Practice Patterns, Physicians'

实践模式,Physicians '
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尿路感染(UTI)在其一生中影响所有女性的近三分之二,并且许多经历复发性感染。有来自多个国际协会的基于证据的评估和治疗指南;然而,最近基于索赔的分析表明,这些指南的依从性很差。本研究旨在了解美国初级保健提供者(PCP)在为UTI和复发性UTI(rUTI)提供基于指南的护理方面遇到的障碍。
    方法:18个PCP的半结构化访谈,从大洛杉矶地区招募的,检查了UTI/rUTI发作的真实世界临床管理,决定参考亚专科护理,和资源指导咨询和管理。扎根理论方法可用于分析访谈笔录并确定初步和主要主题。
    结果:参与者表示希望获得每次膀胱炎发作的尿液培养物,但由于患者的要求或护理障碍而感到有压力做出妥协。如果患者有rUTI病史,PCP的经验性治疗阈值较低,年纪大了,或拒绝评估。实验室数据在临床决策中的利用最少:在解释培养数据时很少考虑尿液分析。PCP治疗广泛的泌尿系统和非泌尿系统症状作为UTI,即使是负面文化。PCP在开始UTI预防时感觉不舒服,而是寻求解剖原因的专家评估。他们不知道管理指南,通常使用UpToDate®作为其主要资源。提供者很少推荐基于证据的UTI预防干预措施。
    结论:简洁清晰的专业指南的低可用性是适当UTI/rUTI护理的重大障碍。临床指导文件的可用性差导致对预防措施和额外诊断测试的作用的严重混淆。患者获得护理提供者的困难导致对推定治疗的期望。需要进一步的研究来确定是否为提供者和/或管理算法提供改进的教育材料可以改善UTI管理的指南一致性。
    BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTI) affect almost two-thirds of all women during their lives and many experience recurrent infections. There are evidence-based guidelines from multiple international societies for evaluation and treatment; however, recent claims-based analyses have demonstrated that adherence to these guidelines is poor. This study seeks to understand the barriers experienced by U.S. primary care providers (PCPs) to providing guideline-based care for UTI and recurrent UTI (rUTI).
    METHODS: Semi-structured interviews of 18 PCPs, recruited from the greater Los Angeles area, examined real-world clinical management of UTI/rUTI episodes, decisions to refer to subspecialty care, and resources guiding counseling and management. Grounded theory methodology served to analyze interview transcripts and identify preliminary and major themes.
    RESULTS: Participants expressed the desire to obtain urine cultures for each cystitis episode, but felt pressured to make compromises by patient demands or barriers to care. PCPs had lower thresholds to empirical treatment if patients had a history of rUTIs, were elderly, or declined evaluation. Laboratory data was minimally utilized in clinical decision-making: urinalyses were infrequently considered when interpreting culture data. PCPs treated a broad set of urologic and non-urologic symptoms as UTI, even with negative cultures. PCPs did not feel comfortable initiating UTI prophylaxis, instead seeking specialist evaluation for anatomic causes. They were unaware of management guidelines, typically utilizing UpToDate® as their primary resource. Few evidence-based UTI prevention interventions were recommended by providers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low availability of succinct and clear professional guidelines are substantial barriers to appropriate UTI/rUTI care. Poor useability of clinical guidance documents results in substantial confusion about the role of preventative measures and additional diagnostic testing. Difficulties in patient access to care providers lead to expectations for presumptive treatment. Future studies are needed to determine if improved educational materials for providers and/or management algorithms can improve guideline concordance of UTI management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:\“直接对消费者(DTC)远程医疗\”正在全球范围内增加,并改变了初级卫生保健(PHC)的地图。虚拟医疗在过去十年中有所增加,随着COVID-19大流行的持续,患者对在线护理的使用进一步增加。在瑞典,在线咨询是今天政府支持的医疗保健的一部分,瑞典市场上有几家数字护理提供商,这样就可以在几分钟内与医生取得联系。这个市场的快速扩张引发了人们对仅在没有任何身体预约的在线环境中提供的初级保健质量的质疑。抗生素处方是PHC的常见治疗方法。
    目的:本研究旨在比较数字PHC提供者(互联网PHC)和传统物理PHC提供者(物理PHC)之间的抗生素处方,并确定特定诊断的处方在互联网PHC和物理PHC预约之间是否有所不同,根据任命时年龄的影响进行了调整,性别,和时间相对于COVID-19大流行。
    方法:从2020年1月至2021年3月,从地区行政办公室获得了Sörmland地区居民基于解剖治疗化学(ATC)代码的抗生素处方数据。总的来说,包括68,332名Sörmland居民的160,238个任命(124,398个物理PHC和35,840个互联网PHC任命)。考虑了由互联网PHC或物理PHC医生发布的处方。关于预约日期的信息,为病人服务的人员类别,ICD-10(国际疾病统计分类,第十次修订)诊断代码,处方药的ATC代码,并使用患者的年龄和性别。
    结果:总共登记了160,238次医疗保健预约,其中18433导致感染诊断。在物理PHC和互联网PHC约会中,性别和达到的年龄分布存在很大差异。物理-PHC预约在60-80岁的患者中达到顶峰,而互联网-PHC预约在20-30岁的患者中达到顶峰。在9.3%(11,609/124,398)的物理PHC预约中使用了ATC代码为J01A-J01X的抗生素,而在互联网PHC预约中使用了6.1%(2201/35,840)。此外,61.3%(6412/10454)的物理-PHC感染预约导致抗生素处方,相比之下,只有25.8%(2057/7979)的互联网PHC预约。对处方抗生素的分析表明,互联网PHC对所有诊断均遵循区域建议。Physical-PHC也遵循了建议,但使用了更广泛的抗生素。接受抗生素处方的赔率比(在预约时调整年龄后,患者性别,与物理PHC预约相比,在互联网PHC预约期间处方是否在COVID-19大流行之前或期间)为0.23-0.39。
    结论:互联网-PHC预约导致抗生素处方数量明显低于物理-PHC预约,调整了咨询互联网PHC和物理PHC的患者特征的巨大差异。互联网PHC处方者根据指南显示适当的处方。
    BACKGROUND:  \"Direct-to-consumer (DTC) telemedicine\" is increasing worldwide and changing the map of primary health care (PHC). Virtual care has increased in the last decade and with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, patients\' use of online care has increased even further. In Sweden, online consultations are a part of government-supported health care today, and there are several digital care providers on the Swedish market, which makes it possible to get in touch with a doctor within a few minutes. The fast expansion of this market has raised questions about the quality of primary care provided only in an online setting without any physical appointments. Antibiotic prescribing is a common treatment in PHC.
    OBJECTIVE:  This study aimed to compare antibiotic prescribing between digital PHC providers (internet-PHC) and traditional physical PHC providers (physical-PHC) and to determine whether prescriptions for specific diagnoses differed between internet-PHC and physical-PHC appointments, adjusted for the effects of attained age at the time of appointment, gender, and time relative to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS:  Antibiotic prescribing data based on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes were obtained for Region Sörmland residents from January 2020 until March 2021 from the Regional Administrative Office. In total, 160,238 appointments for 68,332 Sörmland residents were included (124,398 physical-PHC and 35,840 internet-PHC appointments). Prescriptions issued by internet-PHC or physical-PHC physicians were considered. Information on the appointment date, staff category serving the patient, ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) diagnosis codes, ATC codes of prescribed medicines, and patient-attained age and gender were used.
    RESULTS:  A total of 160,238 health care appointments were registered, of which 18,433 led to an infection diagnosis. There were large differences in gender and attained age distributions among physical-PHC and internet-PHC appointments. Physical-PHC appointments peaked among patients aged 60-80 years while internet-PHC appointments peaked at 20-30 years of age for both genders. Antibiotics with the ATC codes J01A-J01X were prescribed in 9.3% (11,609/124,398) of physical-PHC appointments as compared with 6.1% (2201/35,840) of internet-PHC appointments. In addition, 61.3% (6412/10,454) of physical-PHC infection appointments resulted in antibiotic prescriptions, as compared with only 25.8% (2057/7979) of internet-PHC appointments. Analyses of the prescribed antibiotics showed that internet-PHC followed regional recommendations for all diagnoses. Physical-PHC also followed the recommendations but used a wider spectrum of antibiotics. The odds ratio of receiving an antibiotic prescription (after adjustments for attained age at the time of appointment, patient gender, and whether the prescription was issued before or during the COVID-19 pandemic) during an internet-PHC appointment was 0.23-0.39 as compared with a physical-PHC appointment.
    CONCLUSIONS:  Internet-PHC appointments resulted in a significantly lower number of antibiotics prescriptions than physical-PHC appointments, adjusted for the large differences in the characteristics of patients who consult internet-PHC and physical-PHC. Internet-PHC prescribers showed appropriate prescribing according to guidelines.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是成人和儿童的重要全球公共卫生问题。喉气管支气管炎(croup)是儿童常见的急性呼吸道感染(ARI),通常是由病毒引起的,并且不应该用抗生素治疗。使用抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)减少ARI中不必要的抗生素的使用是针对儿童AMR的有效措施。这项研究调查了韩国小儿喉气管支气管炎患者的抗生素处方模式。我们的成果将有用改良ASP。
    方法:数据来自政府机构健康保险审查和评估服务。我们分析了针对≤5岁儿童的门诊处方,这些儿童的诊断代码为喉气管支气管炎,即,国际疾病分类,第十次修订,代码J050(croup),J040(喉炎),或J041(支气管炎),2017-2020年。对于每个处方,人口统计信息和有关就诊医疗机构的信息(医院类型,医生的专业,医院的位置)被提取。随后估计了总体抗生素处方率,并进行多变量分析以确定抗生素处方的相关因素。描述了处方抗生素并将其分类为超广谱青霉素,头孢菌素,和大环内酯类。
    结果:在审查的2,358,194张处方中,829,172(35.2%)含有抗生素。在多变量分析中,医院的管理是与抗生素处方相关的最强因素(调整后比值比[aOR],22.33;95%置信区间[CI],20.87-23.89;P<0.001),其次是诊所的管理(AOR,12.66;95%CI,11.83-13.54;P<0.001)和综合医院的管理(aOR,8.96;95%CI,8.37-9.59;P<0.001)。抗生素处方也与≤2岁的患者显着相关,由儿科专家管理,并在非大都市地区的医院接受治疗。总的来说,广谱青霉素是最常用的(18.6%)抗生素,其次是头孢菌素类(9.4%)和大环内酯类(8.5%)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,ASP需要关注医院的医生,诊所,综合医院,和儿科专科。向这些群体提供教育计划以提高对AMR和适当抗生素使用的认识可能是有效的ASP政策,并且可能有助于减少儿科患者中喉气管支气管炎的不必要的抗生素处方,因此可能会减少韩国儿童的AMR。
    BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an important global public health concern in adults and children. Laryngotracheobronchitis (croup) is a common acute respiratory infection (ARI) among children, most often caused by a virus, and should not be treated with antibiotics. Reducing the usage of unnecessary antibiotics in ARI using an antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) is an effective measure against AMR in children. This study investigates the antibiotic prescription pattern in pediatric patients with laryngotracheobronchitis in Korea. Our results will be useful to improve the ASP.
    METHODS: The data were obtained from the government agency Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service. We analyzed outpatient prescriptions issued to children ≤ 5 years of age with a first-listed diagnosis code for laryngotracheobronchitis, i.e., International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision, code J050 (croup), J040 (laryngitis), or J041 (tracheitis), during 2017-2020. For each prescription, demographic information and information about medical facilities visited (type of hospital, specialty of physician, location of hospital) were extracted. The overall antibiotic prescription rate was subsequently estimated, and multivariable analysis was conducted to determine the associated factors of antibiotic prescription. Prescribed antibiotics were described and classified into extended-spectrum penicillins, cephalosporin, and macrolides.
    RESULTS: Of 2,358,194 prescriptions reviewed, 829,172 (35.2%) contained antibiotics. In the multivariable analysis, management in a hospital was the strongest factor associated with antibiotic prescription (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 22.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.87-23.89; P < 0.001), followed by management in a clinic (aOR, 12.66; 95% CI, 11.83-13.54; P < 0.001) and management in a general hospital (aOR, 8.96; 95% CI, 8.37-9.59; P < 0.001). Antibiotic prescription was also significantly associated with patients who were ≤ 2 years of age, managed by a pediatric specialist, and treated at a hospital located in a non-metropolitan region. Overall, extended-spectrum penicillins were the most frequently prescribed (18.6%) antibiotics, followed by cephalosporins (9.4%) and macrolides (8.5%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study suggest that ASPs need to focus on physicians in hospitals, clinics, general hospitals, and pediatric specialties. Providing education programs to these groups to increase awareness of AMR and appropriate antibiotics use could be effective ASP policy and may help to reduce unnecessary prescriptions of antibiotics for laryngotracheobronchitis among pediatric patients and therefore potentially AMR in children in Korea.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前的指南建议对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)反复加重的患者使用三联疗法维持吸入器;然而,这些维持疗法未得到充分利用。这项研究旨在了解医生如何做出COPD治疗决定,以及如何在现实世界中使用组合维持疗法。
    这个探索性的,产生假设,非干预性研究使用了一项横断面在线调查,该调查对美国的执业医师样本进行了分析.该调查包括五个虚构的插图,详细介绍了COPD患者的常见症状。调查问题包括医生在决策中考虑的因素,以及处方治疗的障碍。进行了重复测量多变量分析,以评估医生转换为三联疗法与不改变患者当前的维持疗法或改变为另一种维持疗法的可能性。
    总共,200名医生完成了调查。据报道,治疗费用和患者获得治疗的机会是医生在处方决策中考虑的最常见障碍。如果考虑到患者的新症状史,医生更有可能将患者的维持吸入器转换为三联疗法,而不更换维持吸入器。保险状况,和临床指南在他们的决定。有更多经验治疗COPD患者的医生,那些每周治疗更多COPD患者的人,与不更换维持吸入器相比,更有可能改用三联疗法。
    这项研究表明,在为COPD患者开处方治疗时,可能影响医生决策的因素的复杂性,包括治疗成本的考虑,患者的访问和依从性,患者合并症,目前的治疗效果,临床指南,以及提供者治疗COPD的经验水平。进一步的研究可能有助于阐明影响医生决策的因素的相对重要性,并告知哪些类型的决策支持工具最有益。
    慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)症状可以通过维持治疗得到有效控制,这是常规治疗,以帮助改善症状。在中度至重度COPD患者中,三种不同疗法的组合(三联疗法维持)已被证明比两种不同疗法的组合(双重疗法维持)更有效。然而,维持疗法,包括三联疗法,没有得到充分利用。这项研究旨在探讨医生如何为COPD患者做出治疗决定,以及如何使用组合维持疗法。要做到这一点,我们对美国的执业医师进行了一项调查.该调查包括五项基于临床的,虚构的个人资料,或者小插曲,COPD患者,描述了常见的症状和患者特征。然后,医生被要求回答关于他们将为每个患者开什么治疗方法的问题,以及他们在决定患者治疗时考虑的任何因素。我们发现,治疗费用和患者获得治疗是医生在选择治疗时考虑的最常见障碍。如果考虑到患者的新症状史,医生也更有可能将患者的维持吸入器转换为三联疗法维持吸入器。患者的保险状况,以及做出决定时的临床指南。我们的研究表明,在决定COPD患者的治疗时,有许多复杂的因素会影响医生的决定。
    UNASSIGNED: Current guidelines recommend triple therapy maintenance inhalers for patients with recurrent exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); however, these maintenance therapies are underutilized. This study aimed to understand how physicians make COPD treatment decisions, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized in a real-world setting.
    UNASSIGNED: This exploratory, hypothesis-generating, non-interventional study used a cross-sectional online survey that was administered to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five fictitious vignettes detailing common symptoms experienced by patients with COPD. Survey questions included factors physicians consider in their decisions, and perceived barriers to prescribing treatments. Repeated measures multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate how likely physicians were to switch to triple therapy versus no change to patient\'s current maintenance therapy or change to another maintenance therapy.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 200 physicians completed the survey. Cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were reported as the most common barriers physicians consider in their prescribing decisions. Physicians were more likely to switch a patient\'s maintenance inhaler to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient\'s history of new symptoms, insurance status, and clinical guidelines in their decision. Physicians with more experience treating patients with COPD, and those who treat more patients with COPD per week, were more likely to switch to triple therapy versus no change to maintenance inhaler.
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrates the complexity of factors that can influence physicians\' decisions when prescribing treatments for patients with COPD, including considerations of treatment cost, patient access and adherence, patient comorbidities, efficacy of current treatment, clinical guidelines, and provider\'s level of experience treating COPD. Further research may help elucidate the relative importance of the factors influencing physicians\' decisions and inform what types of decision-support tools would be most beneficial.
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) symptoms can be effectively managed with maintenance therapies, which are treatments that are taken routinely to help improve symptoms. A combination of three different therapies (triple therapy maintenance) has been shown to be more effective than a combination of two different therapies (dual therapy maintenance) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. However, maintenance therapies, including triple therapy, are underutilized. This study aimed to explore how physicians make their treatment decisions for patients with COPD, and how combination maintenance therapies are utilized. To do so, we administered a survey to a sample of practicing physicians in the United States. The survey included five clinically based, fictitious profiles, or vignettes, of patients with COPD, with common symptoms and patient characteristics being described. Physicians were then asked to answer questions about what treatment they would prescribe for each patient, and any factors they considered when deciding on a treatment for a patient. We found that cost of treatment and patient access to treatment were the most common barriers that physicians considered when choosing a treatment. Physicians were also more likely to switch a patient’s maintenance inhaler to a triple therapy maintenance inhaler if they considered the patient’s history of new symptoms, patient’s insurance status, and clinical guidelines when making their decisions. Our study shows that there are many complex factors that influence physicians’ decisions when deciding on a treatment for patients with COPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:下腰痛,一个世界性的普遍问题,导致更多的全球性残疾比任何其他条件,并与高成本的社会。这项基于观察性注册表的研究描述了瑞典VästraGötaland地区神经性下腰痛的医学治疗的当前趋势,拥有170万人口。本研究的目的是:(1)确定研究人群中神经性下腰痛的患病率;(2)探索医疗利用模式,包括指定用于神经性下腰痛(NG)的阿片类药物(OG)和镇痛药的患病率和分布,以及(3)评估研究期间神经性下腰痛的长期趋势和医学治疗实践的变化。
    方法:本研究包括对2017年至2021年期间从瑞典初级保健登记处VEGA和药物处方登记处Digitalis提取的汇总数据的描述性分析。数据按年份分层,年龄,性别,药品代码(ATC),和亚诊断,并表示为在注册诊断神经性下腰痛之前或之后六个月内获得处方药的独特患者的患病率。药物编码还根据其作用机制分为两组:阿片样物质组(OG)和神经病组(NG)。
    结果:在所有四个诊断组中,使用阿片类镇痛药的患者多于神经性镇痛药。阿片类药物组与神经病变组之间的最大差异是腰椎管狭窄症诊断组(67.1%vs.40.6%),其次是腰椎根管狭窄症的诊断(65.9%vs.44.2%),神经根和丛压迫在椎间盘疾病诊断中(57.5%vs.40.8%),和腰痛伴坐骨神经痛诊断(38.4%vs.22.7%)。
    结论:趋势表明处方率普遍增加,因此患者使用神经性镇痛药治疗与研究诊断相关的神经性疼痛。然而,阿片类药物治疗仍然是最常见的。结果表明,神经性下腰痛的治疗需要改进。
    BACKGROUND: Low back pain, a common problem worldwide, causes more global disability than any other condition and is associated with high costs to society. This observational registry-based study describes the current trends in the medical treatment of neuropathic low back pain in the Swedish region of Västra Götaland, which has a population of 1.7 million. The study aims to; (1) identify the prevalence of neuropathic low back pain within the study population; (2) to explore the patterns of medical treatment utilization, including the prevalence and distribution of opioids (OG) and analgesics specified for neuropathic low back pain (NG) and (3) to evaluate the long-term trends and changes in medical treatment practice for neuropathic low back pain over the study period.
    METHODS: This study includes a descriptive analysis of aggregated data extracted from the Swedish primary care registry VEGA and the pharmaceutical prescription registry Digitalis between the years 2017 and 2021. The data were stratified by year, age, gender, pharmaceutical code (ATC), and sub-diagnoses and presented as the prevalence of unique patients retrieving prescribed medication within six months before or after a registered diagnosis of neuropathic low back pain. The pharmaceutical codes were furthermore grouped into two groups depending on their mechanism of action; opioid group (OG) and neuropathic group (NG).
    RESULTS: In all four diagnosis groups, more patients used opioid analgesics than neuropathic analgesics. The greatest difference between the opioid group and neuropathic group was in the lumbar spinal stenosis diagnosis group (67.1% vs. 40.6%), followed by the lumbar root canal stenosis diagnosis (65.9% vs. 44.2%), the nerve root and plexus compressions in intervertebral disc disorders diagnosis (57.5% vs. 40.8%), and lumbago with sciatica diagnosis (38.4% vs. 22.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: The trends suggest a general increase in the prescription rate and therefore patients\' use of neuropathic analgesics for neuropathic pain associated with the studied diagnoses. However, opioid treatment remains the most common. The results indicate that the treatment for neuropathic low back pain needs to be improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:硬化外阴苔藓(VLS)是一种引起疼痛的皮肤疾病,瘙痒,解剖学变化,外阴癌症的风险增加了22倍。VLS是可以治疗的,使用局部类固醇允许症状解决和并发症预防。VLS的诊断延迟和误诊很常见。先前的研究发现,女性将其归因于与临床医生的互动和知识不足。大多数VLS在初级保健中被诊断。
    目的:调查初级保健临床医生对识别和管理外阴皮肤病和VLS的信心的看法,诊断的障碍,外阴皮肤病教育,和VLS的诊断标准。
    方法:通过专业活动和网络分发了混合方法调查。使用归纳主题分析在NVivo中分析定性数据。Spearman的等级相关性用于关联参与者特征和信心。
    结果:共有122个响应,大多数来自全科医生(48%)和全科医生(43%)。对诊断充满信心,识别,治疗VLS与女性性别呈正相关,时间的作用,和考试频率。确定的主题包括不知道正常的患者,男性临床医生:去技能和不情愿,缺乏临床医生知识,以及诊断和治疗的不确定性。38%的参与者从未参与过外阴皮肤病的教学或学习。几乎所有(98%)的参与者都认为诊断标准会有所帮助。
    结论:本研究阐明了VLS诊断和治疗的多重障碍。结果证实,临床医生与患者一样担心知识贫乏,强调制定明确诊断标准的重要性,并将允许我们针对那些缺乏自信的人进行培训。
    BACKGROUND: Vulval lichen sclerosus (VLS) is a skin condition which causes pain, itching, anatomical changes, and increases vulval cancer risk by up to 22 times. VLS is treatable, with use of topical steroids allowing symptom resolution and complication prevention. Diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis of VLS is common. Previous studies found that women attribute this to poor interactions with and knowledge of clinicians. Most VLS is diagnosed in primary care.
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate primary care clinicians\' views on confidence in identifying and managing vulval skin disease and VLS, barriers to diagnosis, education on vulval skin disease, and diagnostic criteria for VLS.
    METHODS: A mixed methods survey was distributed via professional events and networks. Qualitative data was analysed in NVivo using inductive thematic analysis. Spearman\'s rank correlation was used to correlate participant characteristics and confidence.
    RESULTS: There were 122 responses, the majority from GP trainees (48%) and GPs (43%). Confidence in diagnosing, identifying, and treating VLS positively correlated with female gender, time in role, and examination frequency. Themes identified include patients not knowing normal, male clinicians: deskilling and reluctance, lack of clinician knowledge, and uncertainty around diagnosis and treatment. 38% of participants never participated in teaching or learning on vulval skin disease. Almost all (98%) participants feel diagnostic criteria would be helpful.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates the multiple barriers to diagnosis and treatment of VLS. The results confirm that clinicians share patient concerns that knowledge is poor, highlight the importance of developing clear diagnostic criteria, and will allow us to target training to those lacking in confidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:英国的医生在训练中经历了显著的异质性。虽然核心课程是专业培训的基础,临床依恋的多样性导致了异质知识库和当地实践的差异。一些见解或实践,有可能改善病人的护理,但这只存在于当地而不是国家的指导下,仍然未被发现和未充分利用。
    目的:汇总此类临床见解的实例;评估这些见解的推荐程度和证据;提高对未充分利用的临床见解的认识,强调需要进一步研究的领域,并劝阻使用不适当或未经证实的做法。
    方法:寻求自由文本回答的定性调查,向所有英国医疗保健专业人员开放,被机会主义地传播。记录反应,并根据现有证据基础评估见解,成本和潜在的危害。
    结果:在多个专业中收集了29种临床见解。有些已经成为国家指导的一部分,但似乎没有得到充分利用,而其他人只出现在本地或国际指导。一些见解的证据令人信服,但经常混合,而几乎所有人都被评为低成本和低风险。
    结论:我们发现了一系列鲜为人知的临床见解,涉及一系列专业,以及一些证据不足的做法。许多见解有可能对患者护理产生积极影响,特别是在一般实践中。有一个明显的机会提请注意那些提供低成本的见解,低风险和潜在有效的治疗方法,同时强调进一步研究证据较少的见解和实践的机会。
    BACKGROUND: Doctors in the UK experience significant heterogeneity in training. Whilst core curricula underpin specialty training, diversity in clinical attachments results in a heterogeneous knowledge base and variation in local practice. Some insights or practices, which have the potential to improve patient care, but which only exist anecdotally or in local rather than national guidance, remain undiscovered and underutilised.
    OBJECTIVE: To aggregate examples of such clinical insights; To assess the extent of recommendation and evidence for these insights; To raise awareness of underutilised clinical insights, to highlight areas for further study and dissuade the use of inappropriate or un-evidenced practices.
    METHODS: A qualitative survey seeking free text responses, open to all UK healthcare professionals, was disseminated opportunistically. Responses were recorded and the insights were assessed against the existing evidence base, cost and potential for harm.
    RESULTS: 29 clinical insights were collated across multiple specialties. Some already formed part of national guidance, but appeared to be underutilised, while others appeared only in local or international guidance. Evidence for some insights was compelling, but often mixed, whilst almost all were rated as low cost and low risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: We uncovered a range of lesser-known clinical insights across a range of specialties, as well as some less well-evidenced practices. Many insights have the potential to positively impact patient care, particularly in general practice. There is a clear opportunity to draw attention to those insights which offer low-cost, low-risk and potentially effective treatments, whilst highlighting opportunities to further study less well-evidenced insights and practices.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:近年来,在怀孕期间使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药引起了人们的极大关注。然而,有有限的数据捕获处方模式和使用这些药物的诱发因素,特别是在怀孕前长期使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z催眠药的女性中。
    方法:这项基于人群的队列研究包括2004年至2018年台湾的2930988例怀孕。确定在怀孕期间服用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药的妇女,并根据她们在怀孕前的状况进一步分层:长期使用者(一年内供应超过180天),短期用户(一年内供应少于180天),和非用户。评估了使用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药以及与抗抑郁药或阿片类药物一起使用的趋势。使用Logistic回归模型来确定与怀孕期间使用这些药物相关的因素。和中断时间序列分析(ITSA)用于评估这些药物在不同妊娠相关时期的使用模式.
    结果:妊娠期使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的总患病率为3.5%。在孕前长期使用者中,观察到上升趋势。从2004年到2018年,暴露妇女中抗抑郁药或阿片类药物的同时使用分别增加了三倍(从8.6%到23.1%)和六倍(从0.3%到1.7%)。有不健康生活方式行为的女性,例如酗酒(OR2.48;95%CI,2.02-3.03),药物滥用(OR10.34;95%CI,8.46-12.64),和烟草使用(OR2.19;95%CI,1.96-2.45),以及患有焦虑症等精神疾病的患者(OR6.99;95%CI,6.77-7.22),失眠(OR15.99;95%CI,15.55-16.45),抑郁症(OR9.43;95%CI,9.07-9.80),和精神分裂症(OR21.08;95%CI,18.76-23.69),和更高的医疗保健利用率,在怀孕期间更有可能使用苯二氮卓类药物或Z-催眠药。ITSA显示,在确认怀孕后,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的使用突然减少(水平变化-0.55个百分点;95%CI,-0.59至-0.51)。相比之下,苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的暴露量在分娩后显著增加(水平变化0.12个百分点;95%CI,0.09~0.16).
    结论:在这项队列研究中,孕前长期使用者在怀孕期间使用苯二氮卓类药物和Z-催眠药的趋势增加,以及与抗抑郁药或阿片类药物同时使用。研究结果强调了与怀孕期间使用这些药物相关的各种风险因素的存在。利用模式在怀孕的不同阶段有所不同,强调在怀孕期间使用这些药物的妇女需要处方指南和教育服务。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics during pregnancy has raised significant concerns in recent years. However, there are limited data that capture the prescription patterns and predisposing factors in use of these drugs, particularly among women who have been long-term users of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics before pregnancy.
    METHODS: This population-based cohort study comprised 2 930 988 pregnancies between 2004 and 2018 in Taiwan. Women who were dispensed benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics during pregnancy were identified and further stratified into groups based on their status before pregnancy: long-term users (with a supply of more than 180 days within a year), short-term users (with a supply of less than 180 days within a year), and nonusers. Trends in the use of benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics and concomitant use with antidepressants or opioids were assessed. Logistic regression models were utilized to identify factors associated with use of these drugs during pregnancy, and interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) were employed to evaluate utilization patterns of these drugs across different pregnancy-related periods.
    RESULTS: The overall prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-hypnotic use was 3.5% during pregnancy. Among prepregnancy long-term users, an upward trend was observed. The concomitant use of antidepressants or opioids among exposed women increased threefold (from 8.6% to 23.1%) and sixfold (from 0.3% to 1.7%) from 2004 to 2018, respectively. Women with unhealthy lifestyle behaviors, such as alcohol abuse (OR 2.48; 95% CI, 2.02-3.03), drug abuse (OR 10.34; 95% CI, 8.46-12.64), and tobacco use (OR 2.19; 95% CI, 1.96-2.45), as well as those with psychiatric disorders like anxiety (OR 6.99; 95% CI, 6.77-7.22), insomnia (OR 15.99; 95% CI, 15.55-16.45), depression (OR 9.43; 95% CI, 9.07-9.80), and schizophrenia (OR 21.08; 95% CI, 18.76-23.69), and higher healthcare utilization, were more likely to use benzodiazepines or Z-hypnotics during pregnancy. ITSA revealed a sudden decrease in use of benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics after recognition of pregnancy (level change -0.55 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.51). In contrast, exposures to benzodiazepines and Z-hypnotics increased significantly after delivery (level change 0.12 percentage point; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.16).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, an increased trend of benzodiazepine and Z-hypnotic use during pregnancy among prepregnancy long-term users, as well as concomitant use with antidepressants or opioids were found. The findings have highlighted the existence of various risk factors associated with the use of these drugs during pregnancy. Utilization patterns varied across different stages of pregnancy, highlighting the need for prescription guidelines and educational services for women using these drugs during pregnancy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    男性尿路感染(mUTIs)在初级保健中很少见。mUTI的定义因国家而异。法国mUTIs的治疗管理是基于14天的氟喹诺酮类药物疗程,尽管抗微生物药物耐药性风险很高。
    这项定性研究的目的是探索全科医生(全科医生)在mUTI的诊断和治疗管理方面的经验和行为。
    全科医生是在法国上诺曼底(HauteNormandie)通过便利抽样招募的,并与半结构化指南进行了单独采访。使用解释性现象学方法记录和分析了全科医生的经验和行为。
    从2021年3月到2022年5月,20名全科医生被纳入研究。定义mUTI被认为是一种诊断挑战。仅基于临床证据的诊断是不够的,需要补充测试。对于全科医生:“男性膀胱炎不存在”。mUTI被认为是一种不寻常的疾病,可以揭示潜在的疾病。全科医生认为氟喹诺酮类药物是“有效的”抗生素,并以相同的14天疗程治疗所有患者。全科医生实施了抗生素管理的改进策略,并使用计算机决策支持系统遵循了指南。
    由于初级保健中的低暴露和可变的临床表现,mUTI的全科医生经验有限,代表诊断和治疗挑战。为了改变全科医生的抗生素处方行为,将需要提出准则的范式转变。关键信息定义男性尿路感染代表了全科医生的诊断挑战。仅基于临床证据的诊断是不够的,需要补充测试。男性尿路感染是初级保健中的一种不寻常疾病,表明是更严重的潜在疾病。
    UNASSIGNED: Male urinary tract infections (mUTIs) are rare in primary care. The definition of mUTIs varies across countries. The therapeutic management of mUTIs in France is based on a 14-day course of fluoroquinolones despite a high risk of antimicrobial resistance.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this qualitative study was to explore general practitioners\' (GPs) experiences and behaviours regarding the diagnostic and therapeutic management of mUTIs.
    UNASSIGNED: GPs were recruited by convenience sampling in Haute Normandie (France) and interviewed individually with semi-structured guides. GPs\' experiences and behaviours were recorded and analysed using an interpretive phenomenological approach.
    UNASSIGNED: From March 2021 to May 2022, 20 GPs were included in the study. Defining a mUTI was perceived as a diagnostic challenge. A diagnosis based on clinical evidence alone was insufficient and complementary tests were required. For GPs: \'male cystitis does not exist\'. A mUTI was considered an unusual disease that could reveal an underlying condition. GPs considered fluoroquinolones to be \'potent\' antibiotics and treated all patients with the same 14-day course. GPs implemented improvement strategies for antibiotic stewardship and followed the guidelines using a computerised decision support system.
    UNASSIGNED: GPs\' experiences of mUTIs are limited due to low exposure and variable clinical presentations in primary care, representing a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In order to modify GPs\' antibiotic prescribing behaviours, a paradigm shift in the guidelines will need to be proposed.KEY MESSAGESDefining a male urinary tract infection represents a diagnostic challenge for GPs.A diagnosis based on clinical evidence alone is insufficient and complementary tests are required.A male urinary tract infection is an unusual disease in primary care and suggests a more serious underlying condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:白癜风是一种皮肤病,其特征是由于皮肤色素(称为黑素细胞)的丧失而在皮肤上出现白点或斑块。估计白癜风的患病率约为世界人口的0.5-2%,但在印度,患病率从2%到8%不等,取决于地区。本研究旨在评估白癜风患者的药物处方模式。
    方法:在政府总医院皮肤科进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,安得拉邦,印度,从2019年12月到2020年。年龄≥18岁的患者,两种性别,并将诊断和接受白癜风治疗纳入研究。在预先设计的病例报告表上收集给患者开的所有药物。这项研究的伦理批准来自拉吉夫·甘地医学科学研究所(RIMS)的机构伦理委员会。收集的数据采用SPSS18版进行分析。
    结果:最常用的药物类别是皮质类固醇(42.9%),其次是钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(13.4%),维生素(14.6%),碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(BFGF)(9.5%),保湿剂(6.9%),抗组胺药(6.5%),和矿物(6.2%)。在皮质类固醇中,倍他米松是最常用的处方药,其次是丙酸氯倍他索.局部用药的处方频率高于口服。
    结论:白癜风患者的处方模式符合指南和建议。然而,建议使用多个中心进行进一步研究以验证我们的发现.
    BACKGROUND: Vitiligo is a dermatological condition characterized by the appearance of white spots or patches on the skin due to the loss of skin pigment called melanocytes. The estimated prevalence of vitiligo is about 0.5-2% of the world population, but in India, the prevalence rate varies from 2 to 8%, depending on the region. This study aimed to assess drug prescribing patterns in vitiligo patients.
    METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out in the Dermatology Department of Government General Hospital, Andhra Pradesh, India, from December 2019 to 2020. Patients aged ≥18 years, both genders, and diagnosed and receiving treatment for vitiligo were included in the study. All medicines prescribed to the patients were collected on the predesigned case report form. Ethical approval for this study was taken from the Institutional Ethics Committee of Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Medical Science (RIMS). The collected data were analyzed by using SPSS version 18.
    RESULTS: The most commonly prescribed class of drugs was corticosteroids (42.9%), followed by calcineurin inhibitors (13.4%), vitamins (14.6%), basic fibroblast growth factor (BFGF) (9.5%), moisturizers (6.9%), antihistamines (6.5%), and minerals (6.2%). Among corticosteroids, betamethasone was the most commonly prescribed drug, followed by clobetasol propionate. Topical drugs were prescribed more often than orally.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prescription pattern in vitiligo patients is as per the guidelines and recommendations. However, further studies using multiple centers are recommended to verify our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号