背景:为了确定在约翰霍普金斯医院使用基于共识的治疗算法治疗的眼动脉段动脉瘤患者的解剖和视觉结果。
方法:回顾性记录回顾了2004年1月至2009年7月期间接受治疗的88例患者(101个动脉瘤)的前瞻性累积病例系列。记录所有受试者的症状和动脉瘤参数。所有患者的治疗策略由神经外科医师达成共识,神经干预学家,神经学家,和神经眼科医生每周开会审查临床病例。最终临床结果(动脉瘤控制,功能状态,和视力)是从内部检查中确定的,医疗记录,电话采访,或这些方法的组合。评估视觉或其他并发症的危险因素。
结果:治疗后88例患者中至少30例(34%)存在视神经病变。这些患者中有24例(27%)发生了新的视力丧失。其余6例患者先前存在视神经病变相关的视力丧失,治疗后视力恶化。治疗后,没有先前存在视神经病变的患者得到改善。
结论:眼动脉段动脉瘤由于其解剖复杂性和与关键神经结构的关系,对治疗提出了挑战。特别是视觉感官途径。我们采用了基于共识的治疗方法,以优化患者预后和动脉瘤控制。虽然我们的方法导致了动脉瘤的持久治疗,相当比例的患者在治疗后出现了新的视力下降,并且没有与动脉瘤相关的先前存在视力丧失的患者在治疗后视力改善。我们建议所有眼动脉瘤患者接受仔细和彻底的术前咨询,以确保他们意识到治疗的风险和益处,无论使用何种方法。
BACKGROUND: To determine the anatomic and visual outcomes of patients with ophthalmic artery segment aneurysms treated at The Johns Hopkins Hospital using a
consensus-based treatment algorithm.
METHODS: Retrospective record review of a prospectively accrued case series of 88 patients (101 aneurysms) treated between January 2004 and July 2009. Presenting symptoms and aneurysm parameters were recorded for all subjects. Treatment strategy for all patients was determined by
consensus among neurosurgeons, neurointerventionalists, neurologists, and neuroophthalmologists meeting to review the clinical cases on a weekly basis. Final clinical outcomes (aneurysm control, functional status, and vision) were ascertained from in-house examinations, medical records, telephone interviews, or a combination of these methods. Risk factors for visual or other complications were evaluated.
RESULTS: An optic neuropathy was present in at least 30 (34%) of 88 patients after treatment. Presumed new visual loss occurred in 24 (27%) of these patients. The remaining 6 patients had preexisting optic neuropathy-related visual loss that worsened after treatment. No patient with a preexisting optic neuropathy improved following treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic artery segment aneurysms present a treatment challenge because of their anatomic complexity and relationship to critical neural structures, particularly the visual sensory pathway. We have adopted a
consensus-based treatment approach in an effort to optimize patient outcomes and aneurysm control. Although our approach resulted in durable treatment of the aneurysm, a sizable proportion of patients experienced new vision loss after treatment, and no patient with preexisting visual loss related to their aneurysm experienced visual improvement after treatment. We recommend that all patients with ophthalmic artery aneurysms receive careful and thorough preprocedural counseling to ensure they are aware of the risks and benefits of treatment regardless of the method used.