Plaque, Amyloid

牌匾,淀粉样蛋白
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在比较Framingham风险评分(FRS)和集合队列方程(PCE)在符合韩国血脂异常指南目标低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平的中高危患者中冠状动脉粥样硬化的预测性能。在1207例40至65岁因胸部不适而在门诊患者中接受了冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术,我们纳入了414例中危患者(非糖尿病)和86例高危患者(糖尿病).根据FRS和PCE分为3组,然后比较冠状动脉钙化积分(CACS)和斑块负荷程度分层。我们提供了冠状动脉钙化(CAC)和任何斑块存在的接收器工作特征曲线。在中等风险患者中,根据FRS和PCE风险层,CACS和斑块负荷程度的分布在组间显示出显著差异,且趋势一致(P<.001)。FRS和PCE均对CAC[曲线下面积(AUC);0.711vs0.75,P=.02]和任何斑块(AUC;0.72vs0.756,P=.025)的存在表现出良好的区分。然而,在高危患者中,组间无显著差异或一致趋势,CAC的FRS和PCE的AUC值分别为(0.537vs0.571,P=.809),任何显示区分度差的斑块的AUC值分别为(0.478vs0.65P=.273).在预测符合韩国血脂异常指南目标LDL-C水平的中高危患者的冠状动脉粥样硬化中,FRS和PCE均可用于中危患者,但不能用于高危患者.
    This study aims to compare the predicting performance of coronary atherosclerosis between Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) in moderate to high-risk patients who meet the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level of Korean dyslipidemia guidelines. Among 1207 patients aged 40 to 65 who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography at outpatient for chest discomfort, we included 414 moderate-risk patients (non-diabetes) and 86 high-risk patients (diabetes). They were divided into 3 groups according to FRS and PCE, then compared with coronary artery calcification score (CACS) and plaque burden degree strata. We presented receiver operating characteristic curves for the presence of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and any plaque. In moderate-risk patients, the distribution of CACS and plaque burden degree according to FRS and PCE risk strata showed significant differences between groups and a consistent trend (P < .001). Both FRS and PCE showed good discrimination for the presence of CAC [area under the curve (AUC); 0.711 vs 0.75, P = .02] and any plaque (AUC; 0.72 vs 0.756, P = .025). However, in high-risk patients, there was no significant differences or consistent trend between groups and the AUC values of FRS and PCE were (0.537 vs 0.571, P = .809) for CAC and (0.478 vs 0.65 P = .273) for any plaque showing poor discrimination. In predicting coronary atherosclerosis in moderate to high-risk patients who meet the target LDL-C level of Korean dyslipidemia guidelines, both FRS and PCE can be used in moderate-risk patients but not in high-risk patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国国家衰老研究所-阿尔茨海默病协会对散发性阿尔茨海默病(sAD)的定义和分类是基于β-淀粉样蛋白驱动sAD发病机理的假设。因此,β-淀粉样蛋白病理学是sAD诊断的非条件。神经病理学诊断基于老年斑(SP)和神经原纤维缠结(NFT)的并发性,被指定为阿尔茨海默病神经病理学改变。然而,NFT在SP出现之前几十年在大脑中发展,它们的分布与SP的分布不平行。此外,在65岁时约有85%的个体中发现了NFT,在80岁时约有97%的个体中发现了NFT。SPs在65岁时发生在30%,在80岁时发生在50%-60%。在sAD中已经确定了70多个遗传风险因素;编码的蛋白质调节细胞膜,突触,脂质代谢,和神经炎症。阿尔茨海默病(AD)序曲为进一步讨论脑老化和sAD提供了新的概念和定义。AD序曲提出sAD是:(i)多因素和渐进的神经退行性生物学过程,(ii)以3R4RtauNFT的早期出现为特征,(iii)β-淀粉样蛋白和SP的后期沉积,(Iv)NFT和SP的区域分布特别不重叠,(v)在影响细胞膜的分子变化之前或同时发生,细胞骨架,突触,脂质和蛋白质代谢,能量代谢,神经炎症,细胞周期,星形胶质细胞,小胶质细胞,和血管;(vi)伴有进行性神经元丢失和脑萎缩,(vii)在人类大脑老化中普遍存在,和(viii)表现为临床前AD,由于AD,并没有普遍进展为轻度认知障碍,温和,中度,和严重的AD痴呆。
    National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer\'s Association definition and classification of sporadic Alzheimer\'s disease (sAD) is based on the assumption that β-amyloid drives the pathogenesis of sAD, and therefore, β-amyloid pathology is the sine-qua-non condition for the diagnosis of sAD. The neuropathological diagnosis is based on the concurrence of senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) designated as Alzheimer\'s disease neuropathological changes. However, NFTs develop in the brain decades before the appearance of SPs, and their distribution does not parallel the distribution of SPs. Moreover, NFTs are found in about 85% of individuals at age 65 and around 97% at age 80. SPs occur in 30% at age 65 and 50%-60% at age 80. More than 70 genetic risk factors have been identified in sAD; the encoded proteins modulate cell membranes, synapses, lipid metabolism, and neuroinflammation. Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) overture provides a new concept and definition of brain aging and sAD for further discussion. AD overture proposes that sAD is: (i) a multifactorial and progressive neurodegenerative biological process, (ii) characterized by the early appearance of 3R + 4Rtau NFTs, (iii) later deposition of β-amyloid and SPs, (iv) with particular non-overlapped regional distribution of NFTs and SPs, (v) preceded by or occurring in parallel with molecular changes affecting cell membranes, cytoskeleton, synapses, lipid and protein metabolism, energy metabolism, neuroinflammation, cell cycle, astrocytes, microglia, and blood vessels; (vi) accompanied by progressive neuron loss and brain atrophy, (vii) prevalent in human brain aging, and (viii) manifested as pre-clinical AD, and progressing not universally to mild cognitive impairment due to AD, and mild, moderate, and severe AD dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The consensus recommendations for the post mortem diagnosis Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) highlight the difficulties in establishing a pathological diagnosis in brains from clinically demented individuals with both certainty and uniformity. There is, however, a need for diagnostic guidelines that are relatively simple, inexpensive, and adaptable to general pathologists and different laboratories. The current Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer\'s disease (CERAD) criteria and the recommendations in the consensus document giving three probabilistic categories for diagnosis go a long way towards establishing a uniform approach for the diagnosis of AD. However, more uniformity could be adopted in the topography of sectioning to enhance diagnostic and future research comparisons. We also recommend that immunohistochemistry for beta A4 (A beta) amyloid and tau-reactive neurofibrillary changes, in addition to hematoxylin and eosin stains, should become the basis for histological diagnosis. We agree with the guidelines concerning documentation of all AD changes. Until a clearer understanding of the early changes of AD is established, strict observation and recording are the pathologists\' best diagnostic skills. The ill-defined diagnostic areas of AD continue to prompt the need for a new method of detection of the underlying pathologic process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    This report summarizes the consensus recommendations of a panel of neuropathologists from the United States and Europe to improve the postmortem diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer\'s disease. The recommendations followed from a two-day workshop sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (NIA) and the Ronald and Nancy Reagan Institute of the Alzheimer\'s Association to reassess the original NIA criteria for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease published in 1985. The consensus recommendations for improving the neuropathological criteria for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer\'s disease are reported here, and the \"position papers\" by members of the Working Group that accompany this report elaborate on the research findings and concepts upon which these recommendations were based. Further, commentaries by other experts in the field also are included here to provide additional perspectives on these recommendations. Finally, it is anticipated that future meetings of the Working Group will reassess these recommendations and the implementation of postmortem diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer\'s disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号