BACKGROUND: The role of triportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely recognized for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP). The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the potential advantages of uniportal VATS (U-VATS) for the treatment of PSP compared with triportal VATS.
METHODS: A total of 104 triportal (n=39) and uniportal (n=65) VATS procedures where performed for the treatment of PSP in two University hospitals. The prospectively collected data of postoperative outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the two VATS approaches.
RESULTS: No major adverse events occurred after operation. Compared with triportal-VATS, Uniportal-VATS showed the same effectiveness in terms of risk of recurrence (null in both groups), post-operative complications (P=1.000) and operating time (66.04±16.92 vs. 74.57±21.38 min, P=0.141). However, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of uniportal-VATS in terms of necessity of further access [0 vs. 7 (30.4%), P=0.004], chest tube duration (4.39±1.41 vs. 6.32±0.94 days, P<<0.001), postoperative hospital stay (4.78±1.31 vs. 6.61±1.67 days, P<<0.001), visual analogue pain score (VAS) at 24 hours (3.45±1.41 vs. 6.44±2.45, P<<0.001), number of patients who had pain after chest drain removal [1 (4.3%) vs. 16 (69.6%), P<<0.001], VAS after drainage removal (0.11±0.47 vs. 2.74±2.25, P<<0.001), postoperative pain duration (2.50±1.20 vs. 14.82±37.41 days, P<<0.001), pain killers intake (0.75±1.06 vs. 7.53±3.96 days, P=0.001), chronic paresthesia (level scale: 0 to 2; 0 vs. 0.52±0.66, P<<0.001), chronic neuralgia (0 vs. 0.43±0.59, P<<0.001) and cosmetic results (level scale: 0 to 3; 2.91±0.28 vs. 2.00±0.77, P<<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS is feasible and safe and may be a less invasive alternative to triportal VATS for the treatment of PSP because of its effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain, paresthesia, hospital stay and in improving cosmetic results.

The primary objective of this single-institution phase I clinical trial was to establish the maximum tolerated dose of gemcitabine added to cisplatin and delivered as heated intraoperative chemotherapy after resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma.
The extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) treatment arms were based on investigators\' assessment of patient fitness and potential for macroscopic complete resection. Previously established intracavitary dosing of cisplatin (range 175-225 mg/m2) with systemic cytoprotection was used in combination with escalating doses of gemcitabine, following a 3-plus-3 design from 100 mg/m2 in 100-mg increments.
From 2007 to 2011, 141 patients were enrolled and 104 completed treatment. The median age of those completing treatment was 65 years (range 43-85 years), and 22 (21%) were female. In the EPP arm (n = 59), 31 patients (53%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median radiographic tumor volume was 236 cm3 (range 16-4285 cm3). In the P/D arm (n = 41), 29 patients (71%) had the epithelioid histologic type and the median tumor volume was 79 cm3 (range 6-1107 cm3). The operative mortality rate was 2%, and 35 and 22 serious adverse events were encountered among 27 patients (46%) and 16 patients (39%) in the EPP and P/D arms, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 leukopenia) was observed in two patients who were receiving 1100 mg/m2 of gemcitabine, thus establishing the maximum tolerated dose at 1000 mg/m2, in combination with 175 mg/m2 of cisplatin. The median overall and recurrence-free survival times in treated patients were 20.3 and 10.7 months, respectively.
Combination cisplatin and gemcitabine heated intraoperative chemotherapy can be administered safely and feasibly in the context of complete surgical resection of malignant pleural mesothelioma by EPP or P/D.