OBJECTIVE: Per the package insert, pemafibrate was contraindicated for use in patients with severe renal impairment despite its biliary excretion. To validate this, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics and safety of pemafibrate for 12 weeks in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and renal impairment.
METHODS: In this phase 4, multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, comparative study, 21 patients were randomly assigned to pemafibrate 0.2 mg/day or placebo within Groups A (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ＜30 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate n=4; placebo, n=2), B (hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=4; placebo, n=1), and C (eGFR ≥ 30 and ＜60 mL/min/1.73m2 without hemodialysis; pemafibrate, n=8; placebo, n=2) for 12 weeks. Area under the concentration vs time curve within the dosing interval (τ) (AUCτ) of pemafibrate was measured after 12-week administration.
RESULTS: The AUCτ (geometric mean) of pemafibrate was 7.333 and 7.991 ng·h/mL in Groups A+B and C, respectively; in Groups A+B to C at 12 weeks, the geometric mean ratio of pemafibrate AUCτ was 0.92 (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62, 1.36). The upper limit of the 90% CI was ≤ 2.0 (predetermined criterion). There was no consistent trend in the AUCτ and maximum plasma concentration of pemafibrate with/without statin use. Renal impairment degree did not affect the incidence of adverse events. No safety concerns were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Pemafibrate repeated administration in patients with severe renal impairment did not increase pemafibrate exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Pemafibrate substantially lowers serum triglyceride (TG) levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels primarily in Japan, but it has not been evaluated in China. We aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in Chinese patients with hypertriglyceridemia and low HDL-C levels by comparing placebo and fenofibrate.
METHODS: A multicenter, double-masked trial was conducted in China involving 344 patients with high TG and low HDL-C levels randomly assigned to one of four groups: pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage change in fasting TG levels.
RESULTS: The percentage change in TG levels from baseline was -34.1%, -44.0%, -30.5%, and 6.5% in the pemafibrate 0.2 mg/d, pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d, fenofibrate 200 mg/d, and placebo groups, respectively. Pemafibrate 0.4 mg/d significantly reduced TG levels compared with that in both placebo (p＜0.0001) and fenofibrate groups (p=0.0083). Significant improvements in HDL-C, remnant cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A1 levels were also observed with both doses of pemafibrate than with the placebo. Pemafibrate showed significantly smaller changes in alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and serum creatinine levels than those with fenofibrate.
CONCLUSIONS: In Chinese patients, pemafibrate exhibited superior efficacy in improving TG levels and enhanced hepatic and renal safety compared to fenofibrate. Thus, pemafibrate may represent a promising therapeutic option for dyslipidemia in Chinese patients.

OBJECTIVE: No pharmacotherapeutic treatment has been established for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). This trial compared the effects of pemafibrate and omega-3-acid ethyl ester on hepatic function in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD.
METHODS: Patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD were enrolled, randomly assigned to the pemafibrate or omega-3-acid ethyl ester group, and followed for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in alanine aminotransferase (ALT) from baseline to week 24. The secondary endpoints included other hepatic enzymes, lipid profiles, and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers.
RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were enrolled and randomized. The adjusted mean change in ALT from baseline to week 24 was significantly lower in the pemafibrate group (-19.7±5.9 U/L) than in the omega-3-acid ethyl ester group (6.8±5.5 U/L) (intergroup difference, -26.5 U/L; 95% confidence interval, -42.3 to -10.7 U/L; p=0.001). Pemafibrate significantly improved the levels of other hepatic enzymes (aspartate aminotransferase and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase), lipid profiles (triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol), and hepatic fibrosis biomarkers (Mac-2 binding protein glycan isomer and Fibrosis-4 index). No cases of discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions were identified in either group, and there were no safety concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Pemafibrate is recommended over omega-3-acid ethyl ester for lipid management and MASLD treatment in patients with hypertriglyceridemia complicated by MASLD. The study results may contribute to the development of future treatment strategies for patients with MASLD/MASH.

BACKGROUND: The management of hypertriglyceridemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is important. Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha modulator with less toxic effects on liver and kidney function than those of other fibrates, has recently been approved for the treatment of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) lower than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. However, the efficacy and safety of pemafibrate in patients with severe renal impairment have not yet been established.
METHODS: This single-center, retrospective observational study included 12 outpatients with CKD and hypertriglyceridemia, who were newly started on low-dose pemafibrate (0.1 mg/day) treatment between December 2021 and May 2023 and whose eGFRs were less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline. Blood samples were collected before and at 12 weeks after pemafibrate treatment.
RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the serum triglyceride level was significantly decreased, whereas the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was significantly increased. The serum alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and uric acid levels were also significantly decreased, without worsening of the eGFR and serum creatinine levels. In the subgroup analysis, there were no significant differences in the changes in clinical parameters regardless of statin use and CKD stage at baseline.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose pemafibrate administration in patients with severe renal impairment resulted in significant improvements in triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and serum uric acid levels, and liver function, without adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Numerous epidemiological studies have shown that hypertriglyceridemia is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, large clinical studies on triglyceride-lowering therapy have yielded inconsistent results. In the current review, we reassess the importance of triglyceride-lowering therapy in preventing CVD based on previous literature and the recently published findings of the PROMINENT trial.
METHODS: This narrative review is based on literature and public documents published up to November 2023.
RESULTS: Meta-analyses of trials on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α agonists and triglyceride-lowering therapy, including the PROMINENT trial, have indicated that triglyceride-lowering therapy can reduce CVD events. Mendelian randomization studies have also indicated that triglyceride is indeed a true risk factor for coronary artery disease, leaving no doubt about its relationship to CVD. Meanwhile, the negative results from the PROMINENT trial were likely due to the insufficient triglyceride-lowering effect, slight increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, and the inclusion of mostly high-intensity statin users as target patients. It is unlikely that adverse events counteracted the effectiveness of pemafibrate on outcomes. Additionally, pemafibrate has shown positive effects on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and peripheral artery disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the PROMINENT trial did not demonstrate the significance of pemafibrate as a triglyceride-lowering therapy in a specific population, it does not necessarily negate the potential benefits of treating hypertriglyceridemia in reducing CVD events. It is necessary to explore appropriate populations that could benefit from this therapy, utilize data from the PROMINENT trial and other databases, and validate findings in real-world settings.

OBJECTIVE: Pemafibrate, a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α modulator that lowers serum triglyceride levels and increases high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, is approved for treating dyslipidemia as twice-daily immediate-release (IR) tablets. A once-daily extended-release (XR) tablet has also been developed. We aimed to confirm the non-inferiority of XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day; once daily) to IR (0.2 mg/day; twice daily) in lowering triglyceride levels in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
METHODS: This phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study included patients with fasting triglycerides ≥ 200 mg/dL who received IR (0.2 mg/day) or XR (0.2 or 0.4 mg/day). The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage change in fasting triglyceride levels from baseline to 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Common treatment effects at weeks 4 through 12 were compared between groups using repeated analysis of covariance.
RESULTS: In 356 randomized patients, fasting triglyceride levels decreased by 48.0%, 43.8%, and 48.0% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively, confirming the non-inferiority of both XR regimens to IR. The proportion of patients who achieved fasting triglycerides ＜150 mg/dL was 45.7%, 37.4%, and 51.7%, while the percentage change of triglycerides in the subgroup with baseline triglycerides ≥ 500 mg/dL was -59.3%, -52.2%, and -66.3% with IR 0.2, XR 0.2, and XR 0.4 mg/day, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: XR (0.2 and 0.4 mg/day) was non-inferior to IR (0.2 mg/day). XR 0.4 mg/day demonstrated a more potent triglyceride-lowering effect than XR 0.2 mg/day and should be considered for patients with high triglyceride levels.

UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of 48-week pemafibrate treatment in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) complicated by dyslipidemia.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 110 patients diagnosed with MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia received pemafibrate at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily for 48 weeks.
UNASSIGNED: The participants were 54 males and 37 females, with a median age of 63 (52-71) years. Besides improvement in lipid profile, significant reductions from baseline to 48 weeks of treatment were found in liver-related enzymes, such as aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, and alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.001 for all). A significant decrease in the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was observed in patients with insulin resistance (HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5) (4.34 at baseline to 3.89 at Week 48, P < 0.05). Moreover, changes in ALT were weakly correlated with those in HOMA-IR (r = 0.34; p < 0.05). Regarding noninvasive liver fibrosis tests, platelets, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein, type IV collagen 7s, and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score significantly decreased from baseline to Week 48. Most adverse events were Grades 1-2, and no drug-related Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed.
UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated that 48-week pemafibrate administration improved liver-related enzymes and surrogate marker of liver fibrosis in patients with MASLD. The improvement of insulin resistance by pemafibrate may contribute to the favorable effect on MASLD complicated by dyslipidemia.

UNASSIGNED: Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized predominantly by diastolic dysfunction. The multiple mechanisms underlying DCM include altered energy substrate utilization. Recent studies indicate that PPARα plays an important role in the pathogenesis of lipotoxic cardiomyopathy. Pemafibrate is known to be a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα). We thus investigated the effects of pemafibrate on cardiac diastolic function in patients with type 2 diabetes.
UNASSIGNED: Seventeen patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertriglyceridemia were screened and treated with pemafibrate at a dose of 0.2 mg/day for 8-16 weeks. Fourteen patients were eligible for analysis. Echocardiography was used for assessment of diastolic function. Early diastolic filling velocity (E), late atrial filling velocity (A) and the E/A ratio were included in this study. Peak early diastolic annular velocities (e\') were also assessed using color tissue Doppler images. The primary endpoints were changes in the ratio of E to A (E/A), e\', and the ratio of E to e\' (E/e\') from baseline.
UNASSIGNED: Pemafibrate significantly increased average e\' (7.24 ± 0.58 vs 7.94 ± 0.67, p = 0.019) and a significant reduction in E/e\' (9.01 ± 0.94 vs 8.20 ± 0.91, p = 0.041). The increase in e\' was significantly related to increases in fasting blood glucose (r = 0.607, p = 0.021) and non-esterified fatty acid (r = 0.592, p = 0.026).
UNASSIGNED: Pemafibrate improved diastolic function in patients with T2D and hypertriglyceridemia, suggesting that PPARα activation by pemafibrate prevents the development of DCM at an early stage.

The number of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is increasing globally and is raising serious concerns regarding the increasing medical and economic burden incurred for their treatment. The progression of NASH to more severe conditions such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma requires liver transplantation to avoid death. Therefore, therapeutic intervention is required in the NASH stage, although no therapeutic drugs are currently available for this. Several anti-NASH candidate drugs have been developed that enable treatment via the modulation of distinct signaling cascades and include a series of drugs targeting peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) subtypes (PPARα/δ/γ) that are considered to be attractive because they can regulate both systemic lipid metabolism and inflammation. Multiple PPAR dual/pan agonists have been developed but only a few of them have been evaluated in clinical trials for NAFLD/NASH. Herein, we review the current clinical trial status and future prospects of PPAR-targeted drugs for treating NAFLD/NASH. In addition, we summarize our recent findings on the binding modes and the potencies/efficacies of several candidate PPAR dual/pan agonists to estimate their therapeutic potentials against NASH. Considering that the development of numerous PPAR dual/pan agonists has been abandoned because of their serious side effects, we also propose a repositioning of the already approved, safety-proven PPAR-targeted drugs against NAFLD/NASH.

Pemafibrate, a novel selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor modulator, has beneficial effects on lipid metabolism. However, its effects on glucose metabolism in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remain to be fully clarified. This was a subanalysis of the PARM-T2D study, a multicenter prospective observational study on the use of pemafibrate versus conventional therapy for 52 weeks in subjects with T2DM complicated with hypertriglyceridemia. The subanalysis included participants who did not change their treatment for diabetes and did not receive insulin or insulin secretagogues during the study period. Changes in glucose metabolism markers, including homeostatic model assessment (HOMA2) scores and disposition index, were assessed. A total of 279 participants (141 in the pemafibrate group; 138 in the control group) met the criteria for the subanalysis. There were no significant changes in HbA1c during the 52-week study period in both groups. However, the pemafibrate group showed significant improvements versus the control group for insulin resistance assessed by HOMA2-R (-0.15 versus 0.08; estimated treatment difference -0.23 (95% confidence interval -0.44, -0.02); p = 0.03) and maintenance of β-cell function assessed by disposition index (0.015 versus -0.023; estimated treatment difference 0.037 (95% confidence interval 0.005, 0.069); p = 0.02). Correlation analyses showed that improvements in HOMA2-R and disposition index were significantly associated with improvements in lipid abnormalities and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase. In conclusion, pemafibrate reduced insulin resistance and maintained β-cell function in subjects with T2DM and hypertriglyceridemia, presumably by improving lipid profiles and lipid-related hepatocyte stress.