Pregnancy, Ectopic

怀孕,
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:对早期妊娠剖宫产瘢痕妊娠(CSP)的新Delphi共识定义进行临床评估。
    方法:2008年至2021年期间,对36名诊断为CSP并接受局部和全身甲氨蝶呤(MTX)联合治疗的女性进行回顾性队列研究。根据新的Delphi共识标准,根据矢状面的孕囊疝深度将CSP分为三个亚组。A亚组包括8例(22.2%),其中孕囊的最大部分向子宫腔突出。B亚组包括22例(61.1%),其中孕囊的最大部分嵌入子宫肌层,C亚组包括6例(16.7%),其中妊娠部分位于子宫颈或子宫外轮廓之外。
    结果:A亚组入院时β-HCG水平明显低于B或C亚组(11,075±7109,18,787±16,585和58,273±55,267mIU/mL,分别,P=0.01)。所有C亚组患者都有重复的MTX疗程和手术干预(剖腹手术,子宫动脉栓塞术,和手术宫腔镜检查)的发生率是A或B亚组的两倍(100、50和40.9%,分别,P=.036)。A亚组住院时间明显短于B或C亚组(1.9±1.5,2.1±1.1,5.4±4.9天,P=0.01)。
    结论:根据Delphi共识标准定义妊娠早期CSP的结果对临床决策具有重要意义。病人护理,以及CSP的后续行动。
    OBJECTIVE: Clinical evaluation of the new Delphi consensus definition of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) in early gestation.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 36 women diagnosed with CSP and treated with combined local and systemic methotrexate (MTX) between 2008 and 2021. The CSPs were classified according to the new Delphi consensus criteria into three subgroups based on the depth of the gestational sac herniation in the sagittal plane. Subgroup A included 8 (22.2%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac protruded toward the uterine cavity. Subgroup B included 22 (61.1%) cases in which the largest part of the gestational sac was embedded in the myometrium, and subgroup C included 6 (16.7%) cases in which the gestational was partially located outside the outer contour of the cervix or uterus.
    RESULTS: The β-HCG level upon admission was significantly lower in subgroup A than in subgroups B or C (11,075 ± 7109, 18,787 ± 16,585, and 58,273 ± 55,267 mIU/mL, respectively, P = .01). All subgroup C patients had repeated courses of MTX and surgical interventions (laparotomy, uterine artery embolization, and operative hysteroscopy) at double the rate of subgroups A or B (100, 50, and 40.9%, respectively, P = .036). The duration of hospitalization was significantly shorter in subgroup A than in subgroups B or C (1.9 ± 1.5, 2.1 ± 1.1, and 5.4 ± 4.9 days, P = .01).
    CONCLUSIONS: The outcome according to Delphi consensus criteria for defining CSP in early gestation has implications for clinical decision-making, patient care, and the follow-up of CSP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 背景:评估异位妊娠的随机对照试验(RCT)具有不同的结局,以不同的方式定义和测量,这限制了他们为循证临床实践提供信息的能力。
    目的:为了解决已发表的RCT和系统评价中的方法学缺陷,本研究建立了一套核心结果集,以指导异位妊娠的未来研究.
    方法:为了确定潜在的结果,我们进行了全面的文献综述,并对有异位妊娠生活经验的个体进行了访谈.然后将潜在的核心结果输入到三轮Delphi调查中。来自六大洲的154名参与者,包括医疗保健专业人员,研究人员,和有异位妊娠经验的人,完成了德尔福调查的所有三轮。在三个共识发展会议上优先考虑了成果,并就如何在可能的情况下报告这些成果提出了建议。
    方法:医疗保健专业人员,研究人员,和有异位妊娠生活经验的个体结果:六个结果达成完全共识,包括治疗成功,解决时间,额外干预措施的数量,不良事件,死亡率和严重发病率,和治疗满意度。
    结论:异位妊娠六个结局的核心结局将有助于标准化临床试验报告,促进调查结果在临床实践中的实施,加强以病人为中心的护理。
    To address methodological deficiencies in published randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews, this study has developed a core outcome set to guide future research in ectopic pregnancy (EP).
    To identify potential outcomes, we performed a comprehensive literature review and interviews with individuals with lived experience in EP. Potential core outcomes were then entered into a 3-round Delphi survey. A total of 154 participants from 6 continents, comprising health care professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in EP, completed all 3 rounds of the Delphi survey. Outcomes were prioritized at 3 consensus development meetings, and recommendations were developed on how to report these outcomes where possible.
    Not applicable.
    Health care professionals, researchers, and individuals with lived experience in EP.
    Not applicable.
    Consensus for inclusion in core outcome set.
    Six outcomes reached full consensus, including treatment success, resolution time, the number of additional interventions, adverse events, mortality and severe morbidity, and treatment satisfaction.
    The core outcome set with 6 outcomes for EP will help standardize reporting of clinical trials, facilitate implementation of findings into clinical practice, and enhance patient-centered care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有和没有早孕评估单位(EPAU)的医院如何坚持基于指南的EPAU质量指标,
    一项定性访谈研究,评估荷兰四家有EPAU的医院和四家没有EPAU的医院对19项质量指标的依从性。对于每个质量指标,计算了指南依从性的比率.每家医院的总体不依从性定义为对19项质量指标的依从性低于100%。
    在有EPAU的医院的三个指标(3/19[16%])和没有EPAU的医院的五个指标(5/19[26%])中发现了不依从性。所有有EPAU的医院和没有EPAU的三家医院都有标准的数字系统,用于记录超声检查结果并明确解释所有治疗方案。所有医院都没有为在职工作人员提供经过认证的超声培训。一家拥有EPAU的医院存在离散的等候区,而没有一家没有EPAU的医院。在一家有EPAU的医院和一家没有EPAU的医院中,接受了以前有异位妊娠的妇女的自我转诊。
    在荷兰,有和没有EPAU的医院对EPAU的基于指南的质量指标的不遵守情况大致相同。
    OBJECTIVE: How do hospitals with and without an early pregnancy assessment unit (EPAU) adhere to guideline-based quality indicators for an EPAU relating to logistics, access to services and quality of early pregnancy care?
    METHODS: A qualitative interview study assessing the adherence to 19 quality indicators in four hospitals with an EPAU and four hospitals without an EPAU in the Netherlands. For each quality indicator, a ratio for guideline adherence was calculated. Overall non-adherence per hospital was defined as less than 100% adherence to the 19 quality indicators.
    RESULTS: Non-adherence was seen in three indicators (3/19 [16%]) for hospitals with an EPAU and in five indicators (5/19 [26%]) for hospitals without an EPAU. A standard digital system for the registration of ultrasound findings and clear explanation of all treatment options was present in all hospitals with an EPAU and in three hospitals without an EPAU. Certified ultrasound training for working staff members was absent in all hospitals. A discrete waiting area was present in one hospital with an EPAU compared with none of the hospitals without an EPAU. Self-referrals from women with a previous ectopic pregnancy was accepted in one hospital with and in one hospital without an EPAU.
    CONCLUSIONS: Non-adherence to guideline-based quality indicators for an EPAU was about the same for hospitals with and without an EPAU in the Netherlands.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    为指导不明部位妊娠及输卵管与非输卵管异位妊娠的诊断和处理提供循证算法。
    所有育龄期患者。
    本指南的实施旨在使β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素结果阳性的患者受益,并为医生提供标准的预期算法,medical,和手术治疗不明部位妊娠和输卵管妊娠和非输卵管异位妊娠。
    2018年在PubMed/Medline和Cochrane中输入了以下搜索词:剖宫产,绒毛膜促性腺激素,β亚基,人类/血液,输卵管/手术,女性,生育力,人类,不孕症,腹腔镜检查,甲氨蝶呤,甲氨蝶呤/给药和剂量,甲氨蝶呤/治疗用途,怀孕(腹部,角度,子宫颈,cornual,ectopic,异位/诊断,异位/诊断成像,异位/药物治疗,异位/流行病学,异位/死亡率,异位/手术,异位,间质,峡颈,卵巢,输卵管,未知位置),复发,危险因素,输卵管切除术,输卵管造口术,输卵管妊娠,超声检查,多普勒超声,产前。纳入的文章均为随机对照试验,荟萃分析,系统评价,观察性研究,和病例报告。从这些文章的参考书目中确定了其他出版物。仅审查了英语文章。
    作者使用建议分级评估对证据的质量和建议的强度进行了评估,发展,和评估(等级)方法。见在线附录A(表A1的定义和A2的强和弱的建议的解释)。
    妇产科医生,家庭医生,急诊医生,助产士,注册护士,执业护士,医学生,居民和研究员。
    建议(父母的等级评定)。
    To provide an evidence-based algorithm to guide the diagnosis and management of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal and nontubal ectopic pregnancy.
    All patients of reproductive age.
    The implementation of this guideline aims to benefit patients with positive β-human chorionic gonadotropin results and provide physicians with a standard algorithm for expectant, medical, and surgical treatment of pregnancy of unknown location and tubal pregnancy and nontubal ectopic pregnancies.
    The following search terms were entered into PubMed/Medline and Cochrane in 2018: cesarean section, chorionic gonadotropin, beta subunit, human/blood, fallopian tubes/surgery, female, fertility, humans, infertility, laparoscopy, methotrexate, methotrexate/administration & dosage, methotrexate/therapeutic use, pregnancy (abdominal, angular, cervix, cornual, ectopic, ectopic/diagnosis, ectopic/diagnostic imaging, ectopic/drug therapy, ectopic/epidemiology, ectopic/mortality, ectopic/surgery, heterotopic, interstitial, isthmo-cervical, ovarian, tubal, unknown location), recurrence, risk factors, salpingectomy, salpingostomy, tubal pregnancy, ultrasonography, doppler ultrasonography, and prenatal. Articles included were randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational studies, and case reports. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. Only English-language articles were reviewed.
    The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).
    Obstetrician-gynaecologists, family physicians, emergency physicians, midwives, registered nurses, nurse practitioners, medical students, and residents and fellows.
    RECOMMENDATIONS (GRADE RATINGS IN PARENTHESES).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    UNASSIGNED: Ectopic pregnancies (EPs) represent a severe early pregnancy complication that is associated with increased risks of maternal morbidity and mortality. Over the years, there has been a significant reduction in the mortality from this complication by improving the diagnostic tools and the treatment options.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to review and compare the recommendations from published guidelines on this potentially fatal condition.
    UNASSIGNED: A descriptive review of guidelines from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence on EP was carried out.
    UNASSIGNED: All the guidelines point out the crucial role of sonography in the prompt diagnosis of EP and describe similar sonographic findings. There is a consensus on the indications and contraindications to the use of methotrexate, the post-treatment surveillance, and the criteria of expectant management. The indications for a surgical approach are not well established, although the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, the Royal College of Physicians of Ireland, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence agree that a laparoscopy is preferred to laparotomy for hemodynamically stable patients. The latter is considered a better option only in emergency conditions. However, there is controversy in the recommended methotrexate protocols and the evaluation of β-human chorionic gonadotrophin and progesterone levels.
    UNASSIGNED: It is of paramount importance to build consistent international protocols, so as to help clinicians all over the world diagnose EPs in the most timely and accurate way and subsequently treat them effectively as a nonurgent medical condition, with the intention to lower the mortality and morbidity rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    提供有关宫内避孕的国家临床指南。
    使用Pubmed和Cochrane库对现有文献进行了系统综述。美国人,英国和加拿大的指导方针也得到了考虑。
    宫内避孕(IUC)显示出广泛的适应症,包括青少年,未产,艾滋病患者(B级)和有异位妊娠史的妇女(C级)。对于患有IUC(B级)的女性,不应修改宫颈癌筛查。插入器械前必须进行双手检查和宫颈检查(B级)。患者在插入装置之前不应系统地进行性传播感染(STI)筛查(B级)。应优选在插入前进行STI筛查,但可在无症状女性(B级)插入器械时进行。在插入前不建议进行常规抗生素预防和术前用药(A级)。插入后几周可能会进行后续访问(专业共识)。插入装置后不推荐常规盆腔超声检查(B级)。在IUC患者中,计划外出血,当持续或伴有骨盆疼痛时,需要进一步调查以排除并发症(专业协议)。可疑的子宫穿孔需要进行放射学检查以找到设备(专业共识)。从腹腔选择性取出宫内节育器应首选腹腔镜方法(专业共识)。在宫内节育器原位意外怀孕的情况下,应排除异位妊娠(B级)。在可行和期望的宫内妊娠的情况下,如果可以到达字符串(C级),建议移除宫内节育器。在无症状的宫内避孕患者的子宫颈抹片检查中检测到放线菌样生物不需要进一步干预(B级)。在STI或盆腔炎(B级)的情况下,不建议立即取出宫内节育器。在48至72小时的适当治疗(B级)后,在没有临床改善的情况下,应考虑移除设备。
    宫内避孕是一种长效、可逆的避孕方法,疗效好,延续率高。相比之下,并发症发生率低。因此,它应该提供给未产和多产妇女。
    To provide national clinical guidelines focusing on intrauterine contraception.
    A systematic review of available literature was performed using Pubmed and Cochrane libraries. American, British and Canadian guidelines were considered as well.
    Intrauterine contraception (IUC) displays a wide panel of indications, including adolescents, nulliparous, patients living with HIV before AIDS (Grade B) and women with history of ectopic pregnancy (Grade C). Cervical cancer screening should not be modified in women with IUC (Grade B). Bimanual examination and cervix inspection are mandatory before device insertion (Grade B). Patients should not systematically undergo screening for sexually transmitted infections (STI) before device insertion (Grade B). Screening for STI should be preferably done before insertion but it can be performed at the time of device insertion in asymptomatic women (Grade B). Routine antibiotic prophylaxis and premedication are not recommended before insertion (Grade A). A follow-up visit may be offered several weeks after insertion (Professional consensus). Routine pelvic ultrasound examination in not recommended after device insertion (Grade B). In patients with IUC, unscheduled bleeding, when persistent or associated with pelvic pain, requires further investigation to rule out complication (Professional agreement). Suspected uterine perforation warrants radiological workup to locate the device (Professional consensus). Laparoscopic approach should be preferred for elective removal of intrauterine device from abdominal cavity (Professional consensus). In case of accidental pregnancy with intrauterine device in situ, ectopic pregnancy should be excluded (Grade B). In case of viable and desired intrauterine pregnancy, intrauterine device removal is recommended if the strings are reachable (Grade C). Detection of Actinomyces-like organisms on pap smear in asymptomatic patients with intrauterine contraception does not require further intervention (Grade B). Immediate removal of intrauterine device is not recommended in case of STI or pelvic inflammatory disease (Grade B). Device removal should be considered in the absence of clinical improvement after 48 to 72 hours of appropriate treatment (Grade B).
    Intrauterine contraception is a long-acting and reversible contraception method displaying great efficacy and high continuation rate. In contrast, complication rate is low. It should thus be offered to both nulliparous and multiparous women.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号