On-body injector

随身喷油器
  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:为了帮助预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症,pegfilgrastim-cbqv(UDENYCA®;CoherusBioSciences),pegfilgrastim(NEULASTA®;Amgen)生物仿制药,在骨髓抑制化疗后24-96小时给药。使用体内注射器(OBI)递送pegfilgrastim-cbqv提供了一种替代的给药方法,提供药物输送的选择。这项研究旨在建立药代动力学(PK)和药效学(PD)生物等效性,并评估使用OBI与预充式注射器(PFS)比较的pegfilgrastim-cbqv的安全性。
    方法:在此开放标签中,两周期交叉研究,健康的成年男性参与者(N=189)以1:1的比例随机分配,在第1阶段使用OBI(n=92)或PFS(n=95)皮下接受pegfilgrastim-cbqv6mg,然后在第2阶段通过其他方法注射.主要PK终点为从时间0到无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下面积,从时间0到最后可量化浓度的浓度-时间曲线下的面积,和最大血浆浓度。次级PD终点,安全,免疫原性,还评估了耐受性。
    结果:PK和PD终点的几何平均比率的90%置信区间(CI)落在预定范围内(80-125%),表明pegfilgrastim-cbqvOBI和pegfilgrastim-cbqvPFS之间的PK和PD生物等效性。在OBI和PFS组中,87.8%和75.8%的参与者发生了因治疗引起的不良事件(TEAE)。分别。大多数TEAE是肌肉骨骼效应。最常见的OBI相关TEAE是注射部位红斑(31.7%),这是温和的,瞬态,和自我限制。在OBI和PFS之间,治疗中出现的抗药物抗体(ADAs)的发生率相似。ADAs对PK没有明显影响,PD,或安全。在任何参与者中均未检测到中和抗体。
    结论:研究结果表明,与PFS相比,使用OBI给药的pegfilgrastim-cbqv的PK和PD生物等效性。OBI和PFS管理具有相似的安全性,耐受性,和免疫原性谱。未发现意外的安全信号。本文提供的图形摘要。
    发热性中性粒细胞减少症是指患者发热,白细胞数量低于正常水平。当白细胞计数很低时,由于免疫系统减弱,患者更容易受到机会性感染。严重的发热性中性粒细胞减少可导致化疗的停止或延迟。药物pegfilgrastim-cbqv在化疗后24-96小时用于刺激白细胞的生长。Pegfilgrastim-cbqv可用于单剂量预填充注射器和预填充自动注射器。如果病人不能给自己注射药物,他们必须去诊所注射。使用应用于皮肤的体内注射器在特定时间自动注射药物可以消除去诊所的需要。在这项研究中,健康的成年男性参与者通过体内注射器或预填充注射器给予pegfilgrastim-cbqv,以调查药物是否进入,通过,在两种注射方法之间,体内(药代动力学)和体内药物的生理作用(药效学)相似。还研究了副作用。研究人员发现,体内注射器或预填充注射器给予pegfilgrastim-cbqv的药代动力学和药效学相似。副作用的数量和类型也相似。体内注射器最常见的副作用是注射部位的轻度红斑。这种副作用本身就解决了。无论药物如何给药,pegfilgrastim-cbqv的治疗益处和安全性都非常相似。
    BACKGROUND: To help prevent febrile neutropenia, pegfilgrastim-cbqv (UDENYCA®; Coherus BioSciences), a pegfilgrastim (NEULASTA®; Amgen) biosimilar, is administered 24-96 h after myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Delivery of pegfilgrastim-cbqv using an on-body injector (OBI) provides an alternative method of administration, affording options in drug delivery. This study aimed to establish pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) bioequivalence and assess the safety of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using an OBI compared with a prefilled syringe (PFS).
    METHODS: In this open-label, two-period crossover study, healthy adult male participants (N = 189) were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pegfilgrastim-cbqv 6 mg subcutaneously using an OBI (n = 92) or a PFS (n = 95) in period 1 and then an injection via the other method in period 2. Primary PK end points were area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and maximum plasma concentration. Secondary PD end points, safety, immunogenicity, and tolerability were also assessed.
    RESULTS: The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratios for the PK and PD end points fell within the predetermined range (80-125%), indicating PK and PD bioequivalence between pegfilgrastim-cbqv OBI and pegfilgrastim-cbqv PFS. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 87.8% and 75.8% of participants in the OBI and PFS groups, respectively. Most TEAEs were musculoskeletal effects. The most common OBI-related TEAE was injection site erythema (31.7%), which was mild, transient, and self-limiting. The incidence of treatment-emergent antidrug antibodies (ADAs) was similar between the OBI and PFS. ADAs had no apparent impact on PK, PD, or safety. Neutralizing antibodies were not detected in any participant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study showed PK and PD bioequivalence of pegfilgrastim-cbqv administered using OBI compared with PFS. OBI and PFS administration had similar safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity profiles. No unexpected safety signals were identified. Graphical Abstract available for this article.
    Febrile neutropenia is when a patient has a fever and a lower-than-normal number of white blood cells. When white blood cell counts are low, patients are more susceptible to opportunistic infections as a result of their weakened immune systems. Severe febrile neutropenia can lead to the stopping or delaying of chemotherapy. The drug pegfilgrastim-cbqv is used 24–96 h after chemotherapy to stimulate the growth of white blood cells. Pegfilgrastim-cbqv is available in a single-dose prefilled syringe and in a prefilled autoinjector. If a patient cannot inject themselves with the drug, they must go to a clinic for the injection. Using an on-body injector applied to the skin that automatically injects the drug at a specific time could eliminate the need to go to the clinic. During this study, healthy adult male participants were given pegfilgrastim-cbqv through an on-body injector or a prefilled syringe to investigate if the movement of the drug into, through, and out of the body (pharmacokinetics) and the physiological action of the drug in the body (pharmacodynamics) were similar between the two injection methods. Side effects were also studied. The researchers found that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for pegfilgrastim-cbqv given by on-body-injector or prefilled syringe were similar. The number and types of side effects were also similar. The most common side effect for the on-body injector was mild erythema at the injection site. This side effect resolved by itself. The treatment benefit and safety of pegfilgrastim-cbqv were very similar regardless of how the drug was administered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: The on-body injector (OBI) automatically delivers pegfilgrastim the day after chemotherapy (CTx), thus eliminating the need of return visits to the medical office for guideline-compliant pegfilgrastim administration. The CONVENIENCE study aimed to evaluate patient, nurse, and physician preferences as well as health economics for pegfilgrastim administration either with OBI or manually using a pre-filled syringe (PS).
    METHODS: Patients with early breast cancer, receiving two or three weekly anthracycline/cyclophosphamide or three weekly taxane-based CTx, and patients with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving first-line R-CHOP-14 or -21 were randomized 1:1 to receive both pegfilgrastim application forms for four consecutive CTx cycles in an alternating sequence starting either with OBI or PS. Primary endpoint was patient preference, assessed by questionnaires.
    RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were evaluable in the per-protocol analysis. Patients slightly preferred OBI over PS (OBI, n = 133, 43.2%; vs. PS, n = 111, 36.0%; p-value = 0.159), while study nurses slightly preferred PS (n = 19, 46.3%) over OBI (n = 18, 43.9%) and physicians clearly preferred PS (n = 24, 58.8%) over OBI (n = 15, 36.6%). Among patients with preference for OBI, saving of time was their major reason for preference (53.4%). Pegfilgrastim was administered 24-72 h after each CTx cycle in 97.6% of OBI and 63.1% of PS applications.
    CONCLUSIONS: The OBI was slightly preferred by patients and saving time was the major reason for their preference. PS was physicians\' most preferable choice and slightly preferred by nurses. Using OBI, pegfilgrastim was almost always administered within the time period recommended by current guidelines, while it was often not applied as specified using PS.
    BACKGROUND: No: ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT03619993. Registered on June 25, 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号