OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to summarize and synthesize the evidence that investigates the secondary effects of the application of botulinum toxin (BT) into the masticatory muscles and its effects on bone density.
METHODS: Database searches were conducted until March 19th, 2024. The quality of the studies was assessed by the Cochrane tool risk of bias for the randomized controlled trials and the ROBINS-I tool for non-randomized studies. The Cochrane Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) was used to evaluate the confidence in the overall evidence.
RESULTS: Five studies looking at the effects of botulinum toxin on bone density and resorption when applied to masticatory muscles were found. No significant changes were observed in most of the studies when looking at the effects of botulinum toxin on mandibular condyle volume, density, mandibular angle thickness, and coronoid process volume. The only finding that was statistically and clinically relevant was the difference between patients who received a double application of BT when compared with patients who received a single application (SMD: -0.99 [95%CI: -1.94,-0.05]) on the volume of the mandibular angle.
CONCLUSIONS: There is no clear pattern on whether the application of botulinum toxin is associated with bone resorption or not. Although some studies show statistical significance of the findings, the magnitude of the changes in bone density and their clinical significance are not completely clear.
CONCLUSIONS: To understand the effectiveness of the use of botulinum toxin into the masticatory muscles and its possible secondary adverse effects on the density of the mandible.

Since its first approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 1989 for strabismus, botulinum toxin indications of use have been widely expanded. Due to its anticholinergic properties, this toxin is currently approved in adult patients for the treatment of a wide range of neuromuscular, otolaryngologic, orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and urologic disorders. Approved pediatric indications of use include the treatment of blepharospasm associated with dystonia, strabismus, lower-limb spasticity, focal spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy, and neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Alongside these approved indications, botulinum toxin is extensively used off-label. Although several clinical studies have shown that botulinum toxin is effective and well-tolerated in children, uncertainties persist regarding its long-term effects on growth and appropriate dosing in this population. As such, further research is needed to better define the botulinum toxin risk-benefit profile and expand approved uses in pediatrics. This narrative review aimed to provide a broad overview of the evidence concerning the clinical effectiveness and safety of BoNT with respect to its principal authorized and non-authorized pediatric therapeutic indications, as well as to describe perspectives on its future use in children.

Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet it remains underrecognized and undertreated, especially in the pediatric and adolescent population. Chronic migraine occurs approximately in 1% of children and adolescents requiring preventive treatment. Topiramate is the only FDA-approved preventative treatment for children older than 12 years of age, but there is conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy. OnabotulinumtoxinA is a known and approved treatment for the management of chronic migraine in people older than 18 years. Several studies examine its role in the pediatric population with positive results; however, the clear-cut benefit is still unclear. OnabotulinumtoxinA seems not only to improve disability scores (PedMIDAS) but also to improve the quality, characteristics, and frequency of migraines in the said population. This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on the efficacy, dosing, administration, long-term outcomes, and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in pediatric and adolescent migraine. Eighteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. The mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), decreased from of 21.2 days per month to 10.7 after treatment. The reported treatment-related adverse effects were mild and primarily injection site related and ranged from 0% to 47.0%. Thus, this review provides compelling evidence suggesting that OnabotulinumtoxinA may represent a safe and effective preventive treatment option for pediatric migraine.

Botulinum toxin (BT), a first-line treatment for focal dystonias in adults, has gained USA Food and Drug Administration approval for pediatric upper and lower extremity spasticity and sialorrhea, though its use in children younger than 2 years old is still considered off-label treatment for all pathologies. Dosing, treatment strategies and outcome measures lack international consensus, and they are often extrapolated from adult or spasticity guidelines. This review aims to evaluate the best available evidence on the efficacy and safety of BT therapy in pediatric dystonia (age under 21 years old), isolated or associated with other medical conditions. A comprehensive search in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was conducted, including only articles in English. Although no randomized controlled trials are still present, 12 articles were included with an overall of 57 patients. All the papers demonstrate that BT can improve motor function, decrease pain and ameliorate quality of life, with minimal adverse effects in pediatric patients affected by pure or mixed dystonic motor disorders. Despite the low level of evidence, our review shows that BT could be an efficacious treatment for these pediatric patients. The frequent generalized involvement, together with the heterogeneous nature of childhood dystonic forms, sometimes intermingled with spasticity, prompts further multicenter clinical trials or prospective studies with a higher level of evidence to shed light on the efficacy and safety profile of BT in pediatric dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin (BoNT) is first-line treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Treatment of CD with BoNT usually requires injections every 3-4 months for as long as symptoms persist, which can be for the lifetime of the individual. Duration of BoNT effect can impact quality of life since it is important that efficacy is maintained throughout an injection cycle to avoid fluctuations of effect after each injection. There is currently no consensus on how to assess duration of BoNT effect in patients with CD.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted to summarize the available evidence from phase 3 clinical trials of BoNT in CD and on the interpretation of the reported duration of effect. The available evidence was analyzed in the context of clinical experience and real-world treatment practices of CD.
RESULTS: Methods for estimating duration of effect varied across publications; most were based on artificial constructs developed for clinical trials (time until a pre-specified efficacy endpoint was reached) and are not appropriate to apply in clinical practice. Clinical trial outcomes in CD were not objectively evaluated, and did not prioritize patients\' needs or focus on factors that impact patients\' daily living activities and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Better evidence and consistency of reporting for duration of effect for BoNT in CD is needed to help guide clinicians on when reinjection is likely to be required. The goal should be to keep patients as symptom-free as possible with flexible reinjection intervals tailored to individual needs.

OBJECTIVE: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) encompass several conditions that cause pain and impair function of the masticatory muscles (M-TMDs) and temporomandibular joints. There is a large interest among clinicians and researchers in the use of botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A) as a treatment for M-TMD. However, due to the lack of consistent evidence regarding the efficacy as well as adverse events of BoNT-A, clinical decision making is challenging. Therefore, this umbrella review aimed to systematically assess systematic reviews (SRs) evaluating BoNT-A treatment effects on pain intensity, mandibular movements, and adverse events in patients with M-TMDs.
METHODS: An electronic search was undertaken in the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP to identify SRs investigating BoNT-A effects on M-TMDs, published from the inception of each database until 6 December 2023. The quality of evidence was rated according to the critical appraisal checklist developed by the umbrella review methodology working group. Only high-quality SRs were included.
RESULTS: In total, 18 SRs were included. BoNT-A was shown to be more effective than placebo to reduce pain intensity, but not compared to standard treatments. Additionally, BoNT-A was not superior to placebo or standard treatments regarding improvement of mandibular movements. BoNT-A was considered to have a higher risk for adverse events on muscle and bony tissue compared with other treatments.
CONCLUSIONS: The synthesis in this umbrella review provides the highest level of evidence present. Taken together, there are indications of effectiveness of BoNT-A for treatment of M-TMDs, supported by moderate evidence. However, considering the risk of causing serious adverse events, treatment with BoNT-A is recommended to be the last treatment alternative.

Axial postural abnormalities (APAs), characterized by their frequency, disabling nature, and resistance to pharmacological treatments, significantly impact Parkinson\'s disease and atypical Parkinsonism patients. Despite advancements in diagnosing, assessing, and understanding their pathophysiology, managing these complications remains a significant challenge. Often underestimated by healthcare professionals, these disturbances can exacerbate disability. This systematic review assesses botulinum toxin treatments\' effectiveness, alone and with rehabilitation, in addressing APAs in Parkinson\'s disease, utilizing MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases for source material. Of the 1087 records retrieved, 16 met the selection criteria. Most research has focused on botulinum toxin (BoNT) as the primary treatment for camptocormia and Pisa syndrome, utilizing mostly observational methods. Despite dose and injection site variations, a common strategy was using electromyography-guided injections, occasionally enhanced with ultrasound. Patients with Pisa syndrome notably saw consistent improvements in APAs and pain. However, studies on the combined effects of botulinum toxin and rehabilitation are limited, and antecollis is significantly under-researched. These findings recommend precise BoNT injections into hyperactive muscles in well-selected patients by skilled clinicians, avoiding compensatory muscles, and underscore the necessity of early rehabilitation. Rehabilitation is crucial in a multidisciplinary approach to managing APAs, highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary team of experts.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in the salivary glands of patients with neurological impairment and drooling and its impact on the quality of life.
METHODS: This systematic review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42,023,435,242) and conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial databases until August 2023, no language restriction. Cohort studies and randomized clinical trials of patients diagnosed with drooling and neurological impairment who used botulinum toxin on the salivary gland were included, which evaluated subjective quality of life parameters. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and Risk of Bias 2 tools. The certainty of the evidence was analyzed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.
RESULTS: Eight studies involving 317 patients were included. All studies, through subjective parameters, suggested the effectiveness of botulinum toxin in reducing drooling, resulting in an improvement in the quality of life. Three studies demonstrated improvements in swallowing and four in cases of respiratory diseases. Two clinical trials had a high risk of bias, whereas one had low risk. The five cohort studies that were evaluated had a high risk of bias. The certainty of the evidence was considered low.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the patient/caregivers\' perception of improvement in drooling, dysphagia, and respiratory symptoms, it can be inferred that botulinum toxin application reduces subjective drooling in neurologically compromised patients. Its impact contributes to the general well-being and quality of life.
CONCLUSIONS: Injection of botulinum toxin into the salivary glands can be considered an alternative technique to surgical or medicinal approaches in reducing drooling. It is effective, less invasive and without significant side effects. It promotes a positive impact on the well-being and quality of life of neurological patients.

Botulinum toxin type A (BONT-A) has shown promise in improving the mood-related symptoms of psychiatric disorders by targeting muscles linked to the expression of negative emotions. We conducted a systematic review of past and ongoing efficacy trials of BONT-A therapy for psychiatric disorders to identify relevant trends in the field and discuss the refinement of therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search for published clinical trials using BONT-A injections for psychiatric disorders was performed on 4 May 2023 through OVID databases (MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO). Unpublished clinical trials were searched through the ClinicalTrials.gov and International Clinical Trial Registry Platform public registries. The risk of bias was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal tools for use in systematic reviews. We identified 21 studies (17 published, 4 unpublished clinical trials) involving 471 patients. The studies focused on evaluating the efficacy of BONT-A for major depressive, borderline personality, social anxiety, and bipolar disorders. BONT-A was most commonly injected into the glabellar area, with an average dose ranging between 37.75 U and 44.5 U in published studies and between 32.7 U and 41.3 U in unpublished trials. The results indicated significant symptom reductions across all the studied psychiatric conditions, with mild adverse effects. Thus, BONT-A appears to be safe and well-tolerated for psychiatric disorders of negative affectivity. However, despite the clinical focus, there was a noted shortage of biomarker-related assessments. Future studies should focus on pursuing mechanistic explorations of BONT-A effects at the neurobiological level.

METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Onabotulinum toxin A (OBTX-A) treatment for neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients.
METHODS: Iran.
METHODS: All relevant articles of clinical trials and cohort studies indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases up to September 6, 2022, that addressed OBTX-A treatment for NDO following SCI were included. The quality of eligible studies was evaluated using Cochrane criteria. Also, the weighted mean difference (WMD) was measured with a random-effect model.
RESULTS: Regarding the overall efficacy after OBTX-A treatment in the short term, volume per void (VV) (WMD = 118.8, 95% CI: 90.9-146.7, p < 0.01), incontinence-quality of life (IQoL) (WMD = 24.3, 95% CI: 15.8-32.8, p < 0.01), and maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) (WMD = 144.5, 95% CI: 132.3 to 156.7, p < 0.01) significantly increased, while maximum detrusor pressure during storage (MDP) (WMD = -30.5, 95% CI: -35.9 to -25.1, p < 0.01) showed a significant decrease. Furthermore, compared to the placebo group at the 200-unit dose, there was a significant increase in MCC (WMD = 113.5, 95% CI: 84.7 to 142.3, p < 0.01) and a significant decrease in MDP (WMD = -27.2, 95% CI: -39.2 to -15.1, p < 0.01). Urinary tract infection (UTI), hematuria, and autonomic dysreflexia were the most common side effects, occurring at rates of 29.6%, 14.8%, and 13.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlighted the effectiveness and safety of OBTX-A as a promising treatment of NDO following SCI.