UNASSIGNED: Occurrences of relapse after 6-months post-treatment has been reported in recent Visceral Leishmaniasis (VL) efficacy studies. A meta-analysis was carried out to quantify the proportion of relapses observed at and beyond 6-months using the Infectious Diseases Data Observatory (IDDO) systematic review (SR) database.
UNASSIGNED: Studies in the IDDO SR database (1983-2021; 160 studies) were eligible for inclusion if follow-up was at least 6-months, relapse was clearly reported, and patients with HIV coinfections were excluded. Meta-analysis of single proportion was undertaken and the estimates were reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
UNASSIGNED: Overall, 131 studies enrolling 27,687 patients were included; 1193 patients relapsed. In the Indian sub-continent (ISC), relapse estimates at 6-months was 4.5% [95% CI: 2.6%-7.5%; I2 = 66.2%] following single dose liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) and 1.5% [95% CI: 0.7%-3.3%; I2 = 0%] for L-AmB in a combination therapy. In East Africa (EA), corresponding estimates were 3.8% [95% CI: 1.3%-10.9%; I2 = 75.8%] following pentavalent antimony (PA), and 13.0% [95% CI: 4.3%-33.6%; I2 = 0%] for PA + paromomycin. From 21 studies with follow-up longer than 6-months, 0.6% [95% CI: 0.2%-1.8%; I2 = 0%] of patients relapsed after 6-months and estimated 27.6% [95% CI: 11.2%-53.4%; I2 = 12%] of relapses would have been missed by a 6-month follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: The estimated relapse proportion ranged from 0.5% to 4.5% in ISC and 3.8%-13.0% in EA with the currently recommended drugs. Over one-quarter of relapses would be missed with 6-months follow-up suggesting a longer follow-up may be warranted.
UNASSIGNED: Wellcome Trust (ref: 208378/Z/17/Z).

Leishmaniasis is an infectious disease responsible for a huge rate of morbidity and mortality in humans. Chemotherapy consists of the use of pentavalent antimonial, amphotericin B, pentamidine, miltefosine, and paromomycin. However, these drugs are associated with some drawbacks such as high toxicity, administration by parenteral route, and most seriously the resistance of some strains of the parasite to them. Several strategies have been used to increase the therapeutic index and reduce the toxic effects of these drugs. Among them, the use of nanosystems that have great potential as a site-specific drug delivery system stands out. This review aims to compile results from studies that were carried out using first- and second-line antileishmanial drug-carrying nanosystems. The articles referred to here were published between 2011 and 2021. This study shows the promise of effective applicability of drug-carrying nanosystems in the field of antileishmanial therapeutics, with the perspective of providing better patient adherence to treatment, increased therapeutic efficacy, reduced toxicity of conventional drugs, as well as the potential to efficiently improve the treatment of leishmaniasis.

Post-kala-azar dermal Leishmaniasis (PKDL) is one of the important neglected tropical diseases, which has a tremendous epidemiological significance, being the reservoir of kala-azar. Relapse and resistance to treatment along with the lack of a drug of choice and consensus treatment guideline pose a significant problem in the management of PKDL. The aim of this article was to review the available therapeutic options for PKDL, with special emphasis on their pharmaco-dynamics, pharmaco-kinetics, effectiveness, safety, tolerability, and cost factor. A comprehensive English language literature search was done for therapeutic options in PKDL across multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Cochrane) for keywords (alone and in combination). MeSH as well as non-MeSH terms such as \"Kala-azar,\" \"Leishmaniasis\" AND \"Treatment,\" \"Management,\" \"Antimony Sodium Gluconate,\" \"Meglumine Antimoniate,\" \"Amphotericin B,\" \"Paromomycin,\" \"Miltefosine\" were taken into consideration. Among 576 relevant articles, 15 were deemed relevant to this review. These articles were evaluated using \"Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM)\" AND \"strength of recommendation taxonomy\" (SORT) with respect to the level of evidence and grade of recommendation. The review includes 15 studies. The use of sodium stibogluconate is being discouraged because of multiple documented reports of treatment failure. Liposomal amphotericin B is emerging as a favorable option, owing to its superiority in terms of effectiveness and safety profile. Miltesfosine is the drug of choice in India because of the ease of oral administration and minimal risk of toxicity. Isolated Paromomycin alone is not effective in PKDL; however, combination therapy with sodium stibogluconate is found to be safe and effective. Combination of amphotericin B and miltefosine is one of the excellent options. Immunotherapy with combination of alum-precipitated autoclaved Leishmania major (Alum/ALM) vaccine + Bacille Calmette-Gu´erin (BCG) has shown promising results. Kala-azar continues to haunt the tropical countries and PKDL being its reservoir is threatening its elimination. With the availability of drugs such as liposomal amphotericin B and miltefosine, apart from the advent of immunotherapy, the future of treatment of this condition looks promising.

Introduction: The presence of D. fragilis in feces is characterized by an asymptomatic carrier ship to a spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, a causal relationship remains to be elucidated. In this systematic review, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between the eradication of D. fragilis and symptoms to establish the strength of evidence that D. fragilis in symptomatic children warrants antibiotic treatment.Areas covered: This systematic review covers a challenge in daily clinical practice. Is it necessary to test for D. fragilis in children with gastrointestinal symptoms and does a positive fecal PCR test warrant treatment?Expert opinion: Testing for D. fragilis seems justified in a selection of children with persistent unexplained chronic abdominal pain and diarrhea. Treatment of D. fragilis should be withhold until other causes like celiac disease have been excluded. Both microscopic and Real Time-PCR methods (or a combination of the two) can be used for diagnosis. Paromomycin or clioquinol are antibiotics of choice based on their small spectrum of activity, fewer side effects, and better eradication rates than metronidazole. Future randomized studies, with strict inclusion criteria, appropriate diagnostic testing, and doses of antibiotics based on bodyweight are warranted.

Five-nitroimidazole (5-NI) compounds are among the most commonly used medications in the treatment of giardiasis. However, after more than five decades of their initial indication for such treatment, there are some concerns about the efficacy of 5-NIs in giardiasis. This study sought to compare the efficacy of any 5-NI with any other antigiardial drug for the treatment of Cuban children with giardiasis. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched CUMED, EBSCOhost and PubMed databases. Two reviewers independently assessed trial eligibility, trial quality and extracted appropriate data. The primary outcome was the parasitological cure. The effect estimate was the pooled relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We included seven RCTs in the systematic review, involving a total of 1046 children. When the effect of 5-NIs was compared with that of benzimidazole compounds, the pooled effect was significant and favored 5-NIs [the relative risk (RR) is 1.35, 95% CI =1.05 to 1.75], with high heterogeneity (4 studies, I2 =79%). Compared with chloroquine, the pooled effects of the 5-NIs were not significant [RR is 0.96, 95% CI=0.79 to 1.18, (2 studies, I2=68%)]. Our results support the use of 5-NIs (mainly tinidazole) as first-line therapy for Cuban pediatric patients infected with Giardia and may continue being used as reference drugs in future RCTs of giardiasis. These data could help inform policy decisions in Cuba. Caution is needed in extrapolating such data in other settings.

BACKGROUND: Ethiopia has the highest number of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) cases after Sudan in Sub-Saharan Africa. However, there was lack of comprehensive data on VL treatment outcome despite the huge burden of the diseases in the country. Hence, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic to obtain stronger evidence on treatment outcomes of VL from the existing literature in Ethiopia.
METHODS: The Cochrane guidelines to conduct meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis statement was used to conduct a computerized systematic search of the PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases. Random effects model was used to combine studies showing heterogeneity of Cochrane Q P < 0.10 and I2 > 50. Treatment outcomes were assessed at end of treatment and at 6 months follow-up. Subgroup analyses were performed on treatment outcomes based on the different antileishmanial treatment options and patients\' HIV status.
RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included in the final analyses. At end of treatment, an overall treatment success rate of 82.6% was noticed. At 6 months follow-up, the overall treatment success rate was 72.2%. For patients treated with sodium stibogluconate (SSG), the treatment success rates at the end of treatment and at six-month follow-up were 81.5% and 80.7%, respectively. Multiple doses of liposomal-amphotericin B (L-AMB) had treatment success rates of 96.7 and 71-100% at the end of treatment and at 6 months follow-up, respectively. The combination of SSG with paromomycin (PM) gave treatment success rates of up to 90.1% at the end of treatment. HIV-infected individuals were found to have a higher mortality (odds ratio = 4.77, 95% CI: 1.30-17.43, P = 0.009) rate at 6 months follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: SSG alone has shown lower treatment efficacy in the management of VL when compared to combination of SSG with PM and multiple doses of L-AMB. The combination of SSG with PM gave good treatment success rates with shorter duration of treatment. Hence, the combination of SSG with PM should be used preferentially over SSG monotherapy. Multiple doses of L-AMB showed great efficacy especially among patients with complications, severe disease, HIV co-infection, and intolerance to the adverse effects of antimonials. HIV-infected individuals had a worse prognosis than their HIV-negative counterparts.

Leishmaniasis is considered one of the most neglected diseases worldwide. In Morocco, cutaneous leishmaniasis is an important public health problem. Leishmania major and Leishmania tropica are the two major species in this country. Despite all efforts, monitoring and control of the cutaneous leishmaniasis is still challenging. We used for the first time a vertical analysis of the control of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Morocco from the document review and publications. This analysis allowed us to develop an epidemiological model that emphasized key possible interventions. No evaluation studies of these interventions in Morocco were done. Global Evidence underline the effectiveness of preventive interventions produced in integrate inter-sectorial strategy framework (e.g use of insecticide-treated bednets, indoor residual spraying and rodents\' control) rather than treatments such as based thermotherapy, cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, CO2 laser and paromomycin. Therefore, integrated vector management control (IVMC) with communityc participation is recommended as effective strategy. Strengthening of the IVMC with community involvement are necessary conditions to improve the program of cutaneous leishmaniasis and prevent epidemic foci appearance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence for use of different formulations of amphotericin B (AmB), minimum effective dose for each formulation and its comparative efficacy against other drugs in achieving definitive cure of visceral leishmaniasis.
METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis included following data sources: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and CINAHL. Controlled prospective clinical trials (randomized or nonrandomized, including dose-ranging studies) conducted between 1996 and 2017 with at least one treatment group receiving AmB were included (published data only). The primary outcome was definitive cure at 6 months. Adverse events and mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. The PROSPERO registration number for this review is CRD42017067488.
RESULTS: Thirty-one studies (26 from India) that enrolled 6903 patients into 84 study groups met the selection criteria. In India, liposomal AmB was not inferior to AmB deoxycholate (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-1.03, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 514 participants, high-quality evidence), and a single dose of the earlier formulation as low as 3.75 mg/kg achieved a cure rate of over 89% (95% CI 70.6-97.2). AmB deoxycholate was as effective as miltefosine (relative risk 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03, two trials, 523 participants, high-quality evidence) and may be better than paromomycin (relative risk 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.07, one trial, 667 participants, low-quality evidence) in achieving definitive cure.
CONCLUSIONS: AmB is an efficacious drug in the Indian subcontinent. Further evidence is needed from prospective clinical trials in other endemic geographical regions.

Conventional chemotherapy for leishmaniasis includes considerably toxic drugs and reports of drug-resistance are not uncommon. Liposomal encapsulated drugs appear as an option for the treatment of leishmaniasis, providing greater efficacy for the active and reducing its side effects by promoting superior tissue absorption, favouring drug penetration into the macrophages, and retarding its clearance from the site of action. In this paper, a review on the advances achieved with liposome-based anti-leishmaniasis drug delivery systems is presented. Formulations prepared with either conventional or modified (sugar-coated, cationic, niosomes, peptides- and antibodies-bounded) liposomes for the delivery of pentavalent antimonials, amphotericin B, pentamidine, paromomycyn, and miltefosine were covered. This literature review depicts a scenario of no effective therapeutic agents for the treatment of this neglected disease, where liposomal formulations appear to improve the effectiveness of the available antileishmania agents.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic arsenal against cutaneous leishmaniasis is very limited. Pentavalent antimonial compounds have been the drugs of choice for treatment of this disease for over 50 years. Despite their effectiveness, these drugs require daily injections, have many side effects and present prolonged healing time.
OBJECTIVE: To carry out a systematic literature review on the advances in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in the new world in the last ten years.
METHODS: We conducted an electronic search on the Pubmed and LILACS database as well as on the SciELO electronic library in June 2009. The search words in English were: \"cutaneous\", \"leishmaniasis\" and \"treatment\". We included only randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled trials. We used the Jadad scale to assess the quality of the selected studies.
RESULTS: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only eight articles were selected. The drugs evaluated in the selected studies were glucantime®, miltefosine, immunotherapy, imiquimod, rhGM-CSF and pentoxifylline, and paromomycin.
CONCLUSIONS: Although cutaneous leishmaniasis is a major public health issue, the published data on the use of new drugs for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Brazil are still quite limited.