Oral anticoagulation

口服抗凝
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:亚临床甲状腺功能异常是房颤(AF)和卒中风险的标志。本研究探讨了根据促甲状腺激素(TSH)水平进行AF筛查的效果。
    方法:根据基线TSH对AF筛查试验(LOOP研究)进行事后分析。主要结果是卒中或全身性栓塞(SE)。次要结果包括大出血,全因死亡,和中风的组合,SE,心血管死亡。
    结果:TSH测量在6004个试验参与者中的6003个中可用,1500随机进行植入式环路记录仪(ILR)筛查,用于检测房颤和抗凝4503人接受常规护理;平均年龄为74.7±4.1岁,女性为2836人(47%)。跨TSH三元组,ILR与常规护理相比,AF检测约为三倍(调整后的p-交互作用=0.44)。在第一个三分地,筛查与主要结局(风险比0.52[0.30-0.90];p=0.02)和卒中风险降低相关,SE,或心血管死亡(危险比0.54[0.34-0.84];p=0.006)与常规护理相比,而在TSH较高的参与者中没有观察到影响(校正后的p交互作用分别为0.03和0.01).对其他结果没有影响。对连续TSH或排除TSH异常或甲状腺药物的分析显示出相似的结果。
    结论:房颤筛查和后续治疗与低TSH患者卒中风险降低相关,尽管不同TSH水平的筛查结果相似。TSH可能是有用的标记,以表明从AF筛查与过度诊断和过度治疗。这些发现应被认为是探索性的,值得进一步研究。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.gov,标识符:NCT0203645。
    OBJECTIVE: Subclinical thyroid dysfunction is a marker for atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke risk. This study explored the effects of AF screening according to thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels.
    METHODS: An AF screening trial (the LOOP study) was analyzed post-hoc according to baseline TSH. The primary outcome was stroke or systemic embolism (SE). Secondary outcomes included major bleeding, all-cause death, and the combination of stroke, SE, and cardiovascular death.
    RESULTS: TSH measurement was available in 6003 of 6004 trial participants, 1500 randomized to implantable loop recorder (ILR) screening for AF and anticoagulation upon detection vs. 4503 to usual care; mean age was 74.7±4.1 years and 2836 (47%) were women. AF detection was approximately triple for ILR vs usual care across TSH tertiles (adjusted p-interaction=0.44). In the first tertile, screening was associated with decreased risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio 0.52 [0.30-0.90]; p=0.02) and stroke, SE, or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.54 [0.34-0.84]; p=0.006) compared to usual care, while no effect was observed among participants with higher TSH (adjusted p-interaction 0.03 and 0.01, respectively). There was no effect on other outcomes. Analyses of continuous TSH or excluding those with abnormal TSH or thyroid medication showed similar results.
    CONCLUSIONS: AF screening and subsequent treatment was associated with decreased stroke risk among participants with low TSH, though the yield of screening was similar across TSH levels. TSH may be useful as a marker to indicate benefit from AF screening vs. overdiagnosis and overtreatment. These findings should be considered exploratory and warrant further study.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT0203645.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:无阿司匹林策略对接受口服抗凝治疗(OAC)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者出血和心血管事件的影响尚未完全阐明。
    结果:我们根据OAC的使用进行了预设的亚组分析,包括维生素K拮抗剂和直接口服抗凝剂,STOPDAPT-3(双重抗血小板治疗-3的短期和最佳持续时间)试验的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗前7天内,随机比较普拉格雷单药治疗(2984例)与普拉格雷和阿司匹林双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT)(2982例)在急性冠脉综合征或高出血风险患者中的应用。主要终点是大出血事件(出血学术研究联盟类型3或5)和心血管事件(心血管死亡的复合,心肌梗塞,明确的支架血栓形成,或缺血性中风)在1个月时。在5966名研究患者中,有530例患者(8.9%)接受OAC(无阿司匹林:N=248,DAPT:N=282)和5436例患者(91.1%)未接受OAC(无阿司匹林:N=2736,DAPT:N=2700).不管使用OAC,与DAPT相比,无阿司匹林对出血终点的影响不显著(OAC:4.45%和4.27%,危险比[HR],1.04[95%CI,0.46-2.35];无OAC:4.47%和4.75%,HR,0.94[95%CI,0.73-1.20];相互作用的P=0.82),和心血管终点(OAC:4.84%和3.20%,HR,1.53[95%CI,0.64-3.62];无OAC:4.06%和3.74%,HR,1.09[95%CI0.83-1.42];相互作用的P=0.46)。
    结论:与DAPT策略相比,无阿司匹林策略未能减少大出血事件,而与使用OAC无关。在OAC患者中,相对于DAPT策略,无阿司匹林策略在心血管事件方面存在数值上的超额风险。
    BACKGROUND: The effects of aspirin-free strategy on bleeding and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with oral anticoagulation (OAC) have not been fully elucidated.
    RESULTS: We conducted the prespecified subgroup analysis based on the use of OAC, including vitamin K antagonist and direct oral anticoagulants, within 7 days before percutaneous coronary intervention in the STOPDAPT-3 (Short and Optimal Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy-3) trial, which randomly compared prasugrel monotherapy (2984 patients) to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with prasugrel and aspirin (2982 patients) in patients with acute coronary syndrome or high bleeding risk. The coprimary end points were major bleeding events (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 or 5) and cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, or ischemic stroke) at 1 month. Among 5966 study patients, there were 530 patients (8.9%) with OAC (no aspirin: N=248, and DAPT: N=282) and 5436 patients (91.1%) without OAC (no aspirin: N=2736, and DAPT: N=2700). Regardless of the use of OAC, the effects of no aspirin compared with DAPT were not significant for the bleeding end point (OAC: 4.45% and 4.27%, hazard ratio [HR], 1.04 [95% CI, 0.46-2.35]; no-OAC: 4.47% and 4.75%, HR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.73-1.20]; P for interaction=0.82), and for the cardiovascular end point (OAC: 4.84% and 3.20%, HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.64-3.62]; no-OAC: 4.06% and 3.74%, HR, 1.09 [95% CI 0.83-1.42]; P for interaction =0.46).
    CONCLUSIONS: The no-aspirin strategy compared with the DAPT strategy failed to reduce major bleeding events irrespective of the use of OAC. There was a numerical excess risk of the no-aspirin strategy relative to the DAPT strategy for cardiovascular events in patients with OAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:小叶血栓形成(LT)是一种多方面且未充分开发的疾病,可在经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)后出现。本研究的目的是根据实验室评估和临床参数制定预测模型,为TAVI后并发症的这一相对未探索的方面提供更多指导和见解。
    方法:本研究是一项观察性前瞻性假设生成研究,包括101例接受TAVI和通过多探测器计算机断层扫描(MDCT)筛查LT(主要终点)的患者.所有图像均在第三代双源CT系统上获取。血管性血友病因子(vWF)活性水平,血红蛋白(Hb),和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)在其他参数中进行了测量。利用二元逻辑回归的预测评分,Kaplan-Meier事件时间分析,建立了接收机工作特性(ROC)分析。
    结果:在105天的MDCT筛查中位时间(IQR,98-129天)。TAVI前vWF活动水平升高(>188%),Hb值降低(<11.9g/dL),与没有LT的患者相比,在随后的LT形成的患者中发现了TAVI后LDH水平升高(>312U/L),并且没有口服抗凝(OAC)。既定的EFFORT评分范围为-1至3分,≥2分(LT病例的85.7%)与<2分(LT病例的14.3%;p<0.001)的患者发生LT的可能性增加。发现获得≥2分的EFFORT评分与发生LT的10.8倍的可能性显着相关(p=0.001)。EFORT评分具有良好的c统计量(曲线下面积(AUC)=0.89;95%CI0.74-1.00;p=0.001)和高阴性预测值(98%)。
    结论:EFFORT评分可能是预测LT发展的有用工具,可用于风险评估,如果在验证性研究中得到验证。因此,该评分有可能指导个体的分层,以便规划后续的MDCT筛查.
    BACKGROUND: Leaflet thrombosis (LT) is a multifaceted and underexplored condition that can manifest following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The objective of this study was to formulate a prediction model based on laboratory assessments and clinical parameters, providing additional guidance and insight into this relatively unexplored aspect of post-TAVI complications.
    METHODS: The present study was an observational prospective hypothesis-generating study, including 101 patients who underwent TAVI and a screening for LT (the primary endpoint) by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT). All images were acquired on a third-generation dual-source CT system. Levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) activity, hemoglobin (Hb), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were measured among other parameters. A predictive score utilizing binary logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier time-to-event analysis, and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was established.
    RESULTS: LT (11 subclinical and 2 clinical) was detected in 13 of 101 patients (13%) after a median time to screening by MDCT of 105 days (IQR, 98-129 days). Elevated levels of vWF activity (> 188%) pre-TAVI, decreased Hb values (< 11.9 g/dL), as well as increased levels of LDH (> 312 U/L) post-TAVI and absence of oral anticoagulation (OAC) were found in patients with subsequent LT formation as compared to patients without LT. The established EFFORT score ranged from - 1 to 3 points, with an increased probability for LT development in patients with ≥ 2 points (85.7% of LT cases) vs < 2 points (14.3% of LT cases; p < 0.001). Achieving an EFFORT score of ≥ 2 points was found to be significantly associated with a 10.8 times higher likelihood of developing an LT (p = 0.001). The EFFORT score has an excellent c-statistic (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.89; 95% CI 0.74-1.00; p = 0.001) and a high negative predictive value (98%).
    CONCLUSIONS: An EFFORT score might be a helpful tool to predict LT development and could be used in risk assessment, if validated in confirmatory studies. Therefore, the score has the potential to guide the stratification of individuals for the planning of subsequent MDCT screenings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心房颤动(AF)是全球报道的最常见的心律失常。急诊室患者的房颤护理路径存在显著异质性。影响获得指南驱动的治疗。
    本研究的目的是比较有组织的治疗途径与常规治疗途径之间房颤结局的差异。
    电生理服务研究的急诊室(ER2EP)是一个多中心,前瞻性观察性登记处(NCT04476524)纳入房颤患者,这些患者来自建立了房颤治疗途径的地点,而在同一卫生系统内没有建立途径,且所有地点均由相同医师提供服务.进行多变量回归建模以确定临床结果的预测因子。适当报告β系数或比值比。
    总共500名患者(ER2EP组,n=250;对照组,n=250)包括在研究中。平均年龄为73.4±12.9岁,男性占52.2%。主要终点[消融时间(56±50.9天对183.3±109.5天;P<0.001),抗凝开始时间(2.1±1.6天vs19.7±35天,P<0.001),抗心律失常药物起始(4.8±7.1天vs24.7±44.4天,P<0.001)与对照组相比,分别。因此,与对照组相比,这导致ER2EP组的住院时间减少(2.4±1.4天vs3.23±2.5天,P=0.002)。
    这项研究提供了证据,证明从急诊科为房颤患者提供一个涉及电生理服务的有组织的途径可以改善早期获得明确治疗和临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia reported worldwide. There is significant heterogeneity in AF care pathways for a patient seen in the emergency room, impacting access to guideline-driven therapies.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to compare the difference in AF outcomes between those treated with an organized treatment pathway vs routine-care approach.
    UNASSIGNED: The emergency room to electrophysiology service study (ER2EP) is a multicenter, prospective observational registry (NCT04476524) enrolling patients with AF from sites where a pathway for management of AF was put in place compared to sites where a pathway was not in place within the same health system and the same physicians providing services at all sites. Multivariable regression modeling was performed to identify predictors of clinical outcomes. Beta coefficient or odds ratio was reported as appropriate.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 500 patients (ER2EP group, n = 250; control group, n = 250) were included in the study. The mean age was 73.4 ± 12.9 years, and 52.2% were males. There was a statistically significant difference in primary endpoint [time to ablation (56 ± 50.9 days vs 183.3 ± 109.5 days; P < 0.001), time to anticoagulation initiation (2.1 ± 1.6 days vs 19.7 ± 35 days, P < 0.001), antiarrhythmic drug initiation (4.8 ± 7.1 days vs 24.7 ± 44.4 days, P < 0.001) compared to the control group, respectively. As such, this resulted in reduced length of stay in the ER2EP group compared to the control group (2.4 ± 1.4 days vs 3.23 ± 2.5 days, P = 0.002).
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides evidence that having an organized pathway from the emergency department for AF patients involving electrophysiology services can improve early access to definitive therapies and clinical outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们旨在比较在TikurAnbessa专科医院(TASH)接受华法林的患者的常规医疗护理(UMC)和药剂师主导的抗凝服务(PLAS)之间的抗凝控制和结局。亚的斯亚贝巴,埃塞俄比亚。
    方法:进行了准实验研究,包括来自UMC和PLAS组的350名(66.7%)和175名(33.3%)患者,分别,525名患者使用Rosendaal方法确定治疗范围内的时间(TTR),TTR≥65%设定为最佳抗凝的截止值。使用双样本Wilcoxon秩和(Mann-WhitneyU)检验比较组间的连续变量。使用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较组间的分类变量。进行Logistic回归和负二项回归分析,以确定与次优TTR和次要结局相关的因素。分别,在p值<0.05和95%置信区间(CI)。
    结果:与UMC组相比,PLAC组的患者显示出明显更高的中位数(IQR)TTR[60.89%(43.5-74.69%)与53.65%(33.92-69.14%),p<0.001]。PLAC组的最佳TTR(≥65%)明显更高(41.7%vs.31.7%)比UMC组(p=0.002)。与UMC组相比,PLAC组患者TTR差的几率降低了43%(AOR=0.57,95%CI=0.36-0.88,p=0.01)。两组之间的次要结局没有统计学上的显着差异,除了所有原因的紧急访问(p=0.003)。INR监测频率每增加一次,出血事件的发生率降低3%(IRR=0.97,95%CI=0.96-0.99,p<0.001)。CHA2DS2-VASc评分高的患者与评分中等的患者相比,血栓栓塞事件的发生率增加了15.13倍(IRR=15.13,95%CI=1.47-155.52,p=0.02)。
    结论:PLAC组患者的中位TTR明显高于UMC组。两组之间的次要结局没有统计学上的显着差异,除了PLAC组的全因急诊科就诊次数较少。
    BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare anticoagulation control and outcomes between usual medical care (UMC) and pharmacist-led anticoagulation services (PLAS) in patients receiving warfarin at the Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
    METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was conducted, including 350 (66.7%) and 175 (33.3%) patients from the UMC and PLAS groups, respectively, from 525 patients. The time in therapeutic range (TTR) was determined using the Rosendaal method, with a TTR ≥ 65% set as the cut-off for optimal anticoagulation. The two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was used to compare continuous variables between groups. Categorical variables were compared between groups using Pearson\'s chi-square test or Fisher\'s exact test. Logistic regression and negative binomial regression analyses were conducted to identify the factors associated with suboptimal TTR and secondary outcomes, respectively, at the p values < 0.05, and 95% confidence interval (CI).
    RESULTS: Compared with the UMC group, the patients in the PLAC group showed a significantly higher median (IQR) TTR [60.89% (43.5-74.69%) vs. 53.65% (33.92-69.14%), p < 0.001]. A significantly higher optimal TTR (≥ 65%) was achieved in the PLAC group (41.7% vs. 31.7%) than in the UMC group (p = 0.002). The odds of having a poor TTR were reduced by 43% (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.36-0.88, p = 0.01) among patients in the PLAC group compared to those in the UMC group. There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the groups, except for all-cause emergency visits (p = 0.003). The incidence of bleeding events decreased by 3% (IRR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.99, p < 0.001) for every increase in INR monitoring frequency. The incidence of thromboembolic events increased by a factor of 15.13 (IRR = 15.13, 95% CI = 1.47-155.52, p = 0.02) among patients with a high-risk CHA2DS2-VASc score compared with those with a moderate score.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the PLAC group had a significantly higher median TTR than those in the UMC group did. There were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcomes between the groups, except for fewer all-cause emergency department visits in the PLAC group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经皮左心耳封堵术(LAAC)是预防房颤患者中风的既定方法,提供口服抗凝药物的替代方案。已经开发了各种封堵器装置以满足个体解剖学需要并确保安全和有效的程序。在这次回顾中,单中心队列研究,我们比较了不同的LAAO装置的临床结果,左心耳密封性能,和设备相关的并发症。
    方法:我们对2009年至2023年在我们中心接受经皮LAA封堵术的270例患者进行了回顾性分析。从病历中提取患者数据,包括性别,植入时的年龄,指示,设备类型和尺寸,实验室值,左心耳解剖学,围手术期并发症,心电图参数,经胸和经食管超声心动图参数(TTE和TEE),以及出院时的药物治疗。此外,透视时间和植入时间,以及植入后长达1年的临床事件,被收集。终点为出血事件,复发性中风,装置上的血栓,和死亡。
    结果:植入的设备是Watchman2.5,WatchmanFLX,Amplatzer心脏封堵器(ACP),还有护身符.手术成功率为95.7%(n=265),仙人掌的解剖构成了所有设备的最大挑战。患者平均年龄为75.5±7.7岁,64.5%是男性。CHA2DS2-VASc评分中位数为4.8±1.5,HAS-BLED评分中位数为3.8±1.0。LAA封堵的适应症包括既往出血事件和出血风险升高。围手术期并发症最常见的是穿刺部位出血,特别是ACP植入后(p=0.014)。在21.4%的简单密封机构设备中观察到明显的周围装置泄漏(PDL),而在双密封机构设备中观察到0%(p=0.004)。在6名患者的设备上检测到血栓,随后无缺血性卒中或血栓栓塞事件。比较分析显示中风的发生没有显着差异,短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA),血栓栓塞事件,装置相关血栓,或不同设备类型之间的死亡率。在568.2患者年中,可以观察到血栓栓塞事件的相对风险降低62.3%,重大出血的相对风险降低38.6%。
    结论:总之,我们的研究强调了使用各种封堵器封堵LAA的有效性和安全性,尽管存在解剖学挑战.我们的长期随访结果支持左心耳封堵术是在选定的患者队列中预防中风的有希望的选择。需要进一步的研究来完善患者选择标准并优化左心耳封堵手术的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left-atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is an established method for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation, offering an alternative to oral anticoagulation. Various occluder devices have been developed to cater to individual anatomical needs and ensure a safe and effective procedure. In this retrospective, monocentric cohort study, we compare different LAAO devices with respect to clinical outcomes, LAA sealing properties, and device-related complications.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 270 patients who underwent percutaneous LAA closure in our center between 2009 and 2023. Patient data were extracted from medical records, including gender, age at implantation, indication, device type and size, laboratory values, LAA anatomy, periprocedural complications, ECG parameters, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography parameters (TTE and TEE), as well as medication at discharge. Moreover, fluoroscopy time and implantation duration, as well as post-implantation clinical events up to 1 year, were collected. Endpoints were bleeding events, recurrent stroke, thrombi on devices, and death.
    RESULTS: The implanted devices were the Watchman 2.5, Watchman FLX, Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (ACP), and Amulet. The procedural success rate was 95.7% (n = 265), with cactus anatomy posing the most challenges across all devices. The mean patient age was 75.5 ± 7.7 years, with 64.5% being male. The median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.8 ± 1.5 and the median HAS-BLED score was 3.8 ± 1.0. Indications for LAA closure included past bleeding events and elevated bleeding risk. Periprocedural complications were most commonly bleeding at the puncture site, particularly after ACP implantation (p = 0.014). Significant peridevice leaks (PDL) were observed in 21.4% of simple sealing mechanism devices versus 0% in double sealing mechanism devices (p = 0.004). Thrombi were detected on devices in six patients, with no subsequent ischemic stroke or thromboembolic event. Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in the occurrence of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), thromboembolic events, device-related thrombi, or mortality among different device types. A 62.3% relative risk reduction in thromboembolic events and 38.6% in major bleedings could be observed over 568.2 patient years.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, our study highlights the efficacy and safety of LAA closure using various occluder devices despite anatomical challenges. Our long-term follow-up findings support LAA closure as a promising option for stroke prevention in selected patient cohorts. Further research is needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize outcomes in LAA closure procedures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在房颤(AF)患者中,与直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)相比,个体治疗时间范围(TTR)对华法林治疗的有效性和安全性的影响鲜为人知。
    为了比较标准剂量DOAC与华法林在房颤患者中的有效性和安全性,根据个体TTR将华法林治疗的患者分为四分位数。
    我们在芬兰进行了一项全国性研究,包括2011年至2018年间所有新发房颤患者。使用Cox回归分析与治疗加权逆概率方法计算危险比(HR),以评估缺血性卒中(IS)的风险。阿哌沙班使用者的颅内出血(ICH)和死亡率(n=12,426),达比加群(n=4545),利伐沙班(n=12,950)和华法林(n=43,548)。
    华法林使用者的TTR中位数为72%。与第二好的TTR四分位数(参考)相比,在两个最差的TTR四分位数中,IS的风险更高,在最佳TTR四分位数和利伐沙班[2.35(95%置信区间,1.85-2.85),1.44(1.18-1.75),0.60(0.47-0.77)和0.72(0.56-0.92)]。对于阿哌沙班和达比加群,这些差异不显著。在两个最贫穷的TTR组中,ICH的HR分别为6.38(4.88-8.35)和1.87(1.41-2.49),1.44(1.02-1.93)利伐沙班,与参考组相比,最佳TTR组的TTR和0.58(0.40-0.85)。死亡率在两个最差的TTR组中较高,在最好的TTR组中最低。
    在两个最低TTR四分位数的患者中,有一半接受华法林治疗的患者的结果不令人满意。高TTR组和标准剂量DOAC之间的差异不存在或适度。
    UNASSIGNED: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban (n = 12,426), dabigatran (n = 4545), rivaroxaban (n = 12,950) and warfarin (n = 43,548).
    UNASSIGNED: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group.
    UNASSIGNED: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:口服抗凝(OAC)是房颤(AF)血栓预防的关键,但西班牙缺乏真实的证据.我们的目的是分析患病率,临床特征,以及接受OAC的房颤患者的治疗模式,使用自然语言处理(NLP)和机器学习(ML)。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括来自15家西班牙医院(2014-2020年)的接受OAC的AF患者。使用EHRead®(包括NLP和ML),和SNOMED_CT,我们提取并分析了病人的人口统计,合并症,以及来自电子健康记录的OAC治疗。估计房颤患病率,并进行了描述性分析。
    结果:在我们队列中的4,664,224名患者中,房颤患病率为1.9%至2.9%。共纳入57,190名接受OAC治疗的患者,80.7%接受维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)和19.3%直接作用OAC(DOAC)。中位年龄分别为78岁和76岁,男性占队列的53%。高血压等合并症(76.3%),糖尿病(48.0%),心力衰竭(42.2%),肾脏疾病(18.7%)很常见,在VKA用户中更为频繁。超过50%的患者有较高的CHA2DS2-VASc评分。最常见的治疗转换是从DOAC到acenocoumarol(58.6%至70.2%)。在从VKA到DOAC的交换机中,阿哌沙班的选择最多(35.2%)。
    结论:利用NLP和ML提取RWD,我们建立了迄今为止最全面的西班牙OAC房颤患者队列.分析显示房颤患病率高,患者复杂性,和标记的VKA优先于DOAC。重要的是,在VKA到DOAC的转换中,阿哌沙班是最受欢迎的选择。
    BACKGROUND: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is key in atrial fibrillation (AF) thromboprophylaxis, but Spain lacks substantial real-world evidence. We aimed to analyze the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns among patients with AF undertaking OAC, using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML).
    METHODS: This retrospective study included AF patients on OAC from 15 Spanish hospitals (2014-2020). Using EHRead® (including NLP and ML), and SNOMED_CT, we extracted and analyzed patient demographics, comorbidities, and OAC treatment from electronic health records. AF prevalence was estimated, and a descriptive analysis was conducted.
    RESULTS: Among 4,664,224 patients in our cohort, AF prevalence ranged from 1.9% to 2.9%. A total of 57,190 patients on OAC therapy were included, 80.7% receiving Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and 19.3% Direct-acting OAC (DOAC). The median age was 78 and 76 years respectively, with males constituting 53% of the cohort. Comorbidities like hypertension (76.3%), diabetes (48.0%), heart failure (42.2%), and renal disease (18.7%) were common, and more frequent in VKA users. Over 50% had a high CHA2DS2-VASc score. The most frequent treatment switch was from DOAC to acenocoumarol (58.6% to 70.2%). In switches from VKA to DOAC, apixaban was the most chosen (35.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing NLP and ML to extract RWD, we established the most comprehensive Spanish cohort of AF patients with OAC to date. Analysis revealed a high AF prevalence, patient complexity, and a marked VKA preference over DOAC. Importantly, in VKA to DOAC transitions, apixaban was the favored option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:选择性心脏复律(ECV)通常用于心房颤动(AF)以恢复窦性心律。然而,即使在适当的口服抗凝治疗期间,它也包括血栓栓塞的风险。本研究的目的是利用大量房颤人群的数据评估在现实生活中ECV后血栓栓塞和出血并发症的风险。
    结果:这项基于全国注册的研究包括所有(n=9625)芬兰房颤患者在2012年至2018年之间进行了首次ECV。分析ECV后30天内的血栓栓塞和出血并发症。患者平均年龄为67.7±9.9岁,61.2%是男性,平均CHA2DS2-VASc评分为2.6±1.6。华法林用于6245例(64.9%),非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOAC)用于3380例(35.1%)心脏复律。发生了52例(0.5%)血栓栓塞并发症,其中62%是缺血性中风,25%的短暂性脑缺血发作,和13%的其他全身性栓塞。14例(0.4%)NOAC治疗患者和38例(0.6%)华法林治疗患者发生血栓栓塞事件(比值比0.77;置信区间:0.42-1.39)。从ECV到血栓栓塞事件的中位时间为2天,78%的事件发生在10天内.年龄和酒精滥用是血栓栓塞事件的重要预测因素。在华法林用户中,血栓栓塞并发症在国际标准化比率(INR)<2.5时比INR≥2.5时更常见(0.9%vs.0.4%,P=0.026)。总的来说,发生27例(0.3%)出血事件。
    结论:与ECV相关的血栓栓塞和出血并发症的发生率较低,NOAC和华法林治疗的患者之间无显著差异。有了华法林,心脏复律时INR≥2.5可降低血栓栓塞并发症的风险。
    OBJECTIVE: Elective cardioversion (ECV) is routinely used in atrial fibrillation (AF) to restore sinus rhythm. However, it includes a risk of thromboembolism even during adequate oral anticoagulation treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of thromboembolic and bleeding complications after ECV in a real-life setting utilizing data from a large AF population.
    RESULTS: This nationwide register-based study included all (n = 9625) Finnish AF patients undergoing their first-ever ECV between 2012 and 2018. The thromboembolic and bleeding complications within 30 days after ECV were analysed. The mean age of the patients was 67.7 ± 9.9 years, 61.2% were men, and the mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2.6 ± 1.6. Warfarin was used in 6245 (64.9%) and non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in 3380 (35.1%) cardioversions. Fifty-two (0.5%) thromboembolic complications occurred, of which 62% were ischaemic strokes, 25% transient ischaemic attacks, and 13% other systemic embolisms. Thromboembolic events occurred in 14 (0.4%) NOAC-treated patients and in 38 (0.6%) warfarin-treated patients (odds ratio 0.77; confidence interval: 0.42-1.39). The median time from ECV to the thromboembolic event was 2 days, and 78% of the events occurred within 10 days. Age and alcohol abuse were significant predictors of thromboembolic events. Among warfarin users, thromboembolic complications were more common with international normalized ratio (INR) <2.5 than INR ≥2.5 (0.9% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.026). Overall, 27 (0.3%) bleeding events occurred.
    CONCLUSIONS: The rate of thromboembolic and bleeding complications related to ECV was low without significant difference between NOAC- and warfarin-treated patients. With warfarin, INR ≥2.5 at the time of cardioversion reduced the risk of thromboembolic complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:斯堪的纳维亚神经委员会的现行指南要求对头部创伤患者的抗凝药进行24小时观察,即使初始头部CT扫描正常,作为不错过迟发性颅内出血的手段。这项研究旨在评估患病率,和诊断时间,口服抗凝剂治疗的头部创伤患者的临床相关迟发性颅内出血。
    方法:利用索恩地区急诊科的全面两年数据,为130万人口服务,这项研究的重点是成人头部创伤患者口服抗凝剂。我们在30天内发现了颅内出血,将迟发性颅内出血定义为在最初的CT头颅扫描中不明显的出血。如果与死亡率相关,这些病例被进一步定义为临床相关。任何重症监护室入院,或者神经外科手术.
    结果:在纳入的2,362例颅脑损伤病例中(中位年龄84岁,直接作用口服抗凝剂占56%),5例发生迟发性颅内出血.这五例病例均未接受神经外科手术,也未进入重症监护病房。只有2例(0.08%,95%置信区间[0.01-0.3%])被归类为临床相关,涉及82岁和87岁患者的硬膜下血肿,后来两人都死了。这些迟发性颅内出血的诊断是在最初向急诊科就诊后的4天和7天进行的。
    结论:在头部外伤患者中,关于口服抗凝,发现临床相关的迟发性颅内出血的发生率不到千分之一,检测发生在初次报告后四天或更晚。这挑战了斯堪的纳维亚神经创伤委员会指南建议的24小时观察期的有效性,建议需要重新评估这些指南,以优化护理和资源分配。
    背景:这是一项回顾性队列研究,不包括任何干预,因此未注册。
    BACKGROUND: Current guidelines from Scandinavian Neuro Committee mandate a 24-hour observation for head trauma patients on anticoagulants, even with normal initial head CT scans, as a means not to miss delayed intracranial hemorrhages. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, and time to diagnosis, of clinically relevant delayed intracranial hemorrhage in head trauma patients treated with oral anticoagulants.
    METHODS: Utilizing comprehensive two-year data from Region Skåne\'s emergency departments, which serve a population of 1.3 million inhabitants, this study focused on adult head trauma patients prescribed oral anticoagulants. We identified those with intracranial hemorrhage within 30 days, defining delayed intracranial hemorrhage as a bleeding not apparent on their initial CT head scan. These cases were further defined as clinically relevant if associated with mortality, any intensive care unit admission, or neurosurgery.
    RESULTS: Out of the included 2,362 head injury cases (median age 84, 56% on a direct acting oral anticoagulant), five developed delayed intracranial hemorrhages. None of these five cases underwent neurosurgery nor were admitted to an intensive care unit. Only two cases (0.08%, 95% confidence interval [0.01-0.3%]) were classified as clinically relevant, involving subdural hematomas in patients aged 82 and 87 years, who both subsequently died. The diagnosis of these delayed intracranial hemorrhages was made at 4 and 7 days following initial presentation to the emergency department.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with head trauma, on oral anticoagulation, the incidence of clinically relevant delayed intracranial hemorrhage was found to be less than one in a thousand, with detection occurring four days or later after initial presentation. This challenges the effectiveness of the 24-hour observation period recommended by the Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee guidelines, suggesting a need to reassess these guidelines to optimise care and resource allocation.
    BACKGROUND: This is a retrospective cohort study, does not include any intervention, and has therefore not been registered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号