Nurse

护士
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:上呼吸道感染(URI)的抗生素处方高达50%是不合适的。减少不必要的抗生素处方的临床决策支持(CDS)系统已被实施到电子健康记录中。但是提供商对它们的使用受到限制。
    目的:作为委托协议,我们采用了经过验证的电子健康记录集成临床预测规则(iCPR)基于CDS的注册护士(RN)干预措施,包括分诊以识别低视力URI患者,然后进行CDS指导的RN访视。它于2022年2月实施,作为纽约4个学术卫生系统内43个初级和紧急护理实践的随机对照阶梯式楔形试验。威斯康星州,还有犹他州.虽然问题出现时得到了务实的解决,需要对实施障碍进行系统评估,以更好地理解和解决这些障碍。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性案例研究,从专家访谈中收集有关临床工作流程和分诊模板使用的定量和定性数据,研究调查,与实践人员进行例行检查,和图表回顾实施iCPR干预措施的第一年。在更新的CFIR(实施研究综合框架)的指导下,我们描述了在动态护理中对RN实施URIiCPR干预的初始障碍.CFIR结构被编码为缺失,中性,弱,或强大的执行因素。
    结果:在所有实施领域中发现了障碍。最强的障碍是在外部环境中发现的,随着这些因素的不断下降,影响了内部环境。由COVID-19驱动的当地条件是最强大的障碍之一,影响执业工作人员的态度,并最终促进以工作人员变化为特征的工作基础设施,RN短缺和营业额,和相互竞争的责任。有关RN实践范围的政策和法律因州和机构对这些法律的适用而异,其中一些允许RNs有更多的临床自主权。这需要在每个研究地点采用不同的研究程序来满足实践要求。增加创新的复杂性。同样,体制政策导致了与现有分诊的不同程度的兼容性,房间,和文档工作流。有限的可用资源加剧了这些工作流冲突,以及任选参与的实施气氛,很少有参与激励措施,因此,与其他临床职责相比,相对优先级较低。
    结论:在医疗保健系统之间和内部,患者摄入和分诊的工作流程存在显著差异.即使在相对简单的临床工作流程中,工作流程和文化差异明显影响了干预采用。本研究的收获可以应用于现有工作流程中的新的和创新的CDS工具的其他RN委托协议实现,以支持集成和改进吸收。在实施全系统临床护理干预时,必须考虑该州文化和工作流程的可变性,卫生系统,实践,和个人水平。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04255303;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04255303。
    BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of antibiotic prescriptions for upper respiratory infections (URIs) are inappropriate. Clinical decision support (CDS) systems to mitigate unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions have been implemented into electronic health records, but their use by providers has been limited.
    OBJECTIVE: As a delegation protocol, we adapted a validated electronic health record-integrated clinical prediction rule (iCPR) CDS-based intervention for registered nurses (RNs), consisting of triage to identify patients with low-acuity URI followed by CDS-guided RN visits. It was implemented in February 2022 as a randomized controlled stepped-wedge trial in 43 primary and urgent care practices within 4 academic health systems in New York, Wisconsin, and Utah. While issues were pragmatically addressed as they arose, a systematic assessment of the barriers to implementation is needed to better understand and address these barriers.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective case study, collecting quantitative and qualitative data regarding clinical workflows and triage-template use from expert interviews, study surveys, routine check-ins with practice personnel, and chart reviews over the first year of implementation of the iCPR intervention. Guided by the updated CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research), we characterized the initial barriers to implementing a URI iCPR intervention for RNs in ambulatory care. CFIR constructs were coded as missing, neutral, weak, or strong implementation factors.
    RESULTS: Barriers were identified within all implementation domains. The strongest barriers were found in the outer setting, with those factors trickling down to impact the inner setting. Local conditions driven by COVID-19 served as one of the strongest barriers, impacting attitudes among practice staff and ultimately contributing to a work infrastructure characterized by staff changes, RN shortages and turnover, and competing responsibilities. Policies and laws regarding scope of practice of RNs varied by state and institutional application of those laws, with some allowing more clinical autonomy for RNs. This necessitated different study procedures at each study site to meet practice requirements, increasing innovation complexity. Similarly, institutional policies led to varying levels of compatibility with existing triage, rooming, and documentation workflows. These workflow conflicts were compounded by limited available resources, as well as an implementation climate of optional participation, few participation incentives, and thus low relative priority compared to other clinical duties.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both between and within health care systems, significant variability existed in workflows for patient intake and triage. Even in a relatively straightforward clinical workflow, workflow and cultural differences appreciably impacted intervention adoption. Takeaways from this study can be applied to other RN delegation protocol implementations of new and innovative CDS tools within existing workflows to support integration and improve uptake. When implementing a system-wide clinical care intervention, considerations must be made for variability in culture and workflows at the state, health system, practice, and individual levels.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04255303; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04255303.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    护士,最大的医疗劳动力,处于有利地位,可以在促进行星健康的倡议中发挥领导作用。然而,在学术文献中,很少有护士领导在卫生部门应对气候变化的实际例子。
    本讨论文件的目的是介绍澳大利亚护士,他们正在领导旨在倡导行星健康和促进可持续实践的举措。
    本文介绍了来自2023年10月和11月进行的访谈的一系列案例研究。
    护士的经验和见解,随着他们遇到的挑战,作为Kouzes和Posner五种模范领导实践的证据。
    案例研究表明,任命更多具有气候和可持续性专业知识的护士将加快针对废物管理的响应策略的实施。医疗保健组织的减排和气候适应力。
    UNASSIGNED: Nurses, the largest healthcare workforce, are well placed to provide leadership in initiatives that promote planetary health. Yet, few practical examples of nurse leadership in the health sector\'s response to climate change are evident in the scholarly literature.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this discussion paper is to profile Australian nurses who are leading initiatives designed to champion planetary health and promote sustainable practice.
    UNASSIGNED: The paper presents a series of case studies derived from interviews conducted in October and November 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: The nurses\' experiences and insights, along with the challenges they have encountered, are presented as evidence of Kouzes and Posner\'s five practices of exemplary leadership.
    UNASSIGNED: The case studies demonstrate that appointment of more nurses with climate and sustainability expertise will accelerate the implementation of responsive strategies that target waste management, emissions reduction and climate resilience across healthcare organisations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多年来,国家和国际护士组织已经制定了行为守则和道德守则。随着时间的推移,强制性和有抱负的方法之间出现了新的差异,这些方法是护士如何得到遵守规则(强制性道德)或激励措施(理想道德)的支持的基础。然而,到目前为止,没有研究应用这些方法来分析可用的代码并确定主要使用哪种方法。
    方法:在本案例研究中,意大利护理行为准则(NCC),于2019年出版,由八章的53篇文章组成,第一次被翻译,然后使用开发的矩阵进行分析,以确定引用强制性或理想伦理的文章。使用名义组技术来最大程度地减少评估过程中的主观性。
    结果:在组成NNC的53篇中,共有49篇文章涉及个体护士的行为。文章被细分为97个单位(每篇从1个到4个):89个单位(91.8%)属于一个独特的类别,而八类(8.2%)根据其含义分为两类。共有38个单位(39.2%)被归类为强制性伦理,58个单位(59.8%)被归类为理想伦理;然而,一个(1.0%)反映了强制性和理想的道德。
    结论:根据调查结果,意大利专业机构(FNOPI)为护理专业人员发布了现代守则,其中理想的观点占主导地位,为其他护理组织在更新其守则的过程中提供了很好的榜样,旨在体现理想的道德。
    BACKGROUND: Over the years, national and international nurses\' organisations have drawn up Codes of Conduct and Codes of Ethics. A new differentiation has emerged over time between mandatory and aspirational approaches underlying how nurses can be supported by documents with rules to be respected (mandatory ethics) or by incentives (aspirational ethics). However, to date, no research has applied these approaches to analyse available Codes and to identify which approach are predominantly used.
    METHODS: In this case study, the Italian Nursing Code of Conduct (NCC), published in 2019, composed of 53 articles distributed in eight chapters, was first translated, and then analysed using a developed matrix to identify the articles that refer to mandatory or aspirational ethics. A nominal group technique was used to minimise subjectivity in the evaluation process.
    RESULTS: A total of 49 articles addressing the actions of the individual nurse were considered out of 53 composing the NNC. Articles were broken down into 97 units (from one to four for each article): 89 units (91.8%) were attributed to a unique category, while eight (8.2%) to two categories according to their meaning. A total of 38 units (39.2%) were categorised under the mandatory ethics and 58 (59.8%) under the aspirational ethics; however, one (1.0%) reflected both mandatory and aspirational ethics.
    CONCLUSIONS: According to the findings, the Italian Professional Body (FNOPI) has issued a modern code for nursing professionals in which an aspirational perspective is dominant offering a good example for other nursing organisations in the process of updating their codes when aimed at embodying an aspirational ethics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    健康的社会决定因素是影响健康结果的环境条件,比如住房,交通运输,和邻里。在这份报告中,我们调查了3例参与健康指导干预研究的有社会危险因素的参与者.这项研究是以科学为基础的,为中西部州的老年参与者提供护士健康教练模型,旨在装备和授权他们实现和维持他们的健康和最佳功能,以支持在家中独立生活。该计划是一个为期8周的虚拟教练方法,使用每周,30分钟,与参与者进行双向视频辅导。对于三种情况中的每一种,我们描述了参与的模式,随着教练的发展,早期和后期的健康目标,以及所取得的成果的类型。从这些案例研究中,我们说明了社会决定因素如何影响目标的类型,进程,以及健康教练计划参与者取得的潜在成果。从这些见解中,我们提出了卫生政策和服务的方向以及未来的研究考虑。
    Social determinants of health are the conditions in the environment that influence health outcomes, such as housing, transportation, and neighborhoods. In this report, we examine 3 cases of participants with social risk factors who participated in a health coaching intervention study. The study was a science-based, nurse health coaching model provided to older adult participants in a Midwestern state designed to equip and empower them to achieve and maintain their health and optimum function to support independent living at home. The program was an 8-week virtual coaching method using weekly, 30-minute, 2-way video coaching sessions with participants. For each of the 3 cases, we describe the patterns of engagement, early and later health goals as coaching progressed, and the types of outcomes achieved. From these case studies, we illustrate how social determinants may affect the types of goals, processes, and potential outcomes achieved by participants of health coaching programs. From these insights, we propose directions in health policy and services and future research considerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    反思案例讨论(RCD)是护士进行的反思活动,助产士,和其他医护人员提高他们的技能,批判性思维,和知识。本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南清单,包括来自各种数据库的文章,比如Scopus,PubMed,ProQuest,和科学直接。每篇文章的质量评估均使用关键评估技能计划(CASP)进行。在最初的数据库搜索过程中,我们从Scopus检索了997篇文章,来自ProQuest的700篇文章,来自PubMed的357,554篇文章,和来自ScienceDirect的1,526篇文章。搜索是使用相关关键字进行的,包括“反思性案例讨论,\“\”护理,\"\"批判性思维,\"\"技能,“和”知识。“按照纳入和排除标准,确定了八篇相关文章,不包括重复研究,仅限于全文,开放访问,在医院环境中进行,用英语写的.研究结果表明,刚果民盟有效地提高了护士的技能,批判性思维,和知识,有助于他们在病人护理方面的专业精神。事实证明,RCD还有利于防止重复错误和促进护士之间的团队合作。因此,应将RCD视为持续专业发展(CPD)的宝贵形式,并将其纳入护士的持续学习过程中。
    Reflective case discussion (RCD) is a reflective activity conducted by nurses, midwives, and other healthcare workers to enhance their skills, critical thinking, and knowledge. This systematic review follows the PRISMA Guideline checklist and includes articles from various databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, ProQuest, and ScienceDirect. The quality assessment of each article was performed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP). During the initial database search, we retrieved 997 articles from Scopus, 700 articles from ProQuest, 357,554 articles from PubMed, and 1,526 articles from ScienceDirect. The search was conducted using relevant keywords, including \"reflective case discussion,\" \"nursing,\" \"critical thinking,\" \"skills,\" and \"knowledge.\" Following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight relevant articles were identified, excluding duplicate studies, limited to full papers, open access, conducted in a hospital setting, and written in English. The findings demonstrate that RCD effectively enhances nurses\' skills, critical thinking, and knowledge, contributing to their professionalism in patient care. RCD also proved beneficial in preventing repetitive mistakes and promoting teamwork among nurses. Thus, RCD should be embraced as a valuable form of Continuing Professional Development (CPD) and integrated into nurses\' ongoing learning processes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    护士经常创新以应对运营故障,法规,程序,和/或其他阻止他们提供高质量患者护理的工作流程障碍。不幸的是,大多数护士创新不会传播到更广泛的受众,剥夺其他护士利用已经在其他地方开发的解决方案。从社会和福利的角度来看,这种扩散不足是有问题的。本文的目的是了解如何减少护士创新的扩散不足。
    我们对荷兰最大的学术医院的医疗创客空间进行了定性案例研究。该医疗创客空间报告了异常高的护士创新扩散率。我们的数据收集包括现场观察,档案数据,辅助数据,对主要线人进行了15次深入采访。定性编码程序以及演绎推理和归纳推理的组合用于分析数据。
    我们的数据显示,组织,监管,和市场壁垒阻止护士以预期的方式进一步发展和传播他们的创新。也就是说,因为护士期望将最初的解决方案转变为可以与他人共享的创新将太耗时和困难,他们不会继续进一步发展。我们研究的医疗创客空间通过开发一个主要接管创新和扩散过程的创新生态系统来充分解决这个问题。
    我们提供了一个医疗创客空间,和更广泛意义上的创新支持系统,可以设计为更充分地解决护士创新-扩散差距。我们确定的实际解决方案的两个主要要素是:(1)支持系统应促进其他人可以领导创新的发展和传播;(2)支持系统应促进参与者将其功能专长整合到创新生态系统中。我们有两个理论贡献。首先,我们有助于从心理学角度理解护士创新-扩散过程中的障碍.第二,我们发现,生态系统的观点有利于发展扩散更频繁发生的创新支持系统。
    Nurses frequently innovate in response to operational failures, regulations, procedures, and/or other workflow barriers that prevent them from delivering high-quality patient care. Unfortunately, most nurse innovations do not diffuse to a broader audience, depriving other nurses from taking advantage of solutions that have already been developed elsewhere. This under-diffusion is problematic from a societal and welfare point of view. The goal of this paper is to understand how diffusion shortage of nurse innovations can be reduced.
    We develop a qualitative case study of a medical makerspace at the largest academic hospital in the Netherlands. This medical makerspace reported unusually high rates of nurse innovation diffusion. Our data collection includes on-site observations, archival data, secondary data, and fifteen in-depth interviews with key informants. Qualitative coding procedures and a combination of deductive and inductive reasoning are used to analyze the data.
    Our data show that personal, organizational, regulatory, and market barriers prevent nurses from further developing and diffusion their innovations in an anticipatory manner. That is, because nurses expect that transforming an initial solution into an innovation that can be shared with others will be too time consuming and difficult they do not proceed with the further development. The medical makerspace that we investigated adequately addresses this problem by developing an innovation ecosystem that largely takes over the innovation and diffusion process.
    We provide a concrete example of how a medical makerspace, and innovation support systems in a broader sense, can be designed to more adequately address the nurse innovation-diffusion gap. The two main elements of the practical solution that we identified are: (1) Support systems should facilitate that others may lead the development and diffusion of innovations and (2) The support system should promote that actors integrate their functional specializations within an innovation ecosystem. We make two theoretical contributions. First, we contribute to understanding barriers in the nurse innovation-diffusion process from a psychological point. Second, we identified that an ecosystem perspective is beneficial to develop innovation support systems in which diffusion occurs more often.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    电子药物管理系统(EMMS)已在澳大利亚大多数急性护理机构中实施,以减少药物错误率。与在医院引入EMMS相关的关键挑战之一是临床医生采用非正式的“变通办法”,包括护士。在这项研究中,我们旨在深入研究一种解决方法,护士在给药时未在EMMS中记录药物给药。我们对事件报告进行了审查,以确定导致这种解决方法发生的因素以及这种解决方法对患者的后果或潜在后果。我们确定了一系列促成因素,与用户相关的因素(例如护士时间不足)在事件报告中最常见。这种解决方法最常见的结果是患者接受了额外的剂量。这项研究表明,减少这种解决方法的策略应该考虑用户和组织因素,而不仅仅是EMMS设计。
    Electronic medication management systems (EMMS) have been implemented in most acute care settings in Australia to reduce medication error rates. One of the key challenges related to the introduction of EMMS in hospitals is the uptake of informal \"workarounds\" by clinicians, including nurses. In this study, we aimed to examine one workaround in depth, nurses not documenting medication administration in the EMMS at the time of administration. We conducted a review of incident reports to identify the factors that contribute to this workaround occurring and the consequences or potential consequences of this workaround on patients. We identified a range of contributing factors, with factors relating to the user (e.g. nurses being time poor) occurring most frequently in incident reports. The most frequently seen consequence of this workaround was the patient receiving an additional dose. This research revealed that strategies to reduce the uptake of this workaround should consider user and organisational factors rather than just EMMS design alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    简介:由于缺乏知识(关于病毒传播,等。),也是由于缺乏统一的组织和处理程序。这是一个有能力为危机做准备的时期,为了适应现有的条件,并从情况中得出结论对于保持ICU(重症监护病房)的运作至关重要。该项目的目的是比较波兰在大流行的第一波和第二波中对COVID-19的大流行反应。此比较将用于确定响应的优缺点,包括根据欧盟弹性模型(2014年)和世卫组织弹性模型(2020年)向卫生专业人员和卫生系统以及患有COVID-19患者的ICU提出的挑战。世卫组织复原力模型适用于COVID-19的情况,因为它是基于这一经验开发的。方法:使用EC和WHO弹性指南创建了6个元素和13个分配给它们的标准的矩阵。结果:弹性系统中的良好治理可确保不受限制地访问所有资源,自由和透明的信息流动,和足够数量的动机良好的人力资源。结论:适当的准备,适应现有情况,危机局势的有效管理是确保ICUs复原力的重要因素。
    Introduction: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic was a period of uncertainty and stress for healthcare managers due to the lack of knowledge (about the transmission of the virus, etc.) and also due to the lack of uniform organisational and treatment procedures. It was a period where the ability to prepare for a crisis, to adapt to the existing conditions, and to draw conclusions from the situation were of critical importance to keep ICUs (intensive care units) operating. The aim of this project is to compare the pandemic response to COVID-19 in Poland during the first and second waves of the pandemic. This comparison will be used to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the response, including challenges presented to health professionals and health systems and ICUs with COVID-19 patients according to the European Union Resilience Model (2014) and the WHO Resilience Model (2020). The WHO Resilience model was suitable to the COVID-19 situation because it was developed based on this experience. Methods: A matrix of 6 elements and 13 standards assigned to them was created using the EC and WHO resilience guidelines. Results: Good governance in resilient systems ensures access to all resources without constraints, free and transparent flow of information, and a sufficient number of well-motivated human resources. Conclusions: Appropriate preparation, adaptation to the existing situation, and effective management of crisis situations are important elements of ensuring the resilience of ICUs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究旨在了解延长产后家庭访问计划对父母的多元文化综合健康素养(CHL)的影响,社会经济上处于不利地位的瑞典环境。
    方法:这项准实验研究采用了病例对照抽样方法,通过斯德哥尔摩的两个儿童保健中心招募首次父母。从2017年10月至2020年8月,当他们的孩子年龄在不到两个月(n=193)和15-18个月(n=151)之间时,参与者通过结构化问卷进行了两次访谈。分析使用线性回归模型和非参数检验。
    结果:需要语言翻译的父母亚组显示,在接受长期家庭访问干预的干预组中,从前期措施到后期措施,CHL在统计学上得到了显着改善(F=11.429;p<.001),与仅接受普通瑞典儿童保健中心计划的相应亚组相比(F=5.025;p=.027)。
    结论:产后家庭访视干预措施可能会减少生活在多元文化中的父母在CHL中的不平等,社会经济上处于不利地位的环境。
    This study aimed to gain knowledge about the impact of an extended postnatal home visiting program on parents\' comprehensive health literacy (CHL) in multicultural, socioeconomically disadvantaged Swedish settings.
    This quasi-experimental study adopted a case-control sampling method recruiting first-time parents through two Child Health Care Centers in Stockholm. Participants were interviewed twice through structured questionnaires when their child was aged between less than two months (n = 193) and 15-18 months (n = 151) from October 2017 to August 2020. Analyses used linear regression models and nonparametric tests.
    A subgroup of parents that needed language interpreters demonstrated statistically significantly improved CHL from premeasures to postmeasures within the intervention group that received an extended home visiting intervention (F = 11.429; p <.001), and when compared with a corresponding subgroup that received merely the ordinary Swedish Child Health Care Centers program (F = 5.025; p = .027).
    Postnatal home visiting interventions may reduce inequity in CHL for parents living in multicultural, socioeconomically disadvantaged settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    进行这项研究是为了确定护士的同情心疲劳水平,并回顾与之相关的几个变量;此外,评估同组的同理心水平。这是一项从2021年12月至2022年5月对在与土耳其卫生部相关的城市医院工作的护士进行的横断面研究。研究组由616名护士组成。个人信息表格,同情疲劳短量表(CF-SS),和杰斐逊同理心量表被用来收集数据。数据是通过面对面访谈收集的。学生t检验,单向方差分析,采用多元线性回归分析进行数据分析。统计学显著性值被接受为p<0.05。研究组由499名(81.0%)女性和117名(19.0%)男性组成,年龄20~51岁,平均年龄29.2±6.9岁。从CF-SS获得的得分范围为16至130,平均得分为70.96±25.04。发现在家庭收入较低的参与者中,同情疲劳的程度更高,那些每周工作超过40小时的人,那些不情愿选择自己职业的人,那些对自己的职业不满意的人,以及与COVID-19患者有接触史的患者(每组p<0.05)。同情疲劳水平与同理心之间存在显着关联(r=0.92;p=0.220)。在观察到的护士中,同情疲劳的水平是中等的。影响同情疲劳程度的因素包括性别、家庭收入,选择护理专业的原因,由护士进行日常护理的患者数量,对自己的职业满意,以及与COVID-19患者的接触史。需要进行更广泛的研究,重点关注护士的同情心疲劳和同理心之间的关联。
    This study was conducted to determine the compassion fatigue level of nurses and to review several variables believed to be associated with it; in addition, an assessment is made of empathy levels in the same group. This is a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2021 to May 2022 on nurses working at a city hospital linked to the Turkish Ministry of Health. The study group consisted of 616 nurses. A Personal Information Form, the Compassion Fatigue-Short Scale (CF-SS), and the Jefferson Scale of Empathy were used to collect data. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews. Student\'s t-test, One-Way Analysis of Variance, and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis were used for data analysis. The statistical significance value was accepted as p < 0.05. The study group consisted of 499 (81.0%) females and 117 (19.0%) males, and their ages ranged from 20 to 51, with a mean age of 29.2 ± 6.9 years. The scores obtained from the CF-SS ranged from 16 to 130, with a mean score of 70.96 ± 25.04. The level of compassion fatigue was found to be higher in participants with a low family income, those who work more than 40 h a week, those who chose their profession unwillingly, those who are not satisfied with their profession, and those with a history of contact with a COVID-19 patient (p < 0.05 for each group). There was a significant association between levels of compassion fatigue and empathy (r = 0.92; p = 0.220). The level of compassion fatigue was found to be moderate in the nurses observed. The factors affecting the level of compassion fatigue included gender, family income, reasons for choosing nursing as a profession, the number of patients given daily care by the nurses, satisfaction with their profession, and history of contact with a COVID-19 patient. More extensive studies focusing on the association between compassion fatigue and empathy in nurses are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号