Alkaptonuria is a rare inherited disorder for which there was no disease-modifying treatment. In order to develop a successful approved therapy of AKU multiple barriers had to be overcome. These included activities before the conduct of the study including deciding on the drug therapy, the dose of the drug to be used, clarify the nature of the disease, develop outcome measures likely to yield a positive outcome, have a strategy to ensure appropriate patient participation through identification, build a consortium of investigators, obtain regulatory approval for proposed investigation plan and secure funding. Significant barriers were overcome during the conduct of the multicentre study to ensure harmonisation. Mechanisms were put in place to recruit and retain patients in the study. Barriers to patient access following completion of the study and regulatory approval were resolved.

BACKGROUND: Nitisinone used in alkaptonuria (AKU) can result in keratopathy due to strongly increased tyrosine levels.
METHODS: This study aimed to investigate nutritional status and changes in plasma tyrosine and phenylalanine and urinary homogentisic acid (u-HGA) levels in 8 adult AKU patients (mean age, 56.3 ± 4.7 years) who were on tyrosine/phenylalanine-restricted diet together with 2 mg/day nitisinone.
RESULTS: The treatment period was 23.4 ± 6.9 months. Daily dietary protein intake was restricted to 0.8-1.0 g/kg/day. Daily tyrosine intake was restricted to 260-450 mg/day for females and 330-550 mg/day for males. Tyrosine/phenylalanine-free amino acid supplements accounted for an average of 56.1% of daily protein intake. The following assessments were performed: anthropometric and plasma tyrosine level measurements every 2 months; ophthalmological examination every 6 months, and nutritional laboratory analyses and measurements of plasma amino acids and u-HGA once in a year. It was targeted to keep the plasma tyrosine level <500 μmol/L. The plasma tyrosine level was <100 μmol/L before the treatment in all patients and around a mean of 582.5 ± 194.8 μmol/L during the treatment. The diet was rearranged if a plasma tyrosine level of >700 μmol/L was detected. The u-HGA level before and after the 1st year of treatment was 1,429.3 ± 1,073.4 mmol/mol creatinine and 33.6 ± 9.5 mmol/mol creatinine, respectively. None of the patients developed keratopathy or experienced weight loss and protein or micronutrient deficiency.
CONCLUSIONS: AKU patients should receive tyrosine/phenylalanine-restricted diet for reducing plasma tyrosine level to the safe range. Tyrosine/phenylalanine-free amino acid supplements can be safely used to enhance dietary compliance. Keratopathy and nutrient deficiency should be frequently monitored.

Four patients, from three families, with alkaptonuria receiving 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting nitisinone therapy, which lowers homogentisic acid and increases tyrosine, developed vitiligo. Three of the four patients were receiving nitisinone 2 mg daily, while the fourth was on 10 mg daily. All four patients were either receiving or had received transiently proton-pump inhibitors as therapy for dyspepsia. The ages of the patients were 35, 42, 40, and 67 years, respectively. Three patients were men and one was a woman. All four patients were either taking a proton-pump inhibitor or had been taking one at some point. Three of the four were of South Asian and one of Caucasian background. The three patients with South Asian background also had either a personal or family history of autoimmune disease. Distressing vitiligo, initially in an acrofacial distribution, developed unexpectedly in these four patients, before then progressing to involve other parts of the body. Potential factors in the appearance of vitiligo in this setting, including nitisinone and other drug therapy, are explored and responses to the appearance of vitiligo are discussed.

Background: Hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 is a rare genetic disorder leading to liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Few decades ago, dietary measures and ultimately liver transplant constituted the only treatment modalities. Nowadays, early diagnosis and therapy with nitisinone can reverse the clinical picture. In developing countries, diagnostic and therapeutic challenges may affect the outcome of this disease. The choice of the treatment modality may depend on the economic status of each country. Few reports on the long-term outcome of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 are available from developing and Arab countries. Methods: A retrospective study of charts of Lebanese patients diagnosed with tyrosinemia type 1 and followed, at the American University of Beirut, during a 12-year period was performed. Clinical presentation and liver biochemical profile at diagnosis were analyzed, along with therapeutic modalities and long-term outcome. Results: Twenty-two children were diagnosed and followed during the study period. Median age at diagnosis was 7 months (range: one day to 35 months). Most of the patients presented with hepatomegaly and jaundice. Four patients were referred for atypical presentations with developmental delay and seizures, secondary to undiagnosed hypoglycemia episodes. Around half of the patients presented with failure to thrive. Transaminitis, cholestasis and increased α-fetoprotein level were variably present at diagnosis (36% to 50%). All patients had elevated plasma tyrosine and urinary succinylacetone levels. Genetic testing was performed in 9%. Only one third could be treated with nitisinone. Liver transplant was electively performed in 9% of cases, to overcome the long-term cost of nitisinone. One third of the patients died between the age of 1 month and 11 years. Surviving patients are still candidates for liver transplant. Conclusion: Our experience reflects the challenges of diagnosis and treatment of hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 in a developing country. In the absence of specific neonatal screening, early diagnosis relies mostly on the clinical awareness of the physician. Long-term nitisinone use may be deterred by its high cost and liver transplantation carries risks of surgical complications. New, effective, and less expensive treatments are needed, especially for developing countries.

Nitisinone, although unapproved for use in alkaptonuria (AKU), is currently the only homogentisic acid lowering therapy with a potential to modify disease progression in AKU. Therefore, safe use of nitisinone off-label requires identifying and managing tyrosine keratopathy. A 22-year-old male with AKU commenced 2 mg daily nitisinone after full assessment. He was issued an alert card explaining potential ocular symptoms such as red eye, tearing, ocular pain and visual impairment and how to manage them. On his first and second annual follow-up visits to the National Alkaptonuria Centre (NAC), there was no corneal keratopathy on slit lamp examination. On his third follow-up annual visit to the NAC, he was found to have typical dendritiform corneal keratopathy in both eyes which was asymptomatic. Nitisinone was suspended until a repeat slit lamp examination, 2 weeks later, confirmed that the keratopathy had resolved. He recommenced nitisinone 2 mg daily with a stricter low protein diet. On his fourth annual follow-up visit to the NAC, a routine slit lamp examination showed mild corneal keratopathy in the left eye. This is despite him reporting no ocular symptoms. This case highlights the fact that corneal keratopathy can occur without symptoms and any monitoring plan with off-label use of nitisinone in AKU will need to take this possibility into account. This is also the first time that typical corneal keratopathy has been described with the use of low dose nitisinone in AKU without symptoms.

Tyrosinemia type 1 (TYR1) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder of amino acid metabolism that is fatal without treatment. With medication (nitisinone) and dietary restrictions outcomes are improved. We conducted a systematic review to investigate if treatment with nitisinone following screening provides better long-term outcomes than treatment with nitisinone following symptomatic detection.
We searched Web of Science, Medline, Pre-Medline, and Embase up to 23rd September 2016 for journal articles comparing clinical outcomes of TYR1 patients receiving earlier versus later nitisinone treatment. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, assessed full texts, and appraised study quality. Data extraction was performed by a single reviewer and checked by a second.
We included seven articles out of 470 unique records identified by our search. The seven articles included four studies (three cohort studies and one cross-sectional study). Study sample sizes ranged from 17 to 148. There is consistent evidence that nitisinone is an effective treatment for TYR1, and some evidence that earlier treatment with nitisinone and dietary restrictions within the first one or 2 months of life is associated with reduced need for liver transplantation, lower rates of renal dysfunction, fewer neurological crises, and fewer, shorter hospital admissions compared to later treatment. However, study quality was moderate to weak, with high risk of confounding and applicability concerns to the screening context. We conducted post hoc analyses to address these issues. Results suggested an association between earlier treatment and fewer liver transplants (earlier treatment: 0% of 10-24 patients; later treatment: 25-60% of 4-15 patients), but no impact on neurological crises. We found no effect of treatment timing on mortality in either the primary or post hoc analyses. Post hoc analyses of other health-related outcomes were not possible because of sample size or reporting.
There is some evidence from observational studies that earlier treatment with nitisinone might be beneficial but this is subject to bias. The applicability of our findings to the screening context or clinical practice is limited as not all early-treated patients were identified by screening and late-treated groups included patients born prior to the availability of nitisinone.