未经证实:先前对颌骨坏死(ONJ)的药物基因组学研究有各种方法学限制,包括使用候选基因选择作为他们唯一的策略,少数ONJ病例,或基于肿瘤学背景的研究人群。
UNASSIGNED:我们的病例对照研究的目的是评估先前报道的遗传因素与ONJ之间的关联,基于全基因组关联研究(GWAS)或候选基因方法。此外,我们的目的是通过使用GWAS测定单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)来确定ONJ的遗传危险因素,这些多态性在ONJ患者和对照组之间的频率有统计学显著差异.
UNASSIGNED:纳入经医学证实的ONJ患者和在ONJ患者的斯堪的纳维亚队列中注册的患者。来自普通人群的对照在年龄上匹配(±5岁),性别,和累积抗吸收药物暴露。病例的ONJ诊断日期与匹配对照的索引日期相对应。DNA分离,基因分型,数据分析由Q2/EA基因组学使用标准方案和最佳实践进行。收集55个ONJ病例和125个对照的血液或组织样本。由于组织样本质量低,最终分析基于40例ONJ病例和124例对照的血液样本.
UNASSIGNED:我们没有检测到显著的全基因组关联。在先前研究中与ONJ关联的43个SNP中,我们的研究中没有重复.
未经评估:尽管我们的研究样本是迄今为止最大的,我们对GWAS的统计能力有限,但对复制分析有足够的能力.我们的研究没有提供任何ONJ遗传易感性的证据。未来的研究可以通过结合ONJGWAS数据集并进行荟萃分析或采用测序策略来识别罕见变异,从而提高其统计能力。
UNASSIGNED: Prior studies of the pharmacogenomics of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) have had various methodological limitations, including using candidate gene selection as their sole strategy, a small number of ONJ cases, or a study population based on an oncology setting.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of our
case-control study was to evaluate previously reported associations between genetic factors and ONJ, which were based on either genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or candidate gene approaches. Furthermore, we aimed to identify genetic risk factors for ONJ by using GWAS to determine single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with statistically significant differences in frequency between ONJ patients and osteoporosis controls.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with medically confirmed ONJ and who were registered in the Scandinavian Cohort of ONJ patients were included. Controls from the general population were matched on age (±5 years), sex, and cumulative antiresorptive drug exposure. The ONJ diagnosis date for cases corresponded to the index date for matched controls. DNA isolation, genotyping, and data analyses were performed by Q2/EA Genomics using standard protocols and best practices. Blood or tissue samples for 55 ONJ cases and 125 controls were collected. Due to the low quality of the tissue samples, final analyses were based on blood samples of 40 ONJ cases and 124 controls.
UNASSIGNED: We detected no significant genome-wide associations. Of the 43 SNPs with ONJ association in prior studies, none were replicated in our study.
UNASSIGNED: Even though our study sample is the largest to date, we had limited statistical power for GWAS but adequate power for replication analyses. Our study provides no evidence for any genetic predisposition to ONJ. Future studies could increase their statistical power by combining ONJ GWAS datasets and by performing a meta-analysis or pursuing a sequencing strategy in order to identify rare variants.