暂无摘要。

Recent advances in the laboratory diagnostic approach to inherited thrombophilia call for an update on laboratory strategies and organization. The present paper therefore deals in particular with: the panel test choice, timing and test appropriateness, and analytical methods in several clinical conditions. Specific recommendations are supported by the state-of-the-art in this branch.

Although there are numerous risk factors for venous thromboembolic disease, the term \'thrombophilia\' refers only to those familial or acquired disorders of the haemostatic system that result in an increased risk of thrombosis. The inherited thrombophilias include antithrombin III deficiency, resistance to activated protein C (factor V Leiden), protein C and protein S deficiencies as well as some rare forms of dysfibrinogenaemia. It is possible that other inherited conditions might also predispose to thrombosis. In contrast, when using the above definition, the antiphospholipid syndrome is the only genuine acquired thrombophilic state. Patients who have thromboembolic disease at a young age with no provoking event or who have a positive family history or whose thrombosis involves an unusual site should be investigated for thrombophilia. The management of a patient identified as having a laboratory abnormality associated with thrombophilia will depend on a variety of factors such as the patient\'s individual and family thrombotic history, the site of the thrombosis and the presence of other prothrombotic risk factors. The use of prophylactic anticoagulation during pregnancy and the puerperium requires particularly careful consideration in thrombophilic women. As more becomes known about the thrombophilias it will become possible to formulate more exact guidelines as to the management of these conditions.

A multicenter study on protein C-antigen and -activity values was carried out in transmitter patients with hereditary protein C deficiency (diagnosis established by pedigree analysis) and in normal controls in order to (1) establish the range of protein C levels in genetically determined heterozygotes and (2) to evaluate the usefulness of statistical procedures to discriminate between protein C deficient patients and controls. In transmitters absolute protein C activity values ranged from 19 to 82% and antigen values from 22 to 88.5%. Most transmitter patients could clearly be differentiated from the control group. However, in some transmitter patients values of protein C were within the range of the control group. The discrimination between transmitters and controls could be improved by statistical procedures. Using tolerance ellipses the overlapping area of the two groups was smallest when (factor II antigen+factor X antigen)/2 was plotted against protein C antigen. To specify the degree of uncertainty likelihood ratios were calculated to obtain the posterior probability for an individual for being deficient or not. In quadratic discriminant analysis the best discrimination between transmitters and controls was obtained using protein C activity versus factor X antigen and protein C antigen versus factor X antigen. Based on these analysis an equation was derived, which allows the calculation of the likelihood ratio favouring deficiency or non-deficiency in an individual.