson\'s for people with the disease vs. family of people with Parkinson\'s. Independent T-tests were used to identify significance of between group differences for patients vs. family at < 2, 2-5, 6-10, 11-20, > 20-year durations. ANOVA was used to assess for within group differences by disease duration. We found that symptom priority changed significantly over time with longer disease duration. Tremor was reported less often later on, whereas mobility, dyskinesias, gait and speech/communication symptoms gained priority. In general, patients identified movement-related symptoms (e.g., walking, bradykinesia) as the most bothersome at all durations while family more strongly prioritized the physical and psychosocial impacts of disease (e.g., mobility, safety, interpersonal interactions, independence, and family impact). We conclude that important differences exist between family and patient perspectives of what matters and change over time with longer duration of disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:减肥手术是肥胖患者最有效的治疗方法。研究表明,在病理生理学和治疗中存在复杂的社会心理叠加,这在提供护理时需要特别考虑。在新西兰接受减肥计划的患者的辍学率很高,导致无法进行手术干预。
    方法:我们进行了个人,对接受减肥手术计划但未完成计划的患者进行半结构化访谈,或在2015年至2020年之间接受手术。扎根理论方法被用来创建一个探索性框架来识别和描述遇到的主题。主题分析和参与者经验之间的比较的迭代过程被用来巩固共同的关键障碍。这项研究旨在探索患者在减肥手术计划中的经验,以了解完成减肥计划并接受手术的障碍和推动者。增加了以前的定性工作,调查了新西兰减肥手术计划的患者经验。
    结果:确定了患者在接受减肥手术时面临的五个障碍主题。这些是术前减肥的要求,经历肥胖的社会耻辱,通信,社会经济和地理障碍,和社区支持。这五个主题通常在患者体验中共存并结合,导致患者脱离减肥服务。
    结论:许多因素导致符合条件的患者在接受减肥手术后不接受减肥手术。指定的减肥目标是最重要的障碍。社区支持和在线资源是重要的推动力。这项研究应告知新西兰减肥计划的变化。
    BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for people with obesity. It has been shown that there\'s is a complex psychosocial overlay in the pathophysiology and treatment, which requires specific consideration when delivering care. There is a significant drop out rate for patients accepted on to bariatric programmes in New Zealand, resulting in failure to progress to surgical intervention.
    METHODS: We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with patients who were accepted onto the bariatric surgery programme but did not complete the programme, or receive an operation between 2015 and 2020. Grounded theory methodology was used to create an exploratory framework to identify and describe the themes encountered. An iterative process of thematic analysis and comparison between participants experiences was used to consolidate the shared key barriers. This study aims to explore patients experiences of a bariatric surgery programme to understand barriers and enablers to complete a bariatric programme and receive an operation. Adding to previous qualitative work investigating patients experience of bariatric surgery programmes in New Zealand.
    RESULTS: Five themes of barriers that patients face to receiving bariatric surgery were identified. These were preoperative weight loss requirement, experiencing the social stigma of obesity, communication, socioeconomic and geographic barriers, and community support. These five themes often co-exist in patients experiences and combine, to cause patients to disengage with the bariatric service.
    CONCLUSIONS: Many factors contribute to eligible patients not receiving bariatric surgery once accepted onto the programme. Specified weight loss goals was the most significant barrier. Community support and online resources were significant enablers. This study should inform changes to bariatric programmes in New Zealand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是描述护士在COVID-19大流行后的经历,并探讨护士当前期望的支持需求。
    方法:本研究采用了定性的描述性设计。
    方法:这项研究是在美国东南部的学术卫生系统中进行的,该系统包括急性护理医院和门诊专科诊所。2023年8月和9月,在五个小组的两个或三个护士中采访了13名护士。使用Photovoice进行数据收集,每位护士提交了两张照片。使用常规内容分析对数据进行分析,转录本和照片分析同时发生。
    结果:确定了三个主题:(1)组织动荡,(2)个人创伤和过渡;(3)争取复兴和更新。开发了一个概念模型来说明这三个主题及其关系,以描述研究结果。
    结论:护士受到组织因素的影响,例如人员配备问题和缺乏支持,并亲自经历了仍然具有挑战性的心理创伤。护士在他们的个人生活中找到了复兴和更新,但仍然希望继续改善组织因素,以提高他们的福祉,以目前尚未解决的方式实现全面恢复。这项研究的结果与医疗机构和领导者制定组织变革和心理健康解决方案以支持护士福祉有关。
    护士健康的优先次序对于护理专业和医疗机构来说至关重要。迫切需要组织改进和实施支持资源,以帮助护士康复,保留护士,并确保患者获得优质护理。
    结论:这项研究发现,在COVID-19大流行开始3年后,护士出现了挣扎,强调持续需要提供支持护士健康的资源和干预措施。我们的发现为护士提供了他们的经历和支持需求的描述,供组织和医疗保健领导者在未来考虑。
    定性研究报告标准(SRQR)清单。
    没有患者或公众捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to describe the experiences of nurses in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and to explore nurses\' current desired support needs.
    METHODS: This study used a qualitative descriptive design.
    METHODS: This study was conducted in the Southeastern United States at an academic health system encompassing acute care hospitals and outpatient speciality clinics. Thirteen nurses were interviewed in August and September of 2023 in five small groups of two or three nurses. Photovoice was used for data collection and each nurse submitted two photographs. Data were analysed utilising conventional content analysis, with transcripts and photograph analysis occurring concurrently.
    RESULTS: Three themes were identified: (1) organisational turmoil, (2) personal traumatisation and transitions and (3) striving for revival and renewal. A conceptual model illustrating the three themes and their relationships was developed to depict study findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: Nurses were impacted by organisational factors, such as staffing issues and lack of support, and personally through psychological trauma that has remained challenging. Nurses found revival and renewal in their personal lives, but still desire continued improvement in organisational factors to enhance their well-being in ways not currently being addressed to allow for full recovery. Findings from this study are pertinent for healthcare organisations and leaders to develop organisational changes and mental health solutions to support nurse well-being.
    UNASSIGNED: The prioritisation of nurse well-being is critical for the nursing profession and healthcare organisations. Organisational improvements and the implementation of support resources are urgently needed to aid in nurse recovery, nurse retention and to ensure patients receive quality care.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified nurses\' struggles 3 years after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the ongoing need to provide resources and interventions that support nurse well-being. Our findings offer nurses\' descriptions of their experiences and support needs for organisations and healthcare leaders to consider in the future.
    UNASSIGNED: Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) Checklist.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在接受基于电子烟的戒烟干预措施后,从吸烟过渡到电子烟的途径已被最低限度地探索。
    目的:1)确定干预实施和最终随访之间的途径;2)描述与不同途径组的吸烟/吸烟行为相关的基线和干预后统计数据;3)探索定性参与者观点,将途径组情境化。
    方法:在急诊科(COSTED)随机对照试验中收集的戒烟试验数据的嵌入式混合方法分析。
    方法:在2022年1月至8月期间从6个急诊科(英格兰5个,苏格兰1个)招募。
    方法:366名成年吸烟者被随机分配接受COSTED干预,并在6个月随访时提供数据。随访后接受采访的24名参与者的定性子样本。
    方法:简短的戒烟建议,提供电子烟入门套件,并转介给当地的戒烟服务。
    方法:基线和6个月随访时已确定的途径和吸烟/吸烟行为的描述性统计报告。半结构化电话/视频访谈按主题进行分析。
    结果:13.4%(n=49)的参与者在接受干预后1个月内戒烟,19.1%(n=70)在1至6个月之间辞职,24.9%(n=91)每天减少香烟(CPD)至少50%,42.6%的人没有显著减少吸烟。大约三分之一的参与者在随访时报告没有吸烟。报告双重使用与CPD减少相关。几乎有三分之一的人报告了使用与作为干预措施一部分提供的设备不同的设备进行的实验。Quitters报告了对电子烟满意的主题,促进戒烟的环境变化和戒烟的动机。
    结论:香烟和电子烟的双重使用可以减少吸烟,并可能阻止戒烟。持续使用电子烟并不总是成功戒烟所必需的。成功取决于个人背景以及对电子烟的满意度。
    OBJECTIVE: Pathways of transitioning from tobacco smoking to vaping after receiving an e-cigarette-based smoking cessation intervention have been minimally explored.
    OBJECTIVE: 1) identify pathways between intervention delivery and final follow-up; 2) describe baseline and post-intervention statistical data in relation to smoking/vaping behaviour of the different pathway groups; 3) explore qualitative participant perspectives contextualising pathway groups.
    METHODS: Embedded mixed-methods analysis of data collected for the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (COSTED) randomised controlled trial.
    METHODS: Recruitment from 6 Emergency Departments (5 in England and 1 in Scotland) between January and August 2022.
    METHODS: 366 adult smokers who were randomised to receive the COSTED intervention and provided data at 6-month follow-up. Qualitative subsample of 24 participants interviewed after follow-up.
    METHODS: Brief smoking cessation advice, provision of an e-cigarette starter kit and referral to the local Stop Smoking Service.
    METHODS: Descriptive statistical reporting of identified pathways and smoking/vaping behaviour at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Semi-structured phone/video interviews analysed thematically.
    RESULTS: 13.4% (n = 49) of participants quit smoking within 1 month of receiving the intervention, 19.1% (n = 70) quit between 1 and 6 months, 24.9% (n = 91) reduced cigarettes per day (CPD) by at least 50%, and 42.6% did not experience a significant smoking reduction. Approximately a third of participants who quit reported not vaping at follow-up. Reporting dual use was associated with a reduction in CPD. Appoximately a third reported experimenting with a different device to the one provided as part of the intervention. Quitters reported themes of satisfaction with vaping, changes in environment facilitating quitting and motivation to quit.
    CONCLUSIONS: Dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes can result in a reduction of smoking and may preclude quitting smoking. Sustained e-cigarette use is not always necessary for quitting success. Success depends on personal context as well satisfaction with vaping.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生活在遗传遗传性疾病的风险中可能是一种具有挑战性的经历,会导致心理困扰,以及遗传疾病导致身体健康问题的可能性。亨廷顿病(HD)是一种遗传性疾病,神经退行性疾病。它会导致运动功能障碍,认知能力下降和,在疾病的进展过程中,不同的心理困难是常见的。总共采访了12名有HD风险的参与者,并使用解释性现象学分析方法来了解他们维持心理健康的经验。这导致了三个主题:(1)“你一直处于困境”:生活在两个世界中;(2)“我必须生活,只是血腥的生活\“:管理有时间限制的寿命的可能性;和(3)\“我试着尽我最大的努力去看过去的疾病\”:令人筋疲力尽的追求保持生活良好。调查结果表明,需要在专业环境中提高知识水平,比如家庭医生,辅导员,和其他卫生专业人员,遗传咨询师可以用来支持这个群体的具体策略,并提供可获得的支持和实施系统干预措施,为心理应对策略和围绕个人及其家庭单位的福祉进行沟通提供支持。未来的研究可能有助于这些知识的形成和提供与HD一致的服务,以帮助支持有HD风险的人的心理健康。
    Living at risk of a genetically inherited disease can be a challenging experience causing psychological distress as well as the possibility of the genetic disease leading to physical health problems. Huntington\'s disease (HD) is a genetic, neurodegenerative condition. It causes motor dysfunction, cognitive decline and, during the progression of the disease, different psychological difficulties are common. A total of 12 participants living at risk of HD were interviewed and interpretative phenomenological analysis methodology was used to understand their experiences of maintaining psychological well-being. This resulted in three themes: (1) \"you\'re constantly in limbo\": living in two worlds; (2) \"I have to live, just bloody live\": managing the possibility of a time-limited lifespan; and (3) \"I try and try my hardest to look past the disease\": the exhausting quest to keep living well. The findings indicated a need for improved knowledge within professional settings, such as for family doctors, counselors, and other health professionals, specific strategies that genetic counselors can use to support this group, and provision of accessible support and implementation of systemic interventions that would offer support for psychological coping strategies and communication around well-being to the individual and their family unit. Future research could contribute to the formation of such knowledge and the provision of HD-aligned services to help support the psychological well-being of people living at risk of HD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:生活在沿海社区的人们在英国的健康状况最差,部分原因是高吸烟率。被剥夺的沿海社区包括难以获得传统戒烟服务的社会弱势群体。这项研究旨在征求居住在沿海社区的吸烟者的意见,评估该人群的最佳戒烟干预措施。此外,采用干预描述复制模板(TIDieR)检查表作为定性数据的分析框架,为干预设计提供信息.
    方法:招募了当前或最近戒烟的人(n=25),以参加来自英国海滨小镇的一系列社区地点的定性访谈。采用TIDieR框架对访谈数据进行了主题分析。此分析与相关文献和利益相关者会议和观察的注释进行了三角剖分,以映射到TIDieR清单上,以描述最佳干预措施。
    结果:目标人群戒烟的障碍包括戒烟动机低,高度焦虑/无聊,吸烟正常化和广泛的非法烟草使用。有广泛支持结合行为支持,电子烟和财政激励措施,强烈倾向于在(非医疗保健)社区环境中机会主义和本地实施干预,以非加压的方式,理想情况下是由经过专门培训的社区工作者提供戒烟支持。
    结论:目标人群可以接受基于社区的密集戒烟干预措施。将TIDieR清单调整为演绎定性分析框架,为干预措施的发展提供了系统的方法。结合其他干预发展活动,这确保了干预设计过程是透明的,拟议的干预措施是明确的。建议在干预开发之前,研究人员与目标人群的成员交谈,他们可能会对最佳干预提供有价值的见解。
    BACKGROUND: People living in coastal communities have some of the worst health outcomes in the UK, driven in part by high smoking rates. Deprived coastal communities include socially disadvantaged groups that struggle to access traditional stop smoking services. The study aimed to seek the views of people who smoke living in coastal communities, to assess the optimal smoking cessation intervention for this population. In addition, the Template for Intervention Description Replication (TIDieR) checklist was adapted as an analytical framework for qualitative data to inform intervention design.
    METHODS: Current or recent ex-smokers (n = 25) were recruited to participate in qualitative interviews from a range of community locations in a deprived English seaside town. A thematic analysis of the interview data was undertaken adapting the TIDieR framework. This analysis was triangulated with relevant literature and notes from stakeholder meetings and observations to map onto the TIDieR checklist to describe the optimal intervention.
    RESULTS: Barriers to quitting smoking in the target population included low motivation to quit, high anxiety/boredom, normalisation of smoking and widespread illicit tobacco use. There was broad support for combining behavioural support, e-cigarettes and financial incentives, with a strong preference for the intervention to be delivered opportunistically and locally within (non-healthcare) community settings, in a non-pressurising manner, ideally by a community worker specially trained to give stop smoking support.
    CONCLUSIONS: An intensive community-based smoking cessation intervention was acceptable to the target population. Adapting the TIDieR checklist as a deductive qualitative analytical framework offered a systematic approach to intervention development. Combined with other intervention development activities, this ensured that the intervention design process was transparent and the proposed intervention was well defined. It is recommended that prior to intervention development researchers speak to members of the target population who may give valuable insight into the optimal intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号