Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A

妊娠相关血浆蛋白 A
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小于胎龄(SGA),通常由胎盘不良引起,是全球围产期死亡率和发病率的主要原因。母体血清中胎盘蛋白和血管生成因子的水平在SGA中发生变化。使用来自基于人群的怀孕队列的数据,我们估计了中期妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)水平之间的关系,胎盘生长因子(PlGF),和血清可溶性fms样酪氨酸激酶-1(sFlt-1)与SGA。
    方法:纳入三千名孕妇。训练有素的卫生工作者在家访中前瞻性地收集数据。收集了产妇的血样,制备血清等分试样并储存在-80℃。分析中包括1,718名妇女,她们分娩了单胎活产婴儿,并在妊娠24-28周时提供了血液样本。我们使用Mann-WhitneyU检验来检查SGA(小于胎龄的10分出生体重)和适合胎龄(AGA)之间的中位生物标志物浓度差异。我们创建了生物标志物浓度四分位数,并分别针对每种生物标志物通过四分位数估计了SGA的风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。改良的泊松回归用于确定胎盘生物标志物与SGA的关联,调整潜在的混杂因素。
    结果:SGA妊娠中的PlGF中位数水平较低(934pg/mL,IQR613-1411pg/mL)比AGA(1050pg/mL,IQR679-1642pg/mL;p<0.001)。SGA妊娠的sFlt-1/PlGF比值中位数(2.00,IQR1.18-3.24)高于AGA妊娠(1.77,IQR1.06-2.90;p=0.006)。在多元回归分析中,PAPP-A最低四分位数的女性患SGA的风险高25%(95%CI1.09~1.44;p=0.002).对于PlGF,在最低的(aRR1.40,95%CI1.21-1.62;p<0.001)和第二四分位数(aRR1.30,95%CI1.12-1.51;p=0.001)的女性中,SGA风险较高。sFlt-1最高和第3四分位数的女性SGA分娩风险降低(分别为aRR0.80,95%CI0.70-0.92;p=0.002,和aRR0.86,95%CI0.75-0.98;p=0.028)。sFlt-1/PlGF比率最高四分位数的女性SGA分娩风险高18%(95%CI1.02-1.36;p=0.025)。
    结论:这项研究提供了证据表明PAPP-A,PlGF,和sFlt-1/PlGF比值测量可能是SGA的中期妊娠生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Small-for-gestational-age (SGA), commonly caused by poor placentation, is a major contributor to global perinatal mortality and morbidity. Maternal serum levels of placental protein and angiogenic factors are changed in SGA. Using data from a population-based pregnancy cohort, we estimated the relationships between levels of second-trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), placental growth factor (PlGF), and serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFlt-1) with SGA.
    METHODS: Three thousand pregnant women were enrolled. Trained health workers prospectively collected data at home visits. Maternal blood samples were collected, serum aliquots were prepared and stored at -80℃. Included in the analysis were 1,718 women who delivered a singleton live birth baby and provided a blood sample at 24-28 weeks of gestation. We used Mann-Whitney U test to examine differences of the median biomarker concentrations between SGA (< 10th centile birthweight for gestational age) and appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA). We created biomarker concentration quartiles and estimated the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for SGA by quartiles separately for each biomarker. A modified Poisson regression was used to determine the association of the placental biomarkers with SGA, adjusting for potential confounders.
    RESULTS: The median PlGF level was lower in SGA pregnancies (934 pg/mL, IQR 613-1411 pg/mL) than in the AGA (1050 pg/mL, IQR 679-1642 pg/mL; p < 0.001). The median sFlt-1/PlGF ratio was higher in SGA pregnancies (2.00, IQR 1.18-3.24) compared to AGA pregnancies (1.77, IQR 1.06-2.90; p = 0.006). In multivariate regression analysis, women in the lowest quartile of PAPP-A showed 25% higher risk of SGA (95% CI 1.09-1.44; p = 0.002). For PlGF, SGA risk was higher in women in the lowest (aRR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.62; p < 0.001) and 2nd quartiles (aRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.51; p = 0.001). Women in the highest and 3rd quartiles of sFlt-1 were at reduced risk of SGA delivery (aRR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.92; p = 0.002, and aRR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.98; p = 0.028, respectively). Women in the highest quartile of sFlt-1/PlGF ratio showed 18% higher risk of SGA delivery (95% CI 1.02-1.36; p = 0.025).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that PAPP-A, PlGF, and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio measurements may be useful second-trimester biomarkers for SGA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在确定孕早期母体血清生物标志物与早产(PTB)的关系,双胎妊娠中胎儿生长受限(FGR)和妊娠高血压疾病(HDP)。
    方法:这是一项对MaternidadeAlfredodaCosta博士进行的双胎妊娠的回顾性队列研究,里斯本,葡萄牙,2010年1月至2022年12月。我们纳入了在我们单位完成孕早期筛查并有两个活胎持续怀孕的妇女,并在24周后交付。产妇特征,分析妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)和β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-hCG)水平的不同结局:小于胎龄(SGA),妊娠期高血压(GH),早发型和晚发型先兆子痫(PE),以及与FGR和/或HDP相关的PTB的复合结局。单变量,使用多变量逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线。
    结果:466例双胎妊娠符合纳入标准。总的来说,185例(39.7%)妊娠受SGA<第5百分位数和/或HDP影响。PAPP-A与出生时的胎龄和平均出生体重呈线性关系。PAPP-A被证明是与FGR和/或HDP相关的SGA和PTB(<34周和<36周)的独立危险因素。PAPP-AMoM>90百分位数的女性均未发生早发性PE或PTB<34周。
    结论:高血清PAPP-A(>第90百分位数)排除了早发性PE和PTB<34周。除非存在高血压疾病的其他主要危险因素,这些女性不应被视为阿司匹林预防的候选人.然而,仍建议密切监测所有TwP的产科不良结局.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the association of first-trimester maternal serum biomarkers with preterm birth (PTB), fetal growth restriction (FGR) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in twin pregnancies.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of twin pregnancies followed at Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa, Lisbon, Portugal, between January 2010 and December 2022. We included women who completed first-trimester screening in our unit and had ongoing pregnancies with two live fetuses, and delivered after 24 weeks. Maternal characteristics, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) and β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) levels were analyzed for different outcomes: small for gestational age (SGA), gestational hypertension (GH), early and late-onset pre-eclampsia (PE), as well as the composite outcome of PTB associated with FGR and/or HDP. Univariable, multivariable logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic curve were used.
    RESULTS: 466 twin pregnancies met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 185 (39.7%) pregnancies were affected by SGA < 5th percentile and/or HDP. PAPP-A demonstrated a linear association with gestational age at birth and mean birth weight. PAPP-A proved to be an independent risk factor for SGA and PTB (< 34 and < 36 weeks) related to FGR and/or HDP. None of the women with PAPP-A MoM > 90th percentile developed early-onset PE or PTB < 34 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: A high serum PAPP-A (> 90th percentile) ruled out early-onset PE and PTB < 34 weeks. Unless other major risk factors for hypertensive disorders are present, these women should not be considered candidates for aspirin prophylaxis. Nevertheless, close monitoring of all TwP for adverse obstetric outcomes is still recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胎儿医学基金会(FMF)的研究表明,通过结合生物物理,可以在妊娠早期预测先兆子痫。生物化学,和超声标记,并阻止使用阿司匹林。我们旨在评估未分娩妇女的FMF早产先兆子痫筛查试验。
    我们在11到14周时招募了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。产妇特征,平均动脉血压,PAPP-A(妊娠相关血浆蛋白A),母体血液中的PlGF(胎盘生长因子),招募时收集子宫动脉搏动指数。早产先兆子痫的风险由不知道妊娠结局的第三方计算。根据FMF筛查测试和根据美国妇产科学院标准,使用受试者工作特征曲线来估计早产(<37周)和早发型(<34周)先兆子痫的检出率(灵敏度)和假阳性率(1-特异性)。
    我们招募了7554名参与者,其中7325名(97%)在20周后仍符合资格,其中65名(0.9%)出现了先兆子痫,22例(0.3%)出现早发型先兆子痫。使用FMF算法(110例先兆子痫的临界值≥1),早产先兆子痫的检出率为63.1%,早发型先兆子痫的检出率为77.3%,假阳性率为15.8%.使用美国妇产科学院的标准,等效检出率为61.5%和59.1%,分别,假阳性率为34.3%。
    孕早期FMF先兆子痫筛查试验预测,在未产妇女中,有三分之二的早产先兆子痫和四分之三的早发型先兆子痫,假阳性率约为16%。
    URL:https://www。clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT02189148.
    UNASSIGNED: Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) studies suggest that preterm preeclampsia can be predicted in the first trimester by combining biophysical, biochemical, and ultrasound markers and prevented using aspirin. We aimed to evaluate the FMF preterm preeclampsia screening test in nulliparous women.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study of nulliparous women recruited at 11 to 14 weeks. Maternal characteristics, mean arterial blood pressure, PAPP-A (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A), PlGF (placental growth factor) in maternal blood, and uterine artery pulsatility index were collected at recruitment. The risk of preterm preeclampsia was calculated by a third party blinded to pregnancy outcomes. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to estimate the detection rate (sensitivity) and the false-positive rate (1-specificity) for preterm (<37 weeks) and for early-onset (<34 weeks) preeclampsia according to the FMF screening test and according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria.
    UNASSIGNED: We recruited 7554 participants including 7325 (97%) who remained eligible after 20 weeks of which 65 (0.9%) developed preterm preeclampsia, and 22 (0.3%) developed early-onset preeclampsia. Using the FMF algorithm (cutoff of ≥1 in 110 for preterm preeclampsia), the detection rate was 63.1% for preterm preeclampsia and 77.3% for early-onset preeclampsia at a false-positive rate of 15.8%. Using the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists criteria, the equivalent detection rates would have been 61.5% and 59.1%, respectively, for a false-positive rate of 34.3%.
    UNASSIGNED: The first-trimester FMF preeclampsia screening test predicts two-thirds of preterm preeclampsia and three-quarters of early-onset preeclampsia in nulliparous women, with a false-positive rate of ≈16%.
    UNASSIGNED: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02189148.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较三种不同的孕早期筛查数学模型对先兆子痫(PE)的预测性能,将产妇危险因素与平均动脉压(MAP)相结合,子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI)和血清胎盘生长因子(PlGF),和两个风险评分系统,基于NICE和ACOG的建议。
    方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,于2017年9月至2019年12月在西班牙五个不同地区的八个胎儿医学单位进行。邀请所有在妊娠110至136周进行常规超声检查的单胎妊娠和非畸形活胎孕妇参加研究。记录产妇特征和病史,并测量MAP,UtA-PI,血清PlGF和妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)转换为中位数(MoM)的倍数。期限风险,根据FMF竞争风险模型计算早产PE(<37周妊娠)和早期PE(<34周妊娠),Crovetto等人。,Logistic回归模型,和Serra等人。,高斯模型。还进行了基于NICE和ACOG指南的患者分类。我们在固定的10%筛查阳性率(SPR)下,用95%置信区间(CI)估计检出率(DR),以及早产儿PE的接收器工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),早期PE,和所有PE的三个数学模型。对于评分系统,我们计算了DR和SPR。还评估了风险校准。
    结果:研究人群包括10,110例单胎妊娠,包括32例(0.3%)发展为早期PE,72例(0.7%)发生早产PE,230例(2.3%)发生任何PE。在固定的10%SPR下,FMF,Crovetto等人。,和Serra等人。,检测到82.7%(95%CI,69.6至95.8%),73.8%(95%CI,58.7至88.9%),早期PE的79.8%(95%CI,66.1至93.5%);72.7%(95%CI,62.9至82.6%),69.2%(95%CI,58.8至79.6%),早产PE的74.1%(95%CI,64.2至83.9%)和55.1%(95%CI,48.8至61.4%),47.1%(95%CI,40.6至53.5%),和所有PE的53.9%(95%CI,47.4至60.4%),分别。预测病例和观察病例之间的最佳相关性是通过FMF模型实现的,AUROC为0.911(95%CI,0.879至0.943),斜率为0.983(95%CI,0.846-1.120),截距为0.154(95%CI,-0.091至0.397)。NICE标准在11%SPR时确定了46.7%(95%CI,35.3%至58.0%)的早产PE,ACOG标准在33.8%SPR时确定了65.9%(95%CI,55.4%至76.4%)的早产PE。
    结论:通过将母体因素与MAP相结合的数学模型,可以实现筛查早产PE的最佳性能,UtA-PI和PlGF,与NICE或ACOG标准等风险评分系统相比。虽然所有三种算法在总体预测方面都显示出相似的结果,FMF模型在个体水平上表现最佳。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the predictive performance of three different mathematical models for first-trimester screening of pre-eclampsia (PE), which combine maternal risk factors with mean arterial pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and serum placental growth factor (PlGF), and two risk-scoring systems.
    METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study performed in eight fetal medicine units in five different regions of Spain between September 2017 and December 2019. All pregnant women with singleton pregnancy and a non-malformed live fetus attending their routine ultrasound examination at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks\' gestation were invited to participate in the study. Maternal characteristics and medical history were recorded and measurements of MAP, UtA-PI, serum PlGF and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) were converted into multiples of the median (MoM). Risks for term PE, preterm PE (< 37 weeks\' gestation) and early PE (< 34 weeks\' gestation) were calculated according to the FMF competing-risks model, the Crovetto et al. logistic regression model and the Serra et al. Gaussian model. PE classification was also performed based on the recommendations of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). We estimated detection rates (DR) with their 95% CIs at a fixed 10% screen-positive rate (SPR), as well as the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) for preterm PE, early PE and all PE for the three mathematical models. For the scoring systems, we calculated DR and SPR. Risk calibration was also assessed.
    RESULTS: The study population comprised 10 110 singleton pregnancies, including 32 (0.3%) that developed early PE, 72 (0.7%) that developed preterm PE and 230 (2.3%) with any PE. At a fixed 10% SPR, the FMF, Crovetto et al. and Serra et al. models detected 82.7% (95% CI, 69.6-95.8%), 73.8% (95% CI, 58.7-88.9%) and 79.8% (95% CI, 66.1-93.5%) of early PE; 72.7% (95% CI, 62.9-82.6%), 69.2% (95% CI, 58.8-79.6%) and 74.1% (95% CI, 64.2-83.9%) of preterm PE; and 55.1% (95% CI, 48.8-61.4%), 47.1% (95% CI, 40.6-53.5%) and 53.9% (95% CI, 47.4-60.4%) of all PE, respectively. The best correlation between predicted and observed cases was achieved by the FMF model, with an AUC of 0.911 (95% CI, 0.879-0.943), a slope of 0.983 (95% CI, 0.846-1.120) and an intercept of 0.154 (95% CI, -0.091 to 0.397). The NICE criteria identified 46.7% (95% CI, 35.3-58.0%) of preterm PE at 11% SPR and ACOG criteria identified 65.9% (95% CI, 55.4-76.4%) of preterm PE at 33.8% SPR.
    CONCLUSIONS: The best performance of screening for preterm PE is achieved by mathematical models that combine maternal factors with MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF, as compared to risk-scoring systems such as those of NICE and ACOG. While all three algorithms show similar results in terms of overall prediction, the FMF model showed the best performance at an individual level. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阿司匹林预防先兆子痫(PE)的确切机制尚不清楚。其在整个妊娠期间对血清胎盘生物标志物的影响也是未知的。
    目的:研究阿司匹林对妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)和胎盘生长因子(PlGF)轨迹的影响,并对早产PE风险增加的女性进行重复测量。
    方法:这是对使用PAPP-A和PlGF重复测量的多标记物筛查和阿司匹林联合患者治疗的循证先兆子痫预防(ASPRE)试验的纵向二次分析。在审判中,在11-13+6周时,使用胎儿医学基金会算法确定了1,620名早产PE风险增加的女性,其中798人被随机分配接受阿司匹林150mg和822人接受安慰剂每日14周至36周.在妊娠19至24、32至34和36周的基线和随访时测量血清生物标志物。使用具有胎龄相互作用项的治疗的广义加性混合模型来研究阿司匹林随时间对生物标志物轨迹的影响。
    结果:总体而言,有5,507个PAPP-A和5,523个PlGF测量值。原始PAPP-A值随着时间的推移而增加,和原始PlGF增加,直到妊娠32周,然后下降。相同生物标志物的中位数(MoM)平均值的倍数始终低于1.0MoM,反映了研究人群的高风险特征。平均PAPP-A和PlGFMoM值的轨迹在阿司匹林组和安慰剂组之间没有显着差异(阿司匹林治疗的胎龄相互作用p值分别为0.259和0.335)。
    结论:在早产PE风险增加的女性中,与安慰剂相比,每天150mg阿司匹林对PAPP-A或PlGF轨迹无显著影响.
    BACKGROUND: The exact mechanism by which aspirin prevents preeclampsia remains unclear. Its effects on serum placental biomarkers throughout pregnancy are also unknown.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of aspirin on serum pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor trajectories using repeated measures from women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia.
    METHODS: This was a longitudinal secondary analysis of the Combined Multimarker Screening and Randomized Patient Treatment with Aspirin for Evidence-based Preeclampsia Prevention trial using repeated measures of pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor. In the trial, 1620 women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia were identified using the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm at 11 to 13+6 weeks of gestation, of whom 798 were randomly assigned to receive aspirin 150 mg and 822 to receive placebo daily from before 14 weeks to 36 weeks of gestation. Serum biomarkers were measured at baseline and follow-up visits at 19 to 24, 32 to 34, and 36 weeks of gestation. Generalized additive mixed models with treatment by gestational age interaction terms were used to investigate the effect of aspirin on biomarker trajectories over time.
    RESULTS: Overall, there were 5507 pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and 5523 placental growth factor measurements. Raw pregnancy-associated plasma protein A values increased over time, and raw placental growth factor increased until 32 weeks of gestation followed by a decline. The multiple of the median mean values of the same biomarkers were consistently below 1.0 multiple of the median, reflecting the high-risk profile of the study population. Trajectories of mean pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and placental growth factor multiple of the median values did not differ significantly between the aspirin and placebo groups (aspirin treatment by gestational age interaction P values: .259 and .335, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: In women at increased risk of preterm preeclampsia, aspirin 150 mg daily had no significant effects on pregnancy-associated plasma protein A or placental growth factor trajectories when compared to placebo.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    目的:本研究旨在探讨妊娠早期妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)水平与随后的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)发展之间的关系。
    方法:这项研究是对5854名接受常规产前护理的孕妇进行的。母体生物标志物,包括PAPP-A和游离β-hCG,在转诊实验室对所有女性进行测量,并转换为MoM值。孕妇分为两组,根据PAPP-A的血清浓度,(PAPP-A>0.4(正常)和PAPP-A<0.4(低))。收集GDM筛查试验和妊娠结局的数据,并用适当的试验进行分析。
    结果:在5854名孕妇中,889(15.19%)发展GDM。与对照相比,GDM病例中的母体PAPP-AMoM浓度显著更低。的确,PAPP-AMoM<0.4时,分娩孕龄和出生体重显著降低(p<0.001),宫内生长受限(IUGR)发生率显著升高(p<0.001)。ROC分析显示MoM浓度预测GDM的敏感性和特异性分别为53.3%和51.9%,分别。
    结论:妊娠早期低产PAPP-A可导致葡萄糖耐受不良,并增加后续GDM发展的风险。此外,PAPP-A的血清浓度降低与较低的出生体重和IUGR显着相关。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the association between first-trimester Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) levels and subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) development.
    METHODS: The study was conducted on 5854 pregnant women who attended routine prenatal care. Maternal biomarkers, including PAPP-A and free beta hCG, were measured for all women in a referral laboratory and converted to MoM values. Pregnant women were divided into two groups, based on the serum concentration of PAPP-A, (PAPP-A > 0.4 (normal) and PAPP-A < 0.4 (low)). Data on the screening test for GDM and pregnancy outcomes were collected and analyzed with appropriate tests.
    RESULTS: Of the 5854 pregnant women, 889 (15.19%) developed GDM. The maternal PAPP-A MoM concentrations were significantly lower in GDM cases compared to controls. Indeed, gestational age at delivery and birth weight were significantly lower (p < 0.001) in PAPP-A MoM < 0.4, and the rate of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was significantly higher (p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of MoM concentration for predicting GDM were 53.3% and 51.9%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lower maternal PAPP-A in early pregnancy can lead to glucose intolerance and increase the risk of subsequent GDM development. In addition, decreased serum concentration of PAPP-A is significantly correlated to lower birth weight and IUGR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:本研究旨在评估孕早期低水平的母体妊娠相关血浆蛋白-A(PAPP-A)是否与妊娠后期的脐动脉搏动指数(UAPI)升高有关,在估计胎儿体重在第3百分位数和第10百分位数之间的情况下,为了建立PAPP-A作为胎儿生长受限(FGR)这种特殊情况的预测因子。
    方法:观察性,回顾性队列研究,在波尔图的一所三级大学医院进行,葡萄牙。做了前三个月联合筛查的孕妇,2013年5月至2020年6月在同一家医院分娩,包括第3百分位和第10百分位之间的估计胎儿体重(EFW)。主要结果是两组之间UAPI患病率增加的差异:PAPP-A<0.45MoM和PAPP-A≥0.45MoM。由于次要结局是评估新生儿体重的差异,分娩时的胎龄,剖宫产,新生儿重症监护病房住院,两组之间的5-minApgar评分低于7,活产率相同。
    结果:我们包括664例妊娠:PAPP-A<0.45MoM的110例和PAPP-A≥0.45MoM的554例。UAPI患病率增加,这是这项研究的主要结果,两组之间存在显着差异(p=0.005),与PAPP-A≥0.45MoM组(5.4%)相比,PAPP-A<0.45MoM组的患病率更高(12.7%).二次结局剖宫产率在组间有显著差异(p=0.014),PAPP-A<0.45MoM组的患病率(42.7%)高于PAPP-A≥0.45MoM组(30.1%).没有其他次要结果显示两组之间的差异。
    结论:孕早期低血清母体PAPP-A(<0.45MoM)与妊娠后期UAPI(>95百分位数)升高有关联,在EFW介于第3和第10百分位数之间的情况下。然而,这种关联并不足以使低PAPP-A成为该人群UAPI升高的可靠预测因子.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate if low levels of serum maternal pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) during the first trimester are related to increased umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA PI) later in pregnancy, in cases of estimated fetal weight between the 3rd and 10th percentiles, in order to establish PAPP-A as a predictor of this particular cases of fetal growth restriction (FGR).
    METHODS: An observational, retrospective cohort study, conducted at a tertiary University Hospital located in Oporto, Portugal. Pregnant women who did the first trimester combined screening, between May 2013 and June 2020 and gave birth in the same hospital, with an estimated fetal weight (EFW) between the 3rd and 10th percentiles were included. The primary outcome is the difference in increased UA PI prevalence between two groups: PAPP-A<0.45 MoM and PAPP-A≥0.45 MoM. As secondary outcomes were evaluated differences in neonatal weight, gestational age at delivery, cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit hospitalization, 5-min Apgar score below 7 and live birth rate between the same two groups.
    RESULTS: We included 664 pregnancies: 110 cases of PAPP-A<0.45 MoM and 554 cases with PAPP-A≥0.45 MoM. Increased UA PI prevalence, which was the primary outcome of this study, was significantly different between the two groups (p=0.005), as the PAPP-A<0.45 MoM group presents a higher prevalence (12.7 %) when compared to the PAPP-A≥0.45 MoM group (5.4 %). The secondary outcome cesarean delivery rate was significantly different between the groups (p=0.014), as the PAPP-A<0.45 MoM group presents a higher prevalence (42.7 %) than the PAPP-A≥0.45 MoM group (30.1 %). No other secondary outcomes showed differences between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is an association of low serum maternal PAPP-A (<0.45 MoM) during the first trimester and increased UA PI (>95th percentile) later in pregnancy, in cases of EFW between the 3rd and 10th percentiles. However, this association is not strong enough alone for low PAPP-A to be a reliable predictor of increased UA PI in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定五个妊娠早期生物标志物(妊娠相关血浆蛋白A[PAPP-A],甲胎蛋白[AFP],β人绒毛膜促性腺激素[β-hCG],胎盘生长因子[PlGF]和可溶性fms样酪氨酸激酶受体-1[sFlt-1])和一系列不良妊娠结局(APO)。
    方法:未产单胎妊娠的前瞻性队列研究。
    方法:剑桥,英国。
    方法:4056名妊娠结局预测研究参与者。
    方法:在妊娠约12周时测量母体血清中的生物标志物浓度。使用逻辑回归进行APO的单变量分析。多变量分析使用最佳子集逻辑回归和交叉验证。
    方法:先兆子痫(PE),小于胎龄(SGA),包括严重的SGA(出生体重<3),胎儿生长受限(FGR),早产(PTB,诱导和自发[iPTB和sPTB,分别]),存活前的丧失和死产,加上结果的组合。
    结果:PAPP-A的较低值,PlGF和sFlt-1以及较高的AFP值与FGR相关(OR为1SD较高的值0.59[95%CI0.48-0.74],或0.56[95%CI0.44-0.70],OR0.68[95%CI0.54-0.87]和OR1.53[95%CI1.25-1.88]),严重SGA(OR0.59[95%CI0.49-0.72],或0.71[95%CI0.57-0.87],OR0.74[95%CI0.60-0.91]和OR1.41[95%CI1.17-1.71]),sPTB(OR0.61[95%CI0.50-0.73],或0.79[95%CI0.66-0.96],或0.57[95%CI0.47-0.70]和1.41[95%CI1.18-1.67])和iPTB(或0.72[95%CI0.57-0.91],或0.62[95%CI0.49-0.78],OR0.71[95%CI0.56-0.90]和OR1.44[95%CI1.16-1.78]),分别。当评估生物标志物的组合时,PAPP-A和AFP与重度SGA独立相关;PAPP-A单独合并PE+PTB;PlGF单独合并重度PE;PlGF,β-hCG,AFP和PAPP-A与PE和SGA的组合;AFP和sFlt-1与sPTB的组合;以及AFP和PlGF与iPTB的组合。
    结论:孕早期胎盘生物标志物的组合与APO相关。然而,模式因不同类型的APO而异,表明潜在病理生理途径的异质性。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the inter-relationships between five first-trimester biomarkers (pregnancy associated plasma protein A [PAPP-A], alpha-fetoprotein [AFP], beta human chorionic gonadotrophin [beta-hCG], placenta growth factor [PlGF] and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-1 [sFlt-1]) and a range of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs).
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study of nulliparous singleton pregnancy.
    METHODS: Cambridge, UK.
    METHODS: 4056 pregnancy outcome prediction study participants.
    METHODS: The biomarker concentrations were measured in maternal serum at ~12 weeks of gestation. Univariable analysis of APOs was performed using logistic regression. Multivariable analysis used best subsets logistic regression with cross-validation.
    METHODS: Pre-eclampsia (PE), small for gestational age (SGA), including severe SGA (birthweight <3rd), fetal growth restriction (FGR), preterm birth (PTB, both induced and spontaneous [iPTB and sPTB, respectively]), pre-viable loss and stillbirth, plus combinations of outcomes.
    RESULTS: Lower values of PAPP-A, PlGF and sFlt-1 and higher values of AFP were associated with FGR (OR for 1 SD higher value 0.59 [95% CI 0.48-0.74], OR 0.56 [95% CI 0.44-0.70], OR 0.68 [95% CI 0.54-0.87] and OR 1.53 [95% CI 1.25-1.88]), severe SGA (OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.49-0.72], OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.57-0.87], OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.60-0.91] and OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.17-1.71]), sPTB (OR  0.61 [95% CI 0.50-0.73], OR 0.79 [95% CI 0.66-0.96], OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.47-0.70] and OR 1.41 [95% CI 1.18-1.67]) and iPTB (OR  0.72 [95% CI 0.57-0.91], OR 0.62 [95% CI 0.49-0.78], OR 0.71 [95% CI 0.56-0.90] and OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.16-1.78]), respectively. When combinations of biomarkers were assessed, PAPP-A and AFP were independently associated with severe SGA; PAPP-A alone with PE + PTB; PlGF alone with severe PE; PlGF, beta-hCG, AFP and PAPP-A with the combination of PE and SGA; AFP and sFlt-1 with sPTB; and AFP and PlGF with iPTB.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combinations of first-trimester placental biomarkers are associated with APOs. However, the patterns vary for different types of APO, indicating heterogeneity in the underlying pathophysiological pathways.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:使用竞争风险模型可以实现先兆子痫(PE)的有效早孕期筛查,该模型结合了来自母体病史的危险因素和多个生物标志物的中位数(MoM)值。通过机器学习方法使用人工智能(AI)的新模型已被证明可以实现类似的筛查性能,而无需将生物标志物的原始数据转换为MoM。我们旨在展示该模型如何在没有特定适应的情况下跨人群使用。
    方法:使用完全连接的神经网络得出的机器学习模型,用于早期(<34周)的早孕预测,早产(<37周),所有PE均在英国的一组孕妇中进行开发和测试。该模型基于母体危险因素和平均动脉血压(MAP),子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI),胎盘生长因子(PlGF),和妊娠相关胎盘蛋白-A(PAPP-A)。该模型应用于在西班牙检查的10110例单胎妊娠的数据集,这些妊娠参与了早孕期先兆子痫验证(PREVAL)研究。其中妊娠早期PE筛查由胎儿医学基金会(FMF)竞争风险模型进行.如果不对用于测量PlGF的分析仪进行调整,则筛选性能较差,这在英国和西班牙是不同的。这种调整是通过简单的线性回归进行的。因此,在10%筛查阳性率(SPR)时,通过检查受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)和检出率(DR)来评估筛查性能之前,我们对这些分析仪进行了调整.将这些指数与应用FMF竞争风险模型得出的指数进行了比较。
    结果:早期10%SPR的DR,早产,机器学习模型的所有PE为84.4%(95%CI,67.2至94.7%),77.8%(95%CI,66.4至86.7%),和55.7%(95%CI,49.0至62.2%),分别,相应的AUROC为0.920(95%CI,0.864至0.920),0.913(95%CI,0.882至0.913)和0.846(95%CI,0.820至0.846)。通过使用三种生物标志物(MAP,UtA-PI,PlGF);PAPP-A的掺入对DR没有显着改善。这些结果与应用FMF竞争风险模型所获得的结果相似(10%SPR为82.7%,早期PE的95%CI为69.6%至95.8%,72.7%,95%CI早产PE为62.9%至82.6%,55.1%,所有PE的95%CI48.8%至61.4%),但不需要模型适应人群。
    结论:基于神经网络的用于妊娠早期预测PE的机器学习模型提供了可应用于不同人群的PE的有效筛选,但在这样做之前,必须对用于生化测试的分析仪进行调整。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    Effective first-trimester screening for pre-eclampsia (PE) can be achieved using a competing-risks model that combines risk factors from the maternal history with multiples of the median (MoM) values of biomarkers. A new model using artificial intelligence through machine-learning methods has been shown to achieve similar screening performance without the need for conversion of raw data of biomarkers into MoM. This study aimed to investigate whether this model can be used across populations without specific adaptations.
    Previously, a machine-learning model derived with the use of a fully connected neural network for first-trimester prediction of early (< 34 weeks), preterm (< 37 weeks) and all PE was developed and tested in a cohort of pregnant women in the UK. The model was based on maternal risk factors and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI), placental growth factor (PlGF) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). In this study, the model was applied to a dataset of 10 110 singleton pregnancies examined in Spain who participated in the first-trimester PE validation (PREVAL) study, in which first-trimester screening for PE was carried out using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) competing-risks model. The performance of screening was assessed by examining the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and detection rate (DR) at a 10% screen-positive rate (SPR). These indices were compared with those derived from the application of the FMF competing-risks model. The performance of screening was poor if no adjustment was made for the analyzer used to measure PlGF, which was different in the UK and Spain. Therefore, adjustment for the analyzer used was performed using simple linear regression.
    The DRs at 10% SPR for early, preterm and all PE with the machine-learning model were 84.4% (95% CI, 67.2-94.7%), 77.8% (95% CI, 66.4-86.7%) and 55.7% (95% CI, 49.0-62.2%), respectively, with the corresponding AUCs of 0.920 (95% CI, 0.864-0.975), 0.913 (95% CI, 0.882-0.944) and 0.846 (95% CI, 0.820-0.872). This performance was achieved with the use of three of the biomarkers (MAP, UtA-PI and PlGF); inclusion of PAPP-A did not provide significant improvement in DR. The machine-learning model had similar performance to that achieved by the FMF competing-risks model (DR at 10% SPR, 82.7% (95% CI, 69.6-95.8%) for early PE, 72.7% (95% CI, 62.9-82.6%) for preterm PE and 55.1% (95% CI, 48.8-61.4%) for all PE) without requiring specific adaptations to the population.
    A machine-learning model for first-trimester prediction of PE based on a neural network provides effective screening for PE that can be applied in different populations. However, before doing so, it is essential to make adjustments for the analyzer used for biochemical testing. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨孕早期妊娠相关血浆蛋白A(PAPP-A)的相关性及预测价值,母性因素,中国南方母亲妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的生化指标。
    这项研究招募了4872名孕妇。PAPP-A,人绒毛膜促性腺激素的游离β亚基(游离β-HCG),空腹血糖(FPG),总胆固醇(TC),甘油三酯(TG),和高密度和低密度脂蛋白(高密度脂蛋白,LDL)在妊娠11-13周测量。在妊娠24-28周时,根据75g口服葡萄糖耐量试验诊断GDM。我们进行了逐步逻辑回归分析,以确定GDM的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。我们使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和曲线下面积(AUC)来评估PAPP-A的预测价值,母性因素,和生化标记。使用DeLong检验评估AUC值之间差异的显著性。
    在750名(15.39%)女性中诊断为GDM。GDM的独立因素是年龄,孕前BMI,GWG在诊断GDM之前,GDM的历史,糖尿病家族史,FPG,TG,LDL,PAPP-A,和TC。PAPP-A的AUC为0.56(95%CI0.53-0.58)。基于合并母体因素的模型的AUC,生化标志物,PAPP-A为0.70(95%CI0.68-0.72)。单独使用PAPP-A与基于合并母体因素的模型之间的AUC值差异,生化标志物,与PAPP-A比较,差异有统计学意义(Z=9.983,P<0.001)。
    孕早期血清PAPP-A水平低是妊娠后期发生GDM的独立危险因素。然而,尽管低血清PAPP-A水平与母体因素和生化标志物相结合时的预测价值增加,但这并不是一个很好的独立预测因子.
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the relationship and predictive value of first-trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), maternal factors, and biochemical parameters with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in southern China mothers.
    UNASSIGNED: This study recruited 4872 pregnant women. PAPP-A, the free beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (free β-HCG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), and high- and low-density lipoproteins (HDL, LDL) were measured at 11-13+ weeks of gestation. GDM was diagnosed based on a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test at 24-28 weeks of gestation. We performed stepwise logistic regression analysis to determine the odds ratio (OR) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of GDM. We used Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves with the area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate the predictive value of PAPP-A, maternal factors, and biochemical markers. The significance of the differences between the AUC values was assessed using the DeLong test.
    UNASSIGNED: GDM was diagnosed in 750 (15.39%) women. Independent factors for GDM were age, pre-gestational BMI, GWG before a diagnosis of GDM, previous history of GDM, family history of diabetes, FPG, TG, LDL, PAPP-A, and TC. The AUC of PAPP-A was 0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.58). The AUC of a model based on combined maternal factors, biochemical markers, and PAPP-A was 0.70 (95% CI 0.68-0.72). Differences in AUC values between PAPP-A alone and the model based on combined maternal factors, biochemical markers, and PAPP-A were statistically significant (Z= 9.983, P<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: A Low serum PAPP-A level in the first trimester is an independent risk factor for developing GDM later in pregnancy. However, it is not a good independent predictor although the predictive value of a low serum PAPP-A level increases when combined with maternal factors and biochemical markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号