The α-amino-3‑hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) is an ionotropic glutamate receptor recognized for its active involvement in epilepsy. Through AMPAR functional alterations, multiple factors contribute to the increased susceptibility to seizures in the geriatric population. These factors include changes in the hippocampus, neuroinflammation, ischemic insults, amyloid deposition, previous seizures, alterations in the microenvironment, and neurovascular unit dysfunction. Perampanel, a noncompetitive AMPAR antagonist, has been approved for the treatment of focal and generalized epilepsy. However, a complete understanding of AMPAR\'s role in epileptogenesis and the pharmacotherapy of perampanel in the geriatric population remains elusive. To address this gap, we conducted a comprehensive literature review, screening 1557 articles and ultimately selecting 94 relevant ones. We provided insights into AMPAR functionality changes and perampanel\'s role in treating geriatric epilepsy. Various clinical trials and retrospective studies have demonstrated that the safety and efficacy of perampanel in the older population are comparable to those in the younger population, with overall good tolerability. It is also effective for treating focal and generalized onset seizures and possibly for managing status epilepticus. In conclusion, the existing body of evidence supports the safety and efficacy of perampanel in the geriatric population, indicating its potential as a valuable therapeutic option for focal and generalized epilepsy. Additional research is warranted to deepen our understanding of AMPAR\'s involvement in epileptogenesis and to refine the pharmacotherapeutic nuances in this specific demographic.

UNASSIGNED: The centrifugal ultrafiltration-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was established to determine the free perampanel (PER) concentration in children with epilepsy.
UNASSIGNED: Free PER concentration was obtained using centrifugal ultrafiltration devices. The internal standard was PER-D5. The method was investigated for selectivity, carryover, lower limit of quantification, calibration curve, accuracy, precision, matrix effects, recovery, and stability. The Spearman\'s correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between the free and total PER concentrations. A nonparametric test was used to estimate the effects of PER along with other antiepileptic drugs on the total and free PER concentrations.
UNASSIGNED: The free PER concentration was positively correlated with the total PER concentration in the 57 plasma samples (r = 0.793 > 0, P < 0.001). Additionally, the free PER concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) increased in valproic acid (VPA) co-therapy (9.87 ± 5.83) compared with non-VPA co-therapy (5.03 ± 4.57).
UNASSIGNED: The proposed method is efficient, sensitive, and suitable for detecting free PER concentrations in children with epilepsy. Simultaneously, the free PER concentration response to clinical outcomes in children with epilepsy was more clinically significant, particularly when combined with VPA.

Sodium channelopathies are genetic disorders caused by mutations in genes, including sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1 (SCN1A), that lead to several epilepsy syndromes. Traditional treatments with sodium channel blockers often have limited effectiveness and side effects. Dravet syndrome (DS), a severe epilepsy starting in infancy, presents significant treatment challenges. Perampanel (PER), a noncompetitive α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist, has shown promise for DS, reducing seizure frequency and improving quality of life (QoL). The limited availability of randomized controlled trials on PER among DS is challenging, but broader studies on refractory epilepsies offer insights. Real-world studies support PER\'s efficacy, underscoring its potential for managing refractory seizures in DS. Studies showed long-term effectiveness in reducing seizure frequency and enhancing QoL. While PER has minimal impact on cognitive development, it significantly improves seizure control. Numerous studies confirm the use of PER as an effective adjunctive treatment for DS; however, it is crucial to observe the safety profile, especially for pediatric sodium channelopathy patients. Common side effects include dizziness, drowsiness, and irritability, necessitating careful management. Long-term safety is generally favorable, but monitoring for behavioral and mood changes is essential. Additionally, the response to PER in DS varies widely, complicating its use. The limited clinical data and the need for careful dosage monitoring, especially in children, present significant challenges. Side effects, potential drug interactions, and high costs further complicate treatment. Despite increasing attention to its cost-effectiveness, accessibility remains limited in some regions, posing significant barriers for many families. In this paper, we review the role of PER in treating pediatric patients with DS, emphasizing clinical evidence and practical considerations.

Although perampanel (PER) has received approval as an antiseizure medication, reports quantifying its antiseizure effects using electroencephalography (EEG) remain scarce. In a previous study, we demonstrated that the interictal high gamma oscillation regularity (GOR) on scalp EEG is an excellent marker of epileptogenicity. Herein, we investigated whether the antiseizure effect of PER could be quantified through interictal GOR analysis of scalp EEG data. To investigate this, we examined the interictal GOR from 20 s of scalp EEG data before and after PER administration collected from five patients with epilepsy with focal seizures. Prior to PER administration, each patient presented with localized areas with high GOR consistent with brain lesions or seizure semiology. In all patients, the seizures improved following PER administration, and the localized high GOR, which is considered an epileptogenic focus, disappeared. These results indicate that interictal GOR analysis may be a useful tool for the quantitative assessments of the antiseizure effects of PER in focal epilepsy. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: This study explored whether perampanel (PER)\'s antiseizure effects can be quantified using interictal high gamma oscillation regularity (GOR) analysis from scalp EEG data. Analyzing 20-second EEG segments before and after PER administration in five patients with focal epilepsy, we found that high GOR areas, indicative of epileptogenic foci, disappeared following PER administration. The results suggest that interictal GOR analysis could effectively quantify the antiseizure effects of PER.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: This study was the first to evaluate the effect of CYP3A4 gene polymorphisms on the plasma concentration and effectiveness of perampanel (PER) in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy.
METHODS: We enrolled 102 patients for this investigation. The steady-state concentration was determined after patients maintained a consistent PER dosing regimen for at least 21 days. Plasma PER concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Leftover samples from standard therapeutic drug monitoring were allocated for genotyping analysis. The primary measure of efficacy was the rate of seizure reduction with PER treatment at the final check-up.
RESULTS: The CYP3A4×10 GC phenotype exhibited the highest average plasma concentration of PER at 491.1 ± 328.1 ng/mL, in contrast to the CC phenotype at 334.0 ± 161.1 ng/mL. The incidence of adverse events was most prominent in the CYP3A4×1 G TT and CYP3A4×10 GC groups, with rates of 77.8 % (7 of 9 patients) and 50.0 % (46 of 92 patients), respectively. Moreover, the percentage of patients for whom PER was deemed ineffective was least in the CYP3A4×1 G TT and CYP3A4×10 CC groups, recorded at 11.1 % (1 of 9 patients) and 10.0 % (1 of 10 patients), respectively. There was a significant correlation between PER plasma concentration and either exposure or toxicity (both with p < 0.05). We suggest a plasma concentration range of 625-900 ng/mL as a suitable reference for PER in Chinese patients with epilepsy.
CONCLUSIONS: The CYP3A4×10 gene\'s genetic polymorphisms influence plasma concentrations of PER in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy. Given that both efficacy and potential toxicity are closely tied to plasma PER levels, the CYP3A4 genetic phenotype should be factored in when prescribing PER to patients with epilepsy.

Managing epilepsy in the context of intellectual disability can be complicated as this population is known to have higher rates of drug resistance and sensitivity to side effects of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Perampanel is a novel ASM recently approved as an adjunctive treatment for drug resistant focal seizures. It carries a black-box warning for serious psychiatric and behavioral adverse reactions of aggression, irritability, et cetera. However, psychosis is a seldom reported side effect of perampanel. We herein describe a case of a 15-year-old girl with moderate intellectual disability who presented with refractory seizures managed successfully after using perampanel. Around 2 months later, she developed psychosis and aggression. The patient\'s history lacked any significant family or personal history of mental illness. Managing psychotic symptoms was difficult in this case; as perampanel was needed for proper seizure control, and both psychosis and seizures were severe and significantly endangering the patient and people around her. Thus, symptoms were addressed by adding a low-dose risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic. This paper highlights the importance of pre-treatment counselling and monitoring for the emergence of psychiatric side effects including the rarely occurring psychosis while using perampanel, particularly in highly sensitive patients, e.g., those with intellectual disability. We also emphasize on the importance of accurate weighing of risks and benefits while managing psychosis as an adverse event to ASMs in the background of drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of perampanel (PER) in patients with post-stroke epilepsy (PSE), brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), and post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE) using Japanese real-world data.
METHODS: The prospective post-marketing observational study included patients with focal seizures with or without focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures who received PER combination therapy. The observation period was 24 or 52 weeks after the initial PER administration. The safety and efficacy analysis included 3716 and 3272 patients, respectively. This post hoc analysis examined responder rate (50% reduction in seizure frequency), seizure-free rate (proportion of patients who achieved seizure-free), and safety in patients included in the post-marketing study who had PSE, BTRE, and PTE in the 4 weeks prior to the last observation.
RESULTS: Overall, 402, 272, and 186 patients were included in the PSE, BTRE, and PTE subpopulations, and 2867 controls in the \"Other\" population (etiologies other than PSE, BTRE, or PTE). Mean modal dose (the most frequently administered dose) values at 52 weeks were 3.38, 3.36, 3.64, and 4.04 mg/day for PSE, BTRE, PTE, and \"Other,\" respectively; PER retention rates were 56.2%, 54.0%, 52.6%, and 59.7%, respectively. Responder rates (% [95% confidence interval]) were 82% (76.3%-86.5%), 78% (70.8%-83.7%), 67% (56.8%-75.6%), and 50% (47.9%-52.7%) for PSE, BTRE, PTE, and \"Other,\" respectively, and seizure-free rates were 71% (64.5%-76.5%), 62% (54.1%-69.0%), 50% (40.6%-60.4%), and 28% (25.8%-30.1%), respectively. Adverse drug reactions tended to occur less frequently in the PSE (14.7%), BTRE (16.5%), and PTE (16.7%) subpopulations than in the \"Other\" population (26.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: In real-world clinical conditions, efficacy and tolerability for PER combination therapy were observed at low PER doses for the PSE, BTRE, and PTE subpopulations.
CONCLUSIONS: To find out how well the medication perampanel works and whether it is safe for people who have epilepsy after having had a stroke, brain tumor, or head injury, we used information from real-life medical situations in Japan. We looked at the data of about 3700 Japanese patients with epilepsy who were treated with perampanel. We found that perampanel was used at lower doses and better at controlling seizures, and had fewer side effects for patients with epilepsy caused by these etiologies than the control group.

Perampanel belongs to a novel class of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Studies examining the effect of hemodialysis on perampanel serum levels in clinical settings are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the changes in serum perampanel levels during hemodialysis. We studied patients with seizures who received oral perampanel between April 2020 and March 2023 and whose serum concentration of perampanel was measured before and after hemodialysis. We analyzed the serum concentrations of levetiracetam and lacosamide for comparison. Fourteen patients, with a mean age of 76.1 ± 7.88 years, were included. The dose of perampanel was 2.14 ± 1.27 mg. The hemodialysis clearance rate of perampanel, levetiracetam, and lacosamide was 0 ± 13%, 69 ± 11%, and 59.6 ± 8.2%, respectively. The post-dialysis CD ratio decreased significantly with levetiracetam but not with perampanel. Adverse but acceptable effects of perampanel were observed in two patients. The serum concentrations of several ASMs have been shown to be reduced during hemodialysis. Our study revealed that the serum perampanel concentration does not decrease during hemodialysis. Owing to the low rate of adverse effects and the stability of perampanel serum concentration during hemodialysis, perampanel could be a favorable choice as an ASM for patients with seizures undergoing hemodialysis. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our study looked at how hemodialysis affects the serum levels of perampanel, a new type of medication for seizures. In 14 patients who started treatment between April 2020 and March 2023, perampanel serum levels did not decrease during hemodialysis, unlike other seizure medications. This shows that perampanel can be a good option for patients with seizures who need hemodialysis, with fewer side effects compared to other medications.