目的:总结有关剽窃及其各种类型的普遍性的文献发现,知识,以及学生对抄袭的态度,与抄袭相关的因素,以及减少剽窃发生率的干预措施。
背景:抄袭是所有教育水平的学生实施的学术不诚实的主要形式。
背景:学术不诚实被定义为任何未经授权的帮助,增加学生的正式学习成绩。这些不诚实的行为可以归类为伪造信息,隐藏错误,在不允许的情况下与同事合作,和抄袭。
方法:2021年9月对数据库进行了系统搜索,以确定在护理研究中讨论抄袭的研究。我们在本系统综述和荟萃分析中纳入了31项研究,共有9175名护理学生。使用RevMan软件进行分析。
结果:抄袭是护理专业学生中最常见的学术不端行为(占55.3%)。没有引用的释义是最实践的形式(39.53%),而提交其他人的工作没有确认是最少的(9.61%)。大多数学生意识到抄袭的概念(80.8%),并对此有积极的道德态度(88.26%)。抄袭与年龄呈负相关,育儿,完成学期学分。然而,它与平均成绩和自由教育者呈正相关。抄袭是临床不当行为的重要预测因素。
结论:注意到学生的知识和技能存在差距。这些差距可能会导致抄袭行为的高发生率,除了不道德的态度。
结论:抄袭是一种严重的学术不端行为,可能与随后的临床不端行为有关。有必要填补知识和技能的空白,制定有效的政策。
结论:在消除抄袭的尝试中,鼓励护士教育工作者提供有效的教育培训和实际任务,以填补知识和技能的空白。此外,实施明确有效的惩罚政策将防止故意抄袭行为。这将有助于引入对患者健康负责的合格护士。
OBJECTIVE: To summarize the findings from literature regarding the prevalence of
plagiarism and its various types, knowledge, and attitudes of students toward
plagiarism, factors associated with
plagiarism, and the applied interventions to decrease the incidence of
plagiarism.
BACKGROUND: Plagiarism is a major form of academic dishonesty practiced by students at all educational levels.
BACKGROUND: Academic dishonesty was defined as any unauthorized help that adds to students\' formal academic performance. These dishonest behaviors can be categorized as falsifying information, hiding errors, collaborating with colleagues when not allowed, and plagiarism.
METHODS: Systematic search of databases was conducted in September 2021 to identify studies that discussed plagiarism in nursing studies. We included 31 studies in this systematic
review and meta-analysis, with a total of 9,175 nursing students. The analysis was conducted using RevMan software.
RESULTS: Plagiarism was the most frequent academic misconduct among nursing students (practiced by 55.3%). Paraphrasing without referencing was the most practiced form (39.53%), while submitting others\' work without acknowledgment was the least one (9.61%). Most students were aware of the concept of plagiarism (80.8%) and had positive ethical attitudes toward it (88.26%). Plagiarism was negatively associated with age, parenting, and completing semester credits. However, it was positively correlated with average grades and liberal educators.
Plagiarism was a significant predictor of clinical misconduct.
CONCLUSIONS: A gap in the students\' knowledge and skills were noticed. These gaps may be contributing to the high occurrence of plagiaristic acts, besides the unethical attitudes.
CONCLUSIONS: Plagiarism is a serious academic misconduct practice that can be associated with subsequent clinical misconduct. There is a need to fill the knowledge and skills gap, and to set effective policies.
CONCLUSIONS: In their attempts to eliminate plagiarism, nurse educators are encouraged to provide effective educational training and practical tasks, in order to fill the gaps in knowledge and skills. Additionally, implementing clear and effective punishment policies would prevent intentional plagiaristic acts. This would aid in introducing qualified nurses accountable for the health of patients.