Perioperative monitoring

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    动脉血压是麻醉患者必须监测的生命体征之一。即使是短时间的术中低血压也会增加术后器官功能障碍的风险,例如急性肾损伤和心肌损伤。由于几乎没有证据表明患者监护仪中更高的警报阈值是否有助于预防术中低血压,我们分析了低血压警报设置改变之前(第1组)和之后(第2组)的血压数据.该研究是在一个拥有32个手术室的大型外科中心进行的回顾性观察性队列研究。平均动脉压(MAP)低血压警报的警报阈值从60(之前)更改为65mmHg,用于有创测量,用于无创测量。包括4222例患者(第1组和第2组分别为1982年和2240年)的电子麻醉记录中的血压数据,其中有406,623例血压值接受非心脏手术。我们通过准二项回归分析了(A)在所有测量中低于阈值的血压测量值的比例,以及(B)通过逻辑回归分析了是否发生了至少一个低于阈值的血压测量值。低血压定义为MAP<65mmHg。在调整警报设置之前和之后,平均动脉压的低血压发作的总体比例没有显着差异(低于65mmHg的值的平均比例在第1组中为6.05%,在第2组中为5.99%)。在第2组中,在麻醉期间经历低血压发作的风险显着降低,比值比为0.84(p=0.029)。总之,较高的警报阈值通常不会导致围手术期低血压发作较少。在存在较高血压警报阈值的情况下,术中低血压的发生率略有但显着降低。然而,这种减少似乎只存在于很少有低血压发作的患者中.
    Arterial blood pressure is one of the vital signs monitored mandatory in anaesthetised patients. Even short episodes of intraoperative hypotension are associated with increased risk for postoperative organ dysfunction such as acute kidney injury and myocardial injury. Since there is little evidence whether higher alarm thresholds in patient monitors can help prevent intraoperative hypotension, we analysed the blood pressure data before (group 1) and after (group 2) the implementation of altered hypotension alarm settings. The study was conducted as a retrospective observational cohort study in a large surgical centre with 32 operating theatres. Alarm thresholds for hypotension alarm for mean arterial pressure (MAP) were altered from 60 (before) to 65 mmHg for invasive measurement and 70 mmHg for noninvasive measurement. Blood pressure data from electronic anaesthesia records of 4222 patients (1982 and 2240 in group 1 and 2, respectively) with 406,623 blood pressure values undergoing noncardiac surgery were included. We analysed (A) the proportion of blood pressure measurements below the threshold among all measurements by quasi-binomial regression and (B) whether at least one blood pressure measurement below the threshold occurred by logistic regression. Hypotension was defined as MAP < 65 mmHg. There was no significant difference in overall proportions of hypotensive episodes for mean arterial pressure before and after the adjustment of alarm settings (mean proportion of values below 65 mmHg were 6.05% in group 1 and 5.99% in group 2). The risk of ever experiencing a hypotensive episode during anaesthesia was significantly lower in group 2 with an odds ratio of 0.84 (p = 0.029). In conclusion, higher alarm thresholds do not generally lead to less hypotensive episodes perioperatively. There was a slight but significant reduction of the occurrence of intraoperative hypotension in the presence of higher thresholds for blood pressure alarms. However, this reduction only seems to be present in patients with very few hypotensive episodes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to depict the patterns of change in the perioperative hemoglobin (Hb) concentration and hematocrit (Hct) and to identify the optimal timing of Hb and Hct measurement in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
    METHODS: This prospective observational study involved 302 consecutive patients who underwent TKA. The patients were kept in hospital for 1 full week postoperatively. Hb and Hct measurements were performed preoperatively and on days 1 to 7 postoperatively and then during clinic visits at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
    RESULTS: The Hb concentration and Hct decreased during the first few days postoperatively and reached a nadir on postoperative day 4 and 3, respectively; they then recovered in the following days. Significant differences in the Hb concentration and Hct were detected between the preoperative period and day 1, between days 1 and 2, between days 2 and 3, between day 7 and 1 month, and between 1 and 3 months. A significant difference in the Hct was also detected between 3 and 6 months.
    CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing of Hb and Hct measurement is on postoperative day 3 or 4. This timing accurately reflects ongoing hidden blood loss to better guide blood transfusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    During neuromuscular monitoring, repeated electrical stimulation evokes muscle responses of increasing magnitude (\'staircase phenomenon\', SP). We aimed to evaluate whether SP affects time course and twitches\' values of an acceleromyographic assessed neuromuscular block with or without previous tetanic stimulation. Fifty adult patients were randomized to receive a 50 Hz tetanic stimulus (S group) or not (C group) before monitor calibration. After 20 min of TOF ratio (TOFr) stimulation rocuronium was administered. Onset time of block (primary endpoint), recovery of T1 to 25%, TOFr to 0.9, and recovery index were compared. We also compared T1 and TOFr at baseline, post-stimulation, and during recovery from block. Moreover the correlation between T1 at maximum recovery and (a) baseline T1 and (b) post-stimulation T1 along with T1/TOFr ratio during recovery were evaluated. After stimulation median T1 increased (32%) in group C and decreased (16%) in group S (P = 0.0001). Onset time (Median [IQR] in seconds) was 90 (29-77) vs. 75 (28-60) in C and S group (P = 0.002). Time [Mean (SD) in minutes] to normalized TOFr 0.9 were 70.13 (14.9) vs. 62.1 (21.2) in C and S groups (P = 0.204). TOFr showed no differences between groups at any time point. T1 at maximum recovery showed a stronger correlation with post-stabilization T1 compared to baseline. (ρ = 0.80 and ρ = 0.85, for C and S groups.) Standard calibration does not ensure twitch baseline stabilization and prolongs onset time of neuromuscular block. TOF ratio is not influenced by SP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号