UNASSIGNED: Assessing the perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) based solely on individual complications is not comprehensive, and the association between perioperative outcomes and the long-term prognosis of individuals diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains uncertain. Our study is designed to evaluate the impact of a novel composite indicator, textbook outcomes (TO), on the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing PD for PDAC.
UNASSIGNED: This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 139 patients who underwent PD for pathologically confirmed PDAC at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2021. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 111 patients were included in the subsequent analysis. These patients were categorized into two groups: the non-TO group (n=42) and the TO group (n=69). The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was employed to describe the relationship between TO and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was employed to assess the impact of achieving TO on long-term survival. Logistic regression was employed to investigate the risk factors affecting the achievement of TO.
UNASSIGNED: Out of the 111 PDAC patients, 69 (62.2%) achieved TO following PD. The achievement of TO significantly improved the OS of PDAC patients [P=0.03; hazard ratio (HR) =0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.37-0.83]. Cox regression analysis indicated that achieving TO was a protective factor for OS (P=0.04; HR =4.08; 95% CI: 1.07-15.61). Logistic regression analysis indicated that high amylase in drainage fluid on the third day after surgery (>1,300 U/L) was detrimental to achieve TO [odds ratio (OR) =0.10; 95% CI: 0.02-0.58; P=0.01], longer surgery durations (≥6.25 hours) was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.19; 95% CI: 0.06-0.54; P=0.002), and soft pancreatic texture was detrimental to achieve TO (OR =0.31; 95% CI: 0.10-0.93, P=0.04).
UNASSIGNED: Achievement of TO significantly improves the OS of PDAC patients and has the potential to serve as a robust prognostic indicator. Looking ahead, it is highly necessary for TO to become a standard surgical quality control measure in hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Complete surgical removal of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is central to all curative treatment approaches for this aggressive disease, yet this is only possible in patients technically amenable to resection. Hence, an accurate assessment of whether patients are suitable for surgery is of paramount importance. The SCANPatient trial aims to test whether implementing a structured synoptic radiological report results in increased institutional accuracy in defining surgical resectability of non-metastatic PDAC.
METHODS: SCANPatient is a batched, stepped wedge, comparative effectiveness, cluster randomised clinical trial. The trial will be conducted at 33 Australian hospitals all of which hold regular multi-disciplinary team meetings (MDMs) to discuss newly diagnosed patients with PDAC. Each site is required to manage a minimum of 20 patients per year (across all stages). Hospitals will be randomised to begin synoptic reporting within a batched, stepped wedge design. Initially all hospitals will continue to use their current reporting method; within each batch, after each 6-month period, a randomly selected group of hospitals will commence using the synoptic reports, until all hospitals are using synoptic reporting. Each hospital will provide data from patients who (i) are aged 18 or older; (ii) have suspected PDAC and have an abdominal CT scan, and (iii) are presented at a participating MDM. Non-metastatic patients will be documented as one of the following categories: (1) locally advanced and surgically unresectable; (2) borderline resectable; or (3) anatomically clearly resectable (Note: Metastatic disease is treated as a separate category). Data collection will last for 36 months in each batch, and a total of 2400 patients will be included.
CONCLUSIONS: Better classifying patients with non-metastatic PDAC as having tumours that are either clearly resectable, borderline or locally advanced and unresectable may improve patient outcomes by optimising care and treatment planning. The borderline resectable group are a small but important cohort in whom surgery with curative intent may be considered; however, inconsistencies with definitions and an understanding of resectability status means these patients are often incorrectly classified and hence overlooked for curative options.
BACKGROUND: The SCANPatient trial was registered on 17th May 2023 in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) (ACTRN12623000508673).

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with a highly immunosuppressive microenvironment. This single-blind, randomized study aimed to evaluate the synergistic immunomodulatory effects of synbiotics (probiotics and inulin prebiotics), as well as their impact on postoperative complications and outcomes, compared to the use of probiotics alone. Ninety patients diagnosed with PDAC were enrolled and randomly assigned into three groups: the placebo group, the probiotics group (receiving a mixture of ten strains of Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus bacteria at a dose of 25 billion CFUs), and the synbiotics group (the same probiotics along with inulin prebiotics). The interventions were administered for 14 days before the surgery and continued for one month postoperatively. Tumor tissue infiltration of CD8 + T cells and the expression of IFN γ were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Inflammatory cytokines concentrations, including Il 1 B, IL 6, and IL 10, were evaluated as well by ELISA at various time points pre- and postoperative. Furthermore, patients were followed up after the surgery to assess postoperative short-term outcomes. Our results showed a significant elevation of CD8 + T cell proportion and IFN γ expression in the synbiotics group compared to the probiotics group (p = 0.049, p = 0.013, respectively). Inflammatory cytokines showed a significant gradual decrease in the synbiotics group compared to placebo and probiotics-treated groups (p = 0.000 for both). Administration of synbiotics and probiotics significantly decreased the rate of postoperative complications including anastomotic leakage, diarrhea, and abdominal distension (p = 0.032, p = 0.044, p = 0.042, respectively), with a remarkable reduction in bacteremia in the synbiotics group. These results revealed that this synbiotics formulation potentially enhances the immune response and reduces complications associated with surgery.Clinical trial identification: NCT06199752 (27-12-2023).

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of chemotherapy in different histological types of pancreatic cancer using data collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients who were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer between 2004 and 2015 were selected from the SEER database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize the selection bias. The Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the log-rank test were utilized to compare the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) among different groups. Of the 7,653 pancreatic cancer patients, both OS and CSS were higher in the chemotherapy group than those in the non-chemotherapy group (p < 0.001). After PSM, 2381 pairs were generated. The Kaplan-Meier survival curved indicated that both OS and CSS for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC), and pancreatic mucin-producing adenocarcinoma (PMPAC) (p < 0.001) in the chemotherapy group were superior to those in the non-chemotherapy group, while there was no significant difference in pancreatic mucinous adenocarcinoma (PMAC) (p = 0.2586). Compared with PASC and PMPAC, PDAC exhibited longer OS and CSS. The results of statistical analysis showed that PASC tumors were mainly poorly differentiated, and the majority of patients with PMPAC had distant metastasis. Chemotherapy could prolong pancreatic cancer patients\' survival, especially for patients with advanced disease. PMPAC patients had a higher rate of metastasis, accompanying with the worse survival.

The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex is a multimeric protein involved in transcription regulation and DNA damage repair. SWI/SNF complex abnormalities are observed in approximately 14-34 % of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Herein, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of a subset of the SWI/SNF complex proteins (ARID1A, SMARCA4/BRG1, SMARCA2/BRM, and SMARCB1/INI1) within our PDAC tissue microarray to determine whether SWI/SNF loss is associated with any clinicopathologic features or patient survival in PDAC. In our cohort, 13 of 353 (3.7 %) PDACs showed deficient SWI/SNF complex expression, which included 11 (3.1 %) with ARID1A loss, 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA4/BRG1 loss, and 1 (0.3 %) with SMARCA2/BRM loss. All cases were SMARCB1/INI1 proficient. The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were more frequently identified in older patients with a mean age of 71.6 years (SD = 7.78) compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs which occurred at a mean age of 65.2 years (SD = 10.95) (P = 0.013). The SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs were associated with higher histologic grade, compared to the SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (P = 0.029). No other significant clinicopathologic differences were noted between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs. On follow-up, no significant differences were seen for overall survival and progression-free survival between SWI/SNF-deficient and SWI/SNF-proficient PDACs (both with P > 0.05). In summary, SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs most frequently demonstrate ARID1A loss. SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs are associated with older age and higher histologic grade. No other significant associations among other clinicopathologic parameters were seen in SWI/SNF-deficient PDACs including survival.

UNASSIGNED: No study has compared EUS-guided radiofrequency ablation (EUS-RFA) plus systemic chemotherapy (CMT) with CMT alone for unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
UNASSIGNED: This study compared the results of treatment in patients receiving EUS-RFA plus concomitant CMT (group A; n = 14) with those receiving CMT (group B; n = 14) as a pilot study.
UNASSIGNED: From July 2017 to August 2018, 4 and 2 patients from groups A and B, respectively, withdrew from the study because of progression of the disease. In total, 10 and 12 patients from groups A and B, respectively, completed the study. All 30 EUS-RFA procedures were successful. Mean maximal tumor diameter before treatment of group A (n = 10) versus B (n = 12) was 62.2 ± 21.0 versus 50.5 ± 22.0 mm, respectively (P = not significant). After treatment, no statistically significant difference in mean maximal tumor diameter was found between both groups. However, in group B, mean maximal tumor diameter was significantly increased from 50.5 ± 22.0 to 56.3 ± 18.7 mm, respectively (P = 0.017). Tumor necrosis occurred in group A versus B at 10 of 10 (100%) versus 6 of 12 (50%) patients, respectively (P = 0.014). After treatment, group A patients could reduce the mean narcotic pain drug dosage at 26.5 mg of morphine equivalent per day (from 63.6 to 37.1 mg, P = 0.022), whereas group B patients could not reduce the dosage of pain-controlled medication. No statistically significant difference in 6-month mortality rate was found. In group A, 1 procedure-related nonsevere adverse event (n = 1 of 30 [3.3%]) occurred in 1 patient (n = 1 of 14 [7.1%]).
UNASSIGNED: In this study, the mean tumor diameter of group B was significantly increased after the treatment. Group A had a significantly higher rate of necrosis of tumor and required less narcotic.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic cancer is the most common pancreatic solid malignancy with an aggressive clinical course and low survival rate. There are a limited number of reliable prognostic biomarkers and a need to understand the pathogenesis of pancreatic tumors; neuroendocrine (PNET) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC) encouraged us to analyze the serum metabolome of pancreatic tumors and disturbances in the metabolism of PDAC and PNET.
METHODS: Using the AbsoluteIDQ® p180 kit (Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria) with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we identified changes in metabolite profiles and disrupted metabolic pathways serum of NET and PDAC patients.
RESULTS: The concentration of six metabolites showed statistically significant differences between the control group and PDAC patients (p.adj < 0.05). Glutamine (Gln), acetylcarnitine (C2), and citrulline (Cit) presented a lower concentration in the serum of PDAC patients, while phosphatidylcholine aa C32:0 (PC aa C32:0), sphingomyelin C26:1 (SM C26:1), and glutamic acid (Glu) achieved higher concentrations compared to serum samples from healthy individuals. Five of the tested metabolites: C2 (FC = 8.67), and serotonin (FC = 2.68) reached higher concentration values in the PNET serum samples compared to PDAC, while phosphatidylcholine aa C34:1 (PC aa C34:1) (FC = -1.46 (0.68)) had a higher concentration in the PDAC samples. The area under the curves (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves presented diagnostic power to discriminate pancreatic tumor patients, which were highest for acylcarnitines: C2 with AUC = 0.93, serotonin with AUC = 0.85, and PC aa C34:1 with AUC = 0.86.
CONCLUSIONS: The observations presented provide better insight into the metabolism of pancreatic tumors, and improve the diagnosis and classification of tumors. Serum-circulating metabolites can be easily monitored without invasive procedures and show the present clinical patients\' condition, helping with pharmacological treatment or dietary strategies.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive and lethal malignancy with a high rate of recurrence and a dismal 5-year survival rate. Contributing to the poor prognosis of PDAC is the lack of early detection, a complex network of signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms, a dense and desmoplastic stroma, and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. A recent shift toward a neoadjuvant approach to treating PDAC has been sparked by the numerous benefits neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has to offer compared with upfront surgery. However, certain aspects of NAT against PDAC, including the optimal regimen, the use of radiotherapy, and the selection of patients that would benefit from NAT, have yet to be fully elucidated. This review describes the major signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms involved in PDAC initiation and progression in addition to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of PDAC. We then review current guidelines, ongoing research, and future research directions on the use of NAT based on randomized clinical trials and other studies. Finally, the current use of and research regarding targeted therapy for PDAC are examined. This review bridges the molecular understanding of PDAC with its clinical significance, development of novel therapies, and shifting directions in treatment paradigm.

Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a type of lethal gastrointestinal malignancy. It is mainly discovered at, and diagnosed with, an advanced stage of metastasis. As the only potentially curative treatment for PDAC, surgical resection has an uncertain impact on the survival of these patients. As such, we aimed to investigate if patients with metastatic PDAC (mPDAC) benefit from surgery. Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer in 18 registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2000 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. According to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), the eighth edition staging system was utilized. Propensity score matching was applied to strengthen the comparability of the study. The impact of surgery on survival was evaluated by restricted mean survival time (RMST) and Kaplan−Meier analysis. Results: A total of 210 well-matched mPDAC patients were included in the study. The 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year overall survival (OS) of patients undergoing surgery was 34.3%, 15.2%, and 11.0%, respectively. The 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year cancer-specific survival (CSS) of these patients was 36.1%, 19.7%, and 14.2%, respectively. RMST analysis revealed that mPDAC patients with surgery had better OS and CSS than those without (OS: 9.49 months vs. 6.45 months, p < 0.01; CSS: 9.76 months vs. 6.54 months, p < 0.01). Nevertheless, subgroup analysis demonstrated that such statistical significance especially existed in oligometastatic PDAC patients, which refers to those metastases that were limited in number and concentrated to a single organ in this study. Additionally, surgery was identified as a significant predictor for the long-term prognosis of patients (OS: [HR, hazard ratio] = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.36−0.65, p < 0.001; CSS: HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.33−0.63, p < 0.001). Lastly, a nomogram was established to predict whether an individual was suitable for surgical treatment in this study. Conclusions: Surgical resection significantly prolonged the long-term prognosis of oligometastatic PDAC patients. Such insights might broaden the management of patients with mPDAC to a large extent. However, a prospective clinical trial should be conducted before a recommendation of surgery in these patients.

BACKGROUND: Personalized and effective treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) continue to remain elusive. Novel clinical trial designs that enable continual and rapid evaluation of novel therapeutics are needed. Here, we describe a platform clinical trial to address this unmet need.
METHODS: This is a phase II study using a Bayesian platform design to evaluate multiple experimental arms against a control arm in patients with PDAC. We first separate patients into three clinical stage groups of localized PDAC (resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced disease), and further divide each stage group based on treatment history (treatment naïve or previously treated). The clinical stage and treatment history therefore define 6 different cohorts, and each cohort has one control arm but may have one or more experimental arms running simultaneously. Within each cohort, adaptive randomization rules are applied and patients will be randomized to either an experimental arm or the control arm accordingly. The experimental arm(s) of each cohort are only compared to the applicable cohort specific control arm. Experimental arms may be added independently to one or more cohorts during the study. Multiple correlative studies for tissue, blood, and imaging are also incorporated.
CONCLUSIONS: To date, PDAC has been treated as a single disease, despite knowledge that there is substantial heterogeneity in disease presentation and biology. It is recognized that the current approach of single arm phase II trials and traditional phase III randomized studies are not well-suited for more personalized treatment strategies in PDAC. The PIONEER Panc platform clinical trial is designed to overcome these challenges and help advance our treatment strategies for this deadly disease.
BACKGROUND: This study is approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of MD Anderson Cancer Center, IRB-approved protocol 2020-0075. The PIONEER trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) NCT04481204 .