QTc

QTc
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    评估在接受睡眠研究的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,目的设计的QTc评分算法与既定的手动评分算法的诊断准确性。
    我们收集了28名COPD患者的62次夜间心电图(ECG)记录。校正心率的QT间期(QTc,Bazett)在1分钟的时间内平均并量化,无论是通过算法还是通过光标辅助手评分。手动评分是对算法得出的结果不知情的。计算了三个阈值(460、480和500ms)的Bland-Altman统计数据和混淆矩阵。
    手动和计算机分析了总共32944个1-min周期和相应的平均QTc间隔。手动和基于算法的QTc间隔之间的平均差为-1ms,协议限制为-18到16ms。总的来说,2587(8%),357(1%),和0个超过阈值460、480和500ms的QTc间隔,分别,是通过手工评分识别的。其中,2516、357和0被该算法一致地识别。这导致诊断分类准确率为0.98(95%CI0.98/0.98),1.00(1.00/1.00),和1.00(1.00/1.00),持续460、480和500ms,分别。灵敏度分别为0.97、1.00和460、480和500ms的NA,分别。460、480和500ms的特异性分别为0.98、1.00和1.00,分别。
    总的来说,在稳定的COPD患者中,有8%的夜间1分钟时间显示出临床相关的QTc延长。自动QTc算法以非常高的灵敏度和特异性准确地识别临床相关的QTc延长。使用这个工具,医院睡眠实验室可以识别无症状的QTc延长患者有恶性心律失常的风险,允许他们在最终的心脏事件之前咨询心脏病专家。
    UNASSIGNED: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of a purpose-designed QTc-scoring algorithm versus the established hand-scoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) undergoing sleep studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We collected 62 overnight electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings in 28 COPD patients. QT-intervals corrected for heart rate (QTc, Bazett) were averaged over 1-min periods and quantified, both by the algorithm and by cursor-assisted hand-scoring. Hand-scoring was done blinded to the algorithm-derived results. Bland-Altman statistics and confusion matrixes for three thresholds (460, 480, and 500ms) were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 32944 1-min periods and corresponding mean QTc-intervals were analysed manually and by computer. Mean difference between manual and algorithm-based QTc-intervals was -1ms, with limits of agreement of -18 to 16ms. Overall, 2587 (8%), 357 (1%), and 0 QTc-intervals exceeding the threshold 460, 480, and 500ms, respectively, were identified by hand-scoring. Of these, 2516, 357, and 0 were consistently identified by the algorithm. This resulted in a diagnostic classification accuracy of 0.98 (95% CI 0.98/0.98), 1.00 (1.00/1.00), and 1.00 (1.00/1.00) for 460, 480, and 500ms, respectively. Sensitivity was 0.97, 1.00, and NA for 460, 480, and 500ms, respectively. Specificity was 0.98, 1.00, and 1.00 for 460, 480, and 500ms, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 8% of nocturnal 1-min periods showed clinically relevant QTc prolongations in patients with stable COPD. The automated QTc-algorithm accurately identified clinically relevant QTc-prolongations with a very high sensitivity and specificity. Using this tool, hospital sleep laboratories may identify asymptomatic patients with QTc-prolongations at risk for malignant arrhythmia, allowing them to consult a cardiologist before an eventual cardiac event.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Icenticaftor(QBW251)是囊性纤维化跨膜受体的增效剂。基于其作用机制,icentraftor有望通过恢复粘膜纤毛清除为慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者提供益处,这最终会导致细菌定植和相关炎症级联反应的减少。安慰剂和阳性对照,在46名健康参与者中进行了四向交叉全面QT研究,目的是评估治疗(300mg,每天两次,共6天)和超治疗(750mg,每天两次,共6天)口服剂量的icententeaftor对心电图参数的影响。包括浓度校正QT(QTc)分析。莫西沙星(400毫克,口服)用作阳性对照。在对第1天和第6天(稳态)的汇总数据进行的浓度-QTc分析中,估计的种群斜率较浅,略有负值:-0.0012ms/ng/mL。预测对Fridericia校正的QT(QTcF)间隔(ΔQTcF)的影响在300mg每日两次峰浓度下为-1.3毫秒(几何平均值为1094ng/mL),在750-mg每日两次峰浓度(几何平均值Cmax为45ng/mL)下为-5.5毫秒,表明icentator对QTcF间隔长度有轻微的缩短作用。按时间点分析的结果表明,在750-mg剂量组的第6天给药后1和24小时,时间点的最小二乘安慰剂校正平均值ΔQTcF范围为-7.9至0.1毫秒,而在300-mg剂量组的第1天给药后1.5和24小时为-3.7至1.6毫秒。用莫西沙星证明了测定灵敏度。曝光的大量积累,特别是在第6天,与Icenticaftor每天两次两次(2.3倍)相比,icenticaftor每天两次,每天两次服用750-mg的血浆峰值浓度增加了4.3倍,提供了较大的浓度范围(高达9540ng/mL)来评估icenticaftor对ΔQTcF的影响。基于浓度-QTc分析,对ΔQTcF超过10毫秒的影响可以排除在icenticaftor的血浆浓度的全部观察范围内,高达约9540ng/mL。Icenticaftor在研究剂量下显示QTcF轻度缩短,这在治疗环境中不太可能具有临床意义。
    Icenticaftor (QBW251) is a potentiator of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor. Based on its mechanism of action, icenticaftor is expected to provide benefits in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by restoring mucociliary clearance, which would eventually lead to a reduction of bacterial colonization and related inflammatory cascade. A placebo- and positive-controlled, 4-way crossover thorough QT study was conducted in 46 healthy participants with the objective to assess the effect of therapeutic (300 mg twice daily for 6 days) and supratherapeutic (750 mg twice daily for 6 days) oral doses of icenticaftor on electrocardiogram parameters, including concentration-corrected QT (QTc) analysis. Moxifloxacin (400 mg, oral) was used as a positive control. In the concentration-QTc analysis performed on pooled data from Day 1 and Day 6 (steady state), the estimated population slope was shallow and slightly negative: -0.0012 ms/ng/mL. The effect on the Fridericia corrected QT (QTcF) interval (∆ΔQTcF) was predicted to be -1.3 milliseconds at the icenticaftor 300-mg twice-daily peak concentration (geometric mean was 1094 ng/mL) and -5.5 milliseconds at the 750-mg twice-daily peak concentration (geometric mean Cmax was 4529 ng/mL) indicated a mild shortening effect of icenticaftor on QTcF interval length. The results of the by-time-point analysis indicated least squares placebo corrected mean ∆∆QTcF across time points ranged from -7.9 to 0.1 milliseconds at 1 and 24 hours after dosing both on Day 6 in the 750-mg dose group compared with -3.7 to 1.6 milliseconds at 1.5 and 24 hours after dosing on Day 1 in the 300-mg dose group. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated with moxifloxacin. The large accumulation of exposures, especially the 4.3-fold increase in peak plasma concentration observed at the icenticaftor 750-mg twice-daily dosage compared with Icenticaftor 300 mg twice daily (2.3-fold) on Day 6 provided a large concentration range (up to 9540 ng/mL) to evaluate the effect of icenticaftor on ΔΔQTcF. Based on the concentration-QTc analysis, an effect on ΔΔQTcF exceeding 10 milliseconds can be excluded within the full observed ranges of plasma concentrations on icenticaftor, up to approximately 9540 ng/mL. Icenticaftor at the studied doses demonstrated a mild shortening in QTcF, which is unlikely to be of clinical relevance in a therapeutic setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为满足ICHS7A和S7B而进行的心血管安全药理学(SP)研究通常使用交叉研究设计,其中每只动物接受所有治疗。在越来越多的案例中,交叉设计是不可能的,必须使用并行研究。这些很少可以大到8只动物/处理以匹配n=8交叉。平行设计的动物仅接受一次治疗。平行研究将具有不同的灵敏度来检测变化。在使用非临床QTc评估来支持新发布的ICHE14/S7BQ&As下的综合心律失常风险评估时,这种敏感性是一个关键问题。当前的分析使用了一项足够大的研究(n=48),可以作为并行和交叉设计进行分析,以直接比较耦合到不同统计模型的两种实验设计的性能。而所有其他研究的行为方面都是相同的。共有48只非人灵长类动物(NHP)两次接受2种不同的治疗:载体,莫西沙星(80mg/kg),车辆,莫西沙星(80mg/kg)。每次治疗48小时记录给药后QTc间期数据。在平行设计中或作为n=48动物交叉研究,使用针对每种治疗随机选择的12只动物分析数据。使用不同的统计模型。主要终点是应用于每小时时间间隔的模型的残差偏差(sigma)。sigma用于确定研究设计-统计模型组合的最小可检测差异(MDD)。两种统计模型适用于任一研究设计。他们给出了类似的sigma和所得的MDD值。在交叉设计中,可以在统计模型中使用个体动物标识(ID)。这启用了最小的MDD值。鉴定了用于分析的简单统计模型:用于平行设计的治疗+基线和用于交叉设计的治疗+ID。NHP并行研究设计的统计灵敏度是合理的(MDD为n=6的12.7ms),并结合测试暴露高于可能需要的人可以用于综合风险评估。当NHP体内QTc评估的灵敏度至关重要时,交叉设计实现了更高的灵敏度(对于n=4,MDD为12.2ms;对于n=8,MDD为8ms)。
    The cardiovascular safety pharmacology (SP) study conducted to satisfy ICH S7A and S7B has commonly used a cross-over study design where each animal receives all treatments. In an increasing number of cases, cross-over designs are not possible and parallel studies have to be used. These can seldom be as large as 8 animals/treatment to match an n = 8 cross-over. Animals in parallel designs receive only one treatment. Parallel studies will have a different sensitivity to detect changes. This sensitivity is a critical question in using nonclinical QTc evaluations to support an integrated proarrhythmic risk assessment under the newly released ICH E14/S7B Q&As. The current analysis used a study large enough (n = 48) to be analyzed both as a parallel and as a cross-over design to directly compare the performance of the two experimental designs coupled to different statistical models, while all other study conduct aspects were the same. A total of 48 nonhuman primates (NHP) received 2 different treatments twice: vehicle, moxifloxacin (80 mg/kg), vehicle, moxifloxacin (80 mg/kg). Post-dose QTc interval data were recorded for 48 h for each treatment. Data were analyzed using 12 animals randomly selected for each treatment in a parallel design or as an n = 48 animal cross-over study. Different statistical models were used. The primary endpoint was the residual deviation (sigma) from the models applied to hourly time intervals. The sigma was used to determine the minimal detectable difference (MDD) for the study design-statistical model combination. Two statistical models were applicable to either study design. They gave similar sigma and resulting MDD values. In cross-over designs, the individual animal identification (ID) can be used in the statistical model. This enabled the smallest MDD value. Simple statistical models for analysis were identified: Treatment + Baseline for parallel designs and Treatment + ID for cross-over designs. The statistical sensitivity of NHP parallel study designs is reasonable (MDD for n = 6 of 12.7 ms), and in combination with testing exposures higher than likely to be necessary in man could be used in an integrated risk assessment. Where sensitivity of the NHP in vivo QTc assessment is critical, the cross-over design enabled a higher sensitivity (MDD 12.2 ms for n = 4; 8 ms for n = 8).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:药物诱导的心率校正QT间期(QTc)延长与潜在致命性心律失常尖端扭转的风险增加相关。由于心律失常的风险,癌症治疗的临床试验通常根据QTc延长的阈值排除患者.我们的目标是评估QT延长药物的处方与达到癌症试验排除性QTc阈值的可能性之间的关联。
    UNASSIGNED:对在我们机构分子实体瘤诊所就诊的271例患者的电子健康记录进行回顾性分析。收集的数据包括人口统计,QTc测量,室性心律失常相关诊断,以及所有住院和门诊处方。评估人口统计学和临床变量之间的潜在关联,包括QT延长药物的处方,和QTc测量。
    UNASSIGNED:女性的中位QTc测量值比男性长(p=0.030),并且在研究期间服用了更多的QT延长药物(p=0.010)。在所有患者中,在多个评估时间点,QT延长药物的处方与更长的中值和最大QTc测量值相关(即,对于在QTc测量后10、30、60和90天内开出的QT延长药物)。同样,在多个时间点,处方的QT延长药物数量与较长的中位和最大QTc测量值相关.常见的与QTc相关的排除标准是从ClinicalTrials.gov最近的癌症临床试验的综述中收集的。根据常见的排除标准,QT延长药物的处方增加了排除试验的几率.
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究表明,延长QT的药物处方与更长的QTc测量值和被排除在癌症临床试验之外的可能性增加有关。
    UNASSIGNED: Drug-induced prolongation of the heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc) is associated with increased risk for the potentially fatal arrhythmia torsades de pointes. Due to arrhythmia risk, clinical trials with cancer therapeutics often exclude patients based on thresholds for QTc prolongation. Our objective was to assess associations between prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs and the odds of meeting cancer trial exclusionary QTc thresholds in a cohort of adults with advanced cancer.
    UNASSIGNED: Electronic health records were retrospectively reviewed for 271 patients seen at our institutional molecular solid tumor clinic. Collected data included demographics, QTc measurements, ventricular arrhythmia-related diagnoses, and all inpatient and outpatient prescriptions. Potential associations were assessed between demographic and clinical variables, including prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs, and QTc measurements.
    UNASSIGNED: Women had longer median QTc measurements than men (p = 0.030) and were prescribed more QT-prolonging drugs during the study (p = 0.010). In all patients, prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs were associated with longer median and maximum QTc measurements at multiple assessed time points (i.e., for QT-prolonging drugs prescribed within 10, 30, 60, and 90 days of QTc measurements). Similarly, the number of QT-prolonging drugs prescribed was correlated with longer median and maximum QTc measurements at multiple time points. Common QTc-related exclusionary criteria were collected from a review of ClinicalTrials.gov for recent cancer clinical trials. Based on common exclusion criteria, prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs increased the odds of trial exclusion.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates that prescriptions for QT-prolonging drugs were associated with longer QTc measurements and increased odds of being excluded from cancer clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    Futibatinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-4 inhibitor, is being investigated for FGFR-aberrant tumors. A 4-period, crossover, phase 1 thorough QT/QTc study compared effects on Fridericia heart rate-corrected QT (QTcF) interval of single doses of futibatinib 20 and 80 mg (therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses, respectively), placebo, and moxifloxacin (positive control) in healthy subjects. The study objective was to assess the time-matched difference in change from baseline in QTcF (ddQTcF) between futibatinib and placebo. In addition, changes from baseline in QTcF and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, pharmacokinetics, ECG morphology, and safety were assessed. Forty-eight subjects were randomized. ddQTcF upper limits of 2-sided 90%CIs remained <10 milliseconds (clinical threshold) for both futibatinib doses at all time points (range, 2.0-4.5 milliseconds). Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by lower limits of 2-sided 97.5%CIs of the dQTcF difference between moxifloxacin and placebo of >5 milliseconds. Futibatinib exposure increased in a dose-dependent manner, and no significant relationship was detected between plasma futibatinib concentration and ddQTcF. There were no significant effects on heart rate, other ECG parameters, or ECG morphology. No serious adverse events occurred. Futibatinib did not prolong QTcF or affect other cardiac measures at therapeutic or supratherapeutic doses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心脏代谢组学和激素状态的变化与长QT综合征有关,心源性猝死和死亡率增加。QTc持续时间的潜在机制尚未完全了解。因此,在这些患者中需要鉴定新的标志物来补充诊断.在本研究中,我们对心血管疾病高风险的糖尿病患者的血清进行了非靶向代谢组学,随访2.55[2.34-2.88]年(NCT02431234),目的是确定与QTc相关的代谢组学变化。我们使用独立加权基因相关网络分析(WGCNA)来探索代谢物簇与T1(基线)和T2(随访)时QTc之间的关联。T1和T2高度相关模块的重叠确定N-乙酰天冬酰胺是唯一的共同代谢物,与尿素循环和精氨酸代谢有关,脯氨酸,谷氨酸,天冬氨酸和天冬酰胺.这一分析通过应用混合模型得到了证实,进一步强调了其与QTc的联系。在目前的研究中,我们能够在两个时间点确定与糖尿病患者QTc相关的代谢物,提示N-乙酰天冬酰胺在患有长QTc的糖尿病患者中的潜在作用。
    Changes in the cardio-metabolomics profile and hormonal status have been associated with long QT syndrome, sudden cardiac death and increased mortality. The mechanisms underlying QTc duration are not fully understood. Therefore, an identification of novel markers that complement the diagnosis in these patients is needed. In the present study, we performed untargeted metabolomics on the sera of diabetic patients at a high risk of cardiovascular disease, followed up for 2.55 [2.34-2.88] years (NCT02431234), with the aim of identifying the metabolomic changes associated with QTc. We used independent weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to explore the association between metabolites clusters and QTc at T1 (baseline) and T2 (follow up). The overlap of the highly correlated modules at T1 and T2 identified N-Acetyl asparagine as the only metabolite in common, which was involved with the urea cycle and metabolism of arginine, proline, glutamate, aspartate and asparagine. This analysis was confirmed by applying mixed models, further highlighting its association with QTc. In the current study, we were able to identify a metabolite associated with QTc in diabetic patients at two chronological time points, suggesting a previously unrecognized potential role of N-Acetyl asparagine in diabetic patients suffering from long QTc.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在本文中,我们探索了静态定性轨迹演算(QTCS)的使用,一种基于QTC的定性时空方法,用于分析足球中的球队阵型。虽然体育中团队形成分析方法主要是定量的,QTCS通过定性的方式描述球员之间的相对位置,从而实现团队编队的比较,这更多地与球员在球场上的位置有关。QTCS有可能允许根据教练的预定阵型监控足球队的比赛程度。当应用于一支球队的多场比赛时,该方法可以有助于定义团队的比赛风格。我们提出了一项实验,旨在确定比利时国家足球队在法国举行的2018年FIFA世界杯期间的队形。
    In this paper, we explore the use of the Static Qualitative Trajectory Calculus (QTCS), a qualitative spatiotemporal method based on the QTC, for the analysis of team formations in football. While methods for team formation analysis in sports are predominantly quantitative in nature, QTCS enables the comparison of team formations by describing the relative positions between players in a qualitative manner, which is more related to the way players position themselves on the field. QTCS has the potential to allow to monitor to what extent a football team plays according to a coach\'s predetermined formation. When applied to multiple matches of one team, the method can contribute to the definition of the playing style of a team. We present an experiment aimed at identifying the team formation played by Belgian national football team during the 2018 FIFA World Cup held in France.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进行了一项多中心观察性研究,以评估rac-美沙酮的有效性。左美沙酮,和丁丙诺啡在意大利南部阿片类药物依赖患者的治疗。主要终点是减少尿液对物质的阳性和维持剂量。患者(N=266,年龄=44.80±5.65,男性=79.70%,女性=20.30%)已被招募。招聘时,75%的患者接受rac-美沙酮治疗,左美沙酮,还有丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮.将患者分组为三组。A组的左美沙酮患者(N患者=211),180天后,显示尿美沙酮阳性的稳定性,海洛因显著下降-53±4%,大麻酚-48±2%,和可卡因-37±6%阳性,治疗之间没有差异。左美沙酮患者的QTcF值较低,为426±8.4ms(delta=-19ms)rac-美沙酮,在显着低剂量的左美沙酮(-34%,-50.2%的男性)(p<0.05)。B组数据来自37例患者,合并症感染(HIV/HCV/HPV)患病率高,在COVID-19期间监测了21个月。需要高剂量的左美沙酮(58.33±31.58mg/天)来稳定阿片类药物和大麻素阴性的药物,与rac-美沙酮和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮患者的毒理学阳性相反。双重诊断为C组的18例患者(重度抑郁症38.90%,双极27.78%,和精神分裂症16.67%)的稳定与高剂量的外消旋97.5±8毫克/天,51.8±5毫克/天的左美沙酮(-46.8%vs.rac-美沙酮;-71%的男性),和2.5±1毫克/天的丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮。三名缓解患者接受了逐渐减少剂量的左美沙酮治疗。用左美沙酮记录QTcF值显着降低(delta-32msvs.rac-美沙酮)在双相情感障碍患者中,以及缓解期精神分裂症患者(delta-45.19msvs.rac-美沙酮)。我们的病人安全稳定了。左美沙酮,与外消旋体相比,有助于减少非法使用,尤其是阿片类药物和大麻素在显著低剂量与心血管安全,which,在双相情感障碍患者中,具有临床意义。
    A multicenter-observational study was performed to assess the effectiveness of rac-methadone, levomethadone, and buprenorphine in opioid-dependent patients in polytherapy in Southern Italy. The primary endpoint was the reduction of urinary positivity to the substances and the maintaining doses. Patients (N = 266, age = 44.80 ± 5.65, male = 79.70%, female = 20.30%) have been recruited. At recruitment, 75% of them were on treatment with rac-methadone, levomethadone, and buprenorphine/naloxone. The patients were grouped into three clusters. The levomethadone patients of Cluster A (N patients = 211), after 180 days, showed stability in urinary methadone positivity, with a marked decrease in heroin -53 ± 4%, cannabinol\'s -48 ± 2%, and cocaine -37 ± 6% positivity, with no differences between treatments. A lower QTcF value of 426 ± 8.4 ms was recorded in the levomethadone patients (delta = -19 ms) vs. rac-methadone, at significantly lower doses of levomethadone (-34%, -50.2% in males) (p < 0.05). The Cluster B data were collected from 37 patients, with a high prevalence of comorbidity infections (HIV/HCV/HPV), monitored for 21 months during COVID-19. High doses of levomethadone (58.33 ± 31.58 mg/day) were needed to stabilize those that were negative for opioids and cannabinoids, in contrast to the rac-methadone and buprenorphine/naloxone patients that showed positive toxicology. Eighteen patients of the Cluster C in double diagnosis (major depressive 38.90%, bipolar 27.78%, and schizophrenia 16.67%) were stabilized with high doses of racemate 97.5 ± 8 mg/day, 51.8 ± 5 mg/day of levomethadone (-46.8% vs. rac-methadone; -71% in men), and 2.5 ± 1 mg/day of buprenorphine/naloxone. Three patients in remission were treated with tapering doses of levomethadone. Significantly reduced QTcF values were recorded with levomethadone (delta -32 ms vs. rac-methadone) in the bipolar patients, as well as the schizophrenia patients in remission (delta -45.19 ms vs. rac-methadone). Our patients were safely stabilized. Levomethadone, compared to the racemate, contributes to reducing the illicit use, especially of opioids and cannabinoids at significantly lower doses with cardiovascular safety, which, in bipolar patients, is clinically significant.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Some data suggests that citalopram has more risk of corrected QT interval (QTc) prolongation than other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Consequently the U.S. Food and Drug Administration distributed a safety warning limiting the maximum dose for citalopram. There is also a suggestion that bupropion may decrease QTc in patients on drugs that increase QTc. The goals of this cross-sectional study were to examine (1) effects on QTc of citalopram compared to sertraline, bupropion, and tricyclic antidepressants; (2) dose dependent effects of citalopram; and (3) effects of bupropion on citalopram-mediated changes in QTc.
    Records of subjects who received an EKG while taking one of the specified antidepressants were reviewed to collect demographic information, antidepressant history, and information about other confounders. Linear regression was used to examine the relationship between QTc and antidepressants.
    487 subjects provided 798 EKG records. The sample was 95% male with an average age of 61 years. No differences were found in QTc between citalopram and other antidepressants. No dose relationship was detected between citalopram and QTc. Bupropion did not affect the relationship between citalopram and QTc (coefficient = -3.4; 95%CI = -14.2, 7.5; p = 0.54).
    Observational study designs are prone to biases from retrospective data collection. Some data subsets had small numbers of subjects.
    No effect of citalopram on QTc was found at therapeutic doses. Neither was there evidence of a \"QTc-sparing\" effect of bupropion. The risk of adverse cardiovascular effects from citalopram at doses of 60 mg per day or less appears minimal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号