This comprehensive review thoroughly examines post-resuscitation care in pediatric ICUs (PICUs) following cardiac arrest. The analysis encompasses adherence to resuscitation guidelines, advances in therapeutic interventions, and the nuanced management of neurological, cardiovascular, and respiratory considerations during the immediate post-resuscitation phase. Delving into the complexities of long-term outcomes, cognitive and developmental considerations, and rehabilitation strategies, the review emphasizes the importance of family-centered care for pediatric survivors. A call to action is presented, urging continuous education, research initiatives, and quality improvement efforts alongside strengthened multidisciplinary collaboration and advocacy for public awareness. Through implementing these principles, healthcare providers and systems can collectively contribute to ongoing advancements in pediatric post-resuscitation care, ultimately improving outcomes and fostering a culture of excellence in pediatric critical care.

The developing central nervous system is vulnerable to several stimuli, especially psychotropic drugs. Sedation procedures during the developmental period are frequent in pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), in which the use of the sedative agent is still a challenge for the PICU team. Ketamine has been indicated for sedation in critically ill children with hemodynamic and ventilatory instabilities, but the possible neurobehavioral consequences related to this use are still uncertain. Here, we performed a bibliometric analysis with conventional metrics and a critical review of clinical findings to reveal a gap in the literature that deserves further investigation. We revealed that only 56 articles corresponded to the inclusion criteria of the study. The United States of America emerges as the main country within the scope of this review. In addition, professional clinical societies play a key role in the publications of scientific clinical findings through the specialist journals, which encourages the sharing of research work. The co-occurrence of keywords evidenced that the terms \"sedation\", \"ketamine\", and \"pediatric\" were the most frequent. Case series and review articles were the most prevalent study design. In the critical evaluation, the scarce studies highlight the need of use and post-use monitoring, which reinforces the importance of additional robust clinical studies to characterize the possible adverse effects resulting from ketamine anesthetic protocol in critically ill children.

The objective of this study is to describe the clinical features of young infants with apneas as a clinical sign of COVID-19. We reported the cases of 4 infants who needed respiratory support in our PICU for a severe course of COVID-19 complicated with recurrent apneas. Moreover, we conducted a review of the literature about COVID-19 and apneas in infants ≤ 2 months of corrected age. A total of 17 young infants were included. Overall, in most of the cases (88%), apnea was an initial symptom of COVID-19, and in two cases, it recurred after 3-4 weeks. Regarding neurological workup, most children underwent a cranial ultrasound, while a minority underwent electroencephalography registration, neuroimaging, and lumbar punctures. One child showed signs of encephalopathy on electroencephalogram, with further neurological workup resulting normal. SARS-CoV-2 was never found in the cerebrospinal fluid. Ten children required intensive care unit admission, with five of them needing intubation and three non-invasive ventilation. A less invasive respiratory support was sufficient for the remaining children. Eight children were treated with caffeine. All patients had a complete recovery.  Conclusion: Young infants with recurrent apneas during COVID-19 usually need respiratory support and undergo a wide clinical work-up. They usually show complete recovery even when admitted to the intensive care unit. Further studies are needed to better define diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for these patients. What is Known: • Although the course of COVID-19 in infants is usually mild, some of them may develop a more severe disease needing intensive care support. Apneas may be a clinical sign in COVID-19. What is New: • Infants with apneas during COVID-19 may require intensive care support, but they usually show a benign course of the disease and full recovery.

We aimed to compare the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia for 24, 48, and 72 h, and normothermia following pediatric cardiac arrest. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE via Ovid, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. from their inception to December 2021. We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating target temperature management (TTM) in children aged < 18 years with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) after cardiac arrest. We compared four intervention groups (normothermia, therapeutic hypothermia for 24 h (TTM 24h), therapeutic hypothermia for 48 h (TTM 48h), and therapeutic hypothermia for 72 h (TTM 72h)) using network meta-analysis. The outcomes were survival and favorable neurological outcome at 6 months or more. Seven studies involving 1008 patients and four studies involving 684 patients were included in the quantitative synthesis of survival and neurological outcome, respectively. TTM for 72 h was associated with a higher survival rate, compared to normothermia (RR 1.75 (95% CI 1.27-2.40)) (very low certainty), TTM 24h (RR 1.53 (95% CI 1.06-2.19)) (low certainty), and TTM 48h (RR 1.54 (95% CI 1.06-2.22)) (very low certainty). TTM for 72 h was also associated with favorable neurological outcomes compared with normothermia (RR 9.36 (95% CI 2.04-42.91)), or TTM 48h (RR 8.15 (95% CI 1.6-40.59)) (all very low certainty). TTM for 24 h was associated with favorable neurological outcome, compared with normothermia (RR 8.02 (95% CI 1.28-50.50)) (very low certainty). In the ranking analysis, the hierarchies for efficacy for survival and favorable neurological outcome were TTM 72h > TTM 48h > TTM 24h > normothermia. Although prolonged therapeutic hypothermia might be effective in pediatric patients with ROSC after cardiac arrest, the evidence to support this result is only weak to very weak. There is no conclusive evidence regarding the effectiveness and length of therapeutic hypothermia and high-quality RCRs comparing long-length therapeutic hypothermia to short-length hypothermia and normothermia are needed.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow nasal cannulae therapy (HFNCT) are first-line methods of treatment for children presenting with acute respiratory distress, with paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) providing an ideal environment for subsequent treatment monitoring. However, the availability of step-down units, where NIV and HFNCT can be safely utilised, has reduced the need for such patients to be admitted to PICUs, thereby leading to the better overall utilisation of critical care resources. In addition, NIV and HFNCT can also be used during transport instead of invasive ventilation, thus avoiding the complications associated with the latter approach. This review article examines the safety and applicability of these respiratory support approaches outside of paediatric intensive care as well as various factors associated with treatment success or failure.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes for children diagnosed with cancer have improved dramatically over the past 20 years. However, although 40% of pediatric cancer patients require at least one intensive care admission throughout their disease course, PICU outcomes and resource utilization by this population have not been rigorously studied in this specific group.
METHODS: Using a systematic strategy, we searched Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases for articles describing PICU mortality of pediatric cancer patients admitted to PICU. Two investigators independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed data quality, and extracted data. We pooled PICU mortality estimates using random-effects models and examined mortality trends over time using meta-regression models.
RESULTS: Out of 1218 identified manuscripts, 31 studies were included covering 16,853 PICU admissions with the majority being retrospective in nature. Overall pooled weighted mortality was 27.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 23.7-31.9%). Mortality decreased slightly over time when post-operative patients were excluded. The use of mechanical ventilation (odds ratio (OR): 18.49 [95% CI 13.79-24.78], p < 0.001), inotropic support (OR: 14.05 [95% CI 9.16-21.57], p < 0.001), or continuous renal replacement therapy (OR: 3.24 [95% CI 1.31-8.04], p = 0.01) was significantly associated with PICU mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: PICU mortality rates of pediatric cancer patients are far higher when compared to current mortality rates of the general PICU population. PICU mortality has remained relatively unchanged over the past decades, a slight decrease was only seen when post-operative patients were excluded. This compared infavorably with the improved mortality seen in adults with cancer admitted to ICU, where research-led improvements have led to the paradigm of unlimited, aggressive ICU management without any limitations on resuscitations status, for a time-limited trial.

Limited studies exist regarding the timing, location, or physicians involved in do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order placement in pediatrics. Prior pediatric studies have noted great variations in practice during end-of-life (EOL) care. This study aims to analyze the timing, location, physician specialties, and demographic factors influencing EOL care in pediatrics. We examined the time preceding and following the implementation of a pediatric palliative care team (PCT) via a 5-year, retrospective chart review of all deceased patients previously admitted to inpatient services. Thirty-five percent (167/471) of the patients in our study died with a DNR order in place. Sixty-two percent of patients died in an ICU following DNR order placement. A difference was noted in DNR order timing between patients on general inpatient units and those discharged to home compared with those in the ICUs (p = 0.02). The overall DNR order rate increased following the initiation of the PCT from 30.8% to 39.2% (p = 0.05), but no change was noted in the rate of death in the ICUs. Our study demonstrates a variation in the timing of death following DNR order placement when comparing ICUs and general pediatric floors. Following the initiation of the PCT, we saw increased DNR frequency but no change in the interval between a DNR order and death.