Trametinib is a targeted therapy used for the treatment of solid tumours, with significant variability reported in real-life studies. This variability increases the risk of suboptimal exposure, which can lead to treatment failure or increased toxicity. Using model-based simulation, this study aims to characterize and investigate the pharmacokinetics and the adequacy of the currently recommended doses of trametinib. Additionally, the simulation of various suboptimal adherence scenarios allowed for an assessment of the impact of patients\' drug adherence on the treatment outcome. The population data collected in 33 adult patients, providing 113 plasmatic trametinib concentrations, were best described by a two-compartment model with linear absorption and elimination. The study also identified a significant positive effect of fat-free mass and a negative effect of age on clearance, explaining 66% and 21% of the initial associated variability, respectively. Simulations showed that a maximum dose of 2 mg daily achieved the therapeutic target in 36% of male patients compared to 72% of female patients. A dose of 1.5 mg per day in patients over 65 years of age achieved similar rates, with 44% and 79% for male and female patients, respectively, reaching the therapeutic target. Poor adherence leads to a significant drop in concentrations and a high risk of subtherapeutic drug levels. These results underline the importance of interprofessional collaboration and patient partnership along the patient\'s journey to address patients\' needs regarding trametinib and support medication adherence.

MAPK has been reported as a key oncogenic pathway for canine histiocytic sarcoma, which can be pharmacologically targeted with trametinib, a small inhibitor of MEK1/2. Preliminary data showed promising antitumor activity in in vitro and in vivo models and represented a proof of concept to translate the findings from bench to bedside. In this phase I, dose escalating study using a 3 + 3 cohort design, trametinib was evaluated in 18 dogs with cancer. Adverse events were graded according to VCOG-CTCAE v2. Blood samples and tumour biopsies were collected for pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment. Trametinib was well tolerated with a maximum tolerated dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day, PO. Dose-limiting toxicities included systemic hypertension, proteinuria, lethargy and elevated ALP, and were all Grade 3. The drug exposures increased more than linearly with dose since the elimination of trametinib was saturable. At a dose of 500 μg Q24h (0.5 mg/m2/day in a 30 kg dog), approximately 70% of dogs had an average steady-state concentration of 10 ng/mL, achieved after approximately 2 weeks. This threshold was associated with clinical efficacy in humans. Target engagement was not observed in biospecimens collected on Days 0 and 7. In conclusion, trametinib was considered safe in dogs with cancer, and the dose of 0.5 mg/m2/day was the recommended dose for phase II studies.

Teverelix drug product (DP) is a parenteral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist that has been successfully tested in phase 2 trials for hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer (APC) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In previous APC trials, teverelix DP was administered as intramuscular (IM) and subcutaneous (SC) injections, using a loading dose and (in a single trial) a maintenance dose. Our objective was to derive an optimal dosing regimen for phase 3 clinical development, using a pharmacometrics modeling approach. Data from 9 phase 2 studies (229 patients) was utilized to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model that described the concentration profile accommodating both IM and SC routes of administration. A 2-compartment model with sequential first-order absorption (slow and fast) and lag times best described the PK profiles of teverelix following SC and IM administration. An indirect response model with inhibition of production rate was fit to describe testosterone (T) concentrations based on physiological relevance. The final population PK-pharmacodynamic model was used to conduct simulations of various candidate dosing regimens to select the optimal dosing regimen to achieve clinical castration (T < 0.5 ng/mL by day 28) and to sustain clinical castration for 26 weeks. Model simulation showed that a loading dose of 360 mg SC and 180 mg IM with a maintenance dose of 360 mg SC 6-weekly (Q6W) starting at day 28 can achieve a ≥95% castration rate up to 52 weeks. This dose regimen was selected for phase 3 clinical development, which includes cardiovascular safety assessment in comparison to a GnRH agonist.

BACKGROUND: Hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common dose-limiting adverse effect of multi kinase inhibitors (MKI) whose mechanism is not fully understood, and the prophylaxis is inadequate.
OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of topical urea in secondary prevention of sunitinib-induced HFSR in renal cell cancer patients.
METHODS: Out of 55 screened patients, 14 were randomized to receive topical urea or placebo for four weeks. The association of HFSR with drug levels of sunitinib and its metabolite (n-desethyl sunitinib), genetic polymorphism of VEGFR2 gene, quality of life (QOL) and biochemical markers was also assessed.
RESULTS: The results showed that urea-based cream was not superior to placebo (P = .075). There was no change in the QOL in both the groups. Single nucleotide polymorphism was checked for two nucleotides rs1870377 and rs2305948 located in VEGFR2 gene on chromosome 4. SNP (variant T > A) at rs1870377 was associated with appearance of new HFSR as compared to the wild type, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference between mean plasma levels of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib in urea arm as compared to placebo arm as compared to placebo. The best fit population pharmacokinetic model for sunitinib was one compartment model with first order absorption and linear elimination. The median (IQR) of population parameters calculated from the population pharmacokinetics model for Ka, V and Cl was 0.22 (0.21-0.24) h-1, 4.4 (4.09-4.47) L, 0.049 (0.042-0.12) L/hr, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study suggested that the urea-based cream was not superior to placebo in decreasing the appearance of new HFSR in renal cancer patients receiving 4:2 regimen of sunitinib.

OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to explore the pharmacokinetics of perampanel (PER) in children with epilepsy, identify factors that contribute to pharmacokinetic variations among subjects, evaluate the connection between PER exposure and clinical outcome, and establish an evidence-based approach for tailoring individualized antiepileptic treatment in this specific population.
METHODS: In this prospective study, PER plasma concentrations and genetic information on metabolic enzymes were obtained from 194 patients younger than 18 years. The disposition kinetics of PER in pediatric patients following oral dosing were characterized using nonlinear mixed effect models. The effective range for the plasma concentration of PER was determined by assessing the efficacy and safety of PER treatment and analyzing the relationship between drug exposure and clinical response. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to evaluate and optimize the current dosing regimens.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic profile of PER was adequately described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight, total bilirubin level, and concomitant oxcarbazepine were found to have significant influences on PER pharmacokinetics. Model estimates of apparent clearance and volume of distribution were .016 ± .009 L/h/kg and 1.47 ± .78 L/kg, respectively. The effective range predicted from plasma concentration data in responders was 215-862 μg/L. Dosing scenarios stratified according to essential covariates were proposed through simulation analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we captured the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of PER in pediatric epilepsy patients through analysis of real-world data and adopted a pharmacometric approach to support an individualized dosing strategy for PER in this specific population.

Aims: Cetirizine is frequently administered at an increased dosage in clinical practice and recommended by several guidelines. Nonetheless, the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and real-world safety data remain insufficient in the Chinese pediatric population. The objective of the current study is to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model for cetirizine in Chinese pediatric patients and to investigate the rationale behind its off-label usage. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling children who had been diagnosed with allergic diseases and prescribed cetirizine. The outcomes were safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Cetirizine concentrations were measured using a pre-established analytical method. Subsequently, a PK model was developed, followed by model evaluation and simulation. The developed PK model was employed to investigate the drug exposure differences across various age groups and to simulate scenarios of potential overdose. Results: Sixty-three children were enrolled, and 24 of them received a cetirizine dose exceeding the recommended dosage. A PPK model, based on published literature, served as the basis of our analysis, with adjustment made to estimate certain parameters. The final model evaluation and validation indicated accurate predictive performance and robust parameter estimation. Simulations conducted for the label-dose among age 1-12 indicated median maximum concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) of 7 year old children could be the highest. The model was also used to predict the off-label dose scenarios and overdose patient to support the clinical decision. There were no adverse drug reactions in either group. Conclusion: This study provides evidence-based and model-based exploration for optimizing cetirizine usage in Chinese pediatric patients. The cetirizine PPK model showed accurate predictive performance and could be utilized to simulate individual patient exposure in real-world clinical scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Topical brepocitinib, a tyrosine kinase (TYK)2/Janus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor, is in development for psoriasis (PsO) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Quantitative analyses of prior clinical trial data were used to inform future clinical trial designs.
METHODS: Two phase 2b studies in patients with AD and PsO were used to characterize the amount of topical brepocitinib and the resultant systemic trough concentration (CTrough) using a linear mixed-effects regression (LMER). This model was used to predict brepocitinib systemic CTrough for higher treated body surface areas (BSAs) in adults and children. Information from non-clinical and clinical trials with oral brepocitinib was leveraged to set safety thresholds. This combined approach was used to inform future dose-strength selection and treated BSA limits.
RESULTS: Data from 256 patients were analyzed. Patient type, dose strength, and frequency had significant impacts on the dose-exposure relationship. Systemic concentration in patients with PsO was predicted to be 45% lower than in patients with AD from the same dose. When topically applied to the same percentage BSA, brepocitinib systemic exposures are expected to be comparable between adults and children. The systemic steady-state exposure after 3% once daily and twice daily (2 mg/cm2) cream applied to less than 50% BSA in patients with AD and PsO, respectively, maintains at least a threefold margin to non-clinical safety findings and clinical hematologic markers.
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between the amount of active drug applied and brepocitinib systemic CTrough, described by LMER, may inform the development strategy for dose optimization in the brepocitinib topical program.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin in treating drug-susceptible tuberculosis (TB) is still highly debated. In the phase 3 clinical trial Study 31/ACTG 5349 (NCT02410772), all participants in the control regimen arm received 600 mg rifampicin daily as a flat dose. Here, we evaluated relationships between rifampicin exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes.
METHODS: We analyzed rifampicin concentration time profiles using population nonlinear mixed-effects models. We compared simulated rifampicin exposure from flat- and weight-banded dosing. We evaluated the effect of rifampicin exposure on stable culture conversion at 6 months; TB-related unfavorable outcomes at 9, 12, and 18 months using Cox proportional hazard models; and all trial-defined safety outcomes using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Our model-derived rifampicin exposure ranged from 4.57 mg · h/L to 140.0 mg · h/L with a median of 41.8 mg · h/L. Pharmacokinetic simulations demonstrated that flat-dosed rifampicin provided exposure coverage similar to the weight-banded dose. Exposure-efficacy analysis (n = 680) showed that participants with rifampicin exposure below the median experienced similar hazards of stable culture conversion and TB-related unfavorable outcomes compared with those with exposure above the median. Exposure-safety analysis (n = 722) showed that increased rifampicin exposure was not associated with increased grade 3 or higher adverse events or serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Flat-dosing of rifampicin at 600 mg daily may be a reasonable alternative to the incumbent weight-banded dosing strategy for the standard-of-care 6-month regimen. Future research should assess the optimal dosing strategy for rifampicin, at doses higher than the current recommendation.

Background: Due to the heterogeneity of critically ill patients, the pharmacokinetics of tigecycline are unclear, and the optimal dosing strategy is controversial. Methods: A single-center prospective clinical study that included critically ill patients who received tigecycline was performed. Blood samples were intensively sampled (eight samples each), and plasma drug concentrations were determined. A population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model was developed and evaluated by goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap analysis and visual predictive checks. Monte Carlo simulation was conducted to optimize the dosage regimen. Results: Overall, 751 observations from 98 patients were included. The final PPK model was a two-compartment model incorporating covariates of creatinine clearance on clearance (CL), body weight on both central and peripheral volumes of distribution (V1 and V2), γ-glutamyl transferase and total bilirubin on intercompartment clearance (Q), and albumin on V2. The typical values of CL, Q, V1 and V2 were 3.09 L/h, 39.7 L/h, 32.1 L and 113 L, respectively. A dosage regimen of 50 mg/12 h was suitable for complicated intra-abdominal infections, but 100 mg/12 h was needed for community-acquired pneumonia, skin and skin structure infections and infections caused by less-susceptive bacteria. Conclusion: The Tigecycline PPK model was successfully developed and validated. Individualized dosing of tigecycline could be beneficial for critically ill patients.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly used for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, limited population pharmacokinetic (PPK) data are available for pediatric HSCT patients. This study aimed to develop a PPK model and recommend optimal oral MMF dosage in pediatric HSCT patients. This prospective study involved pediatric HSCT patients at a tertiary academic institution. Patients received oral MMF 15-20 mg/kg twice daily for aGVHD prophylaxis and treatment. The PPK analysis was conducted using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling method. Simulation was performed considering different body surface areas (BSAs) (0.5 m2, 1.0 m2, 1.5 m2) and dosing (400 mg/m2, 600 mg/m2, 900 mg/m2 twice daily). Based on the simulation, an optimal dosage of oral MMF was suggested. A total of 20 patients and 80 samples were included in the PPK model development. A one-compartment model with first-order absorption adequately described the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA). BSA was a statistically significant covariate on Vd/F. Simulation suggested the optimal dosage of oral MMF as 900 mg/m2 twice daily, respectively. A reliable PPK model was developed with good predictive performance. This model-informed optimal MMF dosage in pediatric HSCT patients can provide valuable dosing guidance in real-world clinical practice.