Non-dystrophic myotonias (NDM) are rare skeletal muscle channelopathies, mainly linked to two voltage-gated ion channel genes, CLCN1 and SCN4A. The aim of this study is to identify the clinical and genetic features of patients with NDM in Japan. We collected a Japanese nationwide case series of patients with clinical diagnosis of NDM (1999-2021). Among 71 out of 88 pedigrees, using Sanger and next-generation sequencing targeting both CLCN1 and SCN4A genes, variants classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic/unknown significance were detected from CLCN1 (31 probands), SCN4A (36 probands), or both genes (4 probands), and 11 of them were novel. Pedigrees carrying mono-allelic CLCN1 variants were more commonly seen than that with bi-allelic/double variants (24:7). Compared to patients with CLCN1 variants, patients harboring SCN4A variants showed younger onset age (5.64 ± 4.70 years vs. 9.23 ± 5.21 years), fewer warm-up phenomenon, but more paramyotonia, hyperCKemia, transient muscle weakness, and cold-induced myotonia. Haplotype analysis verified founder effects of the hot spot variants in both CLCN1 (p.T539A) and SCN4A (p.T1313M). This study reveals variants in CLCN1 and SCN4A from 80.7% of our case series, extending genetic spectrum of NDM, and would further our understanding of clinical similarity/diversity between CLCN1- and SCN4A-related NDM, as well as the genetic racial differences.

BACKGROUND: Non-dystrophic myotonias (NDMs) are skeletal muscle disorders involving myotonia distinct from myotonic dystrophy. It has been reported that the muscle pathology is usually normal or comprises mild myopathic changes in NDMs. We describe various pathological findings mimicking those of myotonic dystrophy (DM) in biopsied muscle specimens from a patient with NDMs with a long disease duration.
METHODS: A 66-year-old Japanease man presented eye closure myotonia, percussion myotonia and grip myotonia together with the warm-up phenomenon and cold aggravation from early childhood. On genetic analysis, a heterozygous mutation of the SCN4A gene (c.2065 C > T, p.L689F), with no mutation of the CLCN1, DMPK, or ZNF9/CNBP gene, was detected. He was diagnosed as having NDMs. A biopsy of the biceps brachii muscle showed increasing fiber size variation, internal nuclei, chained nuclei, necrotic fibers, fiber splitting, endomysial fibrosis, pyknotic nuclear clumps and disorganized intermyofibrillar networks. Sarcoplasmic masses, tubular aggregates and ragged-red fibers were absent.
CONCLUSIONS: It is noteworthy that the present study revealed various pathological findings resembling those seen in DM, although the pathology is usually normal or mild in NDMs. The pathological similarities may be due to muscular modification with long-standing myotonia or excessive muscle contraction based on abnormal channel activity.

Non-dystrophic myotonias are caused by mutations of either the skeletal muscle chloride (CLCN1) or sodium channel (SCN4A) gene. They exhibit several distinct phenotypes, including myotonia congenita, paramyotonia congenita and sodium channel myotonia, and a genotype-phenotype correlation has been established. However, there are atypical cases that do not fit with the standard classification. We report a case of 27-year-old male who had non-dystrophic myotonia with periodic paralysis and two heterozygous mutations, E950K in CLCN1 and F1290L in SCN4A. His mother, who exhibited myotonia without paralytic attack, only harbored E950K, and no mutations were identified in his asymptomatic father. Therefore, the E950K mutation was presumed to be pathogenic, although it was reported as an extremely rare genetic variant. The proband experienced paralytic attacks that lasted for weeks and were less likely to be caused by CLCN1 mutation alone. Functional analysis of the F1290L mutant channel heterologously expressed in cultured cells revealed enhanced activation inducing membrane hyperexcitability. We therefore propose that the two mutations had additive effects on membrane excitability that resulted in more prominent myotonia in the proband. Our case stresses the value of performing genetic analysis of both CLCN1 and SCN4A genes for myotonic patients with an atypical phenotype.