A group of experts in dermatology, genetics, neuroscience, and regenerative medicine collaborated to summarize current knowledge on the defined factors contributing to cutaneous neurofibroma (cNF) development and to provide consensus recommendations for future research priorities to gain an improved understanding of the biology of cNF.
The group members reviewed published and unpublished data on cNF and related diseases via literature search, defined a set of key topic areas deemed critical in cNF pathogenesis, and developed recommendations in a series of consensus meetings.
Five specific topic areas were identified as being relevant to providing an enhanced understanding of the biology of cNF: (1) defining the human cells of origin; (2) understanding the role of the microenvironment, focusing on neurons, mast cells, and fibroblasts; (3) defining the genetic and molecular differences between the cNFs, focusing on size and number; (4) understanding if sex hormones are critical for cNF development or progression; and (5) identifying challenges in establishing in vitro and in vivo models representing human cNF.
The complexity of cNF biology stems from its heterogeneity at multiple levels including genetic, spatial involvement, temporal development, and cellular composition. We propose a unified working model for cNF that builds a framework to address the key questions about cNF that, when answered, will provide the necessary understanding of cNF biology to allow meaningful development of therapies.

Patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) develop multiple neurofibromas, with 8% to 15% of patients experiencing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) during their lifetime. Prediction of transformation, typically from plexiform neurofibroma, is clinically and histologically challenging. In this overview, after a consensus meeting in October 2016, we outline the histopathologic features and molecular mechanisms involved in the malignant transformation of neurofibromas. Nuclear atypia alone is generally insignificant. However, with atypia, loss of neurofibroma architecture, high cellularity, and/or mitotic activity >1/50 but <3/10 high-power fields, the findings are worrisome for malignancy. We propose the term \"atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential (ANNUBP)\" for lesions displaying at least 2 of these features. This diagnosis should prompt additional sampling, clinical correlation, and possibly, expert pathology consultation. Currently, such tumors are diagnosed inconsistently as atypical neurofibroma or low-grade MPNST. Most MPNSTs arising from neurofibromas are high-grade sarcomas and pose little diagnostic difficulty, although rare nonnecrotic tumors with 3-9 mitoses/10 high-power fields can be recognized as low-grade variants. Although neurofibromas contain numerous S100 protein/SOX10-positive Schwann cells and CD34-positive fibroblasts, both components are reduced or absent in MPNST. Loss of p16/CDKN2A expression, elevated Ki67 labeling, and extensive nuclear p53 positivity are also features of MPNST that can to some degree already occur in atypical neurofibromatous neoplasms of uncertain biologic potential. Complete loss of trimethylated histone 3 lysine 27 expression is potentially more reliable, being immunohistochemically detectable in about half of MPNSTs. Correlated clinicopathological, radiologic, and genetic studies should increase our understanding of malignant transformation in neurofibromas, hopefully improving diagnosis and treatment soon.

暂无摘要。