Kirsten Rat Sarcoma (KRAS) is the most commonly mutated oncogene in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). We have previously reported the interactions between microsatellite instability (MSI), DNA promoter methylation, and gene expression. In this study, we looked for associations between KRAS mutation, gene expression, and methylation that may help with precision medicine. Genome-wide gene expression and DNA methylation were done in paired CRC tumor and surrounding healthy tissues. The results suggested that (a) the magnitude of dysregulation of many major gene pathways in CRC was significantly greater in patients with the KRAS mutation, (b) the up- and down-regulation of these dysregulated gene pathways could be correlated with the corresponding hypo- and hyper-methylation, and (c) the up-regulation of CDKN2A was more pronounced in tumors with the KRAS mutation. A recent cell line study showed that there were higher CDKN2A levels in 5-FU-resistant CRC cells and that these could be down-regulated by Villosol. Our findings suggest the possibility of a better response to anti-CDKN2A therapy with Villosol in KRAS-mutant CRC. Also, the more marked up-regulation of genes in the proteasome pathway in CRC tissue, especially with the KRAS mutation and MSI, may suggest a potential role of a proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib) in selected CRC patients if necessary.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of prior therapies on outcomes with selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (SVd) versus bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd) in 402 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the phase 3 BOSTON trial.
METHODS: Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor (PI)-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, and one prior line of therapy (1LOT) patient subgroups.
RESULTS: At a median follow-up of over 28 months, clinically meaningful improvements in PFS were noted across all groups with SVd. The median SVd PFS was longer in all subgroups (lenalidomide-refractory: 10.2 vs. 7.1 months, PI-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; bortezomib-naïve: 29.5 vs. 9.7; 1LOT: 21.0 vs. 10.7; p < .05). The lenalidomide-refractory subgroup had longer OS with SVd (26.7 vs. 18.6 months; HR 0.53; p = .015). In all subgroups, overall response and ≥very good partial response rates were higher with SVd. The manageable safety profile of SVd was similar to the overall patient population.
CONCLUSIONS: With over 2 years of follow-up, these clinically meaningful outcomes further support the use of SVd in patients who are lenalidomide-refractory, PI-naïve, bortezomib-naïve, or who received 1LOT (including a monoclonal antibody) and underscore the observed synergy between selinexor and bortezomib.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and convenience of in-class transition (iCT) from intravenous bortezomib-based induction to ixazomib-based oral regimens.
METHODS: This retrospective real-world study was conducted in 16 Chinese hospitals between October 2017 and April 2023 and analyzed newly diagnosed (NDMM) and first-line relapsed multiple myeloma (FRMM) patients who attained at least a partial response from bortezomib-based induction therapy, followed by an ixazomib-based oral regimen for 2 year or until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
RESULTS: The study enrolled 199 patients, median age: 63 years old, male 55.4%, 53% as high risk (HR), and 47% as standard risk. Cytogenetic risk stratification by metaphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), based on the Mayo Clinic risk stratification system. The median duration of total PI therapy was 11 months, with ixazomib-based treatment spanning 6 months. At the 20-month median follow-up, 53% of patients remained on therapy. The 24-month PFS rate was 84.3% from the initiation of bortezomib-based induction and 83.4% from the start of ixazomib-based treatment. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100% post-bortezomib induction and 90% following 6 cycles of the ixazomib-based regimen. Based on the Sankey diagrams, 89.51% of patients maintained or improved their disease response after 2 cycles of iCT, 6 cycles (90.14%), and 12 cycles (80%). The HR level of Mayo was found to be a significant independent factor in a worse remission (hazard ratio (HR) 2.55; p = 0.033). Ixazomib\'s safety profile aligned with previous clinical trial data, with 49% of patients experiencing at least one AE of any grade. The most common AEs included peripheral neuropathy, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, and granulocytopenia.
CONCLUSIONS: In the real-world Chinese MM population, NDMM and FRMM patients responded favorably to PI-based continuous therapy, demonstrating substantial response rates. The ixazomib-based iCT allows for sustained PI-based treatment, offering promising efficacy and tolerable AEs.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the impact of prior exposure and refractoriness to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitors (PIs) on the effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
METHODS: INSURE is a pooled analysis of adult RRMM patients who had received IRd in ≥2 line of therapy from three studies: INSIGHT MM, UVEA-IXA, and REMIX.
RESULTS: Overall, 391/100/68 were lenalidomide-naïve/-exposed/-refractory and 37/411/110 were PI-naïve/-exposed/-refractory. Median duration of therapy (DOT) was 15.3/15.6/4.7 months and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 21.6/25.8/5.6 months in lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients. Median DOT and PFS in PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients were 20.4/15.2/6.9 months and not reached/19.8/11.4 months, respectively. The proportion of lenalidomide-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to adverse events (AEs) was ixazomib, 31.6/28.2/28.0% and 18.6/6.7/10.5%; lenalidomide, 21.9/28.2/16.0% and 16.1/6.7/10.5%; dexamethasone, 18.4/20.5/16.0% and 10.6/0/10.5%, respectively. The proportion of PI-naïve/exposed/refractory patients in INSIGHT and UVEA-IXA who discontinued a study drug due to AEs was: ixazomib, 44.4/28.8/27.8% and 22.2/16.7/15.7%; lenalidomide, 33.3/22.0/19.4% and 16.7/15.9/11.8%; dexamethasone, 33.3/17.4/16.7% and 16.7/9.5/7.8%, respectively. REMIX AE discontinuation rates were unavailable.
CONCLUSIONS: IRd appeared to be effective in RRMM patients in routine clinical practice regardless of prior lenalidomide or PI exposure, with better outcomes seen in lenalidomide- and/or PI-nonrefractory versus refractory patients.

BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma includes surgery, radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). The proteasome has long been considered a promising therapeutic target because of its role as a central biological hub in tumor cells. Marizomib is a novel pan-proteasome inhibitor that crosses the blood brain barrier.
METHODS: EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 was a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase 3 superiority trial. Key eligibility criteria included newly diagnosed glioblastoma, age > 18 years and Karnofsky performance status > 70. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ with patients receiving only standard treatment in the whole population, and in the subgroup of patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors.
RESULTS: The trial was opened at 82 institutions in Europe, Canada and the US. A total of 749 patients (99.9% of planned 750) were randomized. OS was not different between the standard and the marizomib arm (median 17 vs 16.5 months; HR=1.04; p=0.64). PFS was not statistically different either (median 6.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR=0.97; p=0.67). In patients with MGMT promoter-unmethylated tumors, OS was also not different between standard therapy and marizomib (median 14.5 vs 15.1 months, HR=1.13; p=0.27). More CTCAE grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in the marizomib arm than in the standard arm.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding marizomib to standard temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy resulted in more toxicity, but did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Treatment outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R-ALL) remain poor, and the optimal induction therapy has not been determined. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor that acts synergistically and additively with standard chemotherapy for ALL. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with bortezomib in children with R/R-ALL. This single-arm, multicenter, phase 2 study was conducted in Japan between 2016 and 2020. Eligible patients were divided into two cohorts: a high-risk first-relapse cohort of untreated patients with high-risk first-relapsed ALL and an expansion cohort of patients with refractory ALL, including multiple relapses, relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and induction failure. All patients received a single course of chemotherapy as induction therapy. Sixteen patients (10 in the high-risk first-relapse cohort, six in the expansion cohort) were evaluable. The overall remission rate after induction therapy was 60% in the high-risk first-relapse cohort and 16.7% in the expansion cohort. All patients had minimal residual disease. Adverse events were acceptable except for interstitial lung disease and hypoxia in a patient in the expansion cohort, but addition of bortezomib to conventional chemotherapy did not produce obvious improvement in children with R/R-ALL.

Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib-Rd) showed clinical efficacy over placebo-Rd in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) in the TOURMALINE-MM1 trial. Over a median follow-up of ∼85 months, as patients showed disease progression, they received subsequent novel therapies that confounded the overall survival (OS) benefit. Here, we conducted a post hoc analysis in 148 patients from seven countries defined as emerging markets, with limited access to novel therapies for MM during the trial period, to describe the impact of these therapies on OS. Patients were randomised to ixazomib-Rd (n = 71) or placebo-Rd (n = 77). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.7 versus 10.2 months, with ixazomib-Rd versus placebo-Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.504; p = 0.008) demonstrating a statistically significant improvement as observed in the primary trial. The median OS improved by 32.6 months with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd (63.5 vs. 30.9 months; HR, 0.794; p = 0.261); however, the statistically significant benefit seen in PFS was not observed for OS. Improvement with ixazomib-Rd over placebo-Rd was observed in overall response (81.7% vs. 64.9%; odds ratio [OR], 2.38; p = 0.019) and complete response (22.5% vs. 3.9%; OR, 7.57; p < 0.001). Patient-reported quality of life and use of subsequent therapies were similar across treatment groups. No new safety concerns were identified. Compared with the main cohort, median OS was 10 months longer with ixazomib-Rd and 21 months shorter with placebo-Rd in this subgroup, indicating a clinically meaningful survival benefit of ixazomib-Rd treatment in this patient population with limited access to subsequent novel therapies.

BACKGROUND: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer diagnosed in childhood. Survival for patients following relapse remains poor, and achieving complete remission (CR) after relapse is the first critical step to cure. Carfilzomib is a proteasome inhibitor with an acceptable safety profile and clinical activity in adults with multiple myeloma but has not been assessed in children. The primary objective of this phase 1b study was to assess the safety and tolerability of carfilzomib combined with vincristine, dexamethasone, asparaginase, and daunorubicin (VXLD) in children with relapsed and/or refractory ALL.
METHODS: Patients aged 1-21 years (n = 24) received 4-week induction therapy with carfilzomib at dose levels of 27 mg/m2 (n = 3), 36 mg/m2 (n = 7), 45 mg/m2 (n = 4), and 56 mg/m2 (n = 10) in combination with VXLD. Patients achieving stable disease were offered further consolidation chemotherapy. Analyses were based on the safety evaluable population.
RESULTS: Following dose escalation of carfilzomib, the recommended phase 2 carfilzomib dose was identified as 56 mg/m2 . Grade ≥3 hematological adverse events were common (83%, 20/24 patients), and serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 58% (14/24) of patients. At the end of induction, CR/CR with incomplete platelet recovery (CRp)/CR with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) was identified in 50% of patients (n = 12/24). By the end of consolidation, cumulative CR/CRp/CRi was identified in 58% of patients (n = 14/24).
CONCLUSIONS: These data support the use of carfilzomib in pediatric patients with relapsed and/or refractory ALL.

BACKGROUND: Achieving prolonged therapy with parenteral proteasome inhibitors (PIs) in clinical practice can be challenging.
OBJECTIVE: To increase the duration of PI-based therapy, improve outcomes, and maintain QoL.
METHODS: Prospective study (NCT03173092) evaluating iCT from parenteral bortezomib-based induction to all-oral IRd. IRd was received for up to 39 cycles or until progression/toxicity (Manda CLML 2020). Interim data (N=101) were previously reported (Rifkin ASH 2021). We report results from the fully accrued study cohort (enrollment completed, May 2021; N=141).
METHODS: US community sites.
METHODS: Transplant-ineligible/delayed-transplant (≥24 months) NDMM patients with ≥stable disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based induction.
METHODS: Primary endpoint: 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. Other endpoints included: key secondary, overall response rate (ORR; partial response [PR]+very good PR [VPGR]+complete response [CR]) and duration of treatment (DOT); secondary, overall survival (OS), safety, and QoL.
RESULTS: At Feb-28-2022, 140 patients (median age, 72.5 years [range, 48-90]; 79% ≥65 years; 42% ≥75 years) had received IRd; 94% had ≥1 comorbidity at IRd initiation. Median follow-up was 20.0 months. 2-year PFS was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59-77%). ORR was 62% (CR, 8%; VGPR, 24%; PR, 30%) after bortezomib-based induction, increasing to 78% (CR, 33%; VGPR, 27%; PR, 18%) after iCT. At data cut-off, 28 patients (20%) were ongoing on IRd, median DOT with IRd was 10.0 months, and median duration of all PI-based treatment was 12.7 months. 2-year OS was 85% (95% CI: 76-90%). 66% of patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (treatment-related, 36%), 44% had serious TEAEs (treatment-related, 14%), and 6 on-study deaths had occurred. Most common TEAEs (any-grade/grade ≥3) were diarrhea (48%/9%), peripheral neuropathies not elsewhere classified (39%/4%), and fatigue (34%/4%). Modification/discontinuation of ixazomib, lenalidomide, or dexamethasone due to TEAEs occurred in 59%/15% of patients. Patient-reported QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QoL score) and treatment satisfaction (TSQM-9 Global Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Convenience scores) were maintained on IRd.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved responses and promising PFS and OS were seen following iCT to IRd in these mostly elderly, community-treated patients with NDMM and comorbidities, with no adverse impact on QoL/treatment satisfaction. Safety results were consistent with previous reports.

CANDOR compared the safety/efficacy of carfilzomib with dexamethasone and daratumumab (KdD) to carfilzomib with dexamethasone (Kd) in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). This CANDOR subgroup analysis evaluated outcomes based on cytogenetic risk. Overall response rates (KdD vs. Kd) were 81% versus 56% in high-risk and 87% versus 79% in standard-risk groups. Median progression-free survival was 11.2 versus 7.4 months in high-risk (hazard ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.34, 0.93]) and not reached versus 16.6 months in standard-risk groups (0.56 [95% CI, 0.39, 0.80]). These data support the efficacy of KdD in RRMM treatment, including in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.