UNASSIGNED: Solitary fibrous tumor/meningeal hemangiopericytoma (SFT/M-HPC) is a rare neoplasm which accounts for around 1% of the intracranial masses. This pathology has a high risk for recurrence and metastasis to distant locations such as the liver, lungs, and bones. Precise diagnosis necessitates detailed histopathological examination.
UNASSIGNED: We present two case reports of SFT/M-HPC. The first case is a 44-year-old female who presented with headache, nausea, vomiting, and frontal ataxia for several months. Imaging findings showed a large parasagittal extra-axial mass with compression of the frontal horns of both lateral ventricles. She underwent gross total resection with an uncomplicated postoperative period. The patient had no recurrent tumors or distal metastases in the follow-up period of 5 years. The second case is a 48-year-old male who presented with right-sided hemianopsia and hemiparesis. Computed tomography (CT) scans revealed a large parieto-occipital extra-axial mass with superior sagittal sinus engulfment and dislocation of the interhemispheric fissure. He underwent gross total resection with an uncomplicated postoperative period. Six years later, he presented with right-sided weakness. CT scan showed a multifocal recurrent mass at the previous location. He underwent subtotal resection with an uncomplicated postoperative period.
UNASSIGNED: SFT/M-HPC should be considered when presented with a meningioma-like tumor mass on preoperative imaging. Immunohistochemical study is crucial for the correct diagnosis. Strict long-term follow-up examinations and regular magnetic resonance imaging scans are key to preventing the appearance of metastases and large recurrent masses.

BACKGROUND: Chondromas are benign cartilaginous tumors that are rarely seen in the brain.
METHODS: A 58-year-old woman had undergone routine brain imaging after a motor vehicle accident and was incidentally found to have a right falcine lesion. Contrast magnetic resonance imaging showed a mostly nonenhancing mass with discontinuous rim enhancement. She was taken to the operating room and pathology revealed a chondroma.
CONCLUSIONS: Falcine intracranial chondromas are rare and typically misdiagnosed as meningiomas. Chondromas should be in the differential for patients presenting with nonenhancing falcine lesions.

Foot drop represents a very common reason for a neurologist referral and is often first seen in emergency departments or by a general practitioner. This condition is defined as weakness of ankle dorsiflexion (mainly through tibialis anterior muscle weakness). The most common causes include lower motor neuron lesion, with L4-L5 radiculopathy and peroneal neuropathy being the most frequent ones. Classical diagnostic pathway includes a thorough medical history, detailed neurological examination, radiological studies (MRI of the lumbosacral spine), EMG and nerve conduction studies, and a battery of laboratory tests. The absence of abnormal radiological and neurophysiological findings when searching for the most common causes of foot drop, should raise a red flag and broaden the diagnostic yield for central nervous system pathology (upper motor neuron, UMN) as a possible cause of foot drop. Central causes of isolated foot drop are very rare, with less than 20 cases reported in literature so far, and seven of them being a meningioma. We present a case of a 79-year-old female patient with an isolated foot drop (with no UMN signs on the initial examination) and parasagittal meningioma. Central causes of foot drop should be suspected when foot drop is associated with UMN signs on examination (hyperreflexia of the patellar or ankle jerk and extensor plantar reflex) and when standard diagnostic work-up (MRI of the lumbar spine, EMG and NCS, standard laboratory screening for most common causes of foot drop) is negative or inconclusive. Although very rare, central lesions present a far more serious cause of foot drop and require a more urgent diagnostic work up and a potential neurosurgical referral and treatment. Keeping in mind the possible central causes of foot drop would eliminate unnecessary diagnostic work up and avoid delayed diagnosis and treatment.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial cause of isolated unilateral foot drop is very rare. There may be a delay in the diagnosis of the cause of central foot drop or patients with such lesions might be misdiagnosed and subjected to unnecessary interventions. One of the reasons for the diagnostic uncertainty might be the absence of upper motor neuron (UMN) signs in the initial examination of such patients.
METHODS: We present a very rare case of a 78-year-old woman who had presented with a five-year progressive right-sided unilateral isolated foot drop from a left-sided parasagittal tumor. Previously, she had undergone biopsy of an abnormality on the right C7/T1 facet, which was found to be benign. On examination of the patient, she had UMN signs in the ipsilateral foot. On magnetic resonance imaging scan of her head, a 3-cm left parasagittal lesion, consistent with it being a meningioma, was noted. The patient had significant medical history and declined to undergo surgical removal of the lesion.
CONCLUSIONS: We review the literature on central foot drop from various intracranial pathologies and discern its clinical features. Patients with central foot drop often have UMN signs; however, these may be absent causing diagnostic uncertainty, and physicians should be vigilant of these variations in the presentation.