Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex

血小板糖蛋白 GPIIb - IIIa 复合物
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:比伐卢定与糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(GPI)同时使用时的疗效和安全性尚不确定。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们旨在评估比伐卢定与肝素在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的疗效和安全性,并探讨不同使用(更高和平衡)GPI的影响.
    方法:从开始到2023年3月,对在线数据库进行了查询,以确定纳入的8项随机对照试验(n=22,483)。主要结果包括全因死亡率,大出血,主要不良心血管事件(MACE),和净不良临床事件(NACE)。次要疗效终点包括心脏死亡,再梗死,支架内血栓形成(ST),和中风。使用随机效应模型汇总数据,以得出风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:与肝素相比,比伐卢定与全因死亡率显著降低相关(RR0.83;95%CI0.72-0.97;P=0.02),大出血(RR0.73;95%CI0.57-0.93;P=0.01),心源性死亡(RR0.79;95%CI0.66-0.94;P=0.01),和NACE(RR0.80;95%CI0.72-0.89;P<0.0001)。然而,而Bivalirudin组显示在GPI较大的亚组中ST的可能性增加(RR1.70;95%CI1.13-2.56;P=0.01),它与平衡GPI亚组ST的可能性降低相关(RR0.40;95%CI0.24-0.65;P=0.0003).
    结论:总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在接受直接PCI治疗的STEMI患者中,比伐卢定可能是比肝素更有效的干预措施.
    OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin when used concurrently with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) is uncertain. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and to explore the impact of differential use (greater and balanced) of GPI.
    METHODS: Online databases were queried from inception to March 2023 to identify eight randomized controlled trials (n = 22,483) for inclusion. The primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and net adverse clinical events (NACE). Secondary efficacy endpoints included cardiac death, reinfarction, stent thrombosis (ST), and stroke. Data were pooled using a random-effects model to derive risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
    RESULTS: When compared to heparin, bivalirudin was associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.72-0.97; P = 0.02), major bleeding (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.93; P = 0.01), cardiac death (RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66-0.94; P = 0.01), and NACE (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.72-0.89; P < 0.0001). However, while the bivalirudin arm showed an increased likelihood of ST in the greater GPI subgroup (RR 1.70; 95% CI 1.13-2.56; P = 0.01), it was associated with a decreased likelihood of ST in the balanced GPI subgroup (RR 0.40; 95% CI 0.24-0.65; P = 0.0003).
    CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings suggest that bivalirudin may be a more efficacious intervention than heparin for reducing certain adverse events in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:血栓栓塞并发症被认为是血管内治疗最常见的并发症。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估研究糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂对血管内动脉瘤卷曲过程中血栓栓塞并发症的影响的研究。
    方法:本系统综述调查了使用三种糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(即abciximab,替罗非班,和eptifibatide)对血管内动脉瘤盘绕过程中的血栓栓塞并发症。PubMed的电子数据库,WebofScience,Scopus,和Medline在2021年6月25日之前使用关键字\“Abciximab,\"\"替罗非班,\"和\"依替巴肽\"与\"血栓栓塞并发症,\"\"动脉瘤,“和”血管内动脉瘤盘绕。\"
    结果:共有21篇文章被认为是合格的,并纳入本综述。在接受阿西昔单抗和替罗非班治疗的患者中,估计完全和部分再通率分别为56%和92%。分别。在大多数患者中发现破裂动脉瘤。总的来说,发现在使用糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的脑动脉瘤血管内治疗期间,血栓栓塞并发症患者的死亡率为4.8%(CI95%:0.027~0.067;p<.005).研究血栓栓塞的平均缓解率为91%(CI95%:0.88-0.95,I2:65.65/p<.001)。
    结论:根据获得的结果,在使用阿昔单抗或替罗非班的研究中,发现依替巴肽完全再通的平均比率较高,与其他提到的代理商相比。此外,据报道,使用替罗非班而非阿西昔单抗后,出血量较少.
    OBJECTIVE: Thromboembolism complication is considered the most common complication associated with the treatment of endovascular. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the studies investigating the effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor agents on thromboembolic complications during endovascular aneurysm coiling.
    METHODS: This systematic review investigated the outcome of the use of three glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor agents (ie abciximab, tirofiban, and eptifibatide) on the thromboembolic complications during endovascular aneurysm coiling. The electronic databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Medline were searched up to 25 June 2021, using the keywords \"Abciximab,\" \"Tirofiban,\" and \"Eptifibatide\" incombination with \"Thromboembolism Complication,\" \"Aneurysms,\" and \"Endovascular Aneurysm Coiling.\"
    RESULTS: A total of 21 articles were found to be eligible and included in this review. The rates of complete and partial recanalization were estimated to be 56% and 92% in patients who underwent abciximab and tirofiban therapy, respectively. Rupture aneurysms were found in the majority of patients. In general, the mortality rate of the patients treated for thromboembolic complications during endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was found to be 4.8% (CI 95%:0.027-0.067; p < .005). The average remission rate in studies investigating thromboembolism was 91% (CI 95%:0.88-0.95, I2 : 65.65/p < .001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the obtained results, a higher mean rate of complete recanalization by eptifibatide was found in studies in which abciximab or tirofiban were used, compared to other mentioned agents. Moreover, the amount of hemorrhage was reported to be less after using tirofiban rather than abciximab.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    发现糖蛋白(GP)IIb/IIIa受体是存在于血小板聚集中的整合素。GPIIb/IIIa拮抗剂通过与纤维蛋白原和血管性血友病因子的竞争来干扰血小板交联和血小板衍生的血栓形成。目前,三个肠胃外GPIIb/IIIa竞争者(替罗非班,依替巴肽,和abciximab)被批准在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)位置接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者中临床使用。GPIIb/IIIa拮抗剂在预防血小板聚集方面有其作用机制,远端血栓栓塞,和血栓形成,而最初的血小板与损伤血管区域的结合被保留。这项工作旨在对GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂作为一种抗血小板药物的意义进行全面综述。它们的作用机制基于影响其功效的因素。另一方面,我们对FDA已经批准的抑制GPIIb/IIIa的药物进行了详细审查.深入研究了来自主要临床试验以及处理GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂的监管实践和指南的结果。详细开发了GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂作为一类抗血小板药物的心血管病理学和神经介入手术应用。目前可用的GPIIb/IIa受体拮抗剂的治疗风险/益处平衡尚未在ACS患者中得到很好的阐明,这些患者没有定期进行早期心血管血运重建的临床评估。另一方面,在从PCI获益的患者中,通过添加GPIIb/IIIa受体拮抗剂(静脉注射)强化抗血小板治疗可能是降低与干预相关的血栓性并发症风险发生的适当治疗策略.与静脉内GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂相比,口服GPIIb/IIIa抑制剂的开发有可能包括短期抗血小板益处,用于心血管疾病的长期二级预防治疗。但是研究表明,长期口服GPIIb/IIIa受体抑制剂对预防缺血事件无效。矛盾的是,它们通过产生血栓前和促炎事件与副作用的高风险有关.
    The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor is found integrin present in platelet aggregations. GP IIb/IIIa antagonists interfere with platelet cross-linking and platelet-derived thrombus formation through the competition with fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor. Currently, three parenteral GP IIb/IIIa competitors (tirofiban, eptifibatide, and abciximab) are approved for clinical use in patients affected by percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in the location of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). GP IIb/IIIa antagonists have their mechanism of action in platelet aggregation prevention, distal thromboembolism, and thrombus formation, whereas the initial platelet binding to damage vascular areas is preserved. This work is aimed to provide a comprehensive review of the significance of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors as a sort of antiplatelet agent. Their mechanism of action is based on factors that affect their efficacy. On the other hand, drugs that inhibit GP IIb/IIIa already approved by the FDA were reviewed in detail. Results from major clinical trials and regulatory practices and guidelines to deal with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were deeply investigated. The cardiovascular pathology and neuro-interventional surgical application of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors as a class of antiplatelet agents were developed in detail. The therapeutic risk/benefit balance of currently available GP IIb/IIa receptor antagonists is not yet well elucidated in patients with ACS who are not clinically evaluated regularly for early cardiovascular revascularization. On the other hand, in patients who have benefited from PCI, the antiplatelet therapy intensification by the addition of a GP IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist (intravenously) may be an appropriate therapeutic strategy in reducing the occurrence of risks of thrombotic complications related to the intervention. Development of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors with oral administration has the potential to include short-term antiplatelet benefits compared with intravenous GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors for long-term secondary preventive therapy in cardiovascular disease. But studies showed that long-term oral administration of GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors has been ineffective in preventing ischemic events. Paradoxically, they have been linked to a high risk of side effects by producing prothrombotic and pro-inflammatory events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    STEMI患者的血栓负荷在实践中仍然是一个挑战。加重冠状动脉阻塞导致心肌灌注受损,心脏功能恶化,和不良的临床结果。已经提倡各种策略来减少血栓负担。
    本荟萃分析旨在评估冠状动脉内溶栓药物或糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂(GPI)与血栓抽吸术(AT)作为经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的辅助手段在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中的有效性。
    使用各种数据库对接受PCI的STEMI患者的冠状动脉内溶栓或GPI与AT进行比较的随机试验进行了全面的文献检索(例如,MEDLINE,EMBASE,CENTRALE).主要结果是程序性措施(例如,TIMI血流分级3级,TIMI心肌灌注分级(TMPG)3级,心肌腮红分级(MBG)2/3级,ST段分辨率(STR))。
    12项随机试验纳入1,466例患者:696例随机接受冠状动脉内药物干预,553例随机接受AT。随机接受单独PCI的患者被排除。溶栓显著改善TIMI流量3级(比值比=3.71,95%CI:1.85-7.45),完全STR(比值比=3.64,95%CI:1.60-8.26),和TMPG3(比值比=5.31,95%CI:2.48-11.36)。溶栓显著减少主要不良心血管事件(MACE)(比值比=0.29,95%CI:0.13-0.65),而不增加出血风险。试验序贯分析评估证实了溶栓药物对主要结局的优越性。冠状动脉内GPI,单独或与AT结合使用,未改善手术或临床结局.
    与AT相比,冠状动脉内溶栓治疗可显著改善STEMI患者的心肌灌注和MACE.
    Thrombus load in STEMI patients remains a challenge in practice. It aggravates coronary obstruction leading to impaired myocardial perfusion, worsened cardiac function, and adverse clinical outcomes. Various strategies have been advocated to reduce thrombus burden.
    This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intracoronary-administered thrombolytics or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) in comparison with aspiration thrombectomy (AT) as an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
    A comprehensive literature search for randomized trials that compared intracoronary-administered thrombolytics or GPI with AT in STEMI patients who underwent PCI, was conducted using various databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRALE). Primary outcome was procedural measures (e.g., TIMI flow grade 3, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) 3, Myocardial blush grade (MBG) 2/3, ST-segment resolution (STR)).
    Twelve randomized trials enrolled 1,466 patients: 696 were randomized to intracoronary-administered pharmacological interventions and 553 to AT. Patients randomized to PCI alone were excluded. Thrombolytics significantly improved TIMI flow grade 3 (odds ratio = 3.71, 95% CI: 1.85-7.45), complete STR (odds ratio = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.60-8.26), and TMPG 3 (odds ratio = 5.31, 95% CI: 2.48-11.36). Thrombolytics significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13-0.65) without increasing bleeding risk. Trial sequential analysis assessment confirmed the superiority of thrombolytics for the primary outcome. Intracoronary GPI, either alone or combined with AT, did not improve procedural or clinical outcomes.
    Compared with AT, intracoronary-administered thrombolytics significantly improved myocardial perfusion and MACE in STEMI patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Emerging data have demonstrated a strong association between the gut microbiota and the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors such as atherosclerosis, inflammation, obesity, insulin resistance, platelet hyperactivity, and plasma lipid abnormalities. Several studies in humans and animal models have demonstrated an association between gut microbial metabolites such as trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), short-chain fatty acids, and bile acid metabolites (amino acid breakdown products) with CVD. Human blood platelets are a critical contributor to the hemostatic process. Besides, these blood cells play a crucial role in developing atherosclerosis and, finally, contribute to cardiac events. Since the TMAO, and other metabolites of the gut microbiota, are asociated with platelet hyperactivity, lipid disorders, and oxidative stress, the diet-gut microbiota interactions have become an important research area in the cardiovascular field. The gut microbiota and their metabolites may be targeted for the therapeutic benefit of CVD from a clinical perspective. This review\'s main aim is to highlight the complex interactions between microbiota, their metabolites, and several CVD risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:血管内治疗和重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂静脉溶栓是两种最推荐的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)治疗方法。糖蛋白(GP)IIb-IIIa抑制剂是短效的选择性可逆抗血小板药物,约10年前成为AIS的有希望的治疗剂。鉴于GP抑制剂的安全性和应用范围不明确,我们进行了这项荟萃分析来探讨同样的问题.
    方法:我们使用GPIIb-IIIa抑制剂,颅内出血,和死亡率作为Medline上的关键词,WebofScience,和Embase数据库。随机对照试验,前瞻性文献,对1990年至2020年发表的英文回顾性研究进行了筛选。结果是死亡和90天脑出血(ICH)的相对风险(RR)。我们将结果分为两个类别,并按不同药物进行了亚组分析。效果模型的选择取决于I2的值。
    结果:总而言之,纳入20项研究的3700名患者。没有发现GPIIb-IIIa抑制剂对ICH发生率有显著影响。阿西昔单抗和依替巴肽的症状性ICH的RR值分别为4.26(1.89,9.59)和0.17(0.04,0.69),分别。替罗非班和阿昔单抗均可降低90天内的死亡率。年龄>70岁,美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表>15和总剂量>10mg是使用替罗非班导致ICH事件的危险因素。血栓切除术联合替罗非班用于预防动脉再闭塞是安全的。
    结论:在中风相关治疗中,服用GPIIb-IIIa抑制剂可能是安全的,但是应该注意药物种类和剂量。阿昔单抗可增加症状性颅内出血的风险。替罗非班和依替巴肽在低剂量下可以被认为是安全的。应使用严格的标准选择合适的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy and intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator are the 2 most recommended treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa inhibitors are short-acting selective reversible antiplatelet agents that emerged as promising therapeutic agents for AIS about 10 years ago. Given the unclear safety profile and application coverage of GP inhibitors, we conducted this meta-analysis to explore the same.
    METHODS: We used GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality as the key words on Medline, Web of Science, and the Embase databases. Randomized controlled trials, prospective literatures, and retrospective studies in English published between 1990 and 2020 were screened. The outcomes were relative risk (RR) of death and 90-day intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We pooled the results in 2 categories and conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by different drugs. The choice of the effects model depended on the value of I 2.
    RESULTS: In all, 3700 patients from 20 studies were included. No GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors were found to have a remarkable influence on the ICH rate. The RR values of symptomatic ICH for abciximab and eptifibatide were 4.26 (1.89, 9.59) and 0.17 (0.04, 0.69), respectively. Both tirofiban and abciximab could decrease the mortality rate within 90 days. Age > 70 years, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale > 15, and overall dose > 10 mg are risk factors for ICH events with tirofiban usage. Thrombectomy combined with tirofiban was safe for arterial reocclusion prevention.
    CONCLUSIONS: In stroke-related treatment, administration of GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors could be safe, but care should be taken regarding drug species and doses. Abciximab can increase the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Tirofiban and eptifibatide can be considered safe in low doses. Suitable patients should be selected using strict criteria.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在成人免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)中,获得性自身免疫性出血性疾病,抗血小板自身抗体检测可作为常规检测。儿童ITP有不同的疾病特点,抗血小板抗体检测的诊断和预后价值仍不确定.
    目的:系统评价抗血小板自身抗体检测在儿童ITP诊断中的准确性。
    方法:在PubMed和EMBASE中搜索评估儿童ITP免疫测定的研究。评估研究质量(QUADAS2),证据是描述性合成的。
    结果:总计,确定了40项研究(1606名患者)。九项研究报告了足够的数据来确定诊断准确性指标。抗血小板IgG抗体测试显示中等敏感性(0·36-0·80血小板相关IgG[直接测试];0·19-0·39循环IgG[间接测试])。在报告控制数据的研究中,包括非免疫性血小板减少症患者,特异性非常好(0·80-1·00)。糖蛋白特异性免疫测定显示出相当的敏感性(三项研究),主要鉴定出IgG抗GPIIb/IIIa抗体,与少数IgG抗GPIb/IX抗体。在相当比例的儿童中鉴定出抗血小板IgM抗体(直接和间接测试的敏感性为0·62-0·64)。
    结论:IgG和IgM抗血小板抗体的诊断性评估可作为ITP的常规检验。在血小板不足以进行直接测试的儿童中,可以进行间接测试。阴性测试不排除ITP的诊断。未来的研究应评估抗血小板抗体测试在疑似ITP的血小板减少性儿童中的价值。
    BACKGROUND: In adult immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), an acquired autoimmune bleeding disorder, anti-platelet autoantibody testing may be useful as a rule-in test. Childhood ITP has different disease characteristics, and the diagnostic and prognostic value of anti-platelet antibody testing remains uncertain.
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the diagnostic accuracy of anti-platelet autoantibody testing in childhood ITP.
    METHODS: PubMed and EMBASE were searched for studies evaluating immunoassays in childhood ITP. Study quality was assessed (QUADAS2), and evidence was synthesized descriptively.
    RESULTS: In total, 40 studies (1606 patients) were identified. Nine studies reported sufficient data to determine diagnostic accuracy measures. Anti-platelet IgG antibody testing showed a moderate sensitivity (0·36-0·80 platelet-associated IgG [direct test]; 0·19-0·39 circulating IgG [indirect test]). In studies that reported control data, including patients with non-immune thrombocytopenia, specificity was very good (0·80-1·00). Glycoprotein-specific immunoassays showed comparable sensitivity (three studies) and predominantly identified IgG anti-GP IIb/IIIa antibodies, with few IgG anti-GP Ib/IX antibodies. Anti-platelet IgM antibodies were identified in a substantial proportion of children (sensitivity 0·62-0·64 for direct and indirect tests).
    CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic evaluation of IgG and IgM anti-platelet antibodies may be useful as a rule-in test for ITP. In children with insufficient platelets for a direct test, indirect tests may be performed instead. A negative test does not rule out the diagnosis of ITP. Future studies should evaluate the value of anti-platelet antibody tests in thrombocytopenic children with suspected ITP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Glanzmann thrombasthenia (GT) is caused by inherited defects of the αIIb β3 platelet glycoprotein. This bleeding disorder can be treated with platelet transfusion therapy, but some patients will be immunized and begin to form anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) and/or anti-αIIb β3 antibodies. These antibodies can bind and interfere with the function of the transfused platelets, rendering treatment ineffective. However, platelet transfusion refractoriness attributable to HLA antibodies may be managed by the selection of compatible donors, although they are not always readily available, particularly in an emergency. Thus, anti-αIIb β3 antibodies represent one of the most severe complications in GT. Both genetic and environmental factors may contribute to the risk of anti-αIIb β3 development, but the underlying pathogenic mechanisms are still unknown. This review will summarize the current knowledge of the risk factors for development of anti-αIIb β3 antibodies in patients with GT and discuss how these findings may influence the clinical management of patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the benefit of \"early\" vs. \"delayed\" P2Y12 inhibition in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
    We conducted a meta-analysis including seven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared early vs. delayed P2Y12inhibition in STEMI patients scheduled for PCI, providing data on major adverse cardiac events (MACE), all-cause death, and major bleeding. The primary endpoint was MACE. Secondary endpoints included stent thrombosis and the use of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI). All endpoints were analysed at the shortest follow-up available. A total of 9,648 patients were included (\"early\"=4,792, \"delayed\"=4,856). \"Early\" P2Y12 inhibition was associated with a significant reduction in MACE rate (OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.88, p=0.0008), myocardial infarction (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.57-0.90, p=0.004), bail-out GPI use (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, p=0.04) and improved coronary reperfusion before PCI (OR for Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction [TIMI] flow grade 2-3=1.12, 95% CI: 1.00-1.26, p=0.04). Major bleeding was not increased (OR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.62-1.21, p=0.41).
    A strategy of early effective P2Y12 inhibition in PCI of STEMI appears to improve coronary reperfusion before PCI, and reduce MACE, MI and bail-out GPI use without increase of major bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Platelet hyperactivity has been implicated in many cardiovascular (CV) events such as ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and CV death. Genetic variability of platelet receptors has been shown to impact Src family kinases (SFKs) activation and in turn influence platelet activation. SFKs are important signal transmitters in platelets, interacting with several receptors as GPIIB/IIIa, GPIb, PEAR 1, GPIa, GPVI, PECAM and CD148.
    In this review, we focused on genetic variants of platelet receptors whose signals are transmitted mainly by SFKs and may be associated with clinical manifestations of platelet hyperactivation like MI or IS.
    The genetic variants of platelet receptors, the signals of which are transmitted by SFKs, and the associated clinical manifestations in platelet hyperactivation, have been examined. The most extensively studied receptors were glycoprotein polymorphisms. The greatest numbers of genetic variants were analyzed in GPIb. GPIIb/IIIa receptor polymorphisms were also well analyzed and many studies highlighted their associations with ischemic stroke (IS) and myocardial infarction (MI). However, there are a number of conflicting studies finding that GPIIb/IIIa receptor polymorphisms may not influence platelet hyperactivity. Moreover, variability within some other receptors like GPVI, PECAM, PEAR1, and CD148 was analyzed only in single studies.
    Src family kinases are one of the most important signal transmitters in platelets. Some receptors have well documented interactions with SFKs, while other have not been examined in humans or data about its association originated from single studies. Further studies are necessary to confirm the findings and reduce falsepositive associations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号