背景:神经性矫正症(ON)的特征是强迫行为和对健康饮食的关注增加。营养师似乎特别容易受到ON的影响,无序的饮食行为是否会促使个人加入营养计划仍有争议,或者这些行为是否源于营养研究期间对健康饮食的过度关注。
目的:目的是提供有关患病率的知识现状的概述,危险因素,以及针对营养师和营养学学生的干预措施。更具体地说,研究了营养师和营养学学生是否与参加不同教育计划的学生或其他卫生专业人员在ON的严重程度和风险因素方面有所不同,以及在营养教育研究的发展过程中,ON的程度是否发生变化。
方法:MEDLINE(Ovid),PubMed,EMBASE(Ovid),PsycInfo(EBSCO),CINAHL(EBSCO),科克伦,ProQuestCentral,CABI,ProQuest论文,谷歌学者,ScienceDirect,和SpringerLink于2021年5月8日进行了搜索,并于2022年11月12日进行了更新。
方法:筛选合格记录;研究特征,方法论,并提取纳入文章的结果;并使用AXIS工具评估方法学质量。每个步骤之前都进行了校准练习,并由2对审阅者独立进行并一式两份。通过讨论解决了任何分歧。
方法:进行叙事合成,由此特征,方法论,并对纳入研究的结果进行了比较。
结论:结果尚无定论;然而,建立了营养师和营养学学生中ON的相对“高”患病率的一般状态,强调需要进行系统的研究,以了解和减轻该群体的正交性倾向。现在回答与患病率有关的问题还为时过早,危险因素,干预措施,以及营养学学生和其他专业之间的差异,在整个持续多年的学习过程中,关于ON的严重程度和进展,或营养师和其他专业团体之间。
背景:开放科学框架标识符:DOI10.17605/OSF。IO/BY5KF。
BACKGROUND: Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is characterized by compulsive behaviors and increased concerns about healthful eating. Dietitians appear to be especially vulnerable to ON, and it is still debatable whether the disordered eating behaviors motivate individuals to enroll in nutrition programs, or whether these behaviors result from an exaggerated preoccupation with healthy eating triggered during their nutrition studies.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to provide an overview of the present state of knowledge about the prevalence, risk factors, and interventions addressing ON among dietitians and dietetics students. More specifically, it was examined whether dietitians and dietetics students differ from students attending different education programs or other health professionals with regard to the severity and risk factors of ON, and whether the extent of ON changes during the progression in the nutrition education years of study.
METHODS: MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), PsycInfo (EBSCO), CINAHL (EBSCO), Cochrane, ProQuest Central, CABI, ProQuest Dissertations, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and SpringerLink were searched on May 8, 2021, and updated on November 12, 2022.
METHODS: Records were screened for eligibility; study characteristics, methodology, and findings of included articles were extracted; and the methodological quality assessed using the AXIS tool. Each step was preceded by a calibration exercise and conducted independently and in duplicate by pairs of 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved through discussions.
METHODS: A narrative synthesis was performed, whereby the characteristics, methodologies, and results of included studies were compared.
CONCLUSIONS: Results were inconclusive; yet, a general status of the relatively \"high\" prevalence of ON among dietitians and dietetics students was established, stressing the need for systematic research to understand and mitigate orthorexic tendencies in this group. It is still too early to answer questions pertaining to prevalence, risk factors, interventions, and differences between dietetics students and other majors when it comes to severity and progress of ON throughout the continuing years of study, or between dietitians and other professional groups.
BACKGROUND: Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/BY5KF.