OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature regarding the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC), while also discussing the mid-long term functional outcomes, complications, and surgical failure rate.
METHODS: We searched Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for studies on OLT treated with AMIC with an average follow-up of at least 2 years. Publication information, patient data, functional scores, surgical failure rate, and complications were extracted.
RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were screened and included, with 12 case series selected for meta-analysis and 3 non-randomized controlled studies chosen for descriptive analysis. The improvements in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot, and Tegner scores at the last follow-up were (SMD = - 2.825, 95% CI - 3.343 to  - 2.306, P < 0.001), (SMD = 2.73, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.86, P < 0.001), (SMD = 0.85, 95% CI 0.5 to 1.2, P < 0.001) respectively compared to preoperative values. The surgery failure rate was 11% (95% CI 8-15%), with a total of 12 patients experiencing complications.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of AMIC demonstrates a positive impact on pain management, functional improvement, and mobility enhancement in patients with OLT. It is worth noting that the choice of stent for AMIC, patient age, and OLT size can influence the ultimate clinical outcomes. This study provides evidences supporting the safety and efficacy of AMIC as a viable treatment option in real-world medical practice.

The lateral talar dome osteochondral fracture has been described as shallow or wafer-shaped and is more likely to have an associated flake fracture than medial injuries. Displacement into the extracurricular space, however, is a rare occurrence. We present a case of ankle trauma with persistent pain and edema. A CT scan revealed a displaced osteochondral fracture of the lateral dome of the talus and an avulsion fracture of the tip of the medial malleolus. After appropriate dissection and exposure, the fragment was found below the skin, outside the ankle joint capsule. The fragment was fixed to the neck of the talus, and the deltoid ligament and anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament were repaired. After a one-year follow-up, full recovery was achieved without pain, stiffness, or osteonecrosis of the displaced fragment. Although the extra-articular displacement of lateral talar dome osteochondral fractures is rare, it should be considered when assessing ankle trauma.

OBJECTIVE: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate can be used as an additive to surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. This systematic literature review aims to study the effect of the additional use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate on top of a surgical treatment for osteochondral lesions of the talus on clinical outcomes compared to surgical treatment alone.
METHODS: An online literature search was conducted using PubMed (Medline), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane library for all studies comparing a surgical intervention with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, with a surgical intervention without bone marrow aspirate concentrate. The methodological quality was rated according to the methodological index for non-randomised studies checklist. The primary outcome measure were clinical outcomes. Secondary outcome measures consisted of revision rate, complication rate, radiographic outcome measures and histological analyses. Subgroups were created based on type of surgical intervention used in the studies. If multiple articles were included in a subgroup, a linear random-effects model was used to compare the bone marrow aspirate concentrate-augmented group with the control group.
RESULTS: Out of 1006 studies found, eight studies with a total of 718 patients were included. The methodological quality, assessed according to the methodological index for non-randomised studies checklist, was weak. A significantly better functional outcome measures (p < 0.05) was found in the subgroup treated with bone marrow stimulation + bone marrow aspirate concentrate compared to the group treated with bone marrow stimulation alone, based on three non-blinded studies. No significant differences regarding clinical outcomes were found in the subgroups comparing matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation with matrix-induced bone marrow aspirate concentrate, osteochondral autologous transplantation alone with osteochondral autologous transplantation + bone marrow aspirate concentrate and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis plus peripheral blood concentrate vs. matrix-associated stem cell transplantation bone marrow aspirate concentrate.
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support a positive effect on clinical outcomes of bone marrow aspirate concentrate as an additive to surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus. However, based on the safety reports and initial results, sufficiently powered, patient- and researcher-blinded, prospective randomised controlled trials are justified and recommended. Until then, we advise not to implement a therapy (addition of bone marrow aspirate concentrate) without clinical evidence that justifies the additional costs involved.
METHODS: Level III.

暂无摘要。

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous serum containing higher concentrations of platelets and growth factors above normal blood. The process of obtaining PRP involves the extraction of blood from the patient which is then centrifuged to obtain a concentrated suspension of platelets. PRP continues to evolve as a potential treatment modality with many applications in orthopaedic surgery. The therapeutic components of PRP possess numerous theoretical regenerative properties. The present manuscript outlines how PRP is prepared, noting the tremendous variability between preparation protocols. Given the growing body of evidence examining the use of PRP in pathologies of the foot and ankle, we assess its efficacy as it relates to our field. Specifically, we evaluate the literature in the past five years regarding the role of PRP in treating plantar fasciitis, Achilles tendinopathy, insertional Achilles tendinitis, Achilles tendon ruptures, osteochondral lesions of the talus, hallux rigidus, and ankle osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to assess the overall clinical success rate of non-operative management for osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT).
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in the PubMed (MEDLINE), COCHRANE and EMBASE (Ovid) databases. Clinical success rates per separate study were calculated at the latest moment of follow-up and were defined as successful when a good or excellent clinical result at follow-up was reported in a qualitative manner or when a post-operative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score at or above 80 was reached. When clinical outcomes were based on other clinical scoring systems, outcomes reported as good or excellent were considered as clinical success. Studies methodologically eligible for a simplified pooling method were combined to calculate an overall pooled clinical success rate. Radiological changes over the course of conservative treatment were assessed either considering local OLT changes and/or overall ankle joint changes.
RESULTS: Thirty articles were included, including an overall of 868 patients. The median follow-up of the included studies was 37 months (range: 3-288 months). A simplified pooling method was possible among 16 studies and yielded an overall pooled clinical success rate of 45% (95% CI 40-50%). As assessed with plain radiographs, progression of ankle joint osteoarthritis was observed in of 9% (95% CI 6-14%) of the patients. As assessed through a Computed Tomography (CT) scan, focal OLT deterioration was observed in 11% (95% CI 7-18%) of the patients. As assessed with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scan, focal OLT deterioration was observed in 12% (95% CI 6-24%) of the patients. An unchanged lesion was detected on plain radiographs in 53% (48/91; CI 43-63%), 76% (99/131; 95% CI 68-82%) on a CT scan and on MRI in 84% (42/50; 95% CI 71-92%) of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The current literature on non-operative management of OLTs is scarce and heterogeneous on indication and type of treatment. Promising clinical results are presented but need to interpreted with caution due to the heterogeneity in indication, duration and type of treatment. Further studies need to focus on specific types on conservative management, indications and its results.
METHODS: Systematic review, Level IV.

The purpose of this review is to develop evidence-based practices for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to treat osseous pathologies of the lower extremity. There is moderate high-quality evidence to support the efficacy of PRP as a surgical augment to microfracture in osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT). The literature supports a conceivable positive impact on bony union and osseous healing. There is insufficient evidence to support PRP injections in the conservative management of OLT or symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis. PRP may serve as a viable treatment method in the surgical augmentation of microfracture surgery in OLT and has promise for increasing bony union following surgical operations. Further high-quality, comparative studies with longer clinical follow-up are required.
The purpose of this review is to develop evidence-based practices for the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to treat bony pathologies of the lower extremity. There is moderate high-quality evidence to support the use of PRP in surgery to treat damage of both cartilage and bone in the foot. The literature supports a conceivable positive impact on bony healing after fracture. There is insufficient evidence to support PRP injections in the conservative management symptomatic ankle osteoarthritis. PRP may augment bone stimulation surgery in cases of cartilage and bone defects with promise for increasing bone to bone healing following surgical operations. Further high-quality, comparative studies with longer clinical follow-up are required.

BACKGROUND: Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common after ankle trauma. Studies have shown that bioactive substances, such as hyaluronic acid (HA), alone, or in combination, with surgical treatment could improve cartilage regeneration and repair, but the effect of HA on patient reported outcomes is unclear.
METHODS: Literature searches were performed across four databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and The Cochrane Library) for randomized controlled trials in which at least one treatment arm involved use of HA as an adjunct to microfracture to treat patients with OLT. Primary outcomes included the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scores (AOFAS), and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. The level of evidence and methodological quality were evaluated using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (MCMS).
RESULTS: Three randomized studies were eligible for review with a total of 132 patients (35, 40, 57 patients, respectively) and follow-up ranged from 10.5 to 25 months. Utilization of HA at the time of microfracture resulted in greater improvement in AOFAS scores compared to microfracture alone. The pooled effect size was moderate (Standardized Mean Difference [SMD] 0.45, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.06, 0.84; P = .02) and between-study heterogeneity was low (I-squared = 0%). Utilization of HA during microfracture also led to greater improvement in VAS-pain scores compared to microfracture alone. The pooled effect size was very large (SMD -3.86, 95% CI -4.75, - 2.97; P < .001) and heterogeneity was moderate (I-squared = 69%).
CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronic acid injection as an adjunct to arthroscopic MF in OLT provides clinically important improvements in function and pain at short-term follow-up compared to MF alone. Future longer-term follow-up studies are warranted to investigate the durability of MF with HA for treatment of OLT.

Osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) are common injuries requiring surgery. Arthroscopic microfracture treatment is effective and acceptable. Although the concept of postoperative rehabilitation is continuously being updated, the choice between early weightbearing (EWB) versus delayed weightbearing (DWB) following microfracture is still not settled. A meta-analysis and systematic review was performed to compare the rehabilitation effect of 2 different weightbearing protocols following microfracture. Five databases were searched for relevant studies, and full-text articles comparing EWB and DWB were reviewed. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to summarize the results of the included studies. Two reviewers independently filtered the studies, assessed quality, extracted data, and estimated the risk of bias. The pain score and functional assessment of the ankle were selected as the endpoints. The mean difference was calculated as the summary statistic for continuous data. Then, visual analog scale and American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale scores were collected and pooled. Five randomized controlled trials including 283 patients were identified for this study, revealing that there was no significant difference in pain scores between EWB and DWB following microfracture 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months postoperatively. Function assessment showed similar results. Comprehensive analysis of current evidence still suggests that EWB and DWB after microfracture of OLT produce comparable clinical outcomes in terms of pain and functional activity. Therefore, EWB is recommended to shorten the length of time before returning to work or sports after microfracture of OLT.