未经证实:比较内侧枢轴设计(MP)和后稳定设计(PS)的临床结果研究存在争议。进行荟萃分析以总结现有证据,旨在确定MP是否优于PS假体。
UNASSIGNED:搜索策略遵循Cochrane合作的建议。电子搜索,如PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,从开始日期到2021年4月,系统地搜索了Cochrane有关医疗枢轴和后稳定假体的出版物。作者还手动检查和检索了包含潜在研究出版物的参考列表,电子搜索没有找到。两名调查员独立搜查,筛选,并对文章全文进行了回顾。通过协商一致解决了整个过程中产生的分歧,如果分歧仍然存在,他们被第三作者仲裁。随后,患者分为MP组和PS组.
未经批准:本研究共包括18篇文章,共2614例基线相似的患者。结果显示,PS组患髌骨残破或隆起的风险较高。然而,MP假体的理论优势不能转化为膝关节功能的差异,临床并发症,修订率和满意度。同样,假体的形状和机制不会影响植入物的位置和术后对齐。
UNASSIGNED:MP假体可降低髌骨笨拙或偶发率。然而,选择MP和PS假体不会影响膝关节功能,临床并发症,修订率,患者满意度,植入物位置,和术后对齐。
UNASSIGNED: Studies of clinical outcomes that compare the Medial Pivot design (MP) with the Posterior-Stabilized design (PS) were controversial. The meta-analysis was performed to summarize existing evidence, aiming to determine whether MP was superior to PS prosthesis.
UNASSIGNED: Search strategies followed the recommendations of the Cochrane collaboration. Electronic searches such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were systematically searched for publications concerning medical pivot and posterior stabilized prosthesis from the inception date to April 2021. Authors also manually checked and retrieved a reference list of included publications for potential studies, which the electronic searches had not found. Two investigators independently searched, screened, and reviewed the full text of the article. Disagreements generated throughout the process were resolved by consensus, and if divergences remain, they were arbitrated by a third author. Subsequently, patients were divided into the MP and PS groups.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 18 articles, comprising a total of 2614 patients with a similar baseline. The results showed the PS group had a higher risk of the patellar clunk or crepitus. However, the theoretical advantages of MP prosthesis could not translate to the difference in knee function, clinical complications, revision rate and satisfaction. Similarly, the shape and mechanism of prostheses could not affect the implant position and postoperative alignment.
UNASSIGNED: The MP prosthesis can reduce the patellar clunk or crepitus rate. However, choices between the MP and PS prosthesis would not affect knee function, clinical complications, revision rate, patient satisfaction, implant position, and postoperative alignment.