Parkinson’s disease

帕金森病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: High-quality evidence shows that exercise helps people with Parkinson\'s disease improve functional abilities including balance. However, few studies have investigated whether the setting and format through which balance-focused exercise programs are provided matters. This systematic review investigated group exercise compared to individual exercise, and to no-exercise control (CTL), on clinical measures of balance for people with Parkinson\'s disease.
    UNASSIGNED: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched through March 24, 2024, on terms for Parkinson\'s disease; exercise or physical activity; community-based or group classes; balance or postural control. Citations, abstracts and full-text articles were independently reviewed, and included studies were rated on risk of bias by two authors.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (30 reports) with 1200 participants met criteria. Meta-analysis using mean difference (MD) compared group exercise to CTL on seven clinical measures of balance. Three yielded significant differences favoring group exercise: Timed Up and Go = -2.29 (MD), -3.56 to -1.02 (95% Confidence interval) (95% CI); Mini-BEST = 2.72 (MD), 1.88 to 3.57 (95% CI); Berg Balance Scale = 4.31 (MD), 1.33 to 7.29 (95% CI). Meta-analyses were also conducted on six clinical measures of balance, comparing group exercise to individual exercise, yielding no significant differences.
    UNASSIGNED: For people with Parkinson\'s disease, group exercise may be more effective than CTL on some clinical measures of balance and it yields similar results to individual exercise. People with Parkinson\'s disease are encouraged to participate regularly in group or individual exercise based on preference and accessibility.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    帕金森病是第二常见的神经退行性疾病,但是诸如神经调节之类的治疗选择仍然显示出不同的效果,使疾病的临床管理变得困难。本系统综述采用荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析,旨在分析经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)与假刺激相比,皮质调节对帕金森病患者认知改变的孤立影响。使用的数据库是:WebofScience,Scopus,PsycINFO,PubMed,还有Cochrane.结果表明,tDCS可以影响PD的认知改善(逆方差:0.24[95%置信区间:0.09至-0.40],p<0.00)。荟萃分析表明,主动tDCS可以通过改善与记忆相关的方面来影响认知功能(逆方差:0.34[95%置信区间:0.07至0.61],p<0.01)并减少认知任务中的反应时间(逆方差:0.42[95%置信区间:0.07至0.76],p<0.02)。创新的荟萃回归分析表明,年龄等变量(Q=2.54,df=1,p<0.11),教育水平(Q=2.62,df=1,p<0.10),病程(Q=0.01,df=1,p<0.92),和统一PD量表阶段(Q=0.01,df=1,p<0.92)不影响结果。因此,TDCS可能是PD患者认知变化的一种治疗选择,我们建议进一步研究以确定可以复制的协议。
    Parkinson\'s disease is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, but therapeutic options such as neuromodulation continue to show variable effects, making clinical management of the disease difficult. This systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression aimed to analyze the isolated effect of cortical modulation with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) compared to sham stimulation on cognitive changes in people with Parkinson\'s disease. The databases used were: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Cochrane. The results showed that tDCS can influence the improvement of cognition in PD (Inverse Variance:0.24 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.09 to -0.40], p < 0.00). The meta-analysis showed that active tDCS can influence cognitive function by improving aspects related to memory (Inverse Variance:0.34 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.07 to 0.61], p < 0.01) and reducing reaction time in cognitive tasks (Inverse Variance:0.42 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.07 to 0.76], p < 0.02). Innovative meta-regression analyses showed that variables such as age (Q = 2.54, df = 1, p < 0.11), education level (Q = 2.62, df = 1, p < 0.10), disease duration (Q = 0.01, df = 1, p < 0.92), and Unified PD Rating Scale stage (Q = 0.01, df = 1, p < 0.92) did not influence the results. Thus, tDCS may be a therapeutic option for cognitive changes in people with PD, and we suggest further studies to identify protocols that can be replicated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    原发性震颤(ET)和帕金森氏病(PD)是以震颤为主要症状的衰弱性神经退行性疾病,显著影响患者生活质量。磁共振引导聚焦超声(MRgFUS)丘脑切开术是一种创新的治疗方法,用于治疗单侧医学难治性震颤,与传统的外科手术相比,不良反应更少。最近的CE批准允许适当的患者进行第二侧治疗。
    本系统评价的目的是分析当前有关使用MRgFUS治疗双侧ET和PD相关震颤的知识,确定与双边治疗相关的有效性和风险。
    通过搜索2014年5月至2024年1月在PubMed和Scopus数据库中已发表的研究,以及通过确定在clinicaltrials.gov网站上注册的正在进行的研究,确定了符合条件的研究。通过考虑以下信息主题来总结数据:涉及的患者数量,选定的病变目标,用于评估临床变化的评估工具,观察到的改善,报道的副作用,和两次治疗之间的时间间隔。该研究在PROSPERO注册(ID:CRD42024513178)。
    九项研究符合本次审查的条件,7用于ET和2用于PD。涉及的人群包括不同数量的患者,ET为1至11名受试者,PD为10至15名受试者。主要病变目标是丘脑腹侧中间核,苍白丘脑和小脑丘脑两侧。所有研究都通过震颤临床评定量表(CRST)调查了ET患者的震颤缓解情况,并通过帕金森病患者的统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)。观察到不同程度的改善,所有患者对双侧治疗表示总体满意。不良事件是轻度和短暂的,主要涉及步态障碍,构音障碍,和共济失调.无法识别两次连续治疗的标准化方案;通常,第二次治疗的时间至少延迟6个月.
    现有证据支持分期双侧MRgFUS治疗ET和PD相关震颤的有效性和安全性。
    UNASSIGNED: Essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson\'s Disease (PD) are debilitating neurodegenerative disorders characterized by tremor as a predominant symptom, significantly impacting patients\' quality of life. Magnetic Resonance-guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) Thalamotomy is an innovative therapeutic option for the treatment of unilateral medically refractory tremor with fewer adverse effects compared to traditional surgical interventions. A recent CE approval allows appropriate patients to have their second side treated.
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of this systematic review was to analyze available current knowledge about the use of MRgFUS for the treatment of bilateral ET and PD related tremor, to identify the effectiveness and the risks associated with bilateral treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible studies were identified by searching published studies in PubMed and Scopus databases from May 2014 to January 2024 and by identifying ongoing studies registered on the clinicaltrials.gov website. Data were summarized by considering the following information topics: the number of patients involved, the selected lesion target, the assessment tool used to evaluate clinical changes, the observed improvement, the reported side effects, and the time interval between the two treatments. The study was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024513178).
    UNASSIGNED: Nine studies were eligible for this review, 7 for ET and 2 for PD. The involved population included a variable number of patients, ranging from 1 to 11 subjects for ET and from 10 to 15 subjects for PD. The main lesional targets were the ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus, the pallidothalamic tract and the cerebellothalamic tract bilaterally. All studies investigated the tremor relief through the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) in patients with ET, and through the Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with PD. A variable degree of improvement was observed, with all patients expressing overall satisfaction with the bilateral treatment. Adverse events were mild and transient, primarily involving gait disturbances, dysarthria, and ataxia. A standardized protocol for administering the two consecutive treatments was not identifiable; typically, the timing of the second treatment was delayed by at least 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Available evidence supports the effectiveness and safety of staged bilateral MRgFUS treatments for ET and PD-related tremor.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在德国和欧洲临床指南中,经颅脑实质超声检查(TCS)已被推荐为帕金森病(PD)的早期和鉴别诊断工具。尽管如此,没有详细说明诊断问题需要检查的大脑结构以及成为合格研究者的要求.现在,这些问题已在德国神经病学会(DGN)2023年更新的PD临床指南中得到解决。
    方法:建议基于PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南的系统文献综述。
    结果:定义了三个诊断问题:(1)TCS在PD与非典型和继发性帕金森综合征的鉴别诊断中的准确性如何?(2)TCS在PD与特发性震颤的鉴别诊断中的准确性如何?(3)TCS在具有典型早期症状的人中诊断PD的准确性如何,与临床随访确定的诊断相比?针对这些问题制定了要评估的大脑结构和推荐水平。被视为合格的TCS研究者的培训要求由负责任的医学学会(德国医学超声学会,德国临床神经生理学和功能成像学会,DGKN)。最后,这些诊断问题的建议在指南委员会达成了强烈共识(各≥97%).这里,详细的审查和建议。
    结论:更新的指南阐明了TCS在PD中的诊断用途和局限性。
    OBJECTIVE: Transcranial brain parenchyma sonography (TCS) has been recommended as a tool for the early and differential diagnosis of Parkinson\'s disease (PD) in German and European clinical guidelines. Still, the brain structures to be examined for the diagnostic questions and the requirements for being a qualified investigator were not specified in detail. These issues have now been addressed in the 2023 update of the clinical guideline on PD by the German Society of Neurology (DGN).
    METHODS: The recommendations were based on a systematic literature review following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
    RESULTS: Three diagnostic questions were defined: (1) What is the accuracy of TCS in the differential diagnosis of PD versus atypical and secondary Parkinsonian syndromes? (2) What is the accuracy of TCS in the differential diagnosis of PD versus essential tremor? (3) What is the accuracy of TCS in the diagnosis of PD in persons with typical early symptoms, compared with the diagnosis established by clinical follow-up? The brain structures to be assessed and the level of recommendation were formulated for these questions. The training requirements for being regarded as qualified TCS investigator were stipulated by the responsible medical societies (German Society of Ultrasound in Medicine, DEGUM; German Society for Clinical Neurophysiology and Functional Imaging, DGKN). Finally, the recommendations for these diagnostic questions reached strong consensus (each ≥ 97%) of the guideline committee. Here, the details of review and recommendations are presented.
    CONCLUSIONS: The updated guideline clarifies the diagnostic uses and limitations of TCS in PD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:帕金森病(PD)患者通常会出现抑郁和焦虑等非运动症状,显著影响他们的生活质量。由于药物治疗的有效性有限,需要有效的非药物干预措施。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估认知行为疗法(CBT)在减轻PD患者抑郁和焦虑症状方面的功效。
    方法:纳入探讨CBT对PD患者抑郁和焦虑的有效性的随机对照试验(RCTs)。直到2023年4月发表的研究都是从PubMed确定的,WebofScience,还有Scopus.使用偏差风险2(ROB-2)工具评估方法学质量。统计分析涉及使用ReviewManager5.4.1计算标准化平均差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:系统评价包括12项研究,涉及241例PD患者。CBT导致焦虑大幅减少(SMD-0.95,95%CI[-1.15至-0.74],P<0.00001)和抑郁(SMD-1.02,95%CI[-1.39至-0.65],P<0.0001)。传统的CBT和远程CBT(通过电话或互联网进行)均可有效治疗抑郁症和焦虑症。传统CBT改善抑郁症(SMD-1.16,95%CI[-1.83至-0.49],P<0.00001),而远程CBT显示出可比的结果(SMD-0.90,95%CI[-1.31至-0.48],P<0.00001)。对于焦虑,两者都是传统的CBT(SMD-0.94,95%CI[-1.25至-0.63],P<0.00001)和远程CBT(SMD-0.95,95%CI[-1.22至-0.67],P<0.00001)症状显著减轻。总之,本系统综述和荟萃分析证明了CBT在降低PD患者抑郁和焦虑方面的疗效.鼓励医疗保健提供者将CBT纳入其治疗方案。然而,需要更多的高质量研究和长期随访评估,以进一步增进对这一领域的了解.
    CRD42023424758。
    BACKGROUND: Parkinson\'s disease (PD) patients often experience non-motor symptoms like depression and anxiety, significantly impacting their quality of life. With the limited effectiveness of pharmacological treatments, effective non-pharmacological interventions are needed. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in reducing depression and anxiety symptoms in PD patients.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) exploring CBT\'s effectiveness for depression and anxiety in PD patients were included. Studies published until April 2023 were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias-2 (ROB-2) tool. Statistical analysis involved calculating the standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Review Manager 5.4.1.
    RESULTS: The systematic review included 12 studies involving 241 PD patients. CBT led to a substantial reduction in anxiety (SMD -0.95, 95% CI [-1.15 to -0.74], P < 0.00001) and depression (SMD -1.02, 95% CI [-1.39 to -0.65], P < 0.0001). Both traditional CBT and tele-CBT (administered over the phone or internet) were effective in treating depression and anxiety. Traditional CBT improved depression (SMD -1.16, 95% CI [-1.83 to -0.49], P < 0.00001), while tele-CBT showed comparable results (SMD -0.90, 95% CI [-1.31 to -0.48], P < 0.00001). For anxiety, both traditional CBT (SMD -0.94, 95% CI [-1.25 to -0.63], P < 0.00001) and tele-CBT (SMD -0.95, 95% CI [-1.22 to -0.67], P < 0.00001) significantly reduced symptoms. In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of CBT in reducing depression and anxiety in PD patients. Healthcare providers are encouraged to integrate CBT into their treatment protocols. However, additional high-quality studies with longer-term follow-up assessments are needed to further enhance understanding in this area.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42023424758.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于相关的虚弱和畸形,帕金森病(PD)患者代表了具有挑战性的脊柱手术候选人。这项研究巩固了有关PD与非PD患者脊柱手术结果的文献。为了评估PD是否会使患者术后预后恶化,这样可以优化治疗方案。
    方法:对PubMed/Medline,Embase,和GoogleScholar数据库符合系统评论和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。感兴趣的研究包括接受脊柱器械融合的比较(PD与非PD)队列。对术后临床结果进行整理,并比较队列之间的显著性。根据所进行的不同外科手术对结果进行了进一步分析(颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF),胸腰椎或腰椎融合,胸腰椎或腰椎融合无骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折(OVCF)患者)。所有统计分析均使用R项目进行统计计算(4.1.2版),p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:总计,在16项研究中纳入了2,323,650名患者。其中,2,308,949(99.37%)是无PD(非PD)的患者,而14,701例(0.63%)患者在手术时患有PD。集体平均年龄为68.23岁(PD:70.14岁,非PD:64.86岁)。相对而言,男性844,641例(PD:4,574;非PD:840,067)和女性959,908例(PD:3,213;非PD:956,695)。总的来说,PD队列中有更多的术后并发症.具体来说,PD患者经历了明显更多的手术部位感染(p=0.01),与非PD队列相比,翻修手术率增加(p=0.04),静脉血栓栓塞事件增加(p=0.02).在无OVCF患者的胸腰椎/腰椎融合中,与非PD队列相比,PD队列的翻修手术率增加(p<0.01).然而,当包括胸腰椎/腰椎融合术中的OVCF患者时,PD队列的术后并发症明显较高(p=0.01),肺炎(p=0.02),与非PD队列相比,翻修手术(p<0.01)。
    结论:尽管还需要更有力的前瞻性研究,这项研究的结果强调了在术后期间需要先进的伤口护理管理,无论是在医院还是在社区,除了由专职医疗专业人员提供全面的多学科护理外,具有在接受脊柱器械融合的PD患者中使用增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案的潜力。
    BACKGROUND: Parkinson\'s Disease (PD) patients represent challenging spinal surgery candidates due to associated frailty and deformity. This study consolidates the literature concerning spinal surgery outcomes in PD versus non-PD patients, to evaluate if PD predisposes patients to worse post-operative outcomes, so that treatment protocols can be optimised.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar databases per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies of interest included comparative (PD versus non-PD) cohorts undergoing spinal instrumented fusions. Post-operative clinical outcomes were collated and compared for significance between cohorts. Further analysis was made on outcomes based on the different surgical procedures performed (Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF), Thoracolumbar or Lumbar fusions, Thoracolumbar or Lumbar fusions without Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression fracture (OVCF) patients). All statistical analysis was performed using The R Project for Statistical Computing (version 4.1.2), with a p-value of < 0.05 deemed statistically significant.
    RESULTS: In total, 2,323,650 patients were included across 16 studies. Of those, 2,308,949 (99.37%) were patients without PD (non-PD), while 14,701 (0.63%) patients had PD at time of surgery. The collective mean age was 68.23 years (PD: 70.14 years vs non-PD: 64.86 years). Comparatively, there were 844,641 males (PD: 4,574; non-PD: 840,067) and 959,908 females (PD: 3,213; non-PD: 956,695). Overall, there were more post-operative complications in the PD cohort. Specifically, PD patients experienced significantly more surgical site infections (p = 0.01), increased rates of revision surgeries (p = 0.04) and increased venous thromboembolic events (p = 0.02) versus the non-PD cohort. In thoracolumbar/lumbar spinal fusions without OVCF patients, the PD cohort had increased rates of revision surgeries (p < 0.01) in comparison to the non-PD cohort. However, when including OVCF patients in thoracolumbar/lumbar spinal fusions, the PD cohort had significantly higher amounts of postoperative complications (p = 0.01), pneumonia (p = 0.02), and revision surgeries (p < 0.01) when compared to the non-PD cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although more robust prospective studies are needed, the results of this study highlight the need for advanced wound care management in the postoperative period, both in-hospital and in the community, in addition to comprehensive multidisciplinary care from allied health professionals, with potential for the use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols in PD patients undergoing spinal instrumented fusions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有运动障碍的患者,如生活在偏远和服务不足地区的帕金森氏病(PD),通常只能有限地获得专门的医疗保健。虽然基于视频的检查的可行性和可靠性尚不清楚。这篇叙述性综述的目的是研究远程神经学评估的哪些部分在运动障碍中是可行和可靠的。临床研究表明,以视频为基础的神经学检查大部分是可行的,即使没有第三方,包括姿势和步态-如果不需要辅助装置-运动迟缓,震颤,肌张力障碍,一些眼活动部位,协调,以及总肌肉力量和感觉评估。技术问题(视频质量、互联网连接,摄像机放置)可能会影响运动迟缓和震颤评估,特别是在轻微的情况下,可能是由于他们的节奏。刚性,除非有训练有素的医疗保健专业人员在场,否则无法远程执行姿势不稳定和深肌腱反射。不完全统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)-III的修改版本以及缺乏刚性和拉力测试项目的相关方程可以可靠地预测总UPDRS-III。UPDRS-II,-IV,定时\"UpandGo\",非运动和生活质量量表可以远程管理,而远程运动障碍协会(MDS)-UPDRS-III需要进一步调查。总之,大部分神经学检查实际上可以在PD中进行,除了僵硬和姿势不稳定,而技术问题可能会影响轻度运动迟缓和震颤的评估。可穿戴设备的组合使用可以至少部分地补偿未来的这些挑战。
    Patients with movement disorders such as Parkinson\'s disease (PD) living in remote and underserved areas often have limited access to specialized healthcare, while the feasibility and reliability of the video-based examination remains unclear. The aim of this narrative review is to examine which parts of remote neurological assessment are feasible and reliable in movement disorders. Clinical studies have demonstrated that most parts of the video-based neurological examination are feasible, even in the absence of a third party, including stance and gait-if an assistive device is not required-bradykinesia, tremor, dystonia, some ocular mobility parts, coordination, and gross muscle power and sensation assessment. Technical issues (video quality, internet connection, camera placement) might affect bradykinesia and tremor evaluation, especially in mild cases, possibly due to their rhythmic nature. Rigidity, postural instability and deep tendon reflexes cannot be remotely performed unless a trained healthcare professional is present. A modified version of incomplete Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III and a related equation lacking rigidity and pull testing items can reliably predict total UPDRS-III. UPDRS-II, -IV, Timed \"Up and Go\", and non-motor and quality of life scales can be administered remotely, while the remote Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-UPDRS-III requires further investigation. In conclusion, most parts of neurological examination can be performed virtually in PD, except for rigidity and postural instability, while technical issues might affect the assessment of mild bradykinesia and tremor. The combined use of wearable devices may at least partially compensate for these challenges in the future.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管通过视频会议进行的有监督和实时远程康复现在在帕金森病(PD)患者中变得很普遍,其对平衡和步态的疗效尚不清楚。本文使用范围研究方法来回顾当前有关视频会议远程康复对PD患者平衡和步态影响的证据。我们还探讨了研究是否在远程康复期间使用可穿戴技术通过视频会议评估和治疗平衡和步态。使用PubMed进行文献检索,ISI的知识网,科克伦图书馆,和Embase。提取数据用于研究设计,治疗,和结果。本综述包括14项研究。其中,七项研究调查了远程康复的影响(例如,远程瑜伽和适应性理疗练习)平衡和步态测量(例如,自我报告的平衡,平衡秤,步行速度,移动性,和运动症状)在评估和治疗中使用视频会议。通过视频会议进行的远程康复计划对于患有PD的人来说是可行且安全的;但是,疗效还需要确定,因为只有四项研究有一个平行组。此外,没有研究使用可穿戴技术。没有发现视频会议远程康复对PD患者平衡和步态影响的有力证据,暗示未来有动力,prospective,需要强有力的临床试验。
    Although supervised and real-time telerehabilitation by videoconferencing is now becoming common for people with Parkinson\'s disease (PD), its efficacy for balance and gait is still unclear. This paper uses a scoping approach to review the current evidence on the effects of telerehabilitation by videoconferencing on balance and gait for patients with PD. We also explored whether studies have used wearable technology during telerehabilitation to assess and treat balance and gait via videoconferencing. Literature searches were conducted using PubMed, ISI\'s Web of Knowledge, Cochrane\'s Library, and Embase. The data were extracted for study design, treatment, and outcomes. Fourteen studies were included in this review. Of these, seven studies investigated the effects of telerehabilitation (e.g., tele-yoga and adapted physiotherapy exercises) on balance and gait measures (e.g., self-reported balance, balance scale, walking speed, mobility, and motor symptoms) using videoconferencing in both assessment and treatment. The telerehabilitation programs by videoconferencing were feasible and safe for people with PD; however, the efficacy still needs to be determined, as only four studies had a parallel group. In addition, no study used wearable technology. Robust evidence of the effects of telerehabilitation by videoconferencing on balance and gait for patients with PD was not found, suggesting that future powered, prospective, and robust clinical trials are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经性吞咽困难是由中枢神经系统和周围神经系统的问题引起的吞咽困难。在帕金森病和中风等疾病中尤为普遍。它严重影响受影响个人的生活质量,并造成额外负担,比如营养不良,吸入性肺炎,窒息,甚至因饮食不当而窒息而死亡。物理疗法提供高疗效和低成本的非侵入性治疗。支持在吞咽困难治疗中使用物理疗法的证据正在增加,包括神经肌肉电刺激等技术,感官刺激,经颅直流电刺激,重复经颅磁刺激.虽然初步研究显示出了有希望的结果,具体治疗方案的有效性仍需进一步验证.目前,缺乏科学证据来指导患者选择,制定适当的治疗方案,并准确评估治疗结果。因此,这篇综述的主要目的是回顾现有研究的结果,总结物理治疗在吞咽困难管理中的应用,我们还讨论了物理治疗神经性吞咽困难的机制和治疗方法。
    A neurogenic dysphagia is dysphagia caused by problems with the central and peripheral nervous systems, is particularly prevalent in conditions such as Parkinson\'s disease and stroke. It significantly impacts the quality of life for affected individuals and causes additional burdens, such as malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia, asphyxia, or even death from choking due to improper eating. Physical therapy offers a non-invasive treatment with high efficacy and low cost. Evidence supporting the use of physical therapy in dysphagia treatment is increasing, including techniques such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation, sensory stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. While initial studies have shown promising results, the effectiveness of specific treatment regimens still requires further validation. At present, there is a lack of scientific evidence to guide patient selection, develop appropriate treatment regimens, and accurately evaluate treatment outcomes. Therefore, the primary objectives of this review are to review the results of existing research, summarize the application of physical therapy in dysphagia management, we also discussed the mechanisms and treatments of physical therapy for neurogenic dysphagia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对随机对照试验进行了网络荟萃分析,以比较和排名各种非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对帕金森病(PD)的有效性。我们搜索了PubMed,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,Embase,中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方数据库,中国科技期刊数据库(VIP),和中国生物医学文献服务系统(SinoMed)数据库从数据库建立之日起至4月30日,2024.两名研究人员根据纳入和排除标准独立筛选了PD患者NIBS治疗的研究。两名研究人员使用Excel电子表格独立进行纳入研究的数据提取,并根据Cochrane偏差风险评估工具(RoB2)评估文献质量。StataMP17.0进行网络荟萃分析。共纳入28项研究,涉及1628名PD患者。结果表明,HF-rTMS高于SMA(SMD=-2.01;95%CI[-2.87,-1.15]),M1和DLPFC上的HF-rTMS(SMD=-1.80;95%CI[-2.90,-0.70]),M1上的HF-rTMS(SMD=-1.10;95%CI[-1.55,-0.65]),DLPFC上的a-tDCS(SMD=-1.08;95%CI[-1.90,-0.27]),M1和PFC上的HF-rTMS(SMD=-0.92;95%CI[-1.71,-0.14]),LF-rTMS超过M1(SMD=-0.72;95%CI[-1.17,-0.28]),与假刺激相比,与DLPFC相比,HF-rTMS(SMD=-0.70;95%CI[-1.21,-0.19])显着改善了运动功能。SUCRA排名最高的三个是HF-rTMS,高于SMA(95.1%),M1和DLPFC上的HF-rTMS(89.6%),和HF-rTMS超过M1(73.0%)。在增强认知功能方面,HF-rTMS优于DLPFC(SMD=0.80;95%CI[0.03,1.56])显著优于假刺激。SUCRA排名最高的三个是M1的a-tDCS(69.8%),DLPFC上的c-tDCS(66.9%),和iTBS超过DLPFC(65.3%)。超过M1的HF-rTMS(SMD=-1.43;95%CI[-2.26,-0.61])和超过DLPFC的HF-rTMS(SMD=-0.79;95%CI[-1.45,-0.12])显着改善了抑郁症。SUCRA排名最高的三个是M1以上的HF-rTMS(94.1%),LF-rTMS高于M1(71.8%),和HF-rTMS超过DLPFC(69.0%)。HF-rTMS超过SMA可能是改善PD患者运动症状的最佳选择。M1上的a-tDCS和HF-rTMS可能是对认知和抑郁影响最显著的NIBS,分开。试验注册:国际前瞻性系统审查注册,PROSPERO(CRD42023456088)。
    A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials was conducted to compare and rank the effectiveness of various noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) for Parkinson\'s disease (PD). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System (SinoMed) databases from the date of database inception to April 30th, 2024. Two researchers independently screened studies of NIBS treatment in patients with PD based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers independently performed data extraction of the included studies using an Excel spreadsheet and assessed the quality of the literature according to the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (RoB2). Network meta-analysis was performed in StataMP 17.0. A total of 28 studies involving 1628 PD patients were included. The results showed that HF-rTMS over the SMA (SMD = - 2.01; 95% CI [- 2.87, - 1.15]), HF-rTMS over the M1 and DLPFC (SMD = - 1.80; 95% CI [- 2.90, - 0.70]), HF-rTMS over the M1 (SMD = - 1.10; 95% CI [- 1.55, - 0.65]), a-tDCS over the DLPFC (SMD = - 1.08; 95% CI [- 1.90, - 0.27]), HF-rTMS over the M1 and PFC (SMD = - 0.92; 95% CI [- 1.71, - 0.14]), LF-rTMS over the M1 (SMD = - 0.72; 95% CI [- 1.17, - 0.28]), and HF-rTMS over the DLPFC (SMD = - 0.70; 95% CI [- 1.21, - 0.19]) were significantly improved motor function compared with sham stimulation. The SUCRA three highest ranked were HF-rTMS over the SMA (95.1%), HF-rTMS over the M1 and DLPFC (89.6%), and HF-rTMS over the M1 (73.0%). In terms of enhanced cognitive function, HF-rTMS over the DLPFC (SMD = 0.80; 95% CI [0.03,1.56]) was significantly better than sham stimulation. The SUCRA three most highly ranked were a-tDCS over the M1 (69.8%), c-tDCS over the DLPFC (66.9%), and iTBS over the DLPFC (65.3%). HF-rTMS over the M1 (SMD = - 1.43; 95% CI [- 2.26, - 0.61]) and HF-rTMS over the DLPFC (SMD = - 0.79; 95% CI [- 1.45, - 0.12)]) significantly improved depression. The SUCRA three highest ranked were HF-rTMS over the M1 (94.1%), LF-rTMS over the M1 (71.8%), and HF-rTMS over the DLPFC (69.0%). HF-rTMS over the SMA may be the best option for improving motor symptoms in PD patients. a-tDCS and HF-rTMS over the M1 may be the NIBS with the most significant effects on cognition and depression, separately.Trial registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Review, PROSPERO (CRD42023456088).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号