Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare cause of acute respiratory failure. Clinical presentations can range from dyspnoea, fever and cough, to rapidly progressive and potentially fulminant respiratory failure. While its exact cause is often unknown, associations with inhalational injuries and exposures to new medications have been described.We report a case of a middle-aged, non-smoking man with a history of alcohol use disorder. He presented with 4 days of shortness of breath that started hours after taking injectable naltrexone (Vivitrol). The patient had rapidly worsening hypoxaemia, necessitating emergent bronchoscopy with transbronchial biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage which showed 66% eosinophils. The patient was intubated for the procedure and unable to get extubated due to worsening hypoxaemic respiratory failure with high fractional inspired oxygen requirements. Chest radiograph showed worsening lung infiltrates and with a high index of suspicion for AEP, he was started empirically on methylprednisolone. He had rapid improvement in his respiratory status and was extubated on day 5 of admission then discharged on day 8. Histopathological examination confirmed acute/subacute eosinophilic pneumonia. A 3-week post-discharge follow-up chest radiograph confirmed the full resolution of pulmonary infiltrates.Naltrexone-induced AEP is rare, with only six other cases reported in the literature. Careful history taking and prompt evaluation for AEP are important given the potential for rapid progression to acute hypoxic respiratory failure and the excellent response to steroid treatment.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic pulmonary disease (EPD) is a general term for a large group of diseases with complex etiology. Ulcerative colitis is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients with IBD may have pulmonary involvement. We herein present a case of ulcerative colitis complicated with EPD.
METHODS: A 34-year-old woman with ulcerative colitis presented with dry cough. She had peripheral eosinophilia and apical ground glass opacities on CT (computed tomography) of her chest. Antibiotic treatment was ineffective.
METHODS: Lung biopsy revealed eosinophil infiltration in the alveolar space and interstitial space, so EPD was considered.
METHODS: After oral administration of prednisone, the lung shadow on CT disappeared when the cough symptoms resolved. However, the symptoms recurred after drug withdrawal, and the lung shadow reappeared on imaging. The cough symptoms and lung shadow disappeared after oral prednisone was given again. Prednisone was slowly discontinued after 6 months of treatment.
RESULTS: The patient stopped prednisone for half a year. No recurrence or abnormal CT findings were detected during the half-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical manifestations of EPD are atypical, laboratory and imaging findings are not specific, and it is difficult to make a definite diagnosis before lung biopsy. The diagnosis depends on pathological examination. Glucocorticoid treatment is effective, but some patients may relapse after drug withdrawal. Active follow-up after glucocorticoid treatment is very important for identifying disease recurrence. Patients with IBD are relatively prone to developing EPD. The etiology of EPD is complex. In clinical practice, we need to make a diagnosis and differential diagnosis to clarify its etiology.

Pulmonary infiltrates with eosinophilia are a heterogeneous group of disorders that are characterized by pulmonary infiltrates on chest radiograph and elevated levels of eosinophils in the peripheral blood. Among patients with these disorders, reports of either allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) or tropical pulmonary eosinophilia (TPE) are common. However, the simultaneous occurrence of ABPA and TPE is not often reported. We present the case of a young man with a history of asthma who was diagnosed with ABPA and TPE. Initially, the patient exhibited a partial response to treatment of ABPA, but persistent symptoms and eosinophilia led to suspicion and subsequent diagnosis of TPE. With implementation of antifilarials and steroids, the patient experienced satisfactory clinical and serological improvements. This case underscores the importance of considering multiple diagnoses in patients with overlapping symptoms and highlights the need for comprehensive management strategies in complex lung diseases.

Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but noteworthy adverse effect linked to dupilumab, an interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 inhibitor used in the managing atopic diseases. The underlying mechanisms, potential predisposing factors, clinical characteristics, and optimal management strategies for dupilumab-induced EP remain unclear. We report a 71-year-old patient who developed acute EP after the first 600-mg dose of dupilumab. Eosinophils (EOSs) were also transiently increased (up to 1,600 cells/μl). After the acute EP was effectively treated with glucocorticoids, dupilumab treatment was continued. Rash, itching, and immunoglobulin E levels continued to decrease in the patient, and no further pulmonary adverse events occurred. We combined this case with a literature review of nine articles and analyzed data from 93 cases reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of patients developing EP after dupilumab use. Our findings imply that dupilumab may induce EP, particularly in individuals over 45 years old, those with a history of respiratory diseases, and those who have previously used inhaled or systemic steroids. Vigilance is required, especially when there is a persistent elevation in peripheral blood EOSs during treatment. Although steroid treatment can effectively manage EP, more data are needed to determine the safety of resuming dupilumab treatment after controlling pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare respiratory condition caused by eosinophil accumulation in the pulmonary tissue that can be related to drug administration. Daptomycin, an antibiotic active against gram-positive bacteria, is one of the leading causes of AEP among drugs. In order to raise awareness of this rare syndrome, in our work we have described a case of an 82-year-old male with Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis treated with daptomycin, who developed a daptomycin-induced AEP. We have performed a systematic review of the literature for all similar reported cases.
METHODS: The systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. To conduct the analysis, the terms \"daptomycin AND eosinoph* AND pneum*\" were entered into the databases Medline, CINAHL, and Embase on April 13, 2023. We considered all relevant records documenting AEP after daptomycin use. No restrictions in terms of year or language were made. A formal appraisal of observational studies was performed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. All results and data were reported by means of tables.
RESULTS: Our search identified 93 relevant records, published between 2007 and 2023. A total of 120 patients were considered. Patients who experienced AEP were mostly males (n = 88, 73.3%) with a mean age of 68.28 years (SD 11.54). Daptomycin was most frequently prescribed for osteoarticular infections (n = 75, 62.5%) and to treat gram-positive cocci infections. The most frequently isolated pathogen was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Daptomycin was mostly used with off-label indications (n = 89, 74%). Symptoms of AEP were usually reported after a mean of 21.75 days of treatment (range 3-84) and typically included fever, dyspnea, dry cough, and acute respiratory failure. Reported treatment strategies invariably included daptomycin withdrawal, respiratory support, and corticosteroid treatment. One hundred and sixteen patients fully recovered. A fatal outcome was described in 4 patients. Suggestive symptoms and imaging raised suspicion for AEP, confirmed with bronchoalveolar lavage in 57.5% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin-induced AEP is a rare but potentially fatal complication, mostly reported after long treatment with daptomycin. Clinicians should be aware of this syndrome, as it could be initially misdiagnosed for an acute infectious respiratory syndrome, resulting in a delay in its diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, since the risk of developing AEP is increased by longer drug exposure, caution should be used when discussing the use of daptomycin in longer treatment regimens.

暂无摘要。

Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare interstitial lung disease of unknown cause. It usually responds well to systemic corticosteroid therapy, but relapses are frequent. We describe two cases of 21- and 27-year-old patients, presenting with dyspnea. The diagnosis of steroid-relapsing and steroid-dependent ICEP was made respectively. Mepolizumab was prescribed to both patients. This treatment resulted in successful long-term disease management with much fewer side effects than a traditional corticosteroid therapy.

BACKGROUND: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is well-known as one of the primary eosinophilic pulmonary diseases of unknown etiology. It\'s defined as a febrile illness along with acute onset respiratory failure that is commonly misdiagnosed at the initial presentation as infectious pneumonia. Despite the fact that AEP sometimes classified as idiopathic as no exact cause can be identified in most cases, it has been suggested recently to be linked with electronic cigarette or vaping products and associated with electronic cigarette or vaping associated lung injury (EVALI). Therefore, history of recent tobacco smoking or vaping exposure along with peripheral eosinophilia are crucial clinical findings suggestive of AEP.
METHODS: A previously healthy 17-year-old female presented to the Emergency Room with one day history of progressively worsening shortness of breath accompanied by left sided pleuritic chest pain and fever. She wasn\'t taking any medications, denied traditional cigarette smoking, exposure to pulmonary irritants, recent travel and had no history of close contact with sick patient. She recently started vaping 20 days prior to the presentation. Initially, she was admitted with a presumptive diagnosis of atypical pneumonia but was found to have AEP due to a recent vaping exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Vaping is a well-known health hazard that has become a growing trend among adolescents and have been promoted as a safe and effective alternative to traditional cigarettes. The etiology of AEP remains unclear, but many studies suggest a possible link with recent tobacco smoking or vaping. A key challenge for this clinical entity is to reach the diagnosis after excluding all other pulmonary eosinophilia causes, and it has an excellent prognosis if diagnosed early and treated appropriately.

The primary symptom of urticarial vasculitis (UV), which is a histopathological leukocytoclastic vasculitis disease, is an eruption that resembles urticaria. Other organs may also experience accompanying symptoms. Lung lesions with UV are mostly obstructive pulmonary disease with smoking. However, the coexistence of eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) and complicated UV remains unclear. We report a man in his 70s with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who attended our department with ring-shaped erythema, marginal edema, and pigmentation. Additionally, a skin histological analysis showed nuclear dust and perivascular neutrophil infiltration, while a blood sample showed a decrease in C3 and C1q concentrations. Administration of prednisone temporarily improved the eruption. However, he developed a cough and a new UV eruption 1 year later. Computed tomography revealed infiltration in the right upper lobe of the lungs, and a blood sample showed a high eosinophil count. He was finally diagnosed with hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome and idiopathic chronic EP. A previous study showed that serum C1q concentrations in patients with EP were lower when this disease was active. Whether a decline in C1q concentrations can cause EP is unclear. However, our case is unique owing to the co-onset of EP with low complement concentrations and recurrence of UV.

Mepolizumab, a humanized anti IL-5 monoclonal antibody, has been used off-label for chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP), inducing disease remission and saving systemic corticosteroids.
We present a case of CEP, requiring long-term corticosteroids therapy due to relapse upon withdrawal. Mepolizumab was started and maintained for 2 years and 6 months.
Corticosteroids could be withdrawn and mepolizumab dose interval was spared up to 10 wk with no disease relapse.
Mepolizumab is shown to be useful for chronic eosinophilic pneumonia, allowing corticosteroid withdrawal. Dose interval may be individualized under close monitoring, for a more efficient treatment, reducing medical costs while improving patients\' quality of life.