There are multiple treatment strategies proposed for the management of vision loss related to the injection of soft tissue fillers. Currently, there is no internationally accepted consensus on the immediate management of soft tissue filler induced vision loss (STFIVL). A recent systematic review of the literature concluded that there is not enough evidence to support retrobulbar hyaluronidase, and alternative treatments require exploration. The available literature demonstrates the inconsistent and unproven success of retrobulbar and peribulbar hyaluronidase in reversal of soft filler induced vision loss. Various therapeutics have been used to aid the reversal of vision loss but with mixed outcomes. The current evidence base does not support the use of retrobulbar and peribulbar hyaluronidase. The use of retrobulbar hyaluronidase for reversing soft tissue filler induced vision loss is controversial. Its efficacy remains unproven and there is mixed evidence within the literature. The current evidence suggests that there may be an increased risk of introducing severe adverse events associated with retrobulbar hyaluronidase and may even exacerbate the problem for those clinicians who are not ophthalmology trained. Therefore, we recommend two alternative treatment pathways for ophthalmology and non-ophthalmology trained practitioners. The suggested goal of this publication is to understand the pathophysiology of STFIVL, recognize signs and symptoms, and to propose algorithms to manage vision loss for both non-ophthalmology and ophthalmology trained clinicians. Clinicians must act swiftly and arrange immediate transfer to an emergency department or ophthalmology specialist setting to give the patient the best chance of vision restoration. The focus of any intervention for non-ophthalmology trained clinicians should be based around the immediate use of non-invasive techniques.